Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2666-2558
  • E-ISSN: 2666-2566

Abstract

The current review conducts a comprehensive comparison of Quantum GIS (QGIS) and ArcGIS in the context of healthcare applications, aiming to assist users in selecting the most appropriate GIS platform for their specific needs. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are essential tools in healthcare, providing capabilities for spatial analysis, disease mapping, and resource allocation. Driven by the need to improve healthcare delivery and public health strategies, this study compares the functionalities, costs, and support systems of QGIS and ArcGIS. The major objective is to determine which GIS platform offers the best balance of cost-efficiency and performance across various healthcare scenarios. The methodology encompasses a detailed comparative analysis, incorporating quantitative data from user satisfaction surveys, performance evaluations, and real-world case studies. Findings reveal that QGIS, as an open-source GIS software, is highly cost-effective and customizable, making it particularly advantageous for budget-limited projects and smaller organizations requiring flexibility. Its extensibility plugins and robust user community fosters continuous innovation and improvement. QGIS proves exceptionally effective in healthcare applications such as disease mapping and accessibility analysis, where customization and cost-efficiency are critical. Conversely, ArcGIS is distinguished by its advanced analytical capabilities and strong performance in handling complex, large-scale studies. Its sophisticated tools and comprehensive spatial analysis functionalities are essential for thorough healthcare research and planning. Although ArcGIS incurs higher costs, its extensive feature set, professional support, and exhaustive documentation justify the investment for large organizations and research institutions engaged in detailed GIS projects. In conclusion, both QGIS and ArcGIS exhibit significant strengths in key healthcare applications. QGIS excels in affordability and flexibility, while ArcGIS provides superior analytical power and support for extensive projects. Future research should focus on integrating real-time data and enhancing user experience to further optimize GIS applications in healthcare.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558332529240919063643
2024-09-27
2025-12-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558332529240919063643
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LüG. BattyM. Reflections and Speculations on the Progress in Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A Geographic Perspective.Geogr. Inf. Syst.201933234636710.1080/13658816.2018.1533136
     [Google Scholar]
  2. MoyroudN. PortetF. Introduction to QGIS.QGIS and Generic Tools.Hoboken, NJ, USAJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.201811710.1002/9781119457091.ch1
     [Google Scholar]
  3. KennedyM. Introducing Geographic Information Systems with ARCGIS: A Workbook Approach to Learning GIS.John Wiley & Sons2009
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ThiedeR. SuttonT. DüsterH. SuttonM. Quantum GIS Training Manual.Quantum Organisation2014
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ScottL.M. JanikasM.V. Spatial Statistics in ArcGIS.Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis.Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer Berlin Heidelberg2010274110.1007/978‑3‑642‑03647‑7_2
     [Google Scholar]
  6. FradelosE. PapathanasiouI. MitsiD. TsarasK. KleisiarisC. KourkoutaL. Health Based Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and their Applications.Acta Inform. Med.201422640240510.5455/aim.2014.22.402‑40525684850
     [Google Scholar]
  7. NhavotoJ.A. GrönlundÅ. Mobile technologies and geographic information systems to improve health care systems: a literature review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth201422e2110.2196/mhealth.321625099368
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HuB. Application of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in the History of Cartography.World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol.201042185189
     [Google Scholar]
  9. TaylorD.R.F. Geographic Information Systems: The Microcomputer and Modern Cartography.Modern Cartography Series.Elsevier1991120
     [Google Scholar]
  10. WoodM. Cartography in the Age of Geographic Information Science.Geo. J. Slovak Acad. Sci.200355267278
     [Google Scholar]
  11. FisherT. MacdonaldC. An Overview of the Canada Geographic Information System (CGIS).1980
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Stunden BowerS. Tools for Rational Development: The Canada Land Inventory and the Canada Geographic Information System in Mid-twentieth century Canada.Sci. Can.2018401447510.7202/1048925ar
     [Google Scholar]
  13. DobsonJ.E. The GIS Revolution in Science and Society.Geography and Technology.DordrechtSpringer Netherlands200457358710.1007/978‑1‑4020‑2353‑8_24
     [Google Scholar]
  14. WhitmeyerS. NicolettiJ. De PaorD. The digital revolution in geologic mapping.GSA Today201041010.1130/GSATG70A.1
     [Google Scholar]
  15. OrmsbyT. FeasterL. Getting to Know ArcGIS Desktop: Basics of ArcView, ArcEditor, and ArcInfo.ESRI2004
     [Google Scholar]
  16. BattyM. New Technology and GIS.Geographical Information Systems2005309316
     [Google Scholar]
  17. DrummondW.J. FrenchS.P. The Future of GIS in Planning: Converging Technologies and Diverging Interests.J. Am. Plann. Assoc.200874216117410.1080/01944360801982146
     [Google Scholar]
  18. TsihrintzisV.A. HamidR. FuentesH.R. Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in water resources: A review.Water Resour. Manage.199610425127710.1007/BF00508896
     [Google Scholar]
  19. JiaP. ChengX. XueH. WangY. Applications of geographic information systems (GIS) data and methods in obesity‐related research.Obes. Rev.201718440041110.1111/obr.1249528165656
     [Google Scholar]
  20. GanapatiS. Uses of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Applications in E‐Government.Public Adm. Rev.201171342543410.1111/j.1540‑6210.2011.02226.x
     [Google Scholar]
  21. KamilarisA. OstermannF.O. Geospatial Analysis and the Internet of Things.ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf.20187726910.3390/ijgi7070269
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LiJ. WangY. Characteristic analysis and integration method of urban planning data based on GIS of internet of things.Sustain. Comput.20223610080110080110.1016/j.suscom.2022.100801
     [Google Scholar]
  23. JiangD. The construction of smart city information system based on the Internet of Things and cloud computing.Comput. Commun.202015015816610.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.035
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ChengY. ZhaoL. Application and Research of GIS Intelligent Environmental Protection Internet of Things System Construction Technology.2019 International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Application (ITCA)201910.1109/ITCA49981.2019.00014
     [Google Scholar]
  25. SpreitzhoferG. SperkaS. SteinackerR. MetGISTM: Combination of Meteorological and Geographic Information Systems to Produce High Resolution Mountain Weather Forecasts: MetGISTM: Combining Meteorological and Geographic Information Systems.Meteorol. Appl.201320337137810.1002/met.1299
     [Google Scholar]
  26. IfedioraC.O. Assessing the Use of Smart Phones-Based Apps, Software and Geographic Information System (GIS) in Real Estate Practice.Int. J. Develop. Econ. Sustain.2022101264010.37745/ijdes.13/vol10no1pp.26‑40
     [Google Scholar]
  27. BurroughP.A. McDonnellR.A. LloydC.D. Principles of Geographical Information Systems.London, EnglandOxford University Press2015
     [Google Scholar]
  28. CooperativeG. CollinsF. The Unique Qualities of a Geographic Information System: A Commentary.Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing19885415471549
     [Google Scholar]
  29. ShermanG. The Geospatail desktop, open source GIS and Mapping.Available from: https://locatepress.com/static/excerpts/geospatial_desktop_gis_scripting.pdf
  30. LöweP. Anguix AlfaroÁ. AntonelloA. BaumannP. CarreraM. DuranteK. Open-Source GIS.Springer Handbook of Geographic Information.Springer International Publishing: Cham202280784310.1007/978‑3‑030‑53125‑6_30
     [Google Scholar]
  31. DuarteL. TeodoroA.C. GIS Open-Source Plugins Development: A 10-Year Bibliometric Analysis on Scientific Literature.Geomatics20211220624510.3390/geomatics1020013
     [Google Scholar]
  32. FriedrichC. Comparison of ArcGIS and QGIS for Applications in Sustainable Spatial Planning.Master’s thesis, University of Vienna2014
     [Google Scholar]
  33. VatsavaiR.R. BurkT.E. LimeS. HugentoblerM. NeumannA. StroblC. Open-Source GIS - Springer Handbook of Geographic Information.Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer Berlin Heidelberg2011579595
     [Google Scholar]
  34. KennedyM. Introducing Geographic Information Systems with ArcGIS.John Wiley & Sons2006
     [Google Scholar]
  35. BobB. AndyM. Getting started with ArcGISTM.Available from: https://web-facstaff.sas.upenn.edu/~dromano/classes/gis/files/Getting_Started_with_ArcGIS.pdf
  36. MorehouseS. The ARC/INFO geographic information system.Comput. Geosci.199218443544110.1016/0098‑3004(92)90073‑Z
     [Google Scholar]
  37. LeeJ. WongD.W. Statistical Analysis with ArcView GIS.John Wiley & Sons2001
     [Google Scholar]
  38. BajjaliW. Working With ArcGIS Pro.ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Online: Applications in Water and Environmental Sciences.ChamSpringer International Publishing2023153310.1007/978‑3‑031‑42227‑0_2
     [Google Scholar]
  39. CorbinT. Learning ArcGIS Pro 2: A Beginner’s Guide to Creating 2D and 3D Maps and Editing Geospatial Data with ArcGIS Pro.Packt Publishing Ltd2020
     [Google Scholar]
  40. DębickaJ. AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering. Comparative Analysis of arcGISs and qGIS in Terms of the Transformations’ Runtime.Folia Quat.2018179910810.4467/21995923GP.18.009.9639
     [Google Scholar]
  41. ArcGIS vs QGIS. TrustRadius.Available from: https://www.trustradius.com/compare-products/arcgis-vs-qgis
  42. Compare ArcGIS Pro and QGIS, G2.Available from: https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-pro-vs-qgishttps://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-pro-vs-qgis
  43. GISGeography. 35 differences between ArcGIS Pro and QGIS 3. GIS Geography.Available from: https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro-vs-qgis-3/
  44. GISGeography. 27 differences between ArcGIS and QGIS. GIS Geography.Available from: https://gisgeography.com/qgis-arcgis-differences/
  45. RoutuR. ArcGIS Pro vs QGIS: Everything you need to know. Medium.Available from: https://rutwikroutu.medium.com/arcgis-pro-vs-qgis-everything-you-need-to-know-8c9fe0aba19c
  46. QGIS vs ArcGIS: Choosing the right GIS software. Algorithmic Mind.Available from: https://algorithmicmind.org/qgis-vs-arcgis/
  47. QGIS Project. QGIS Desktop 3.22 User Guide.Available from: https://docs.qgis.org/3.22/pdf/en/QGIS-3.22-DesktopUserGuide-en.pdf
  48. GIS and Spatial Data Center. Using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5.Available from: https://www.lib.umd.edu/sites/default/files/imported/introduction-to-gis-10-5-workbook9.12.18.pdf
  49. OmotoshoA. AnyanwuA. Comparative review of big data analytics and GIS in healthcare decision-making.World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews20232031293130210.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2589
     [Google Scholar]
  50. TagusariJ. H-RISK with NoiseModelling: a QGIS plugin to predict environmental noise and estimate health risks.J. Open Source Softw.2024993602310.21105/joss.06023
     [Google Scholar]
  51. HerbreteauV. RévillionC. TrimailleE. GeoHealth and QuickOSM, Two QGIS Plugins for Health Applications.QGIS and Generic Tools.Hoboken, NJ, USAJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.201825728610.1002/9781119457091.ch7
     [Google Scholar]
  52. RamosK. SebastianG. PeramoE.C. Optimizing Healthcare Accessibility: An Integration of GIS and Machine Learning for Strategic Hospital Facility Location Planning.2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC)202410.1109/ICAIIC60209.2024.10463219
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Albrieu-LlinásG. EspinosaM.O. QuagliaA. AbrilM. ScavuzzoC.M. Urban environmental clustering to assess the spatial dynamics of Aedes aegypti breeding sites.Geospat. Health201813165410.4081/gh.2018.65429772886
     [Google Scholar]
  54. HarinthiranV. Geographic information system (GIS) in evaluating the accessibility of healthcare facility for patients with colon and rectal carcinoma in the state of kelantan and sabah.Int. J. Geoinformatics2021174959
     [Google Scholar]
  55. HarbiM.R. GeorgeL.E. Spatial analysis of medical services in dhi-qar province using GIS tools.Ann. Rom. Soc. Cell Biol.202117031714
     [Google Scholar]
  56. AzewanM.D.H. Abdul RasamA.R. Disease mapping and health analysis using free and open source software for geospatial (FOSS4G): An exploratory qualitative study of tuberculosis.Charting the Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Science and TechnologySpringer: Singapore2020495506
     [Google Scholar]
  57. MukhopadhyayA. SGBEHIM: Smart GIS based emergency healthcare infrastructure mapping.2021 Third International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA)2021
     [Google Scholar]
  58. SharmaN. GoswamiJ. SharmaP. Utilisation of Geo-Spatial Technology to Study the Variation in Access of Urban Health Care Centres in Kamrup Metropolitan, Assam, India.The Urban Book Series.ChamSpringer International Publishing2021203224
     [Google Scholar]
  59. DommanD. ChowdhuryF. KhanA.I. DormanM.J. MutrejaA. UddinM.I. PaulA. BegumY.A. CharlesR.C. CalderwoodS.B. BhuiyanT.R. HarrisJ.B. LaRocqueR.C. RyanE.T. QadriF. ThomsonN.R. Defining endemic cholera at three levels of spatiotemporal resolution within Bangladesh.Nat. Genet.201850795195510.1038/s41588‑018‑0150‑829942084
     [Google Scholar]
  60. HashtarkhaniS. KianiB. MohammadiA. MohammadEbrahimiS. Dehghan-TezerjaniM. SamimiT. TaraM. MatthewsS.A. Spatio-temporal epidemiology of emergency medical requests in a large urban area. A scan-statistic approach.Geospat. Health202116210.4081/gh.2021.104334726036
     [Google Scholar]
  61. O’BrienO. Open Source GIS Software.Geocomputation: A Practical PrimerSAGE201510.4135/9781473916432.n17
     [Google Scholar]
  62. MenkeK. SmithG.I.S.P. PirelliR. John Van HoesenL. Mastering QGISPackt Publishing Ltd2016
     [Google Scholar]
  63. NingtyasA.A. MiswarD. UtamiR.K.S. PargitoP. YarmaidiY. Utilization webGIS to map the distribution of health facilities in Tanjung Senang subdistrict Bandar Lampung City.J. Environ. Geograph. Educat.202411587510.61511/jegeo.v1i1.2024.687
     [Google Scholar]
  64. RusdiM.R. AdmiralM. MakarawoZ. GibranM.K. YulistianiR. ArifinS. Website dashboard for COVID-19 vaccination locations in Jakarta with ArcGIS.AIP Conf. Proc.20243024104002210.1063/5.0204367
     [Google Scholar]
  65. PraharajS. SolisP. WentzE.A. Deploying geospatial visualization dashboards to combat the socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19.Environ. Plan. B. Urban Anal. City Sci.20235051262127910.1177/2399808322114286338603327
     [Google Scholar]
  66. LiW. Real-time GIS Programming and Geocomputation.Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge202210.22224/gistbok/2022.1.3
     [Google Scholar]
  67. NovákV. KovářL. StočesM. IoT and GIS Data Platform Solutions in Agricultural.Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3132/Paper_19.pdf
  68. CromleyE.K. Using GIS to Address Epidemiologic Research Questions.Curr. Epidemiol. Rep.20196216217310.1007/s40471‑019‑00193‑6
     [Google Scholar]
  69. MastersN. Understanding the Resurgence of an Eliminated Disease: Spatial, Attitudinal, and Regulatory Factors Underlying Measles Outbreaks in the Post-Elimination Era.MS Thesis, University of Michigan202110.7302/1402
     [Google Scholar]
  70. JoO. KrugerE. TennantM. GIS mapping of healthcare practices: do older adults have equitable access to dental and medical care in the UK?Br. Dent. J.202110.1038/s41415‑021‑3406‑034552210
     [Google Scholar]
  71. AhasanR. AlamM.S. ChakrabortyT. HossainM.M. Applications of GIS and geospatial analyses in COVID-19 research: A systematic review.F1000 Res.20209137910.12688/f1000research.27544.135186280
     [Google Scholar]
  72. BaazeemM. TennantM. KrugerE. Determining Variations in Access to Public Hospitals in Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A GIS-Based Approach.Saudi Journal of Health Systems Research202111263210.1159/000513632
     [Google Scholar]
  73. AkakbaA. LahmarB. The use of geocoding for home healthcare application and management an epidemic situation: Case of COVID-19 virus outbreak.Geogr. Pannon.202024428529310.5937/gp24‑28062
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Schwanke KhiljiS.U. RudgeJ.W. DrakeT. ChavezI. BorinK. TouchS. CokerR. Distribution of selected healthcare resources for influenza pandemic response in Cambodia.Int. J. Equity Health20131218210.1186/1475‑9276‑12‑8224090286
     [Google Scholar]
  75. KimK. GhorbanzadehM. HornerM.W. OzguvenE.E. Identifying areas of potential critical healthcare shortages: A case study of spatial accessibility to ICU beds during the COVID-19 pandemic in Florida.Transp. Policy202111047848610.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.00434257481
     [Google Scholar]
  76. GeraghtyE. How GIS Can Help Achieve Equitable and Speedy Vaccine Distribution.ZurichEsri2020
     [Google Scholar]
  77. SunZ. AnX. TaoY. HouQ. Assessment of population exposure to PM10 for respiratory disease in Lanzhou (China) and its health-related economic costs based on GIS.BMC Public Health201313189110.1186/1471‑2458‑13‑89124069906
     [Google Scholar]
  78. XhafaS. KosovrastiA. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in Urban Planning.Europ. J. Interdiscip. Stud.2015118510.26417/ejis.v1i1.p85‑92
     [Google Scholar]
  79. KurowskaK. Marks-BielskaR. BielskiS. AleknavičiusA. KowalczykC. Geographic Information Systems and the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas.Land (Basel)2020101610.3390/land10010006
     [Google Scholar]
  80. AbdelhaleemF.S. BasiounyM. AshourE. MahmoudA. Application of remote sensing and geographic information systems in irrigation water management under water scarcity conditions in Fayoum, Egypt.J. Environ. Manage.202129911368311368310.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11368334526284
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558332529240919063643
Loading
Mapping World: A Comparative Analysis of Functionality and Usability between QGIS and ArcGIS
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications 18, E26662558332529 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558332529240919063643
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558332529240919063643
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558332529240919063643
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): ArcGIS; comparative analysis; GIS; healthcare; mapping; QGIS

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test