Skip to content
2000
image of Comorbidity-Associated Adverse Drug Reactions During Tuberculosis Treatment: A Prospective Study

Abstract

Introduction

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to antitubercular therapy (ATT) pose a major challenge in tuberculosis (TB) management, especially in patients with comorbidities. This study evaluated the prevalence, patterns, and risk factors for ADRs among TB patients with and without comorbidities receiving first-line ATT in India.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted at Erode Tertiary Care Hospital from July 2023 to January 2024. A total of 300 TB patients (207 without comorbidities, 93 with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, HIV, hypertension, and COPD) were enrolled. ADRs were assessed through clinical monitoring, lab investigations, and structured interviews using the WHO causality and Modified Hartwig and Siegel severity scales.

Results

The prevalence of ADR was 49.33%, which was significantly higher in patients with comorbidities (55.91%) than those without (46.37%, = 0.048; RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.96-1.52). Diabetes mellitus had the highest ADR rate (60.53%, = 0.032). ADRs were more frequent in comorbid patients during the intensive phase (59.32% 41.61%, = 0.018) and in pulmonary TB. Gastrointestinal ADRs were most common, with nausea/vomiting, gastritis, and diarrhea significantly more frequent in comorbid groups. Comorbid patients also had more multiple ADRs (40.38% 33.33%, = 0.027) and required more medication changes (17.31% 7.29%, = 0.013). Discussion: Higher ADR frequency in patients with comorbidities may reflect the impact of disease. The increased burden during the intensive phase and in pulmonary TB underscores the importance of tailored pharmacovigilance.

Conclusion

TB patients with comorbidities, particularly diabetes, face significantly higher ADR risks. Enhanced pharmacovigilance is essential. Age-related physiological vulnerability may independently increase ADR risk in elderly patients without comorbidities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X422511250828173106
2025-09-02
2025-09-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Global Tuberculosis Report 2023. <comment xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.who.int/citations-detail-redirect/9789240083851">https://www.who.int/citations-detail-redirect/9789240083851</ext-link></comment> 2023
  2. Central T.B. Division India TB Report 2023 New Delhi Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: Module 4. Treatment - Drug-susceptible tuberculosis treatment. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.who.int/citations-detail-redirect/9789240048126">https://www.who.int/citations-detail-redirect/9789240048126</ext-link></comment> 2022
  4. Central T.B. Division Training Modules (1-4) for Programme Managers and Medical Officers New Delhi Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhushan B. Chander R. Kajal N.C. Ranga V. Gupta A. Bharti H. Profile of adverse drug reactions in drug resistant tuberculosis from Punjab. Indian J Tuberc 2014 61 4 318 324 25675695
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Singh A. Prasad R. Balasubramanian V. Gupta N. Gupta P. Prevalence of adverse drug reaction with first-line drugs among patients treated for pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 2015 3 1 S80 S90 10.1016/j.cegh.2015.10.005
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Prasad R. Singh A. Gupta N. Adverse drug reactions in tuberculosis and management. Indian J Tuberc 2019 66 4 520 532 10.1016/j.ijtb.2019.11.005 31813444
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pérez-Guzmán C. Vargas M.H. Torres-Cruz A. Villarreal-Velarde H. Does aging modify pulmonary tuberculosis?: A meta-analytical review. Chest 1999 116 4 961 967 10.1378/chest.116.4.961 10531160
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jayapriya B, Antony LJ, Balamurugan PV, Raja AD. Pattern of adverse drug reactions of antitubercular drugs in tuberculosis patients with comorbidities and risk factors in South Indian government health-care facilities. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2021 11 08 920-924 10.5455/njppp.2021.11.07220202105072021
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Marzuki O.A. Fauzi A.R. Ayoub S. Imran K.M. Prevalence and risk factors of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatitis in Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2008 49 9 688 693 18830542
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sant´Anna F.M. Araújo-Pereira M. Schmaltz C.A.S. Arriaga M.B. Andrade B.B. Rolla V.C. Impact of adverse drug reactions on the outcomes of tuberculosis treatment. PLoS One 2023 18 2 e0269765 10.1371/journal.pone.0269765 36749743
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dostalek M. Akhlaghi F. Puzanovova M. Effect of diabetes mellitus on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 2012 51 8 481 499 10.1007/BF03261926 22668340
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Seifert S.M. Castillo-Mancilla J.R. Erlandson K.M. Anderson P.L. Inflammation and pharmacokinetics: Potential implications for HIV-infection. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2017 13 6 641 650 10.1080/17425255.2017.1311323 28335648
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson K. Kulkarni J. Sergejew A.A. Reliability and validity of a new Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) for the psychoses. Schizophr Res 2000 42 3 241 247 10.1016/S0920‑9964(99)00130‑9 10785582
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Safety monitoring of medicinal products: Guidelines for setting up and running a Pharmacovigilance Centre. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.who-umc.org">https://www.who-umc.org</ext-link></comment> 2000
  16. Hartwig S.C. Siegel J. Schneider P.J. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1992 49 9 2229 2232 10.1093/ajhp/49.9.2229 1524068
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Alfarisi O. Mave V. Gaikwad S. Sahasrabudhe T. Ramachandran G. Kumar H. Gupte N. Kulkarni V. Deshmukh S. Atre S. Raskar S. Lokhande R. Barthwal M. Kakrani A. Chon S. Gupta A. Golub J.E. Dooley K.E. Effect of diabetes mellitus on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tuberculosis treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018 62 11 e01383-18 10.1128/AAC.01383‑18 30126955
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gwilt P.R. Nahhas R.R. Tracewell W.G. The effects of diabetes mellitus on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in humans. Clin Pharmacokinet 1991 20 6 477 490 10.2165/00003088‑199120060‑00004 2044331
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Semvua H.H. Kibiki G.S. Kisanga E.R. Boeree M.J. Burger D.M. Aarnoutse R. Pharmacological interactions between rifampicin and antiretroviral drugs: challenges and research priorities for resource-limited settings. Ther Drug Monit 2015 37 1 22 32 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000108 24943062
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Niemi M. Kivistö K.T. Backman J.T. Neuvonen P.J. Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000 50 6 591 595 10.1046/j.1365‑2125.2000.00295.x 11136298
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Park J. Kim K.A. Park P.W. Park C.W. Shin J.G. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gliclazide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003 74 4 334 340 10.1016/S0009‑9236(03)00221‑2 14534520
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Niemi M. Backman J.T. Fromm M.F. Neuvonen P.J. Kivistö K.T. Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin : Clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003 42 9 819 850 10.2165/00003088‑200342090‑00003 12882588
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Desta Z. Soukhova N.V. Flockhart D.A. Inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoforms by isoniazid: Potent inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001 45 2 382 392 10.1128/AAC.45.2.382‑392.2001 11158730
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shah H. Yasobant S. Patel J. Bhavsar P. Saha S. Patel Y. Saxena D. Sinha A. Characteristics and contributing factors of adverse drug reactions: an analytical study of patients with tuberculosis receiving treatment under the National TB Program of India. F1000 Res 2022 11 1388 10.12688/f1000research.125815.2 39935535
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar R.N.H. Rao C.R. Maradi R. Umakanth S. Sanju S.V.C. Balu P.S. Incidence of adverse drug reactions among tuberculosis patients initiated on daily drug regimen in a southern district of Karnataka. Perspect Clin Res 2025 16 1 31 37 10.4103/picr.picr_20_24 39867528
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maleki D. Locke G.R. Camilleri M. Zinsmeister A.R. Yawn B.P. Leibson C. Melton L.J. Gastrointestinal tract symptoms among persons with diabetes mellitus in the community. Arch Intern Med 2000 160 18 2808 2816 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2808 11025791
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pham A.Q. Doan A. Andersen M. Pyrazinamide-induced hyperuricemia. PT 2014 39 10 695 715 25336865
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ssentongo P. Prevalence and incidence of new-onset seizures and epilepsy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): Systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav 2019 93 49 55 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.01.033 30831402
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Asril I. Soetikno V. Ascobat P. Associations between the adverse drug reactions and the tuberculosis treatment dropout rates at the CempakaPutih Islamic Hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2019 10 3 S29 S33 10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_31_19
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Noor S. Ismail M. Khan F. Drug safety in hospitalized patients with tuberculosis: Drug interactions and adverse drug effects. Clin Respir J 2021 15 1 97 108 10.1111/crj.13276 32949069
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Abdallah Y.E.H. Chahal S. Jamali F. Mahmoud S.H. Drug-disease interaction: Clinical consequences of inflammation on drugs action and disposition. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2023 26 11137 10.3389/jpps.2023.11137 36942294
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McNeill R.P. Zhang M. Epton M.J. Doogue M.P. Drug metabolism in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A phenotyping cocktail study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021 87 11 4397 4407 10.1111/bcp.14862 33855722
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Höcht C. Bertera F.M. Mayer M.A. Taira C.A. Issues in drug metabolism of major antihypertensive drugs: β-blockers, calcium channel antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2010 6 2 199 211 10.1517/17425250903397381 20095790
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X422511250828173106
Loading
/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X422511250828173106
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test