Skip to content
2000
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0250-6882
  • E-ISSN: 0250-6882

Abstract

Background

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive treatment modality that is gaining prominence due to the limitations of existing pharmacotherapy approaches. To date, there is a paucity of research examining the awareness of rTMS among psychiatrists in the Arabian Gulf region. In this region, treatment resistance is prevalent due to the cultural attribution of psychological distress to somatic factors and the stigma associated with pharmacotherapy.

Aims

This study aims to assess the comprehension and attitudes of psychiatrists towards rTMS and determine the factors that contribute to their knowledge of rTMS in Oman.

Methods

A quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing an online survey. The survey collected demographic information, and a validated measure was used to assess variations in knowledge and attitudes towards rTMS. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were performed to identify risk factors associated with knowledge levels.

Results

Fifty psychiatrists participated in this study, resulting in a response rate of 53%. The mean age of the participants was 32.7±4.3 years (range: 26.0–41.0), with more than half being female (n=28, 56.0%) and classified as residents (junior/senior) (n=25, 50.0%). Most of the sample was Omani (n=45, 90.0%) and were employed in tertiary hospitals (n=38, 76.0%). The mean scores for knowledge and attitudes towards rTMS in this sample were 14.5±3.8 and 22.5±6.3, respectively. The linear model indicated that senior residents and older participants had a higher level of knowledge than junior residents (β=4.65, <.001). Furthermore, participants who had access to an rTMS device at work demonstrated a higher level of knowledge than those who did not β=1.88, =0.027).

Conclusion

Three factors significantly influence the knowledge of psychiatrists about rTMS: their educational level, access to an rTMS device at work, and the availability of standardized training in rTMS.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882361774250217044041
2024-01-01
2025-10-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nemj/5/1/NEMJ-5-E02506882361774.html?itemId=/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882361774250217044041&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AndersonR.J. HoyK.E. DaskalakisZ.J. FitzgeraldP.B. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment resistant depression: Re-establishing connections.Clin. Neurophysiol.2016127113394340510.1016/j.clinph.2016.08.01527672727
    [Google Scholar]
  2. LefaucheurJ.P. André-ObadiaN. AntalA. AyacheS.S. BaekenC. BenningerD.H. CantelloR.M. CincottaM. de CarvalhoM. De RidderD. DevanneH. Di LazzaroV. FilipovićS.R. HummelF.C. JääskeläinenS.K. KimiskidisV.K. KochG. LangguthB. NyffelerT. OlivieroA. PadbergF. PouletE. RossiS. RossiniP.M. RothwellJ.C. Schönfeldt-LecuonaC. SiebnerH.R. SlotemaC.W. StaggC.J. Valls-SoleJ. ZiemannU. PaulusW. Garcia-LarreaL. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).Clin. Neurophysiol.2014125112150220610.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.02125034472
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS).StatPearlsTreasure Island (FL)2023
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bukhari-ParlakturkN MulcaheyPJ LutzMW TMS target comparison identifies motor network reorganization associated with behavioral improvement in writer’s cramp dystonia: A randomized, double-blind, Sham-controlled clinical trial.medRxiv preprint2024
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KashyapR. BhardwajS. BhattacharjeeS. SunnyA.S. UdupaK. KumarM. PalP.K. BharathR.D. The perturbational map of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex in movement disorders.Brain Disorders2023910007110007110.1016/j.dscb.2023.100071
    [Google Scholar]
  6. QiC. ZhaoJ.H. WeiY.R. GanJ. WanY. WuN. SongL. ZhangY. LiuZ.G. Observation on the efficacy of different targets low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of tremor-dominant subtypes of Parkinson’s disease.Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi2023103393112311837840182
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SinghM. AgrawalM. Deep brain stimulation for tremor and dystonia.Neurol. India2020688Suppl.18710.4103/0028‑3886.30247233318349
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LatorreA. RocchiL. BerardelliA. BhatiaK.P. RothwellJ.C. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for movement disorders: A critical review.Mov. Disord.201934676978210.1002/mds.2770531034682
    [Google Scholar]
  9. QuartaroneA. RizzoV. TerranovaC. CacciolaA. MilardiD. CalamuneriA. ChillemiG. GirlandaP. Therapeutic use of non-invasive brain stimulation in dystonia.Front. Neurosci.20171142342310.3389/fnins.2017.0042328790883
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LefaucheurJ-P. Therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in neurological disorders.Interventional PsychiatryAcademic Press202487147
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KimberleyT.J. SchmidtR.L.S. ChenM. DykstraD.D. BuetefischC.M. Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia.Front. Hum. Neurosci.2015938510.3389/fnhum.2015.0038526217209
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MohamedHZA ElwishyAA ShalabyNM ShehataHSM AliAS 2024Cerebellar rTMS for enhancing coordination in patients with multiple sclerosis: A narrative review.SEE J. Public Health.2024187310.70135/seejph.vi.1873
    [Google Scholar]
  13. YassineI.A. ShehataH. HamdyS. Abdel-NaseerM. HassanT. SherbinyM. MagdyE. ElmaznyA. ShalabyN. ElShebawyH. Effect of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the balance and the white matter integrity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A long-term follow-up study.Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord.20248310547110.1016/j.msard.2024.10547138295628
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SyA. ThebaultS. AvivR.I. AuriatA.M. An overview of transcranial magnetic stimulation and its application in multiple sclerosis.Appl. Sci.202313231267910.3390/app132312679
    [Google Scholar]
  15. AhmadpanahM. AminiS. MazdehM. HaghighiM. SoltanianA. JahangardL. KeshavarziA. BrandS. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) add-on therapy to a standard treatment in individuals with multiple sclerosis and concomitant symptoms of depression—results from a randomized clinical trial and pilot study.J. Clin. Med.2023127252510.3390/jcm1207252537048608
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SuD. WangA. ZhuM. YangF. LiW. MaB. LiuM. LiZ. WangB. TuH. NingB. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of limb spasticity following multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.202356e1270810.1590/1414‑431x2023e1270837255097
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FreyJ. Ramirez-ZamoraA. Wagle ShuklaA. Applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation for understanding and treating dystonia.Adv. Neurobiol.20233111913910.1007/978‑3‑031‑26220‑3_737338699
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhouX. LiK. ChenS. ZhouW. LiJ. HuangQ. XuT. GaoZ. WangD. ZhaoS. DongH. Clinical application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis.Front. Immunol.20221390265810.3389/fimmu.2022.90265836131925
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LefaucheurJ.P. AlemanA. BaekenC. BenningerD.H. BrunelinJ. Di LazzaroV. FilipovićS.R. GrefkesC. HasanA. HummelF.C. JääskeläinenS.K. LangguthB. LeocaniL. LonderoA. NardoneR. NguyenJ.P. NyffelerT. Oliveira-MaiaA.J. OlivieroA. PadbergF. PalmU. PaulusW. PouletE. QuartaroneA. RachidF. RektorováI. RossiS. SahlstenH. SchecklmannM. SzekelyD. ZiemannU. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018).Clin. Neurophysiol.2020131247452810.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.00231901449
    [Google Scholar]
  20. BrunoniA.R. ChaimaniA. MoffaA.H. RazzaL.B. GattazW.F. DaskalakisZ.J. CarvalhoA.F. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes.JAMA Psychiatry201774214315210.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.364428030740
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SlotemaC.W. BlomJ.D. van LutterveldR. HoekH.W. SommerI.E.C. Review of the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation for auditory verbal hallucinations.Biol. Psychiatry201476210111010.1016/j.biopsych.2013.09.03824315551
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SlotemaC.W. BlomJ.D. HoekH.W. SommerI.E.C. Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders.J. Clin. Psychiatry201071787388410.4088/JCP.08m04872gre20361902
    [Google Scholar]
  23. GargS. SinhaV.K. TikkaS.K. MishraP. GoyalN. The efficacy of cerebellar vermal deep high frequency (theta range) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in schizophrenia: A randomized rater blind-sham controlled study.Psychiatry Res.201624341342010.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.02327450744
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ChenL. HudaibA.R. HoyK.E. FitzgeraldP.B. Is rTMS effective for anxiety symptoms in major depressive disorder? An efficacy analysis comparing left‐sided high‐frequency, right‐sided low‐frequency, and sequential bilateral rTMS protocols.Depress. Anxiety201936872373110.1002/da.2289430958907
    [Google Scholar]
  25. EdinoffA.N. HegefeldT.L. PetersenM. PattersonJ.C.II YossiC. SlizewskiJ. OsumiA. CornettE.M. KayeA. KayeJ.S. JavalkarV. ViswanathO. UritsI. KayeA.D. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder.Front. Psychiatry20221370134810.3389/fpsyt.2022.70134835711594
    [Google Scholar]
  26. FerreriF. MouchabacS. SylvestreV. MilletB. El HageW. AdrienV. BourlaA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in post-traumatic stress disorder: Study protocol of a nationwide randomized controlled clinical trial of neuro-enhanced psychotherapy “TraumaStim”.Brain Sci.2023139127410.3390/brainsci1309127437759875
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ObermanL.M. EnticottP.G. CasanovaM.F. RotenbergA. Pascual-LeoneA. McCrackenJ.T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorder: Challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research.Autism Res.20169218420310.1002/aur.156726536383
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ChengP. ZhouY. XuL.Z. ChenY.F. HuR.L. ZouY.L. LiZ.X. ZhangL. ShunQ. YuX. LiL.J. LiW.H. Clinical application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder: A literature review.World J. Clin. Cases20219298658866510.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.865834734044
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Al-SibaniN. ChanM.F. Al-HuseiniS. Al KharusiN. GuilleminG.J. Al-AbriM. GaneshA. Al HasaniY. Al-AdawiS. Exploring Hikikomori-like idiom of distress a year into the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Oman: Factorial validity of the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire, prevalence and associated factors.PLoS One2023188e027961210.1371/journal.pone.027961237549148
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MirzaH. Al-HuseiniS. Al-ShamliS. Al-DhahriM. Al-RashdiZ. Al-HosniA. Al-HasaniH. JajuS. Al-SibaniN. Al-AdawiS. The relationship of sociodemographic and clinical profiles to the duration of untreated psychosis among adolescents with first-episode psychosis in an Oman tertiary hospital.Psychosis202012217218110.1080/17522439.2020.1720272
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ZhangZ. SunK. JatchavalaC. KohJ. ChiaY. BoseJ. LiZ. TanW. WangS. ChuW. WangJ. TranB. HoR. Overview of stigma against psychiatric illnesses and advancements of anti-stigma activities in six asian societies.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health201917128010.3390/ijerph1701028031906068
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Al-AdawiS. DorvloA.S.S. Al-IsmailyS.S. Al-GhafryD.A. Al-NoobiB.Z. Al-SalmiA. BurkeD.T. ShahM.K. GhassanyH. ChandS.P. Perception of and attitude towards mental illness in Oman.Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry200248430531710.1177/00207640212878333412553410
    [Google Scholar]
  33. KumarN. SingalP. ChakladarA. Novel intervention of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with somatic symptom disorder and its safety and outcome.Indian J. Psychiatry202365888789110.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_65_2337736227
    [Google Scholar]
  34. YonelH. AbdelghaniM. Knowledge and attitude towards TMS: A brief educational intervention.Prog. Neurol. Psychiatry2020241172010.1002/pnp.557
    [Google Scholar]
  35. AlHadiA.N. AlShibanA.M. AlomarM.A. AljadoaO.F. AlSayeghA.M. JameelM.A. Knowledge of and attitude toward repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation among psychiatrists in Saudi Arabia.J. ECT2017331303510.1097/YCT.000000000000034927564426
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ArmonkN. IBM Corp. Released 2023. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0.2.0.IBM Corp.2023
    [Google Scholar]
  37. EmanuelE.J. WendlerD. GradyC. What makes clinical research ethical?JAMA2000283202701271110.1001/jama.283.20.270110819955
    [Google Scholar]
  38. MohamedN.A. AbdulhadiN.N. Al-ManiriA.A. Al-LawatiN.R. Al-QasmiA.M. The trend of feminization of doctors’ workforce in Oman: is it a phenomenon that could rouse the health system?Hum. Resour. Health20181611910.1186/s12960‑018‑0283‑y29699562
    [Google Scholar]
  39. LaiT. Al SalmiQ. KochK. HashishA. RavaghiH. MatariaA. Health system performance assessment and reforms, Oman.Bull. World Health Organ.2024102753353710.2471/BLT.24.29175038933483
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Al-AdawiS. DorvloA.S. BhayaC. MartinR.G. Al-NamaniA. Al-HussainiA. GuenediA.D.R. Withering before the sowing? A survey of Oman’s ‘tomorrow’s doctors’ interest in psychiatry.Educ. Health200821111719034834
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Al-SinawiH. Al-AdawiS. Psychiatry in the Sultanate of Oman.Int. Psychiatry200634141610.1192/S174936760000496331507864
    [Google Scholar]
  42. DengJ. GongY. LinX. BaoY. SunH. LuL. Knowledge and attitudes about transcranial magnetic stimulation among psychiatrists in China.BMC Psychiatry202020141610.1186/s12888‑020‑02817‑432831049
    [Google Scholar]
  43. MallonS. WalkerK. BayleyZ. GriffithsC. Practitioner perspectives on best practice in non‐treatment factors that support the delivery of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression.J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs.202229346347110.1111/jpm.1281534958704
    [Google Scholar]
  44. BourlaA. ChaneacE. PouletE. HaffenE. OgorzelecL. GuinchardC. FerreriF. MouchabacS. Acceptability, attitudes and knowledge towards Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) among psychiatrists in France.Encephale2020462889510.1016/j.encep.2019.07.00331522836
    [Google Scholar]
  45. LaiK.S.P. WaxmanR. BlumbergerD.M. GiacobbeP. HaseyG. McMurrayL. MilevR. PalaniyappanL. RamasubbuR. RybakY.E. SacevichT. Vila-RodriguezF. BurhanA.M. Competencies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in postgraduate medical education: expert consensus using a modified delphi process.Can. J. Psychiatry2023681291692410.1177/0706743723116457136959745
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882361774250217044041
Loading
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882361774250217044041
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Attitude; Knowledge; Oman; Psychiatrists; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; TMS
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test