Skip to content
2000
image of Therapeutic Potential of Lobelia inflata in Promoting Wound Healing in Male Wistar Rat

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the wound-healing properties of extract through assessments using incision and excision wound models in Wistar rats.

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of ointment at different concentrations (5% and 10%) in promoting wound contraction, tensile strength, and tissue remodeling, and to compare its efficacy with a standard wound-healing agent (1% Betadine).

Background

Wound healing is a critical biological process involving a series of intricate steps, including hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling, to restore tissue integrity. Interest in natural wound-healing agents has surged due to their potential therapeutic benefits and fewer side effects. This study investigates the efficacy of , a plant known for its medicinal properties, in enhancing wound healing.

Materials & Methods

Thirty adult male Wistar rats with age group more than 9 weeks were randomly divided into five groups (n=6 per group): Group I served as the normal control (untreated), Group II received a simple ointment base (vehicle control), Group III was treated with 1% Betadine ointment (standard group), Group IV was treated with 5% ointment, and Group V with 10% ointment. Two wound models were employed: in the incision model, a linear full-thickness dorsal skin incision was created, and wound contraction and tensile strength were assessed over time. In the excision model, full-thickness circular wounds were developed on the back, with wound closure rate and epithelialization evaluated. Additionally, histological analysis of healed tissues was conducted to assess collagen deposition, angiogenesis, and re-epithelialization.

Results

Treatment with ointment (5% and 10%) significantly improved wound healing, with the 10% ointment (Group V) showing the fastest wound closure and healing. Increased tensile strength was observed in the treated groups, with Group V outperforming Group IV. Histopathological analysis revealed enhanced collagen deposition, angiogenesis, and re-epithelialization, particularly in the 10% group, highlighting its superior wound-healing efficacy.

Conclusion: Lobelia inflata

extract, particularly at a 10% concentration, demonstrates significant potential as a wound-healing agent. It promotes faster wound contraction, improved tensile strength, and enhanced tissue remodeling, making it a promising natural alternative for wound care.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029356142250413012628
2025-04-28
2025-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Monika P. Chandraprabha M.N. Rangarajan A. Waiker P.V. Chidambara Murthy K.N. Challenges in healing wound: Role of complementary and alternative medicine. Front. Nutr. 2022 8 791899 10.3389/fnut.2021.791899 35127787
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chhabra S. Chhabra N. Kaur A. Gupta N. Wound healing concepts in clinical practice of OMFS. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2017 16 4 403 423 10.1007/s12663‑016‑0880‑z 29038623
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boateng J.S. Matthews K.H. Stevens H.N.E. Eccleston G.M. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: A review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008 97 8 2892 2923 10.1002/jps.21210 17963217
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kostadinova-Petrova I. Mitevska E. Janeska B. Histological characteristics of bruises with different age. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2017 5 7 813 817 10.3889/oamjms.2017.207 29362602
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Slowik V. Müller S. Wagner C. Mechtcherine V. Abrasion RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports; StatPearls Publishing 2017 22 119 124 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑1013‑6_7
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davison A.M. The Incised Wound. Essentials Autops. Pract. London Springer 2004 187 220 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑0637‑1_8
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rhee S.W. Pokrovskaya I.D. Ball K.K. Ling K. Vedanaparti Y. Cohen J. Cruz D.R.D. Zhao O.S. Aronova M.A. Zhang G. Kamykowski J.A. Leapman R.D. Storrie B. Venous puncture wound hemostasis results in a vaulted thrombus structured by locally nucleated platelet aggregates. Commun. Biol. 2021 4 1 1090 10.1038/s42003‑021‑02615‑y 34531522
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Järvinen T. Järvinen M. Kalimo H. Regeneration of injured skeletal muscle after the injury. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2019 3 4 337 345 10.32098/mltj.04.2013.16 24596699
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DeYulis M. Hinson J.W. Joint Immobilization. StatPearls Publishing 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaur S. Wound healing potential of medicinal plants with their screening models: A comprehensive review. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2016 6 1 56 66 10.22270/jddt.v6i1.1184
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Turksen K. Wound Healing: Stem Cells Repair and Restorations. Basic and Clinical Aspects 2018 10.1002/9781119282518
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Periayah M.H. Halim A.S. Mat Saad A.Z. Mechanism action of platelets and crucial blood coagulation pathways in Hemostasis. Int. J. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Res. 2017 11 4 319 327 29340130
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Garmo C. Burns B. Physiology, Clotting Mechanism. StatPearls Publishing 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ho J.K. Hantash B.M. The principles of wound healing. Expert. Rev. Dermatol. 2013 8 6 639 658 10.1586/17469872.2013.857161
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Nourshargh S. Alon R. Leukocyte migration into inflamed tissues. Immunity 2014 41 5 694 707 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.008 25517612
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Li S. Zhang Y. Guan Z. Li H. Ye M. Chen X. Shen J. Zhou Y. Shi Z.L. Zhou P. Peng K. SARS-CoV-2 triggers inflammatory responses and cell death through caspase-8 activation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020 5 1 235 10.1038/s41392‑020‑00334‑0 33037188
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hortová-Kohoutková M. De Zuani M. Lázničková P. Bendíčková K. Mrkva O. Andrejčinová I. Mýtniková A. Polanský O. Kočí K. Tomášková V. Šrámek V. Helán M. Frič J. Polymorphonuclear cells show features of dysfunctional activation during fatal sepsis. Front. Immunol. 2021 12 741484 10.3389/fimmu.2021.741484 34966382
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dileepan K.N. Raveendran V.V. Sharma R. Abraham H. Barua R. Singh V. Sharma R. Sharma M. Mast cell-mediated immune regulation in health and disease. Front. Med. 2023 10 1213320 10.3389/fmed.2023.1213320 37663654
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen L. Deng H. Cui H. Fang J. Zuo Z. Deng J. Li Y. Wang X. Zhao L. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget 2018 9 6 7204 7218 10.18632/oncotarget.23208 29467962
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rousselle P. Braye F. Dayan G. Re-epithelialization of adult skin wounds: Cellular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019 146 344 365 10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.019 29981800
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Croasdell Lucchini A. Gachanja N.N. Rossi A.G. Dorward D.A. Lucas C.D. Epithelial cells and inflammation in pulmonary wound repair. Cells 2021 10 2 339 10.3390/cells10020339 33562816
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Xia Y.P. Zhao Y. Marcus J. Jimenez P.A. Ruben S.M. Moore P.A. Khan F. Mustoe T.A. Effects of keratinocyte growth factor-2 (KGF-2) on wound healing in an ischaemia-impaired rabbit ear model and on scar formation. J. Pathol. 1999 188 4 431 438 10.1002/(SICI)1096‑9896(199908)188:4<431:AID‑PATH362>3.0.CO;2‑B 10440755
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Roman J. Fibroblasts—warriors at the intersection of wound healing and disrepair. Biomolecules 2023 13 6 945 10.3390/biom13060945 37371525
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mathew-Steiner S.S. Roy S. Sen C.K. Collagen in wound healing. Bioengineering 2021 8 5 63 10.3390/bioengineering8050063 34064689
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Madden J.W. Peacock E.E. Jr Studies on the biology of collagen during wound healing. I. Rate of collagen synthesis and deposition in cutaneous wounds of the rat. Surgery 1968 64 1 288 294 5658731
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Xue M. Jackson C.J. Extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv. Wound Care 2015 4 3 119 136 10.1089/wound.2013.0485 25785236
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Alhajj M. Bansal P. Goyal A. Physiology, Granulation Tissue. Stat Pearls Treasure Island 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Grey J.E. Enoch S. Harding K.G. Wound assessment. BMJ 2006 332 7536 285 288 10.1136/bmj.332.7536.285 16455730
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Demidova-Rice T.N. Hamblin M.R. Herman I.M. Acute and impaired wound healing: Pathophysiology and current methods for drug delivery, part 1: Normal and chronic wounds: Biology, causes, and approaches to care. Adv. Skin Wound Care 2012 25 7 304 314 10.1097/01.ASW.0000416006.55218.d0 22713781
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao R. Liang H. Clarke E. Jackson C. Xue M. Inflammation in chronic wounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016 17 12 2085 10.3390/ijms17122085 27973441
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gianino E. Miller C. Gilmore J. Smart wound dressings for diabetic chronic wounds. Bioengineering 2018 5 3 51 10.3390/bioengineering5030051 29949930
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Raziyeva K. Kim Y. Zharkinbekov Z. Kassymbek K. Jimi S. Saparov A. Immunology of acute and chronic wound healing. Biomolecules 2021 11 5 700 10.3390/biom11050700 34066746
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Falcone M. De Angelis B. Pea F. Scalise A. Stefani S. Tasinato R. Zanetti O. Dalla Paola L. Challenges in the management of chronic wound infections. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021 26 140 147 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.05.010 34144200
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Charoenkwan K. Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Rerkasem K. Matovinovic E. Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions. Cochrane Libr. 2017 2017 6 CD005987 10.1002/14651858.CD005987.pub3 28931203
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Masson-Meyers D.S. Andrade T.A.M. Caetano G.F. Guimaraes F.R. Leite M.N. Leite S.N. Frade M.A.C. Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2020 101 1-2 21 37 10.1111/iep.12346 32227524
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Baek S.O. Jang U. Shin J. Kim J.H. Kim J.H. Lee J.Y. Shape memory alloy as an internal splint in a rat model of excisional wound healing. Biomed. Mater. 2021 16 2 025002 10.1088/1748‑605X/abda89 33429379
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nun N. Cruz M. Jain T. Tseng Y.M. Menefee J. Jatana S. Patil P.S. Leipzig N.D. McDonald C. Maytin E. Joy A. Thread size and polymer composition of 3D printed and electrospun wound dressings affect wound healing outcomes in an excisional wound rat model. Biomacromolecules 2020 21 10 4030 4042 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00801 32902971
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Bellare A. Epperly M.W. Greenberger J.S. Fisher R. Glowacki J. Development of tensile strength methodology for murine skin wound healing. MethodsX 2018 5 337 344 10.1016/j.mex.2018.04.002 30050753
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nagar H.K. Srivastava A.K. Srivastava R. Kurmi M.L. Chandel H.S. Ranawat M.S. Pharmacological investigation of the wound healing activity of Cestrum nocturnum (L.) ointment in wistar albino rats. J. Pharm. 2016 2016 1 8 10.1155/2016/9249040 27018126
    [Google Scholar]
  40. G/giorgis, SG. Wound healing activity of 80% methanolic crude extract and solvent fractions of the leaves of Justicia schimperiana (Hochst. ex Nees) T. Anderson (Acanthaceae) in mice. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2022 14 167 183 10.2147/JEP.S340177 35592645
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kirubanandan S. Ravi B. Renganathan S. Histological and biochemical evaluation of wound regeneration potential of Terminalia chebula fruits. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016 9 213 218
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029356142250413012628
Loading
/content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029356142250413012628
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test