Skip to content
2000
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2666-7797
  • E-ISSN: 2666-7800

Abstract

The cosmetics industry is a dynamic, ever-expanding worldwide enterprise. The need for premium goods has led to the exponential rise of the beauty and cosmetics business in recent years. Governments worldwide are enforcing rules to ensure the safety and effectiveness of cosmetic products in response to the rapidly evolving sector. The global cosmetics industry is experiencing a surge in growth, driven by a growing emphasis on wellness and self-care, despite a minor setback during the COVID-19 pandemic. Global regulation of cosmetic products ensures efficacy and safety, but differing policies across nations can impact industry competitiveness and profitability. The global industry faces challenges due to differing regulatory frameworks across markets, which are not harmonized, restricting innovation and market growth. These differences also affect international trade and hinder the role of regulatory authorities. The European Union (EU's) cosmetic regulatory framework provided by Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009, ensures uniformity across member states and adapts to technical progress. This Regulation, which took the place of the earlier, 1976- adopted Directive 76/768/EC, was an attempt to bring regulations in all EU member states into compliance while also keeping up with much-needed technological advancements. Globally regulatory agencies have their own regulations to assure the safety of cosmetics. The EU and the United States of America (USA) account for the majority of the cosmetic market. The regulations in these regions serve as a model for the developing globe. The article emphasizes the need for harmonization in cosmetic rules across countries, focusing on safety, stability, and labeling.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797343989241226101025
2025-01-30
2025-10-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797343989241226101025
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. FerreiraM. MatosA. CourasA. MartoJ. RibeiroH. Overview of cosmetic regulatory frameworks around the world.Cosmetics2022947210.3390/cosmetics9040072
     [Google Scholar]
  2. WichmannJ.R.K. UppalA. SharmaA. DekimpeM.G. A global perspective on the marketing mix across time and space.Int. J. Res. Mark.202239250252110.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.09.001
     [Google Scholar]
  3. KollingC. RibeiroJ.L.D. Medeirosd.J.F. Performance of the cosmetics industry from the perspective of corporate social responsibility and design for sustainability.Sustain. Prod. Consum.20223017118510.1016/j.spc.2021.12.002
     [Google Scholar]
  4. MishraL KurmiB.D. Cosmetics regulations and standardization guidelines.Pharmaspire1513715010.56933/Pharmaspire.2023.15124
     [Google Scholar]
  5. AmbrusÁ. CsehS.J. DoanV.V.N. DomakZ. GönczölT. LörinczA. MiklósG. NagyA. DobrikS.H. VásárhelyiA. Development of quality requirements of chemical analytical measurements.Agrochemicals202211294010.3390/agrochemicals1010005
     [Google Scholar]
  6. LionettiN. RiganoL. Labeling of cosmetic products.Cosmetics2018512210.3390/cosmetics5010022
     [Google Scholar]
  7. NarangP. GargV. SharmaA. Regulatory, safety and economic considerations of over-the-counter medicines in the Indian population.Dis. Health Sys.2023211710.1007/s44250‑023‑00032‑y37251102
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ZottoD.A. The Chinese cosmetics industry: An attractive market for foreign companies. A scenario of its characteristics and regulations with Chinese-English Terminological Records.Adv. Econ. Manag. Polit. Sci.202139112112610.54254/2754‑1169/39/20231948
     [Google Scholar]
  9. SuZ. LuoF. PeiX. ZhangF. XingS. WangG. Final publication of the “Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Cosmetics” and new prospectives of cosmetic science in China.Cosmetics2020749810.3390/cosmetics7040098
     [Google Scholar]
  10. FilleyA.R. WoodruffC.M. The modernization of cosmetics regulation act of 2022: What dermatologists need to know.J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.202389362963110.1016/j.jaad.2023.04.02437085016
     [Google Scholar]
  11. LathamM. McHaleJ. The regulation of cosmetic procedures: Legal, ethical and practical challenges.Routledge202010.4324/9780429952661
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BarelA.O. PayeM. MaibachH.I. Cosmetic science and technology.Edisi kedua New YorkJohn Willy and Son Inc Hal.2009626
     [Google Scholar]
  13. WilliamsE.S. PankoJ. PaustenbachD.J. The European Union’s REACH regulation: A review of its history and requirements.Crit. Rev. Toxicol.200939755357510.1080/1040844090303605619650717
     [Google Scholar]
  14. StefanoD.A. The Chinese cosmetics industry and legal requirements on cosmetics: Is China going to align with European regulations?2021Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10579/19890
  15. CheewajornW. Risk assessment of GMP inspection of overseas pharmaceutical manufacturers based on pic/s desktop inspection.J. Pharm. Sci.2019471
     [Google Scholar]
  16. WellsN. FDA Regulation of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Under the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA). Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs.NA-NA2023
     [Google Scholar]
  17. MishraL. KurmiD.B. Cosmetics regulations and standardization guidelines.Pharmaspire202315313715010.56933/Pharmaspire.2023.15124
     [Google Scholar]
  18. SathvikaM. A review on regulatory criteria for cosmetic approval in brazil and india.Res. Gat.7163
     [Google Scholar]
  19. AustraliaW. National industrial chemicals notification and assessment scheme.M390B Unsaturated Polyester Resin,” Full Public Report: (July 1994)Sydney Australia1991
     [Google Scholar]
  20. SrikanthT. Syed, Sajjad, H.; Anand, A. A. comparative view on cosmetic regulations: USA, EU and INDIA. Scholars Research Library.Pharm. Lett.201131334341
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Food and Drug Administration2022Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/default.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  22. PauwelsM. RogiersV. Human health safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU: A legally imposed challenge to science.Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.2010243226027410.1016/j.taap.2009.12.00720006634
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cosmetic info. Cosmetic Regulation in the European Union.2023http://www.cosmeticsinfo.org/othercountries3.php
     [Google Scholar]
  24. KatzL.M. LewisK.M. SpenceS.L. SadriehN. Regulation of cosmetics in the united states.Dermatol. Clin.202240330731810.1016/j.det.2022.02.00635750414
     [Google Scholar]
  25. PollackJ.B. CareyI.Q. XuV.Y. Regulation of products with PFAS.Env’t L Rep.20245410148
     [Google Scholar]
  26. NarangJ.K. DograA. AliJ. BabootaS. SinghH. Drug regulatory affairs: An introduction.Regulatory affairs in the pharmaceutical industry.Elsevier2022130
     [Google Scholar]
  27. AgrawalA. Natural products as cosmeceuticals in different countries: A regulatory perspective.Bio. Nat. Sou. Cosm.2024185210.1039/9781837672288‑00018
     [Google Scholar]
  28. AmareloM. Reforming federal cosmetics law: What is the modernization of cosmetics regulation act?Enviro. Work. Group2023Available from: https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2023/12/reforming-federal-cosmetics-law-what-modernization-cosmetics-regulation
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Administration UFaDModernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022.US Food And Drug Admin.2023https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/modernization-cosmetics-regulation-act-2022-mocra
     [Google Scholar]
  30. AnjumV. SharmaK. JhaP. PotorokoI. KumarR. Regulations in China. Global Regulations of Medicinal, Pharmaceutical, and Food Products.CRC PressBorta Bara202411513210.1201/9781003296492‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  31. CauchonN.S. OghamianS. HassanpourS. AbernathyM. Innovation in chemistry, manufacturing, and controls—a regulatory perspective from industry.J. Pharm. Sci.201910872207223710.1016/j.xphs.2019.02.00730794794
     [Google Scholar]
  32. PatilM.S.V. PatilM.R. GaikwadM.P. Cosmetic medical treatments.Aesth. Treat. Oncol. Pat. CRC Press.2020141156
     [Google Scholar]
  33. MourelleM.L. DíazB. Cosmetic medical treatments. Aesthetic treatments for the oncology patient.CRC Press202014115610.1201/9780203728888‑28
     [Google Scholar]
  34. RajR.K. ChandrulK.K. Regulatory requirements for cosmetics in relation with regulatory authorities in india against us, europe, australia and asean countries.Int. J. Pharma Res. Health Sci.2016451332134110.21276/ijprhs.2016.05.01
     [Google Scholar]
  35. US Food and Drug Administration. (2017). How FDA Evaluates Regulated Products: Cosmetics.US Food and Drug Admin. Last Updated2016http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Transparency/Basi cs/ucm262353.html
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Cosmetic Product Category CodesLast Updated2014http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/Registr ationProgram/PaperRegistration/ucm111279.html
     [Google Scholar]
  37. MendhiS. MoreS. SawarkarK. The Regulatory Aspects of Cosmetics and Cosmeceuticals in India, USA, and Europe.IJCSPUB20221242648
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Cosmetic Info. the science & safety behind your favorite products.2023http://www.cosmeticsinfo.org/
  39. Obelis European responsible person.2021http://obeliscosmetics.net/european-cosmeticsregulation-product-information-file/
  40. General information booklet on asean harmonized cosmetic regulatory scheme.2022http://www.fda.gov.ph/attachments/category/197/for%20publishing%209.5.06%20ASEANInformati onBooklet_Revised.pdf
  41. JinachaiN. AnantachotiP. ASEAN harmonisation; compliance of cosmetics regulatory scheme in thailand within 5 years.IOSR J. Human. Soc. Sci. (IOSR-JHSS).20141934654
     [Google Scholar]
  42. CastroM.L. FerreiraJ.P. PintadoM. RamosO.L. BorgesS. SilvaB.S. Grape by products in sustainable cosmetics: nanoencapsulation and market trends.Appl. Sci.20231316916810.3390/app13169168
     [Google Scholar]
  43. MaY. KwonK.H. Changes in purchasing patterns in the beauty market due to Post–COVID‐19: Literature review.J. Cosmet. Dermatol.202120103074307910.1111/jocd.1435734632711
     [Google Scholar]
  44. CornellE.M. JanetosT.M. XuS. Time for a makeover‐cosmetics regulation in the united states.J. Cosmet. Dermatol.20191862041204710.1111/jocd.1288630950176
     [Google Scholar]
  45. EntisP. Toxic: from factory to food bowl, pet food is a risky business.Phyllis Entis.2023
     [Google Scholar]
  46. HallaN. FernandesI.P. HelenoS.A. CostaP. OtmaniB.Z. BoucheritK. RodriguesA.E. FerreiraI.C.F.R. BarreiroM.F. Cosmetics preservation: A review on present strategies.Molecules2018237157110.3390/molecules2307157129958439
     [Google Scholar]
  47. TejimaY. Drug Regulation in Japan.Competition Law and Policy in the Japanese Pharmaceutical Sector.Springer2022354710.1007/978‑981‑16‑7814‑1_3
     [Google Scholar]
  48. RoestiD. Microbiological examination of non‐sterile final dosage forms and raw material including acceptance criteria and testing frequency.Pharm. Micro. Quality Assu. Cont.201910515110.1002/9781119356196.ch5
     [Google Scholar]
  49. GautamP. GanghasD. MittalP. GuptaV. DhimanK. Regulatory framework of cosmetic in the european union.Toxicol. Commun.2022431310.53388/20220202013
     [Google Scholar]
  50. SteilingW. Safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients regarding their skin sensitization potential.Cosmetics2016321410.3390/cosmetics3020014
     [Google Scholar]
  51. DasP. DasM.K. Physical, chemical, and microbiological stability of nanocosmetics.Nanocosmeceuticals.Elsevier2022139166
     [Google Scholar]
  52. PratiwiR. AsA.N.N. YusarR.F. ShofwanA.A.A. Analysis of prohibited and restricted ingredients in cosmetics.Cosmetics2022948710.3390/cosmetics9040087
     [Google Scholar]
  53. WallackG. Rethinking FDA’S regulation of cosmetics.Harvard J. Legis.201956311
     [Google Scholar]
  54. PanicoA. SerioF. BagordoF. GrassiT. IdoloA. GiorgiD.M. GuidoM. CongedoM. DonnoD.A. Skin safety and health prevention: An overview of chemicals in cosmetic products.J. Prev. Med. Hyg.2019601E50E5731041411
     [Google Scholar]
  55. NietoP.M.A. NicolásA.F. MoleroM.V. MesoneroP.R. SánchezV.A. FuentesM.A. MuñozG.P. de Eusebio-MurilloE. Conservantes en productos de higiene y cosméticos, medicamentos tópicos y productos de limpieza doméstica en España.Actas Dermosifiliogr.2017108875877010.1016/j.adengl.2017.07.00328673419
     [Google Scholar]
  56. InS.J. KimS.H. GoR.E. HwangK.A. ChoiK.C. Benzophenone-1 and nonylphenol stimulated MCF-7 breast cancer growth by regulating cell cycle and metastasis-related genes via an estrogen receptor α-dependent pathway.J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A201578849250510.1080/15287394.2015.101046425849766
     [Google Scholar]
  57. LimS.K. ShinH.S. YoonK.S. KwackS.J. UmY.M. HyeonJ.H. KwakH.M. KimJ.Y. KimT.H. KimY.J. RohT.H. LimD.S. ShinM.K. ChoiS.M. KimH.S. LeeB.M. Risk assessment of volatile organic compounds benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) in consumer products.J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A20147722-241502152110.1080/15287394.2014.95590525343298
     [Google Scholar]
  58. HowdeshellK.L. HotchkissA.K. GrayL.E.Jr Cumulative effects of antiandrogenic chemical mixtures and their relevance to human health risk assessment.Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health2017220217918810.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.00727923611
     [Google Scholar]
  59. OrtonF. ErmlerS. KugathasS. RosivatzE. ScholzeM. KortenkampA. Mixture effects at very low doses with combinations of anti-androgenic pesticides, antioxidants, industrial pollutant and chemicals used in personal care products.Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.2014278320120810.1016/j.taap.2013.09.00824055644
     [Google Scholar]
  60. DarbreP.D. HarveyP.W. Paraben esters: Review of recent studies of endocrine toxicity, absorption, esterase and human exposure, and discussion of potential human health risks.J. Appl. Toxicol.200828556157810.1002/jat.135818484575
     [Google Scholar]
  61. NoE.R. 1004/2014 Amending Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on Cosmetic Products.LuxembourgOfficial Journal of the European Union2014
     [Google Scholar]
  62. LundovM.D. KrongaardT. MennéT.L. JohansenJ.D. Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy: A review.Br. J. Dermatol.201116561178118210.1111/j.1365‑2133.2011.10523.x21777214
     [Google Scholar]
  63. PónyaiG. NémethI. TemesváriE. Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone sensitivity in hungary.Dermatol. Res. Pract.2016201611510.1155/2016/457907127047541
     [Google Scholar]
  64. LaniganR.S. YamarikT.A. Final report on the safety assessment of BHT(1).Int. J. Toxicol.2002212_supplSuppl. 2199410.1080/1091581029009651312396675
     [Google Scholar]
  65. MertensS. GilissenL. GoossensA. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by cocamide diethanolamine.Contact Dermat.2016751202410.1111/cod.1258027144883
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Cancer IAfRoIARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans.199769
     [Google Scholar]
  67. ConcinN. HofstetterG. PlattnerB. TomovskiC. FiselierK. GerritzenK. SemsrothS. ZeimetA.G. MarthC. SieglH. RiegerK. UlmerH. ConcinH. GrobK. Evidence for cosmetics as a source of mineral oil contamination in women.J. Womens health201120111713171910.1089/jwh.2011.282921970597
     [Google Scholar]
  68. KopelovichL. PerezA.L. JacobsN. MendelsohnE. KeenanJ.J. Screening-level human health risk assessment of toluene and dibutyl phthalate in nail lacquers.Food Chem. Toxicol.201581465310.1016/j.fct.2015.04.01125865937
     [Google Scholar]
  69. AndersonS.E. MeadeB.J. Potential health effects associated with dermal exposure to occupational chemicals.Environ. Health Insights20148s1Suppl. 1EHI.S1525810.4137/EHI.S1525825574139
     [Google Scholar]
  70. SalehA.I. EnaziA.S. ShinwariN. Assessment of lead in cosmetic products.Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.200954210511310.1016/j.yrtph.2009.02.00519250956
     [Google Scholar]
  71. JudsonR. RichardA. DixD.J. HouckK. MartinM. KavlockR. DellarcoV. HenryT. HoldermanT. SayreP. TanS. CarpenterT. SmithE. The toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals.Environ. Health Perspect.2009117568569510.1289/ehp.080016819479008
     [Google Scholar]
  72. AndersenF.A. Annual review of cosmetic ingredient safety assessments: 2007-2010. Int. J. Toxicol.2011305_suppl73S127S10.1177/109158181141261822068630
     [Google Scholar]
  73. BhuvaneswariV.S. ChandanR.S. Review on safety assessment of a cosmetic product.Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res.20181031610.22159/ijcpr.2018v10i3.27333
     [Google Scholar]
  74. BartheM. BavouxC. FinotF. MoucheI. PetrenciC.C. ForrerydA. HanssonC.A. JohanssonH. LemkineG.F. ThénotJ-P. PonchetO.H. Safety testing of cosmetic products: Overview of established methods and new approach methodologies (NAMs).Cosmetics2021825010.3390/cosmetics8020050
     [Google Scholar]
  75. BlaschkeJ.W. Globalization of cosmetic regulations.Food Drug Law J.200560341341916304748
     [Google Scholar]
  76. PistollatoF. MadiaF. CorviR. MunnS. GrignardE. PainiA. WorthA. PriceB.A. PrietoP. CasatiS. BerggrenE. BoppS.K. ZuangV. Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: Challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.Arch. Toxicol.20219561867189710.1007/s00204‑021‑03034‑y33851225
     [Google Scholar]
  77. LilienblumW. DekantW. FothH. GebelT. HengstlerJ.G. KahlR. KramerP.J. SchweinfurthH. WollinK.M. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: Role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new european chemicals legislation (REACH).Arch. Toxicol.200882421123610.1007/s00204‑008‑0279‑918322675
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797343989241226101025
Loading
The Global Cosmetic Industry: Regulatory Challenges and Innovations for Ensuring Safety and Compliance
Curr. Cosm. Sci. 4, E26667797340276 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667797343989241226101025
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797343989241226101025
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797343989241226101025
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): cosmetic regulatory framework; Cosmetics industry; COVID-19 pandemic; global regulation; ingredient safety; regulatory framework

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test