Skip to content
2000
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 3050-5070
  • E-ISSN: 3050-5089

Abstract

Introduction

Sustainability and sustainable development have received growing attention in both industry and academia due to concerns regarding the rapid decrease in natural resources and increase in carbon emissions.

Methods

In this study, we focus on the determination, evaluation, and analysis of the critical success factors in product sustainability by specifically focusing on the household goods industry. In the first phase of the study, we determine the critical success factors by referring to the existing literature and opinions of the experts who have experience in the household goods industry. Next, we use a trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy AHP algorithm to rank the determined criteria and discuss the main findings from a practical point of view.

Results

Computational results bring several important managerial insights. First, we observe that all three aspects of sustainability (economic, environmental, and social) should be considered to ensure product sustainability. Second, the analysis reveals that cost (economic), quality (economic), generated waste and emission during the life cycle (environmental), energy and water consumption during the life cycle (environmental), and occupational health and safety (social) are among the highly ranked criteria.

Conclusion

In order to increase product sustainability, the companies should determine ways to decrease water usage, energy usage, carbon emission, and waste without neglecting the cost and quality of the product and without ignoring occupational health and safety.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/iscce/10.2174/0126662949323603240830054929
2025-01-01
2025-10-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/iscce/10.2174/0126662949323603240830054929
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LuthraS. GargD. HaleemA. An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective.Resour. Policy201546375010.1016/j.resourpol.2014.12.006
     [Google Scholar]
  2. LuthraS. GargD. HaleemA. Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian automobile industry.Prod. Plann. Contr.2015265339362
     [Google Scholar]
  3. PaulS. AliS.M. HasanM.A. PaulS.K. KabirG. Critical success factors for supply chain sustainability in the wood industry: an integrated PCA-ISM model.Sustainability2022143186310.3390/su14031863
     [Google Scholar]
  4. DyllickT. RostZ. Towards true product sustainability.J. Clean. Prod.201716234636010.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.189
     [Google Scholar]
  5. WittstruckD. TeutebergF. Understanding the success factors of sustainable supply chain management: empirical evidence from the electrics and electronics industry.Corp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manag.201219314115810.1002/csr.261
     [Google Scholar]
  6. YadavS. SinghS.P. Blockchain critical success factors for sustainable supply chain.Resour. Conserv. Recycling202015210450510.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104505
     [Google Scholar]
  7. NilssonF. GöranssonM. Critical factors for the realization of sustainable supply chain innovations - Model development based on a systematic literature review.J. Clean. Prod.202129612647110.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126471
     [Google Scholar]
  8. DiasG.P. SilvaM. Revealing performance factors for supply chain sustainability: A systematic literature review from a social capital perspective.Braz. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.202119111810.14488/BJOPM.2021.037
     [Google Scholar]
  9. AgrawalV. MohantyR.P. AgarwalS. DixitJ.K. AgrawalA.M. Analyzing critical success factors for sustainable green supply chain management.Environ. Dev. Sustain.20232588233825810.1007/s10668‑022‑02396‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HorneR.E. Limits to labels: The role of eco‐labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption.Int. J. Consum. Stud.200933217518210.1111/j.1470‑6431.2009.00752.x
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GhadimiP. AzadniaA.H. Mohd YusofN. Mat SamanM.Z. A weighted fuzzy approach for product sustainability assessment: a case study in automotive industry.J. Clean. Prod.201233102110.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.010
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ShuaibM. SeeversD. ZhangX. BadurdeenF. RouchK.E. JawahirI.S. Product sustainability index (ProdSI) a metrics‐based framework to evaluate the total life cycle sustainability of manufactured products.J. Ind. Ecol.201418449150710.1111/jiec.12179
     [Google Scholar]
  13. EastwoodM.D. HaapalaK.R. A unit process model based methodology to assist product sustainability assessment during design for manufacturing.J. Clean. Prod.2015108546410.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.105
     [Google Scholar]
  14. WhiteheadJ. Prioritizing sustainability indicators: Using materiality analysis to guide sustainability assessment and strategy.Bus. Strategy Environ.201726339941210.1002/bse.1928
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HeB. LuoT. HuangS. Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle.J. Clean. Prod.201920623825010.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.097
     [Google Scholar]
  16. DereliT. AltunK. Technology evaluation through the use of interval type-2 fuzzy sets and systems.Comput. Ind. Eng.201365462463310.1016/j.cie.2013.05.012
     [Google Scholar]
  17. BuckleyJ.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis.Fuzzy Sets Syst.198517323324710.1016/0165‑0114(85)90090‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  18. MendelJ.M. JohnR.I. LiuF. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple.IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.200614680882110.1109/TFUZZ.2006.879986
     [Google Scholar]
  19. ChenS.M. LeeL.W. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method.Expert Syst. Appl.20103742790279810.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.012
     [Google Scholar]
  20. KahramanC. ÖztayşiB. Uçal Sarıİ. TuranoğluE. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets.Knowl. Base. Syst.201459485710.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.001
     [Google Scholar]
  21. CelikE. GumusA.T. AlegozM. A trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to identify and evaluate criticalsuccess factors for humanitarian relief logistics management.J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.20142762847285510.3233/IFS‑141246
     [Google Scholar]
  22. SaatyT.L. The analytic hierarchy process.Math. Model.198093-5
     [Google Scholar]
  23. GoT.F. WahabD.A. HishamuddinH. Multiple generation life-cycles for product sustainability: the way forward.J. Clean. Prod.201595162910.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.065
     [Google Scholar]
  24. BrockhausS. FawcettS. KerstenW. KnemeyerM. A framework for benchmarking product sustainability efforts.Benchmarking (Bradf.)201623112716410.1108/BIJ‑09‑2014‑0093
     [Google Scholar]
  25. FikselJ. McDanielJ. SpitzleyD. Measuring product sustainability.J. Sustain. Prod. Des.19987718
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/iscce/10.2174/0126662949323603240830054929
Loading
Evaluation of the Critical Success Factors for Household Product Sustainability
Jour Intelli Syst Curr Compu Enginee 3, E26662949323603 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662949323603240830054929
/content/journals/iscce/10.2174/0126662949323603240830054929
/content/journals/iscce/10.2174/0126662949323603240830054929
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): fuzzy AHP; fuzzy MCDM; household goods industry; MCDM; Product sustainability; type-2 fuzzy sets
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test