Predicting Membrane Protein Types Based on Fusing Information Feature and Ensemble Machine Learning Model

References

1. AlménM.S. NordströmK.J.V. FredrikssonR. SchiöthH.B. Mapping the human membrane proteome: A majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin.BMC Biol.2009715010.1186/1741‑7007‑7‑5019678920
   [Google Scholar]
2. OveringtonJ.P. Al-LazikaniB. HopkinsA.L. How many drug targets are there?Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.200651299399610.1038/nrd219917139284
   [Google Scholar]
3. ChouK.C. ShenH.B. MemType-2L: A Web server for predicting membrane proteins and their types by incorporating evolution information through Pse-PSSM.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.2007360233934510.1016/j.bbrc.2007.06.02717586467
   [Google Scholar]
4. SpiessM. Heads or tails: What determines the orientation of proteins in the membrane.FEBS Lett.19953691767910.1016/0014‑5793(95)00551‑J7641889
   [Google Scholar]
5. KabirM. ArifM. AliF. AhmadS. SwatiZ.N.K. YuD.J. Prediction of membrane protein types by exploring local discriminative information from evolutionary profiles.Anal. Biochem.2019564-56512313210.1016/j.ab.2018.10.02730393088
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChouK.C. ElrodD.W. Prediction of membrane protein types and subcellular locations.Proteins199934113715310.1002/(SICI)1097‑0134(19990101)34:1<137::AID‑PROT11>3.0.CO;2‑O10336379
   [Google Scholar]
7. CedanoJ. AloyP. Pérez-PonsJ.A. QuerolE. Relation between amino acid composition and cellular location of proteins.J. Mol. Biol.1997266359460010.1006/jmbi.1996.08049067612
   [Google Scholar]
8. CaiY.D. RicardoP.W. JenC.H. ChouK.C. Application of SVM to predict membrane protein types.J. Theor. Biol.2004226437337610.1016/j.jtbi.2003.08.01514759643
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChouK.C. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo‐amino acid composition.Proteins200143324625510.1002/prot.103511288174
   [Google Scholar]
10. WangM. YangJ. LiuG.P. XuZ.J. ChouK.C. Weighted-support vector machines for predicting membrane protein types based on pseudo-amino acid composition.Protein Eng. Des. Sel.200417650951610.1093/protein/gzh06115314209
    [Google Scholar]
11. CaiY.D. ZhouG.P. ChouK.C. Support vector machines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition.Biophys. J.20038453257326310.1016/S0006‑3495(03)70050‑212719255
    [Google Scholar]
12. CaiY.D. ChouK.C. Predicting membrane protein type by functional domain composition and pseudo-amino acid composition.J. Theor. Biol.2006238239540010.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.03516040052
    [Google Scholar]
13. LiuH. WangM. ChouK.C. Low-frequency Fourier spectrum for predicting membrane protein types.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.2005336373773910.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.16016140260
    [Google Scholar]
14. HayatM. KhanA. Predicting membrane protein types by fusing composite protein sequence features into pseudo amino acid composition.J. Theor. Biol.20112711101710.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.01721110985
    [Google Scholar]
15. AliF. HayatM. Classification of membrane protein types using Voting Feature Interval in combination with Chou׳s Pseudo Amino Acid Composition.J. Theor. Biol.2015384788310.1016/j.jtbi.2015.07.03426297889
    [Google Scholar]
16. WangS.Q. YangJ. ChouK.C. Using stacked generalization to predict membrane protein types based on pseudo-amino acid composition.J. Theor. Biol.2006242494194610.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.00616806277
    [Google Scholar]
17. ChenY.K. LiK.B. Predicting membrane protein types by incorporating protein topology, domains, signal peptides, and physicochemical properties into the general form of Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition.J. Theor. Biol.201331811210.1016/j.jtbi.2012.10.03323137835
    [Google Scholar]
18. NanniL. BrahnamS. LuminiA. Wavelet images and Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition for protein classification.Amino Acids201243265766510.1007/s00726‑011‑1114‑921993538
    [Google Scholar]
19. HayatM. KhanA. YeasinM. Prediction of membrane proteins using split amino acid and ensemble classification.Amino Acids20124262447246010.1007/s00726‑011‑1053‑521850437
    [Google Scholar]
20. HayatM. KhanA. MemHyb: Predicting membrane protein types by hybridizing SAAC and PSSM.J. Theor. Biol.20122929310210.1016/j.jtbi.2011.09.02622001079
    [Google Scholar]
21. WeiL. TangJ. ZouQ. Local-DPP: An improved DNA-binding protein prediction method by exploring local evolutionary information.Inf. Sci.201738413514410.1016/j.ins.2016.06.026
    [Google Scholar]
22. WangS. LiM. GuoL. CaoZ. FeiY. Efficient utilization on PSSM combining with recurrent neural network for membrane protein types prediction.Comput. Biol. Chem.20198191510.1016/j.compbiolchem.2019.10709431472418
    [Google Scholar]
23. WangH. DingY. TangJ. GuoF. Identification of membrane protein types via multivariate information fusion with Hilbert–Schmidt Independence Criterion.Neurocomputing202038325726910.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.103
    [Google Scholar]
24. AlphonseA.S. MaryN.A.B. StarvinM.S. Classification of membrane protein using tetra peptide pattern.Anal. Biochem.2020606111384510.1016/j.ab.2020.11384532739352
    [Google Scholar]
25. ZhangX. ChenL. Prediction of membrane protein types by fusing protein-protein interaction and protein sequence information.Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Proteins Proteomics202018681214052410.1016/j.bbapap.2020.14052432858174
    [Google Scholar]
26. HayatM. KhanA. Mem-PHybrid: Hybrid features-based prediction system for classifying membrane protein types.Anal. Biochem.20124241354410.1016/j.ab.2012.02.00722342883
    [Google Scholar]
27. NanniL. LuminiA. An ensemble of support vector machines for predicting the membrane protein type directly from the amino acid sequence.Amino Acids200835357358010.1007/s00726‑008‑0083‑018427715
    [Google Scholar]
28. WanS. MakM.W. KungS.Y. Mem-ADSVM: A two-layer multi-label predictor for identifying multi-functional types of membrane proteins.J. Theor. Biol.20163987324210.1016/j.jtbi.2016.03.01327000774
    [Google Scholar]
29. WangL. YuanZ. ChenX. ZhouZ. The prediction of membrane protein types with NPE.IEICE Electron. Express20107639740210.1587/elex.7.397
    [Google Scholar]
30. MyersJ.K. OasT.G. Preorganized secondary structure as an important determinant of fast protein folding.Nat. Struct. Biol.20018655255810.1038/8862611373626
    [Google Scholar]
31. WanS. MakM.W. KungS.Y. Benchmark data for identifying multi-functional types of membrane proteins.Data Brief2016810510710.1016/j.dib.2016.05.02427294176
    [Google Scholar]
32. ShenH.B. ChouK.C. PseAAC: A flexible web server for generating various kinds of protein pseudo amino acid composition.Anal. Biochem.2008373238638810.1016/j.ab.2007.10.01217976365
    [Google Scholar]
33. ChouK.C. Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes.Bioinformatics2005211101910.1093/bioinformatics/bth46615308540
    [Google Scholar]
34. ChouK.C. Prediction of protein subcellular locations by incorporating quasi-sequence-order effect.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.2000278247748310.1006/bbrc.2000.381511097861
    [Google Scholar]
35. DillK.A. Dominant forces in protein folding.Biochemistry199029317133715510.1021/bi00483a0012207096
    [Google Scholar]
36. OldfieldC.J. DunkerA.K. Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions.Annu. Rev. Biochem.201483155358410.1146/annurev‑biochem‑072711‑16494724606139
    [Google Scholar]
37. KabschW. SanderC. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features.Biopolymers198322122577263710.1002/bip.3602212116667333
    [Google Scholar]
38. CuffJ.A. BartonG.J. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction.Proteins199934450851910.1002/(SICI)1097‑0134(19990301)34:4<508::AID‑PROT10>3.0.CO;2‑410081963
    [Google Scholar]
39. WangS. LiW. LiuS. XuJ. RaptorX-Property: A web server for protein structure property prediction.Nucleic Acids Res.201644W1W430W43510.1093/nar/gkw30627112573
    [Google Scholar]
40. WangS. MaJ. XuJ. AUCpreD: proteome-level protein disorder prediction by AUC-maximized deep convolutional neural fields.Bioinformatics20163217i672i67910.1093/bioinformatics/btw44627587688
    [Google Scholar]
41. WangS SunS Q XuJ B UC-Maximized Deep Convolutional Neural Fields for Protein Sequence Labeling.Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Database.Springer2016116
    [Google Scholar]
42. WangS. PengJ. MaJ. XuJ. Protein secondary structure prediction using deep convolutional neural fields.Sci. Rep.2016611896210.1038/srep1896226752681
    [Google Scholar]
43. SukY. KangH. KimJ.S. Random forests approach for causal inference with clustered observational data.Multivariate Behav. Res.202156682985210.1080/00273171.2020.180843732856937
    [Google Scholar]
44. CortesC. VapnikV. Support-vector networks.Mach. Learn.199520327329710.1007/BF00994018
    [Google Scholar]
45. RatnerB. Statistical and Machine-Learning Data Mining: Techniques for Better Predictive Modeling and Analysis of Big Data.Crc PresNew York2017
    [Google Scholar]
46. SilvaS. Seara VieiraA. CelardP. IglesiasE.L. BorrajoL. A query expansion method using multinomial naive bayes.Appl. Sci.202111211028410.3390/app112110284
    [Google Scholar]
47. DemirözG. GüvenirH.A. VansomerenM. Classification by voting feature intervals.Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.19971224859210.1007/3‑540‑62858‑4_74
    [Google Scholar]
48. WieczorekW. KozakJ. StrąkŁ. NowakowskiA. Minimum query set for decision tree construction.Entropy20212312168210.3390/e2312168234945988
    [Google Scholar]
49. GorodkinJ. Comparing two K-category assignments by a K-category correlation coefficient.Comput. Biol. Chem.2004285-636737410.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.09.00615556477
    [Google Scholar]
50. HuangG. ZhangY. ChenL. ZhangN. HuangT. CaiY.D. Prediction of multi-type membrane proteins in human by an integrated approach.PLoS One201493e9355310.1371/journal.pone.009355324676214
    [Google Scholar]