Skip to content
2000
Volume 23, Issue 7
  • ISSN: 1570-159X
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6190

Abstract

Background

Today more and more people search the web for health-related information, risking to come across misinformation and biased content that may affect their treatment decisions. Cannabidiol (CBD) is among the products for which beneficial effects have been claimed, often at the expense of the risks; further keeping in mind unreliable information reported on products themselves.

Objective

This study evaluated the quality of information retrieved by Google on the potential effects of CBD on weight management, also comparing Italian and English contents, hypothesizing generally low quality and language-driven differences in offered information.

Methods

Queries regarding cannabidiol and obesity-related terms were entered into Google, ranking the first 50 webpages from both merged Italian and English results for analysis.

Results

Of the outputs, 37 Italian and 27 English websites addressed the topic and were not related to medical literature. As expected, a substantial proportion of information was of low quality, with English sites performing better (29.6%) than Italian ones (54%, 0.052) in terms of “JAMA benchmarks” for trustworthiness of information. Also, while most English sites were “Health portals” (40.7%) with neutral stance toward CBD (74.1%), Italian ones were predominantly “commercial” (78.4%, = 0.001) and promoting CBD use (89.2%, < 0.001).

Conclusion

Findings suggest the need for better online information, especially in non-English-speaking countries, as scarce and unequal information can lead people to make poor health choices, with potentially harmful consequences.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X333465241121184404
2025-01-02
2026-01-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X333465241121184404
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlrubaianF. MullaZ. Governments policy measures to address obesity among adults: A scoping review of the global evidence.Lancet2023402Suppl. 1S2010.1016/S0140‑6736(23)02132‑337997060
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BoerG.A. HayD.L. TupsA. Obesity pharmacotherapy: incretin action in the central nervous system.Trends Pharmacol. Sci.2023441506310.1016/j.tips.2022.11.00136462999
     [Google Scholar]
  3. MüllerT.D. BlüherM. TschöpM.H. DiMarchiR.D. Anti-obesity drug discovery: Advances and challenges.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.202221320122310.1038/s41573‑021‑00337‑834815532
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ChandS. DikkatwarM.S. VargheseT.P. SinghR. SahS.K. SutarA.S. BiswasJ. ShandilyS. Potential therapies for obesity management: Exploring novel frontiers.Curr. Probl. Cardiol.202449310238210.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.10238238184131
     [Google Scholar]
  5. SchoutenM. DalleS. KoppoK. Molecular mechanisms through which cannabidiol may affect skeletal muscle metabolism, inflammation, tissue regeneration, and anabolism: A narrative review.Cannabis Cannabinoid Res.20227674575710.1089/can.2022.022036454174
     [Google Scholar]
  6. CavalheiroE.K.F.F. CostaA.B. SallaD.H. SilvaM.R. MendesT.F. SilvaL.E. TurattiC.R. BitencourtR.M. RezinG.T. Cannabis sativa as a treatment for obesity: From anti-inflammatory indirect support to a promising metabolic re-establishment target.Cannabis Cannabinoid Res.20227213515110.1089/can.2021.001634242511
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BielawiecP. Harasim-SymborE. ChabowskiA. Phytocannabinoids: Useful drugs for the treatment of obesity? special focus on cannabidiol.Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)20201111410.3389/fendo.2020.0011432194509
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BeaunoyerE. ArsenaultM. LomanowskaA.M. GuittonM.J. Understanding online health information: Evaluation, tools, and strategies.Patient Educ. Couns.2017100218318910.1016/j.pec.2016.08.02827595436
     [Google Scholar]
  9. RussoE. AgredanoP.M. FlacheneckerP. LawthomC. MunroD. HindochaC. BagulM. TrinkaE. The attitudes, knowledge and confidence of healthcare professionals about cannabis-based products.J. Cannabis Res.2024613210.1186/s42238‑024‑00242‑y39049083
     [Google Scholar]
  10. PerraA. PretiA. De LorenzoV. NardiA.E. CartaM.G. Quality of information of websites dedicated to obesity: A systematic search to promote high level of information for Internet users and professionals.Eat. Weight Disord.20222711910.1007/s40519‑020‑01089‑x33665782
     [Google Scholar]
  11. OsmanW. MohamedF. ElhassanM. ShoufanA. Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.BMC Med. Educ.202222138210.1186/s12909‑022‑03446‑z35590410
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Swire-ThompsonB. LazerD. Public health and online misinformation: Challenges and recommendations.Annu. Rev. Public Health202041143345110.1146/annurev‑publhealth‑040119‑09412731874069
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonn-MillerM.O. LoflinM.J.E. ThomasB.F. MarcuJ.P. HykeT. VandreyR. Labeling accuracy of cannabidiol extracts sold online.JAMA2017318171708
     [Google Scholar]
  14. JohnsonE. KilgoreM. BabalonisS. Label accuracy of unregulated cannabidiol (CBD) products: Measured concentration vs. label claim.J. Cannabis Res.2022412810.1186/s42238‑022‑00140‑135658956
     [Google Scholar]
  15. LiX AgarwalA HadidiR HeX Quality analysis of online health information in China, India, and the USA.IJHTM201213117
     [Google Scholar]
  16. LawrentschukN. AbouassalyR. HackettN. GrollR. FleshnerN.E. Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: A multilingual longitudinal evaluation.Urology20097451058106310.1016/j.urology.2009.05.09119758687
     [Google Scholar]
  17. VaradyN.H. DeeE.C. KatzJ.N. International assessment on quality and content of internet information on osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis Cartilage20182681017102610.1016/j.joca.2018.04.01729758353
     [Google Scholar]
  18. FabricantP.D. DyC.J. PatelR.M. BlancoJ.S. DoyleS.M. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.J. Pediatr. Orthop.201333436136510.1097/BPO.0b013e31827d0dd223653022
     [Google Scholar]
  19. DyC.J. TaylorS.A. PatelR.M. KitayA. RobertsT.R. DaluiskiA. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.J. Hand Surg. Am.20123791881188710.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.02122857909
     [Google Scholar]
  20. SilbergW.M. LundbergG.D. MusacchioR.A. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor - Let the reader and viewer beware.JAMA1997277151244124510.1001/jama.1997.035403900740399103351
     [Google Scholar]
  21. ZeldmanJ. Taking your talent to the Web : A guide for the transitioning designer.New Riders Publishing2001
     [Google Scholar]
  22. YurdaisikI. Analysis of the most viewed first 50 videos on youtube about breast cancer.BioMed Res. Int.202020201710.1155/2020/275014832596288
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhangS. FukunagaT. OkaS. OritaH. KajiS. YubeY. YamauchiS. KohiraY. EgawaH. Concerns of quality, utility, and reliability of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in public video sharing platform.Ann. Transl. Med.20208519619610.21037/atm.2020.01.7832309343
     [Google Scholar]
  24. SavianoA. RaucciF. TallaricoM. De CaroC. Di MartinoS. NesciV. RobertiR. IannoneL.F. ColiaA.L. DimonteS. FurgiueleA. FerrariM. CosentinoM. BoveM. TucciP. MicaleV. LeoA. FrancoV. MaioneF. RussoE. Cannabidiol and the central nervous system: Translating into clinics.Pharmadvances20213236910.36118/pharmadvances.2021.04
     [Google Scholar]
  25. RivaA. D’OnofrioG. PisatiA. RobertiR. AmadoriE. BoschF. Cannabidiol add-on in glycosylphosphatidylinositol-related drug-resistant epilepsy.Cannabis Cannabinoid Res.202336862522
     [Google Scholar]
  26. RapinL. GamaounR. El HageC. ArboledaM.F. ProskE. Cannabidiol use and effectiveness: Real-world evidence from a Canadian medical cannabis clinic.J. Cannabis Res.2021311910.1186/s42238‑021‑00078‑w34162446
     [Google Scholar]
  27. PavlovicR. NennaG. CalviL. PanseriS. BorgonovoG. GiupponiL. CannazzaG. GiorgiA. Quality traits of “cannabidiol oils”: Cannabinoids content, terpene fingerprint and oxidation stability of european commercially available preparations.Molecules2018235123010.3390/molecules2305123029783790
     [Google Scholar]
  28. RianprakaisangT. GeronaR. HendricksonR.G. Commercial cannabidiol oil contaminated with the synthetic cannabinoid AB-FUBINACA given to a pediatric patient.Clin. Toxicol.202058321521610.1080/15563650.2019.161975831126197
     [Google Scholar]
  29. FazlollahiA. ZahmatyarM. ZareDiniM. GolabiB. NejadghaderiS.A. SullmanM.J.M. GharagozliK. KolahiA.A. SafiriS. Adverse events of cannabidiol use in patients with epilepsy.JAMA Netw. Open202364e23912610.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.912637079302
     [Google Scholar]
  30. AslamR. GibbonsD. GhezziP. Online information on antioxidants: Information quality indicators, commercial interests, and ranking by Google.Front. Public Health201759010.3389/fpubh.2017.0009028484695
     [Google Scholar]
  31. MakiA. EvansR. GhezziP. Bad news: Analysis of the quality of information on influenza prevention returned by Google in English and Italian.Front. Immunol.2015661610.3389/fimmu.2015.0061626697012
     [Google Scholar]
  32. YaqubM. GhezziP. Adding dimensions to the analysis of the quality of health information of websites returned by Google: Cluster analysis identifies patterns of websites according to their classification and the type of intervention described.Front. Public Health2015320410.3389/fpubh.2015.0020426380250
     [Google Scholar]
  33. CutrellE. GuanZ. What are you looking for?Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsNew York, NY, USAACM20074071610.1145/1240624.1240690
     [Google Scholar]
  34. SillenceE. BriggsP. HarrisP. FishwickL. Health Websites that people can trust – The case of hypertension.Interact. Comput.2007191324210.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.009
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X333465241121184404
Loading
In Web We Trust: The Promised Cannabidiol Effects on Obesity as a Matter of Language and Marketing on Webpages
Curr. Neuropharmacol. 23, 780 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/011570159X333465241121184404
/content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X333465241121184404
/content/journals/cn/10.2174/011570159X333465241121184404
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Cannabidiol; health-related information; non-English-speaking countries; obesity-related terms; online information; weight loss; world wide web

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test