Recent Patents on Cardiovascular Drug Discovery (Discontinued) - Volume 9, Issue 2, 2014

The introduction of therapies that inhibit tumor angiogenesis and particularly target to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) (VEGF inhibitors/VEGFi) have revolutionized the treatment of various cancer types. Although their clinical benefit can be optimal for cancer-affected patients, the safety of these targeted agents is of special concern especially for longer-term adjuvant or maintenance treatment. Importantly, VEGFi therapy has been significantly associated with hypertension (HTN) as an adverse effect and therefore the control of blood pressure (BP) after the administration of these drugs remains a challenging matter to be faced. The aim of this review is to summarize studies which investigate the association of VEGFi agents with HTN manifestation and the possible risks associated with this complication. Additionally, given that the optimal management of HTN caused by VEGFi remains obscure, this review will focus on prevention strategies including BP monitoring plans and propose potential therapeutic approaches.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) constitutes a group of pathophysiological entities resulting from reduced blood flow in the coronary arteries leading to decreased or improper functioning or death of heart muscle. Such patients are usually prescribed combination antiplatelet drug therapy, containing acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) and an adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor to prevent recurrence of ischemic events. The combination prophylactic therapy to certain extend has been successful in preventing secondary complications including ischemic/thrombotic events in these patients. However, research is still on for newer advances in anti-thrombotic therapy that can further prevent secondary complications of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Vorapaxar is a newer drug recommended along with aspirin or clopidogril for prevention of recurrence of cardiac events. Vorapaxar, a thrombin receptor antagonist acts by reversible inhibition of the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1). PAR-1 is expressed on platelets, and it inhibits platelet aggregation, both thrombin-induced and thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP)-induced. Various trials world -wide have documented its efficacy as an anti-platelet agent for preventing recurrent cardiovascular ischemic events but at the expense of increased bleeding complications including intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), when compared to standard therapy alone. For the same reason, vorapaxar is contraindicated in patients with prior stroke, transient ischemic attack and ICH. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vorapaxar in May 2014 as an antiplatelet agent along with standard anti-platelet therapy for the reduction of recurring thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction or with peripheral arterial disease. Vorapaxar is developed and marketed by Merck Sharp Dohme and is available by the brand name ‘Zontivity’ as 2.5 mg oral tablet equivalent to 2.08 mg of vorapaxar sulfate.. There are two patents protecting this drug.

Docosahexaenoic (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic (EPA) acid of the ω-3 family of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are abundant in fatty fish and other marine sources. Their consistent consumption has been related to an improved cardiovascular risk especially in high risk patients and populations. In this review, we presented major findings about potential mechanisms of action and clinical evidence regarding ω-3 PUFA effect on the control and prevention of cardiovascular disease. This review is an update of our previous review (Colussi et al. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 2007;2:13-31) in which we additionally summarize and comment new literature of the past few years. Despite clinical studies have been significantly increased in the last years, the evidence in support of a beneficial role of ω-3 PUFA in cardiovascular prevention is still relatively weak. The growing improvement of medical interventions for cardiovascular prevention might explain why these molecules appear to have limited impact on the cardiovascular risk.

Poor prognosis is strongly associated with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and, even though a number of treatment strategies are available, the incidence of subsequent serious complications after an acute event is still high. Statins are hypolipidemic factors and recent studies have demonstrated that they have a protective role during the process of atherogenesis and that they reduce mortality caused by cardiovascular diseases. This review tries to reveal the function of the statins as a component of the primary and secondary action of acute coronary syndrome and to describe the lifestyle changes that have the same effect as the use of statins.

Accumulation of fibrin in blood vessels significantly increases thrombosis, leading to myocardial infraction and other cardiovascular diseases. Microbial enzymes are one option for curing this pathological condition. Fibrinolytic enzymes such as urokinase (UK), tissue type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and streptokinase (SK) attracted much attention for thrombolytic therapy. Among them SK is preferable in low-resource settings because it is cost-effective. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize recent patents related to the occurrence, mechanism of action, physico-chemical properties, cloning and expression, production, structure, immunogenicity, chemical modification, in vivo application and clinical trials of SK. This patent review considers the properties and characteristics of SK that make it a preferred agent for thrombolytic therapy.

The large research series has become known to the international scientific community 1986 after a publication in The Lancet (2:595). In short, cultures of smooth muscle cells from the human aortic intima or blood-derived monocytes/macrophages were used for measurements of ability of drugs and plant substances to induce or prevent cholesterol deposition in the cells, cultured with the sera from atherosclerosis patients, which was interpreted as pro- or anti-atherogenic effects. However, as discussed previously, the relationship between the uptake of lipids by cultured cells and atherogenesis in vivo must be inverse rather than direct. The up-regulation of lipoprotein receptors is one of the action mechanisms of some cholesterol-lowering drugs. Accordingly, if a drug lowers the uptake of lipids by cultured smooth muscle cells or macrophages, it should be expected to elevate the blood cholesterol level in vivo. Nevertheless, following their concept of blood atherogenicity, the same researchers started to apply apheresis (extracorporeal perfusion of patients’ blood for 2 hours through a column with immobilized LDL) aimed at a removal of non-lipid atherogenicity factors. In conclusion, validity of the cell culture method of serum atherogenicity measurement, and testing of pro- or antiatherogenic effects of drugs and dietary supplements is questionable. It would be useful to reproduce some of the cell culture experiments discussed in this letter in an independent laboratory. Verification is necessary prior to preclinical studies in animals and then humans of reportedly anti-atherogenic substances, detected by the cell culture method.