Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1573-3971
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6360

Abstract

Background

Clinically relevant fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients significantly affects their quality of life. Almost all studies have assessed fatigue in this population using non-specific scales. The present multi-centric study aimed to assess the validity, reliability, and clinical significance of the Arabic version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ).

Methods

The present cross-sectional multicentric study was conducted at Aswan, Mansoura, Port Said, and Al-Azhar University Hospitals over a 6-month duration. The study included 311 patients with RA diagnosed according to the 2010 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. The Arabic version of BRAF-MDQ was developed to assess fatigue in these patients. All patients were subjected to careful history taking, thorough clinical assessment, and standard laboratory work-up. The obtained Arabic BRAF-MDQ was tested for construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, and criterion validity. Construct validity was evaluated using factor analysis with the Kaiser Meyer Olkin tool of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's sphericity test. Internal consistency of subscales was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Test-retest reproducibility was assessed after a 1-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to correlate numerical variables. Predictors of fatigue were identified using binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

The present study included 311 RA patients. Construct validity assessment showed a high loading of questionnaire items within the proposed construct subscales with a KMO measure of sphericity of 0.927 and Bartlett's test of sphericity -value < 0.001. Internal consistency assessment showed adequate Cronbach’s alpha of Arabic BRAF-MDQ subscales. Total Arabic BRAF-MDQ had excellent criterion validity, as indicated by the high correlations with MAFS (r=0.95, < 0.001) and SF-36 vitality subscale (r=-0.91, < 0.001). Clinically significant fatigue was identified in 214 patients (68.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age (OR (95% CI): 1.07 (1.02-1.12), < 0.001), disease duration (OR (95% CI): 1.82 (1.43-2.33), < 0.001), DAS28 (OR (95% CI): 8.62 (4.63-16.02), < 0.001), and mHAQ (OR (95% CI): 3.85 (1.07-13.9), = 0 .039) as significant predictors of fatigue development in the studied patients.

Conclusion

The Arabic version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire is a valid, consistent, and reliable tool for the assessment of fatigue in Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clinically significant fatigue was identified in 214 patients (68.8%). Further, risk factors for fatigue included older age, longer disease duration, and higher disease activity.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/crr/10.2174/0115733971292438240620064231
2024-06-28
2025-09-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/crr/10.2174/0115733971292438240620064231
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeloglazovV. PetrovA. KaliberdenkoV. AbramovaK. ShanmugarajK. Clinical and morphological evaluation of erosive and ulcerative gastric lesions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Rev. Recent Clin. Trials2023181465510.2174/157488711766622051310251235570543
     [Google Scholar]
  2. MinistriniS. CarboneF. PCSK9 and inflammation: Their role in autoimmune diseases, with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.Curr. Med. Chem.202229697097910.2174/092986732866621081015094034375179
     [Google Scholar]
  3. MasoumiM. HashemiN. MoadabF. DidehdarM. FarahaniR. KhorramdelazadH. SahebkarA. JohnstonT.P. KaramiJ. Immunometabolism dysfunction in the pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Curr. Med. Chem.202330273119313610.2174/092986732966622090715121336082869
     [Google Scholar]
  4. PrasadP. VermaS. Surbhi GangulyNK. Rheumatoid arthritis: Advances in treatment strategies.Mol. Cell. Biochem.202210.1007/s11010‑022‑04492‑335725992
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BearneL.M. ByrneA.M. SegraveH. WhiteC.M. Multidisciplinary team care for people with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatol. Int.201636331132410.1007/s00296‑015‑3380‑426563338
     [Google Scholar]
  6. LahiriM. CheungP.P.M. DhanasekaranP. WongS.R. YapA. TanD.S.H. ChongS.H. TanC.H. SantosaA. PhanP. Evaluation of a multidisciplinary care model to improve quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: A randomised controlled trial.Qual. Life Res.20223161749175910.1007/s11136‑021‑03029‑334741249
     [Google Scholar]
  7. UhligT. ProvanS.A. Treating fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: Does patient age matter?Drugs Aging2018351087187610.1007/s40266‑018‑0589‑430191517
     [Google Scholar]
  8. NikolausS. BodeC. TaalE. van de LaarM.A.F.J. Fatigue and factors related to fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review.Arthritis Care Res.20136571128114610.1002/acr.2194923335492
     [Google Scholar]
  9. MadsenS.G. Danneskiold-SamsøeB. StockmarrA. BartelsE.M. Correlations between fatigue and disease duration, disease activity, and pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review.Scand. J. Rheumatol.201645425526110.3109/03009742.2015.109594326690505
     [Google Scholar]
  10. MatchamF. AliS. HotopfM. ChalderT. Psychological correlates of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review.Clin. Psychol. Rev.201539162910.1016/j.cpr.2015.03.00425912978
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KatzP. Causes and consequences of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.201729326927610.1097/BOR.000000000000037628207494
     [Google Scholar]
  12. KatzP. Fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.Curr. Rheumatol. Rep.20171952510.1007/s11926‑017‑0649‑528386762
     [Google Scholar]
  13. DruceK.L. BasuN. Predictors of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology201958Suppl. 5v29v3410.1093/rheumatology/kez34631435677
     [Google Scholar]
  14. PopeJ.E. Management of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.RMD Open202061e00108410.1136/rmdopen‑2019‑00108432385141
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HewlettS. HehirM. KirwanJ.R. Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of scales in use.Arthritis Care Res.200757342943910.1002/art.2261117394228
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SantosE.J.F. DuarteC. da SilvaJ.A.P. FerreiraR.J.O. The impact of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis and the challenges of its assessment.Rheumatology201958Suppl. 5v3v910.1093/rheumatology/kez35131435662
     [Google Scholar]
  17. NicklinJ. CrampF. KirwanJ. GreenwoodR. UrbanM. HewlettS. Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional study to evaluate the bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue multi-dimensional questionnaire, visual analog scales, and numerical rating scales.Arthritis Care Res.201062111559156810.1002/acr.2028220583112
     [Google Scholar]
  18. DuresE.K. HewlettS.E. CrampF.A. GreenwoodR. NicklinJ.K. UrbanM. KirwanJ.R. Reliability and sensitivity to change of the bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue scales.Rheumatology201352101832183910.1093/rheumatology/ket21823838026
     [Google Scholar]
  19. HewlettS. KirwanJ. BodeC. CrampF. CarmonaL. DuresE. EnglbrechtM. FransenJ. GreenwoodR. HagelS. van de LaarM. MoltoA. NicklinJ. PeterssonI.F. RedondoM. SchettG. GossecL. The revised bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue measures and the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease scale: validation in six countries.Rheumatology201857230030810.1093/rheumatology/kex37029087507
     [Google Scholar]
  20. SariF. OskayD. TufanA. Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the turkish version of the bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue multi-dimensional questionnaire.Clin. Rheumatol.20183761465147010.1007/s10067‑018‑4008‑329423721
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Oude VoshaarM.A.H. BodeC. HewlettS. KirwanJ. GossecL. van de LaarM.A.F.J. Psychometric properties and cross-language equivalence of the revised bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue and the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease scales in rheumatoid arthritis.Qual. Life Res.20192892543255210.1007/s11136‑019‑02188‑831028510
     [Google Scholar]
  22. PrimdahlJ. EsbensenB.A. PedersenA.K. BechB. de ThurahA. Validation of the danish versions of the bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue multi-dimensional questionnaires (BRAFs).Scand. J. Rheumatol.202150535135910.1080/03009742.2020.186930133605192
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ColakS. SandikciS.C. GokmenD. OmmaA. The relationship between bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue scales and disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clin. Rheumatol.201837112927293210.1007/s10067‑018‑4224‑x30062448
     [Google Scholar]
  24. AletahaD. NeogiT. SilmanA.J. FunovitsJ. FelsonD.T. BinghamC.O.III BirnbaumN.S. BurmesterG.R. BykerkV.P. CohenM.D. CombeB. CostenbaderK.H. DougadosM. EmeryP. FerraccioliG. HazesJ.M.W. HobbsK. HuizingaT.W.J. KavanaughA. KayJ. KvienT.K. LaingT. MeaseP. MénardH.A. MorelandL.W. NadenR.L. PincusT. SmolenJ.S. Stanislawska-BiernatE. SymmonsD. TakP.P. UpchurchK.S. VencovskýJ. WolfeF. HawkerG. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An american college of rheumatology/european league against rheumatism collaborative initiative.Arthritis Rheum.20106292569258110.1002/art.2758420872595
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KangH. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software.J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof.2021181710.3352/jeehp.2021.18.1734325496
     [Google Scholar]
  26. PrevooML van 't HofMA KuperHH van LeeuwenMA van de PutteLB van RielPL Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts.Arthritis Rheum1995381444810.1002/art.1780380107
     [Google Scholar]
  27. PincusT. SummeyJ.A. SoraciS.A.Jr WallstonK.A. HummonN.P. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified stanford health assessment questionnaire.Arthritis Rheum.198326111346135310.1002/art.17802611076639693
     [Google Scholar]
  28. MiedanyY.E. YoussefS. GaafaryM.E. AhmedI. Evaluating changes in health status: sensitivity to change of the modified Arabic health assessment questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Joint Bone Spine200370650951410.1016/S1297‑319X(03)00110‑614667564
     [Google Scholar]
  29. BahouqH. RostomS. BahiriR. HakkouJ. AissaouiN. Hajjaj-HassouniN. Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the multidimensional assessment of fatigue scale (MAF) for use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Rheumatol. Int.201232123969397610.1007/s00296‑011‑2306‑z22205382
     [Google Scholar]
  30. BelzaB.L. Comparison of self-reported fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis and controls.J. Rheumatol.19952246396437791155
     [Google Scholar]
  31. CoonsS.J. AlabdulmohsinS.A. DraugalisJ.R. HaysR.D. Reliability of an arabic version of the RAND-36 health survey and its equivalence to the us-english version.Med. Care199836342843210.1097/00005650‑199803000‑000189520966
     [Google Scholar]
  32. WareJ SherbourneC. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36).Med Care199230473483
     [Google Scholar]
  33. HammamN. GamalR.M. RashedA.M. ElfetohN.A. MosadE. KhedrE.M. Fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Association with sleep quality, mood status, and disease activity.Rehumatol Clin2020165 Pt 133934410.1016/j.reuma.2018.07.010
     [Google Scholar]
  34. DemmelmaierI. PetterssonS. NordgrenB. DufourA.B. OpavaC.H. Associations between fatigue and physical capacity in people moderately affected by rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatol. Int.201838112147215510.1007/s00296‑018‑4140‑z30159774
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LeeH.J. PokL.S.L. NgC.M. YahyaF. SockalingamS. TeeY.C. RajaJ. Fatigue and associated factors in a multi-ethnic cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients.Int. J. Rheum. Dis.20202381088109310.1111/1756‑185X.1389732597545
     [Google Scholar]
  36. GaoL. SunY. PanL. LiY. YuanJ. CuiX. ShiB. Current status and influencing factors of fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional study in China.Int. J. Nurs. Pract.2022283e1299610.1111/ijn.1299634309127
     [Google Scholar]
  37. VersteegG.A. ten KloosterP.M. van de LaarM.A.F.J. Fatigue is associated with disease activity in some, but not all, patients living with rheumatoid arthritis: Disentangling “between-person” and “within-person” associations.BMC Rheumatol.202261310.1186/s41927‑021‑00230‑234991729
     [Google Scholar]
  38. KhidirS.J.H. WoutersF. van der Helm-van MilA.H.M. van MulligenE. The course of fatigue during the development of rheumatoid arthritis and its relation with inflammation: A longitudinal study.Joint Bone Spine202289610543210.1016/j.jbspin.2022.10543235777555
     [Google Scholar]
  39. FeldthusenC. MannerkorpiK. Factors of importance for reducing fatigue in persons with rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative interview study.BMJ Open201995e02871910.1136/bmjopen‑2018‑02871931147369
     [Google Scholar]
  40. IfesemenO.S. McWilliamsD.F. NortonS. KielyP.D.W. YoungA. WalshD.A. Fatigue in early rheumatoid arthritis: Data from the early rheumatoid arthritis network.Rheumatology20212021keab94710.1093/rheumatology/keab94734958376
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/crr/10.2174/0115733971292438240620064231
Loading
Validation, Reliability, and Clinical Significance of the Arabic Version of Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire
Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 21, 280 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733971292438240620064231
/content/journals/crr/10.2174/0115733971292438240620064231
/content/journals/crr/10.2174/0115733971292438240620064231
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

file format download Download

  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): BRAF-MDQ, cross-sectional multicentric study, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients; Fatigue; Rheumatoid arthritis

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test