Skip to content
2000
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1570-159X
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6190

Abstract

Background

Radiotherapy is one of the main therapeutic methods for tumors, and radiation-related cognitive impairment has attracted increasing attention. The purpose of this study was to explore the research prospects in the field of radiotherapy-associated cognitive decline through bibliometric analysis.

Methods

Literature on radiotherapy-related cognitive impairment published during 2004-2023 were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. VOSviewer and R- were utilized to perform bibliometric analysis.

Results

A total of 8,365 publications were retrieved from the database. The United States emerged as the leading country in this research field, with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital identified as the most productive institution. Thomas E. Merchant was the most prolific author in this field, while Charles L. Limoli was the most frequently cited scholar. The research hotspots have gradually shifted from cognitive function and outcome measurement to the development of new therapy models.

Conclusion

This study comprehensively examined the research hotspots and knowledge atlas of radiotherapy-related cognitive decline from a bibliometric perspective. Our results would assist scholars in identifying potential collaborators and significant literature in this field while also providing valuable guidance for future research directions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X368986250415105149
2025-05-09
2026-02-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BaskarR. DaiJ. WenlongN. YeoR. YeohK.W. Biological response of cancer cells to radiation treatment.Front. Mol. Biosci.201412410.3389/fmolb.2014.00024 25988165
    [Google Scholar]
  2. WuB. LiS. WangJ. WangJ. QiuW. GaoH. Bibliometric and visualization analysis of radiation brain injury from 2003 to 2023.Front. Neurol.202414127583610.3389/fneur.2023.1275836 38298563
    [Google Scholar]
  3. TakahashiT. YamanakaT. SetoT. HaradaH. NokiharaH. SakaH. NishioM. KanedaH. TakayamaK. IshimotoO. TakedaK. YoshiokaH. TachiharaM. SakaiH. GotoK. YamamotoN. Prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol.201718566367110.1016/S1470‑2045(17)30230‑9 28343976
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MakaleM.T. McDonaldC.R. Hattangadi-GluthJ.A. KesariS. Mechanisms of radiotherapy-associated cognitive disability in patients with brain tumours.Nat. Rev. Neurol.2017131526410.1038/nrneurol.2016.185 27982041
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Greene-SchloesserD. RobbinsM.E. PeifferA.M. ShawE.G. WheelerK.T. ChanM.D. Radiation-induced brain injury: A review.Front. Oncol.201227310.3389/fonc.2012.00073 22833841
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Greene-SchloesserD. MooreE. RobbinsM.E. Molecular pathways: Radiation-induced cognitive impairment.Clin. Cancer Res.20131992294230010.1158/1078‑0432.CCR‑11‑2903 23388505
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KuilL.E. VarkevisserT.M.C.K. HuismanM.H. JansenM. BuntJ. CompterA. KetH. SchagenS.B. MeeterenA.Y.N.S. PartanenM. Artificial and natural interventions for chemotherapy- and/or radiotherapy-induced cognitive impairment: A systematic review of animal studies.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.202415710551410.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105514 38135266
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PhillipsN.S. DukeE.S. SchofieldH.L.T. UllrichN.J. Neurotoxic effects of childhood cancer therapy and its potential neurocognitive impact.J. Clin. Oncol.202139161752176510.1200/JCO.20.02533 33886374
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DavisC.M. RomaP.G. ArmourE. GoodenV.L. BradyJ.V. WeedM.R. HienzR.D. Effects of X-ray radiation on complex visual discrimination learning and social recognition memory in rats.PLoS One201498e10439310.1371/journal.pone.0104393 25099152
    [Google Scholar]
  10. RobinT.P. RusthovenC.G. Strategies to preserve cognition in patients with brain metastases: A review.Front. Oncol.2018841510.3389/fonc.2018.00415 30356657
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PazzagliaS. BrigantiG. MancusoM. SaranA. Neurocognitive decline following radiotherapy: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Cancers202012114610.3390/cancers12010146 31936195
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KarschniaP. ParsonsM.W. DietrichJ. Pharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy.Lancet Oncol.2019202e92e10210.1016/S1470‑2045(18)30938‑0 30723041
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ChenC. SongM. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews.PLoS One20191410e022399410.1371/journal.pone.0223994 31671124
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KokolP. BlažunV.H. ZavršnikJ. Application of bibliometrics in medicine: A historical bibliometrics analysis.Health Info. Libr. J.202138212513810.1111/hir.12295 31995273
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NinkovA. FrankJ.R. MaggioL.A. Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing.Perspect. Med. Educ.202111317317610.1007/S40037‑021‑00695‑4 34914027
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DonthuN. KumarS. MukherjeeD. PandeyN. LimW.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines.J. Bus. Res.202113328529610.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fabregat-AibarL. Barberà-MarinéM.G. TerceñoA. PiéL. A bibliometric and visualization analysis of socially responsible funds.Sustainability2019119252610.3390/su11092526
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ArrudaH. SilvaE.R. LessaM. ProençaD. BartholoR. VOSviewer and bibliometrix.J. Med. Libr. Assoc.2022110339239510.5195/jmla.2022.1434 36589296
    [Google Scholar]
  19. van EckN.J. WaltmanL. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer.Scientometrics201711121053107010.1007/s11192‑017‑2300‑7 28490825
    [Google Scholar]
  20. YuY. LiY. ZhangZ. GuZ. ZhongH. ZhaQ. YangL. ZhuC. ChenE. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19.Ann. Transl. Med.202081381610.21037/atm‑20‑4235 32793661
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GuleriaD. KaurG. Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989–2019.Libr. Hi Tech20213941001102410.1108/LHT‑09‑2020‑0218
    [Google Scholar]
  22. OyewolaD.O. DadaE.G. Exploring machine learning: A scientometrics approach using bibliometrix and VOSviewer.SN Appl. Sci.20224514310.1007/s42452‑022‑05027‑7 35434524
    [Google Scholar]
  23. AriaM. CuccurulloC. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.J. Informetrics201711495997510.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
    [Google Scholar]
  24. DervişH. Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package.J. Scientometr. Res.20208315616010.5530/jscires.8.3.32
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodríguez-SolerR. Uribe-TorilJ. De Pablo ValencianoJ. Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool.Land Use Policy20209710478710.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104787
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ZhaoR. WangX. LiuZ. QiY. ZhangZ. ChangR. Research on the impact evaluation of academic journals based on altmetrics and citation indicators.Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.201956133634510.1002/pra2.27
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Batista-CaninoR.M. Santana-HernándezL. Medina-BritoP. A scientometric analysis on entrepreneurial intention literature: Delving deeper into local citation.Heliyon202392e1304610.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13046 36755622
    [Google Scholar]
  28. DurieuxV. GevenoisP.A. Bibliometric indicators: Quality measurements of scientific publication.Radiology2010255234235110.1148/radiol.09090626 20413749
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TanY. SongQ. Research trends and hotspots on the links between caveolin and cancer: Bibliometric and visual analysis from 2003 to 2022.Front. Pharmacol.202314123745610.3389/fphar.2023.1237456 37576808
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WinklerF. VenkateshH.S. AmitM. BatchelorT. DemirI.E. DeneenB. GutmannD.H. Hervey-JumperS. KunerT. MabbottD. PlattenM. RollsA. SloanE.K. WangT.C. WickW. VenkataramaniV. MonjeM. Cancer neuroscience: State of the field, emerging directions.Cell202318681689170710.1016/j.cell.2023.02.002 37059069
    [Google Scholar]
  31. JacobJ. DurandT. FeuvretL. MazeronJ.J. DelattreJ.Y. Hoang-XuanK. PsimarasD. DouzaneH. RibeiroM. CapelleL. CarpentierA. RicardD. MaingonP. Cognitive impairment and morphological changes after radiation therapy in brain tumors: A review.Radiother. Oncol.2018128222122810.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.027 30041961
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ToaderC. TataruC.P. MunteanuO. Covache-BusuiocR.A. SerbanM. CiureaA.V. EnyediM. Revolutionizing neuroimmunology: Unraveling immune dynamics and therapeutic innovations in CNS disorders.Int. J. Mol. Sci.202425241361410.3390/ijms252413614 39769374
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SurendranH.P. NarmadhaM.P. KalavaguntaS. SasidharanA. DuttaD. Preservation of cognitive function after brain irradiation.J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract.20222851182118810.1177/10781552221077037 35112915
    [Google Scholar]
  34. BassantM.H. CourtL. Effects of whole-body gamma irradiation on the activity of rabbit hippocampal neurons.Radiat. Res.197875359360610.2307/3574846 724988
    [Google Scholar]
  35. PellmarT.C. LepinskiD.L. Gamma radiation (5-10 Gy) impairs neuronal function in the guinea pig hippocampus.Radiat. Res.1993136225526110.2307/3578619 8248483
    [Google Scholar]
  36. KalmM. KarlssonN. NilssonM.K.L. BlomgrenK. Loss of hippocampal neurogenesis, increased novelty-induced activity, decreased home cage activity, and impaired reversal learning one year after irradiation of the young mouse brain.Exp. Neurol.201324740240910.1016/j.expneurol.2013.01.006 23333566
    [Google Scholar]
  37. MizumatsuS. MonjeM.L. MorhardtD.R. RolaR. PalmerT.D. FikeJ.R. Extreme sensitivity of adult neurogenesis to low doses of X-irradiation.Cancer Res.2003631440214027 12874001
    [Google Scholar]
  38. ChenX. JiangS. WangR. BaoX. LiY. Neural stem cells in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: Current status, challenges, and future prospects.J. Alzheimers Dis.202394s1S173S18610.3233/JAD‑220721 36336934
    [Google Scholar]
  39. SchmalZ. RübeC.E. Region-specific effects of fractionated low-dose versus single-dose radiation on hippocampal neurogenesis and neuroinflammation.Cancers20221422547710.3390/cancers14225477 36428572
    [Google Scholar]
  40. ChenH. GoodusM.T. de ToledoS.M. AzzamE.I. LevisonS.W. SouayahN. Ionizing radiation perturbs cell cycle progression of neural precursors in the subventricular zone without affecting their long-term self-renewal.ASN Neuro201573175909141557802610.1177/1759091415578026 26056396
    [Google Scholar]
  41. WarringtonJ.P. CsiszarA. MitschelenM. LeeY.W. SonntagW.E. Whole brain radiation-induced impairments in learning and memory are time-sensitive and reversible by systemic hypoxia.PLoS One201271e3044410.1371/journal.pone.0030444 22279591
    [Google Scholar]
  42. VenkatesuluB.P. MahadevanL.S. AliruM.L. YangX. BoddM.H. SinghP.K. YusufS.W. AbeJ. KrishnanS. Radiation-induced endothelial vascular injury: A review of possible mechanisms.JACC Basic Transl. Sci.20183456357210.1016/j.jacbts.2018.01.014 30175280
    [Google Scholar]
  43. RooneyJ.W. LaackN.N. Pharmacological interventions to treat or prevent neurocognitive decline after brain radiation.CNS Oncol.20132653154110.2217/cns.13.60 25054823
    [Google Scholar]
  44. JainV. de GodoyL.L. MohanS. ChawlaS. LearnedK. JainG. WehrliF.W. Alonso-BasantaM. Cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic dysregulation in the postradiation brain.J. Neuroimaging20223261027104310.1111/jon.13053 36156829
    [Google Scholar]
  45. PetrJ. HogeboomL. NikulinP. WiegersE. SchroyenG. KallehaugeJ. ChmelíkM. ClementP. NechiforR.E. FodorL.A. De Witt HamerP.C. BarkhofF. PernetC. LequinM. DeprezS. JančálekR. MutsaertsH.J.M.M. PizziniF.B. EmblemK.E. KeilV.C. A systematic review on the use of quantitative imaging to detect cancer therapy adverse effects in normal-appearing brain tissue.MAGMA202235116318610.1007/s10334‑021‑00985‑2 34919195
    [Google Scholar]
  46. PálB. Astrocytic actions on extrasynaptic neuronal currents.Front. Cell. Neurosci.2015947410.3389/fncel.2015.00474 26696832
    [Google Scholar]
  47. MarslandA. KrajinaK. GianarosP.J. 64. Systemic inflammation and the integrity of brain white matter tracts.Brain Behav. Immun.201226S1810.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.088
    [Google Scholar]
  48. GibsonE.M. MonjeM. Microglia in cancer therapy-related cognitive impairment.Trends Neurosci.202144644145110.1016/j.tins.2021.02.003 33674135
    [Google Scholar]
  49. GorbunovN.V. KiangJ.G. Brain damage and patterns of neurovascular disorder after ionizing irradiation. Complications in radiotherapy and radiation combined injury.Radiat. Res.2021196111610.1667/RADE‑20‑00147.1 33979447
    [Google Scholar]
  50. MichaelidesováA. KonířováJ. BartůněkP. ZíkováM. Effects of radiation therapy on neural stem cells.Genes201910964010.3390/genes10090640 31450566
    [Google Scholar]
  51. CramerC.K. CummingsT.L. AndrewsR.N. StrowdR. RappS.R. ShawE.G. ChanM.D. LesserG.J. Treatment of radiation-induced cognitive decline in adult brain tumor patients.Curr. Treat. Options Oncol.20192054210.1007/s11864‑019‑0641‑6 30963289
    [Google Scholar]
  52. ScaringiC. AgolliL. MinnitiG. Technical advances in radiation therapy for brain tumors.Anticancer Res.201838116041604510.21873/anticanres.12954 30396918
    [Google Scholar]
  53. VoginG. HettalL. BartauC. ThariatJ. ClaeysM.V. PeyragaG. RetifP. SchickU. AntoniD. BodgalZ. DhermainF. FeuvretL. Cranial organs at risk delineation: Heterogenous practices in radiotherapy planning.Radiat. Oncol.20211612610.1186/s13014‑021‑01756‑y 33541394
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Haldbo-ClassenL. AmidiA. LukacovaS. WuL.M. OettingenG. Lassen-RamshadY. ZachariaeR. KallehaugeJ.F. HøyerM. Cognitive impairment following radiation to hippocampus and other brain structures in adults with primary brain tumours.Radiother. Oncol.20201481710.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.023 32298906
    [Google Scholar]
  55. GommlichA. RaschkeF. WahlH. TroostE.G.C. Retrospective assessment of MRI-based volumetric changes of normal tissues in glioma patients following radio(chemo)therapy.Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol.20188172110.1016/j.ctro.2017.11.008 29594238
    [Google Scholar]
  56. MaJ. CaoH. HouD. WangW. LiuT. Investigation of high-dose radiotherapy’s effect on brain structure aggravated cognitive impairment and deteriorated patient psychological status in brain tumor treatment.Sci. Rep.20241411014910.1038/s41598‑024‑59694‑0 38698048
    [Google Scholar]
  57. WartenaR. BrandsmaD. BelderbosJ. Are memantine, methylphenidate and donepezil effective in sparing cognitive functioning after brain irradiation?J. Cancer Metastasis Treat.2018201845910.20517/2394‑4722.2018.66
    [Google Scholar]
  58. BrownP.D. PughS. LaackN.N. WefelJ.S. KhuntiaD. MeyersC. ChoucairA. FoxS. SuhJ.H. RobergeD. KavadiV. BentzenS.M. MehtaM.P. Watkins-BrunerD. Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Neuro-oncol.201315101429143710.1093/neuonc/not114 23956241
    [Google Scholar]
  59. AttiaA. PageB.R. LesserG.J. ChanM. Treatment of radiation-induced cognitive decline.Curr. Treat. Options Oncol.201415453955010.1007/s11864‑014‑0307‑3 25228143
    [Google Scholar]
  60. ShamsesfandabadiP. PatelA. LiangY. ShepardM. WegnerR. Radiation-induced cognitive decline: Challenges and solutions.Cancer Manag. Res.2024161043105210.2147/CMAR.S441360 39183756
    [Google Scholar]
  61. ErpolatO.P. DemircanN.V. SarıbasG.S. KuzucuP. SenturkE. ElmasC. BorcekA. KurtG. A comparison of ramipril and bevacizumab to mitigate radiation-induced brain necrosis: An experimental study.World Neurosurg.2020144e210e22010.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.081 32822951
    [Google Scholar]
  62. JenrowK.A. BrownS.L. LiuJ. KolozsvaryA. LapanowskiK. KimJ.H. Ramipril mitigates radiation-induced impairment of neurogenesis in the rat dentate gyrus.Radiat. Oncol.201051610.1186/1748‑717X‑5‑6 20122169
    [Google Scholar]
  63. FidaleoM. FanelliF. CeruM. MorenoS. Neuroprotective properties of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) and its lipid ligands.Curr. Med. Chem.201421242803282110.2174/0929867321666140303143455 24606520
    [Google Scholar]
  64. RamananS. KooshkiM. ZhaoW. HsuF.C. RiddleD.R. RobbinsM.E. The PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate preserves hippocampal neurogenesis and inhibits microglial activation after whole-brain irradiation.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.200975387087710.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.059 19801103
    [Google Scholar]
  65. AcharyaM.M. RosiS. JopsonT. LimoliC.L. Human neural stem cell transplantation provides long-term restoration of neuronal plasticity in the irradiated hippocampus.Cell Transplant.201524469170210.3727/096368914X684600 25289634
    [Google Scholar]
  66. SoriaB. Martin-MontalvoA. AguileraY. Mellado-DamasN. López-BeasJ. Herrera-HerreraI. LópezE. BarciaJ.A. Alvarez-DoladoM. HmadchaA. Capilla-GonzálezV. Human mesenchymal stem cells prevent neurological complications of radiotherapy.Front. Cell. Neurosci.20191320410.3389/fncel.2019.00204 31156392
    [Google Scholar]
  67. DuncanT. ValenzuelaM. Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and stem cell therapy.Stem Cell Res. Ther.20178111110.1186/s13287‑017‑0567‑5 28494803
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wong-GoodrichS.J.E. PfauM.L. FloresC.T. FraserJ.A. WilliamsC.L. JonesL.W. Voluntary running prevents progressive memory decline and increases adult hippocampal neurogenesis and growth factor expression after whole-brain irradiation.Cancer Res.201070229329933810.1158/0008‑5472.CAN‑10‑1854 20884629
    [Google Scholar]
  69. KingwellK. An exercise-linked mediator of memory protection.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.20191829710.1038/d41573‑019‑00006‑x 30710134
    [Google Scholar]
  70. JohnsonD.R. SawyerA.M. MeyersC.A. O’NeillB.P. WefelJ.S. Early measures of cognitive function predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Neuro-oncol.201214680881610.1093/neuonc/nos082 22508762
    [Google Scholar]
  71. OrszághováZ. MegoM. ChovanecM. Long-term cognitive dysfunction in cancer survivors.Front. Mol. Biosci.2021877041310.3389/fmolb.2021.770413 34970595
    [Google Scholar]
  72. LangeM. ClarisseB. LeconteA. DembéléK.P. LequesneJ. NicolaC. DuboisM. DeruesL. GidronY. CastelH. JolyF. Cognitive assessment in patients treated by immunotherapy: The prospective Cog-Immuno trial.BMC Cancer2022221130810.1186/s12885‑022‑10384‑y 36513991
    [Google Scholar]
  73. KiangA. WeinbergV.K. CheungK.H.N. ShugardE. ChenJ. QuiveyJ.M. YomS.S. Long-term disease-specific and cognitive quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A cross-sectional survey of nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors.Radiat. Oncol.201611112710.1186/s13014‑016‑0704‑9 27671196
    [Google Scholar]
  74. McDowellL.J. RockK. XuW. ChanB. WaldronJ. LuL. EzzatS. PothierD. BernsteinL.J. SoN. HuangS.H. GiulianiM. HopeA. O’SullivanB. BratmanS.V. ChoJ. KimJ. JangR. BayleyA. RingashJ. Long-term late toxicity, quality of life, and emotional distress in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.2018102234035210.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.060 30191868
    [Google Scholar]
  75. PariharV.K. AllenB. TranK.K. MacaraegT.G. ChuE.M. KwokS.F. ChmielewskiN.N. CraverB.M. BaulchJ.E. AcharyaM.M. CucinottaF.A. LimoliC.L. What happens to your brain on the way to Mars.Sci. Adv.201514e140025610.1126/sciadv.1400256 26180843
    [Google Scholar]
  76. BraunU. SchäferA. WalterH. ErkS. Romanczuk-SeiferthN. HaddadL. SchweigerJ.I. GrimmO. HeinzA. TostH. Meyer-LindenbergA. BassettD.S. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA201511237116781168310.1073/pnas.1422487112 26324898
    [Google Scholar]
  77. SchimmelW.C.M. GehringK. EekersD.B.P. HanssensP.E.J. SitskoornM.M. Cognitive effects of stereotactic radiosurgery in adult patients with brain metastases: A systematic review.Adv. Radiat. Oncol.20183456858110.1016/j.adro.2018.06.003 30370357
    [Google Scholar]
  78. DuanF. ChengJ. JiangJ. ChangJ. ZhangY. QiuS. Whole-brain changes in white matter microstructure after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A diffusion tensor imaging study.Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.2016273124453445910.1007/s00405‑016‑4127‑x 27272052
    [Google Scholar]
  79. ChinnaiyanP. McTyreE. ScottJ. Whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastasis.Surg. Neurol. Int.20134523610.4103/2152‑7806.111301 23717795
    [Google Scholar]
  80. ConnorM. KarunamuniR. McDonaldC. WhiteN. PetterssonN. MoiseenkoV. SeibertT. MarshallD. CervinoL. BartschH. KupermanJ. MurzinV. KrishnanA. FaridN. DaleA. Hattangadi-GluthJ. Dose-dependent white matter damage after brain radiotherapy.Radiother. Oncol.2016121220921610.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.003 27776747
    [Google Scholar]
  81. HanburyD.B. RobbinsM.E. BourlandJ.D. WheelerK.T. PeifferA.M. MitchellE.L. DaunaisJ.B. DeadwylerS.A. ClineJ.M. Pathology of fractionated whole-brain irradiation in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Radiat. Res.2015183336737410.1667/RR13898.1 25688996
    [Google Scholar]
  82. KempfS.J. CasciatiA. BuratovicS. JanikD. ToerneC. UeffingM. NeffF. MoertlS. StenerlöwB. SaranA. AtkinsonM.J. ErikssonP. PazzagliaS. TapioS. The cognitive defects of neonatally irradiated mice are accompanied by changed synaptic plasticity, adult neurogenesis and neuroinflammation.Mol. Neurodegener.2014915710.1186/1750‑1326‑9‑57 25515237
    [Google Scholar]
  83. YahyaN. MananH.A. Utilisation of diffusion tensor imaging in intracranial radiotherapy and radiosurgery planning for white matter dose optimization: A systematic review.World Neurosurg.2019130e188e19810.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.027 31326352
    [Google Scholar]
  84. QiuY. GuoZ. HanL. YangY. LiJ. LiuS. LvX. Network-level dysconnectivity in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) early post-radiotherapy: Longitudinal resting state fMRI study.Brain Imaging Behav.20181251279128910.1007/s11682‑017‑9801‑0 29164505
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X368986250415105149
Loading
/content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X368986250415105149
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test