Skip to content
2000
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2666-7967
  • E-ISSN: 2666-7975

Abstract

Introduction

This study presents a comprehensive strategy for combating cholera in Syria, with a focus on clean water initiatives, treatment, surveillance, and vaccination, and the critical role of clean water in halting disease transmission.

Methods

The review design has involved a thorough research and review of existing literature and data on cholera outbreaks in Syria. It has also included an analysis of vaccination and treatment options, as well as an exploration of cholera surveillance systems and clean water initiatives.

Results and Discussion

Key findings have indicated that prioritizing access to clean water through community water management plans and water purification technologies is essential for cholera prevention. Case studies, supported by epidemiological data up to September 2023, have underscored the importance of clean water in stopping cholera spread.

Conclusion

The study has highlighted the urgent need for a comprehensive strategy to protect millions in Syria through enhanced water, sanitation, and vaccination measures. It has advocated for improved cholera surveillance and response systems, along with continued efforts to ensure clean water access for all.

© 2026 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975342773241120054659
2024-12-03
2026-01-03

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975342773241120054659
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ParijaS.C. Vibrio, Aeromonas and Plesiomonas.In: Microbiology and Immunology.Springer202356357810.1007/978‑981‑19‑3315‑8_39
     [Google Scholar]
  2. MonteroD.A. VidalR.M. VelascoJ. Vibrio cholerae, classification, pathogenesis, immune response, and trends in vaccine development.Front. Med. (Lausanne)202310115575110.3389/fmed.2023.115575137215733
     [Google Scholar]
  3. MurayaM. Comparison of selected rapid diagnostic kits and stool culture in cholera diagnosis among patients presenting with diarrhoea symptoms attending nairobi womens hospital (Adams).Thesis, JKUAT-COHES2023
     [Google Scholar]
  4. IlicI. IlicM. Global patterns of trends in cholera mortality.Trop. Med. Infect. Dis.20238316910.3390/tropicalmed803016936977170
     [Google Scholar]
  5. AliA. ParisiA. ConversanoM.C. Food-borne bacteria associated with seafoods: A brief review.J Food Qual Hazards Cont202010.18502/jfqhc.7.1.2446
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BrogrenC.H. Louis Pasteur—The life of a controversial scientist with a prepared mind, driven by curiosity, motivation, and competition.Wiley2024730
     [Google Scholar]
  7. AsamoahEK Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae from various water sources in Makurdi, Nigeria.IJARIIE202396
     [Google Scholar]
  8. XuJ. AbeK. KodamaT. The role of morphological adaptability in Vibrio cholerae’s motility and pathogenicity.bioRxiv2024
     [Google Scholar]
  9. JamilM. AbdullahS. TalibF. Vibrionaceae and fish zoonosis.FaisalabadUnique Scientific Publishers2023468480
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HandzelT. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) In: health in humanitarian emergencies: Principles and practice for public health and healthcare practitioners.Cambridge university press201813660
     [Google Scholar]
  11. MauryaVK KumarS SaxenaSK Conventional treatments of water-associated infectious diseases.Water-associated infectious diseases20201051810.1007/978‑981‑13‑9197‑2_11
     [Google Scholar]
  12. NguyenM. WuT.H. DanielsonK.J. KhanN.M. ZhangJ.Z. CraigL. Mechanism of secretion of TcpF by the Vibrio cholerae toxin-coregulated pilus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA202312016e221266412010.1073/pnas.221266412037040409
     [Google Scholar]
  13. KamareddineL. WongA.C.N. VanhoveA.S. Activation of Vibrio cholerae quorum sensing promotes survival of an arthropod host.Nat. Microbiol.20173224325210.1038/s41564‑017‑0065‑729180725
     [Google Scholar]
  14. GanesanD. GuptaS.S. LegrosD. Cholera surveillance and estimation of burden of cholera.Vaccine202038Suppl. 1A13A1710.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.03631326254
     [Google Scholar]
  15. DavideO. MartiniM. The insidious return of cholera in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Lebanon and Syria: A worrying signal! Past, present, and future forthcoming.J. Prev. Med. Hyg.2023641E27E3337293457
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Baker-AustinC. OliverJ.D. AlamM. Vibrio spp. infections.Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers20184111910.1038/s41572‑018‑0005‑830002421
     [Google Scholar]
  17. ShehuB. NazimF. Clean water and sanitation for All: Study on SDGs 6.1 and 6.2 targets with state policies and interventions in Nigeria.Environ Sci Proc202215171
     [Google Scholar]
  18. PersaudA. DayG. VentriglioA. Geopolitical factors, foreign aid and mental health II: Value for money.Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry201864878679810.1177/002076401880855230760106
     [Google Scholar]
  19. BhuiyanT.R. QadriF. ChowdhuryF. Cholera: Resurgence of fatal yet preventable disease.BMJ20233821831
     [Google Scholar]
  20. TaborR. AlmhawishN. AladhanI. Disruption to water supply and waterborne communicable diseases in Northeast Syria: A spatiotemporal analysis.Confl. Health2023171410.1186/s13031‑023‑00502‑336739427
     [Google Scholar]
  21. TaborR. AlmhawishN. AladhanI. Water disruption and waterborne communicable diseases in Northeast Syria: A spatiotemporal analysis.Confl. Health2022171410.21203/rs.3.rs‑2031442/v1
     [Google Scholar]
  22. HmaidehA. TarnasM.C. ZakariaW. Geographical origin, WASH Access, and clinical descriptions for patients admitted to a cholera treatment center in Northwest Syria between october and december 2022.Avicenna J. Med.202313422322910.1055/s‑0043‑177604538144910
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ShanmugamK. MegharethnamK. JayappriyanK. Water and access to sanitation and hygiene.In: Water, the environment and the sustainable development goals.Elsevier2024678410.1016/B978‑0‑443‑15354‑9.00018‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  24. VambeS. RwiziS. HoughE. Cholera outbreak–An overview of management and prevention.S. Afr. Pharm. J.20239042428
     [Google Scholar]
  25. AbdiAM AbdiKH Epidemiology and molecular biology of Vibrio cholerae O139.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. KaunaR. SobiK. PamehW. VinceJ.D. DukeT. Oral rehydration in children with acute diarrhoea and moderate dehydration—effectiveness of an ORS tolerance test.J. Trop. Pediatr.201965658359110.1093/tropej/fmz01731330028
     [Google Scholar]
  27. SchwartzD. AnokoJ. AbramowitzS. Pregnant in the time of ebola: Women and their children in the 2013-2015 West African epidemic.Springer2015339364
     [Google Scholar]
  28. PietroniM.A.C. Case management of cholera.Vaccine202038Suppl. 1A105A10910.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.09831668817
     [Google Scholar]
  29. AhmedS. AhmedM.Z. RafiqueS. Recent approaches for downplaying antibiotic resistance: Molecular mechanisms.Biomed Res. Int.20232023525004010.1155/2023/5250040
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Julia LynchM. Consensus meeting on international standards for oral whole cell killed cholera vaccines Vaccin Res Open J20194112810.17140/VROJ‑4‑112
     [Google Scholar]
  31. JamgochianH.H. ZamakhaevM.V. SluchankoN.N. GoncharenkoA.V. ShumkovM.S. Development of heterologous expression system and optimization of the method of cholera toxin β-Subunit production in E. coli.Biochemistry (Mosc.)20238891304131710.1134/S000629792309010937770397
     [Google Scholar]
  32. ChavdaV.P. VuppuS. MishraT. Combatting infectious diarrhea: Innovations in treatment and vaccination strategies.Expert Rev. Vaccines202423124626510.1080/14760584.2023.229501538372023
     [Google Scholar]
  33. BlakeA. WalderA. HanksE. Impact of a multi-pronged cholera intervention in an endemic setting.medRxiv202310.1101/2023.12.14.23299970
     [Google Scholar]
  34. OrganizationW.H. International coordinating group on vaccine provision for cholera: Report of the annual meeting 23-24 September 2020.In: World Health Organization2021
     [Google Scholar]
  35. OrganizationWH WHO’s response to health emergencies: Annual report 2022.World Health Organization2023146
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LiZ. PangB. WangD. Expanding dynamics of the virulence-related gene variations in the toxigenic Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1.BMC Genomics201920136010.1186/s12864‑019‑5725‑y31072300
     [Google Scholar]
  37. AkolkarJ.K. MatsonJ.S. Stress responses in pathogenic vibrios and their role in host and environmental survival.Vibrio spp Infections.Springer202321323210.1007/978‑3‑031‑22997‑8_11
     [Google Scholar]
  38. RamamurthyT. NandyR.K. MukhopadhyayA.K. Virulence regulation and innate host response in the pathogenicity of Vibrio cholerae.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.20201057209610.3389/fcimb.2020.57209633102256
     [Google Scholar]
  39. WoodT.E. AksoyE. HachaniA. From welfare to warfare: The arbitration of host-microbiota interplay by the type VI secretion system.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.20201058794810.3389/fcimb.2020.58794833194832
     [Google Scholar]
  40. MuhammadA.Y. AmonovM. MurugaiahC. BaigA.A. YusoffM. Intestinal colonization against Vibrio cholerae: Host and microbial resistance mechanisms.AIMS Microbiol.20239234637410.3934/microbiol.202301937091815
     [Google Scholar]
  41. LloydC.J. GuoS. KinradeB. Characterization of the peptide-binding domain of FrhA in Vibrio cholerae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.2023120e2308238120
     [Google Scholar]
  42. SajeevanA. RamamurthyT. SolomonA.P. Vibrio cholerae virulence and its suppression through the quorum-sensing system.Crit. Rev. Microbiol.202412210.1080/1040841X.2024.232082338441045
     [Google Scholar]
  43. IslamM.T. KhanA.I. SayeedM.A. Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh.PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.2019131e000712410.1371/journal.pntd.000712430703097
     [Google Scholar]
  44. BulivaE. ElnosseryS. OkwarahP. TayyabM. BrennanR. AbubakarA. Cholera prevention, control strategies, challenges and World Health Organization initiatives in the eastern mediterranean region: A narrative review.Heliyon202395e1559810.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1559837153427
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Al-NuaimM.A. AlwasitiA.A. ShnainZ.Y. The photocatalytic process in the treatment of polluted water.Chem. Zvesti202377267770110.1007/s11696‑022‑02468‑736213320
     [Google Scholar]
  46. García-VaraM. Orlando-VélizD. BonanseaR.I. PostigoC. López de AldaM. Prioritization of organic contaminants in a reclaimed water irrigation system using wide-scope LC-HRMS screening.J. Hazard. Mater.202345913211910.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.13211937543020
     [Google Scholar]
  47. MishraRK Fresh water availability and its global challenge.Br j multidiscip adv stud20234317810.37745/bjmas.2022.0208
     [Google Scholar]
  48. LiX. CaiM. WangL. NiuF. YangD. ZhangG. Evaluation survey of microbial disinfection methods in UV-LED water treatment systems.Sci. Total Environ.20196591415142710.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.34431096352
     [Google Scholar]
  49. PhiriD.B. BavumiragiraJ.P. YinH. Efficacy of solar water disinfection treatment system in improving rural and peri-urban household drinking water quality and reducing waterborne diarrhoeal diseases.Aqua. (Lond.)20237271288130810.2166/aqua.2023.086
     [Google Scholar]
  50. WangJ.J. ZhouY.Y. XiangJ.L. Disinfection of wastewater by a complete equipment based on a novel ultraviolet light source of microwave discharge electrodeless lamp: Characteristics of bacteria inactivation, reactivation and full-scale studies.Sci. Total Environ.202491717020010.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.17020038296065
     [Google Scholar]
  51. EnwemekaC.S. BakerT.L. BumahV.V. The role of UV and blue light in photo-eradication of microorganisms.J. Photochem. Photobiol.2021810006410.1016/j.jpap.2021.100064
     [Google Scholar]
  52. BallR. Viruses in all dimensions: How an information code controls viruses, software and microorganisms.Springer Nature202310.1007/978‑3‑658‑38826‑3
     [Google Scholar]
  53. ChenX. ChenZ. NgoH.H. Comparison of inactivation characteristics between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in water by synergistic UV and chlorine disinfection.Environ. Pollut.202333312200710.1016/j.envpol.2023.12200737302789
     [Google Scholar]
  54. KakotiS. Optimization of galtneset reverse osmosis plant-optimization of the RO process for a reduced permeate flow and testing the performance using computational program WAVE.Maters Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology2023
     [Google Scholar]
  55. KumarR. ShakirA. SandanayakeS. Fluoride as a global groundwater contaminant.In: Inorganic contaminants and radionuclides.Elsevier202431935010.1016/B978‑0‑323‑90400‑1.00010‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  56. RabieM. AliA.Y.M. Abo-ZahhadE.M. New hybrid concentrated photovoltaic/membrane distillation unit for simultaneous freshwater and electricity production.Desalination202355911663010.1016/j.desal.2023.116630
     [Google Scholar]
  57. J. O. Optimisation of reverse osmosis reject in water treatment operation: A case study of mtu water treatment plant.Thesis, Mountain Top University2022
     [Google Scholar]
  58. PezeshkiH. HashemiM. RajabiS. Removal of arsenic as a potentially toxic nlm from drinking water by filtration: A mini review of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis techniques.Heliyon202393e1424610.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1424636938422
     [Google Scholar]
  59. ZubairM.M. SaleemH. ZaidiS.J. Recent progress in reverse osmosis modeling: An overview.Desalination202356411670510.1016/j.desal.2023.116705
     [Google Scholar]
  60. AhmedM.A. AminS. MohamedA.A. Fouling in reverse osmosis membranes: Monitoring, characterization, mitigation strategies and future directions.Heliyon202394e1490810.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1490837064488
     [Google Scholar]
  61. FikanaE.R. Raafi’uB. Design of water treatment system to change Brackish water into fresh water using reverse osmosis methodAIP Conf Proc2023258004000810.1063/5.0124367
     [Google Scholar]
  62. KadhimR.A. KhudhairB.H. JaafarM.S. Comparative study of water desalination using reverse osmosis (RO) and electro-dialysis systems (ED): Review.J. Eng.2023294617710.31026/j.eng.2023.04.04
     [Google Scholar]
  63. KordbachehF. HeidariG. Water pollutants and approaches for their removal.Mater Chem Horizons202322139153
     [Google Scholar]
  64. ChinkakaE. ChaulukaF. ChinkakaR. KachingweB. LatifE.B. Geospatial variability of cholera cases in Malawi based on climatic and socioeconomic influences.J. Geogr. Inf. Syst.202416112010.4236/jgis.2024.161001
     [Google Scholar]
  65. HarfouchR.M. AlhouriA.L. AlhouriS.L. Cholera outbreak in Syria: A brief reading.Ann Clin Case Stud2022441065
     [Google Scholar]
  66. AlbitarL. AlmasriI.A. Cholera in Syria, a crisis following crises: Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice in a cohort of syrian population.Heliyon202397e1827810.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1827837539115
     [Google Scholar]
  67. HaarR. RayesD. TappisH. The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts.medRxiv202310.1101/2023.12.18.23300154
     [Google Scholar]
  68. HammalA. Preparing new ceramic membranes from Syrian zeolite coated with silver nanoparticles to treatment wells water.Baghdad Sci J202320610.21123/bsj.2023.7620
     [Google Scholar]
  69. AkinsulieO.C. OlukogbeO. IdrisI. COVID-19 and cholera co-infection and comorbidity in Africa and Asia: A systematic review and meta analysis.J. Glob. Health Econ. Policy202433202301110.21203/rs.3.rs‑3845510/v1
     [Google Scholar]
  70. MavrouliM. MavroulisS. LekkasE. An emerging health crisis in Turkey and Syria after the earthquake disaster on 6 February 2023: Risk factors, prevention and management of infectious diseases.Healthcare20231171022
     [Google Scholar]
  71. OrganizationW.H. Burden of disease attributable to unsafe drinking-water, sanitation and hygiene.World Health Organization2023
     [Google Scholar]
  72. SharmaA. WibawaB.S.S. AndhikaputraG. Spatial analysis of food and water-borne diseases in Ahmedabad, India: Implications for urban public health planning.Acta Trop.202425310717010.1016/j.actatropica.2024.10717038467234
     [Google Scholar]
  73. CheronoJ. Risk factors associated with recurrent cholera outbreaks in Borno and Adamawa States,Northeast Nigeria Thesis, Loughborough University
     [Google Scholar]
  74. BorgomeoE. EshaZ. JasonR. Water in the shadow of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa.In: Ebb and flow.World Bank citationsWashington2021
     [Google Scholar]
  75. ZhangL. GuoW. LvC. Modern technologies and solutions to enhance surveillance and response systems for emerging zoonotic diseases.Sci One Health2024310006110.1016/j.soh.2023.10006139077381
     [Google Scholar]
  76. HabboushA. EkzayezA. GilmoreB. A framework for community health worker optimisation in conflict settings: Prerequisites and possibilities from Northwest Syria.BMJ Glob. Health202387e01183710.1136/bmjgh‑2023‑01183737407227
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975342773241120054659
Loading
Combating Cholera in Syria: A Comprehensive Approach to Clean Water, Sanitation, and Vaccination
Coronaviruses 7, E26667975342773 (2026); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975342773241120054659
/content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975342773241120054659
/content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975342773241120054659
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): Cholera; clean water; epidemiological data; gastrointestinal illness; sanitation; vaccination

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test