Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2666-1454
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1462

Abstract

The demand for efficient heat dissipation in advanced electronic devices necessitates the development of polymer composites with exceptional thermal conductivity. Over the course of the last few years, a great deal of research has been conducted to augment the thermal management of polymer composites through the incorporation of fillers possessing exceptionally high thermal conductivity. Among these fillers, aluminum nitride (AlN) has emerged as an exemplary choice for enhancing the thermal conductivity properties of polymer composites. Nevertheless, the substantial thermal resistance that exists at the interface of the filler and polymer matrix, as well as between fillers themselves, significantly impedes heat conduction, thereby limiting the improvement in thermal conductivity. The concise review endeavors to illustrate the recent advancements in the production techniques of polymer/AlN composites that exhibit high thermal conductivity by creating a three-dimensional interconnected filler network. The review begins with an introduction to the proposed mechanisms of heat conductivity in polymer composites, followed by a brief discussion of the various factors influencing the thermal conductivity of these composites. Subsequently, the different methods for fabricating three-dimensional interconnected AlN networks in polymer/AlN composites, all aimed at enhancing thermal conductivity, are presented. The review aims to present novel methods for improving the thermal conductivity of polymer composites by building complex three-dimensional filler networks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cms/10.2174/0126661454342916241207195435
2024-12-16
2026-03-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. SongN. HouX. ChenL. CuiS. ShiL. DingP. A green plastic constructed from cellulose and functionalized graphene with high thermal conductivity.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2017921179141792210.1021/acsami.7b02675 28467836
    [Google Scholar]
  2. WanY.J. LiG. YaoY-M. ZengX-L. ZhuP-L. SunR. Recent advances in polymer-based electronic packaging materials.Composites Communications20201915416710.1016/j.coco.2020.03.011
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LiQ. WangY. WangF. Effect of thickener and reservoir parameters on the filtration property of CO2 fracturing fluid.Energy Sources A Recovery Util. Environ. Effects202042141705171510.1080/15567036.2019.1604880
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KimG.H. LeeD. ShankerA. High thermal conductivity in amorphous polymer blends by engineered interchain interactions.Nat. Mater.201514329530010.1038/nmat4141 25419813
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhuangJ. HuW. FanY. Fabrication and testing of metal/polymer microstructure heat exchangers based on micro embossed molding method.Microsyst. Technol.201925238138810.1007/s00542‑018‑3988‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  6. QinM. XuY. CaoR. FengW. ChenL. Efficiently controlling the 3D thermal conductivity of a polymer nanocomposite via a hyperelastic double-continuous network of graphene and sponge.Adv. Funct. Mater.20182845180505310.1002/adfm.201805053
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ZhangY. HeoY.J. SonY.R. Recent advanced thermal interfacial materials: A review of conducting mechanisms and parameters of carbon materials.Carbon201914244546010.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.077
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ZhangH. ZhangX. FangZ. Recent advances in preparation, mechanisms, and applications of thermally conductive polymer composites: A review.J. Compos. Sci.20204418010.3390/jcs4040180
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZhangL. DengH. FuQ. Recent progress on thermal conductive and electrical insulating polymer composites.Composites Communications20188748210.1016/j.coco.2017.11.004
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ParkJ.G. ChengQ. LuJ. Thermal conductivity of MWCNT/epoxy composites: The effects of length, alignment and functionalization.Carbon20125062083209010.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.046
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ChenH. GinzburgV.V. YangJ. Thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites: Fundamentals and applications.Prog. Polym. Sci.201659418510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.001
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Franco JúniorA. ShanafieldD.J. Thermal conductivity of polycrystalline aluminum nitride (AlN) ceramics.Ceramica20045031524725310.1590/S0366‑69132004000300012
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LeeH.M. BharathiK. KimD.K. Processing and characterization of aluminum nitride ceramics for high thermal conductivity.Adv. Eng. Mater.201416665566910.1002/adem.201400078
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChenG. Phonon transport in low-dimensional structures.Semicond. Semimet.20017120325910.1016/S0080‑8784(01)80130‑7
    [Google Scholar]
  15. XuX. ZhouJ. ChenJ. Thermal transport in conductive polymer-based materials.Adv. Funct. Mater.201930190470410.1002/adfm.201904704
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KimS.J. HongC. JangK.S. Theoretical analysis and development of thermally conductive polymer composites.Polymer201917611011710.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.044
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SunJ. ZhuangJ. ShiJ. Highly elastic and ultrathin nanopaper-based nanocomposites with superior electric and thermal characteristics.J. Mater. Sci.201954118436844910.1007/s10853‑019‑03472‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GuJ. LiangC. ZhaoX. Highly thermally conductive flame-retardant epoxy nanocomposites with reduced ignitability and excellent electrical conductivities.Compos. Sci. Technol.2017139838910.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.015
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZhangF. FengY. QinM. Stress controllability in thermal and electrical conductivity of 3D elastic graphene‐crosslinked carbon nanotube sponge/polyimide nanocomposite.Adv. Funct. Mater.20192925190138310.1002/adfm.201901383
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HuangT. MaC.G. DaiP.B. ZhangJ. Improvement in dielectric constant of carbon black/epoxy composites with separated structure by surface-modified hollow glass beads with reduced graphene oxide.Compos. Sci. Technol.2019176465310.1016/j.compscitech.2019.04.003
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SuY. LiJ.J. WengG.J. Theory of thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer nanocomposites with interfacial Kapitza resistance and graphene-graphene contact resistance.Carbon201813722223310.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.033
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ZhouY. WuS. LongY. Recent advances in thermal interface materials.ES Materials & Manufacturing2020742410.30919/esmm5f717
    [Google Scholar]
  23. GuoY. RuanK. ShiX. YangX. GuJ. Factors affecting thermal conductivities of the polymers and polymer composites: A review.Compos. Sci. Technol.202019310813410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108134
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HuangC. QianX. YangR. Thermal conductivity of polymers and polymer nanocomposites.Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep.201813212210.1016/j.mser.2018.06.002
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ZhaoJ. JiangJ.W. WeiN. ZhangY. RabczukT. Thermal conductivity dependence on chain length in amorphous polymers.J. Appl. Phys.20131131818430410.1063/1.4804237
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HanZ. FinaA. Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: A review.Prog. Polym. Sci.201136791494410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MehraN. MuL. JiT. Thermal transport in polymeric materials and across composite interfaces.Appl. Mater. Today2018129213010.1016/j.apmt.2018.04.004
    [Google Scholar]
  28. MoradiS. CalventusY. RománF. HutchinsonJ.M. Achieving high thermal conductivity in epoxy Composites: Effect of boron nitride particle size and matrix-filler interface.Polymers2019117115610.3390/polym11071156 31284564
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SohnY. HanT. HanJ.H. Effects of shape and alignment of reinforcing graphite phases on the thermal conductivity and the coefficient of thermal expansion of graphite/copper composites.Carbon201914915216410.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.055
    [Google Scholar]
  30. HeX. OuD. WuS. LuoY. MaY. SunJ. A mini review on factors affecting network in thermally enhanced polymer composites: Filler content, shape, size, and tailoring methods.Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater.202251213810.1007/s42114‑021‑00321‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  31. TanimotoM. YamagataT. MiyataK. AndoS. Anisotropic thermal diffusivity of hexagonal boron nitride-filled polyimide films: effects of filler particle size, aggregation, orientation, and polymer chain rigidity.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces20135104374438210.1021/am400615z 23607623
    [Google Scholar]
  32. NgoI.L. Prabhakar VattikutiS.V. ByonC. A modified Hashin-Shtrikman model for predicting the thermal conductivity of polymer composites reinforced with randomly distributed hybrid fillers.Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.201711472773410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.116
    [Google Scholar]
  33. BiggD.M. Electrical properties of metal-filled polymer composites. BhattacharyaS.K. Metal-filled polymers.New YorkMarcel Dekker1986165226
    [Google Scholar]
  34. ZhangD.L. ZhaJ.W. LiW.K. Enhanced thermal conductivity and mechanical property through boron nitride hot string in polyvinylidene fluoride fibers by electrospinning.Compos. Sci. Technol.20181561710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.008
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ZhuB.L. MaJ. WuJ. YungK.C. XieC.S. Study on the properties of the epoxy‐matrix composites filled with thermally conductive AlN and BN ceramic particles.J. Appl. Polym. Sci.201011852754276410.1002/app.32673
    [Google Scholar]
  36. NgH.Y. LuX. LauS.K. Thermal conductivity of boron nitride-filled thermoplastics: Effect of filler characteristics and composite processing conditions.Polym. Compos.200526677879010.1002/pc.20151
    [Google Scholar]
  37. WuH. DrzalL.T. High thermally conductive graphite nanoplatelet/polyetherimide composite by precoating: Effect of percolation and particle size.Polym. Compos.201334122148215310.1002/pc.22624
    [Google Scholar]
  38. YuA. RameshP. SunX. BekyarovaE. ItkisM.E. HaddonR.C. Enhanced thermal conductivity in a hybrid graphite nanoplatelet - Carbon nanotube filler for epoxy composites.Adv. Mater.200820244740474410.1002/adma.200800401
    [Google Scholar]
  39. FuY.X. HeZ.X. MoD.C. LuS.S. Thermal conductivity enhancement with different fillers for epoxy resin adhesives.Appl. Therm. Eng.2014661-249349810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.044
    [Google Scholar]
  40. RaiA. MooreA.L. Enhanced thermal conduction and influence of interfacial resistance within flexible high aspect ratio copper nanowire/polymer composites.Compos. Sci. Technol.2017144707810.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.020
    [Google Scholar]
  41. RivièreL. LonjonA. DantrasE. LacabanneC. OlivierP. GleizesN.R. Silver fillers aspect ratio influence on electrical and thermal conductivity in PEEK/Ag nanocomposites.Eur. Polym. J.20168511512510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.08.003
    [Google Scholar]
  42. ShenX. WangZ. WuY. LiuX. HeY.B. KimJ.K. Multilayer graphene enables higher efficiency in improving thermal conductivities of graphene/epoxy composites.Nano Lett.20161663585359310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00722 27140423
    [Google Scholar]
  43. GuoH. LiuJ. WangQ. High thermal conductive poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based composites with well-dispersed carbon nanotubes/graphene three-dimensional network structure via reduced interfacial thermal resistance.Compos. Sci. Technol.201918110771310.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107713
    [Google Scholar]
  44. NandaJ. MaranvilleC. BollinS.C. Thermal conductivity of single-wall carbon nanotube dispersions: role of interfacial effects.J. Phys. Chem. C2008112365465810.1021/jp711164h
    [Google Scholar]
  45. RashidiV. CoyleE.J. SebeckK. KiefferJ. PipeK.P. Thermal conductance in cross-linked polymers: Effects of non-bonding interactions.J. Phys. Chem. B2017121174600460910.1021/acs.jpcb.7b01377 28362103
    [Google Scholar]
  46. StevensR.J. ZhigileiL.V. NorrisP.M. Effects of temperature and disorder on thermal boundary conductance at solid–solid interfaces: Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations.Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.20075019-203977398910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.040
    [Google Scholar]
  47. RuanK. ShiX. GuoY. GuJ. Interfacial thermal resistance in thermally conductive polymer composites: A review.Composites Communications20202210051810.1016/j.coco.2020.100518
    [Google Scholar]
  48. ShiX. ZhangR. RuanK. MaT. GuoY. GuJ. Improvement of thermal conductivities and simulation model for glass fabrics reinforced epoxy laminated composites via introducing hetero-structured BNN-30@BNNS fillers.J. Mater. Sci. Technol.20218223924910.1016/j.jmst.2021.01.018
    [Google Scholar]
  49. ShiA. LiY. LiuW. Highly thermally conductive and mechanically robust composite of linear ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene and boron nitride via constructing nacre-like structure.Compos. Sci. Technol.201918410785810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107858
    [Google Scholar]
  50. GuanL.Z. WanY.J. GongL.X. Toward effective and tunable interphases in graphene oxide/epoxy composites by grafting different chain lengths of polyetheramine onto graphene oxide.J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain.2014236150581506910.1039/C4TA02429J
    [Google Scholar]
  51. LayekR.K. NandiA.K. A review on synthesis and properties of polymer functionalized graphene.Polymer201354195087510310.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.027
    [Google Scholar]
  52. YuJ. HuangX. WuC. WuX. WangG. JiangP. Interfacial modification of boron nitride nanoplatelets for epoxy composites with improved thermal properties.Polymer201253247148010.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.040
    [Google Scholar]
  53. JiangF. CuiX. SongN. ShiL. DingP. Synergistic effect of functionalized graphene/boron nitride on the thermal conductivity of polystyrene composites.Compos Commun20202010035010.1016/j.coco.2020.04.016
    [Google Scholar]
  54. SunN. SunJ. ZengX. Hot-pressing induced orientation of boron nitride in polycarbonate composites with enhanced thermal conductivity.Compos., Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf.2018110455210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.010
    [Google Scholar]
  55. LiuB. LiY. FeiT. Highly thermally conductive polystyrene/polypropylene/boron nitride composites with 3D segregated structure prepared by solution-mixing and hot-pressing method.Chem. Eng. J.202038512382910.1016/j.cej.2019.123829
    [Google Scholar]
  56. YuS. HingP. HuX. Thermal conductivity of polystyrene–aluminum nitride composite.Compos., Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf.200233228929210.1016/S1359‑835X(01)00107‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  57. HeX. OuD. MaY. Enhancing the thermal conductivities of aluminum nitride‐ polydimethylsiloxane composites via tailoring of thermal losses in filler networks.Polym. Compos.20214231338134610.1002/pc.25904
    [Google Scholar]
  58. DangT.M.L. KimC.Y. ZhangY. YangJ.F. MasakiT. YoonD.H. Enhanced thermal conductivity of polymer composites via hybrid fillers of anisotropic aluminum nitride whiskers and isotropic spheres.Compos., Part B Eng.201711423724610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.008
    [Google Scholar]
  59. ZhangK. LuY. HaoN. NieS. Enhanced thermal conductivity of cellulose nanofibril/aluminum nitride hybrid films by surface modification of aluminum nitride.Cellulose201926168669868310.1007/s10570‑019‑02694‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  60. LeeW. KimJ. Enhanced through-plane thermal conductivity of paper-like cellulose film with treated hybrid fillers comprising boron nitride and aluminum nitride.Compos. Sci. Technol.202020010842410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108424
    [Google Scholar]
  61. WeiZ. XieW. GeB. Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy composites by constructing aluminum nitride honeycomb reinforcements.Compos. Sci. Technol.202019910830410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108304
    [Google Scholar]
  62. WuL. XiangD. Novel in-situ constructing approach for vertically aligned AlN skeleton and its thermal conductivity enhancement effect on epoxy.Ceram. Int.20234945707571910.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.115
    [Google Scholar]
  63. HeX. YuX. WangY. Significantly enhanced thermal conductivity in polyimide composites with the matching of graphene flakes and aluminum nitride by in situ polymerization.Polym. Compos.202041274074710.1002/pc.25404
    [Google Scholar]
  64. LiuL. CaoC. MaX. ZhangX. LvT. Thermal conductivity of polyimide/AlN and polyimide/(AlN + BN) composite films prepared by in-situ polymerization.J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem.202057539840710.1080/10601325.2019.1703555
    [Google Scholar]
  65. LeeS. ParkD. KimJ. 3D ‐printed surface‐modified aluminum nitride reinforced thermally conductive composites with enhanced thermal conductivity and mechanical strength.Polym. Adv. Technol.20223341291129710.1002/pat.5601
    [Google Scholar]
  66. LeeW KimJ Highly thermal conductive and electrical insulating epoxy composites with a three-dimensional filler network by sintering silver nanowires on aluminum nitride surface.Polymers20211356942021;10.3390/polym13050694
    [Google Scholar]
  67. ShteinM. NadivR. BuzagloM. KahilK. RegevO. Thermally conductive graphene-polymer composites: Size, percolation, and synergy effects.Chem. Mater.20152762100210610.1021/cm504550e
    [Google Scholar]
  68. RenteriaJ.D. RamirezS. MalekpourH. Strongly anisotropic thermal conductivity of free‐standing reduced graphene oxide films annealed at high temperature.Adv. Funct. Mater.201525294664467210.1002/adfm.201501429
    [Google Scholar]
  69. ChenY. HouX. LiaoM. Constructing a “pea-pod-like” alumina-graphene binary architecture for enhancing thermal conductivity of epoxy composite.Chem. Eng. J.202038112269010.1016/j.cej.2019.122690
    [Google Scholar]
  70. ZhangF. FengY. FengW. Three-dimensional interconnected networks for thermally conductive polymer composites: Design, preparation, properties, and mechanisms.Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep.202014210058010.1016/j.mser.2020.100580
    [Google Scholar]
  71. NgoI.L. JeonS. ByonC. Thermal conductivity of transparent and flexible polymers containing fillers: A literature review.Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.20169821922610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.02.082
    [Google Scholar]
  72. TabkhPazMShajariSMahmoodiMParkDYSureshHParkSSThermal conductivity of carbon nanotube and hexagonal boron nitride polymer composites.Compos., Part B Eng.20161001930
    [Google Scholar]
  73. ZhaoW. ChenW. YueY. WuS. In-situ two-step Raman thermometry for thermal characterization of monolayer graphene interface material.Appl. Therm. Eng.201711348148910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.063
    [Google Scholar]
  74. YueX.F. WangY.Y. ZhaoY. Measurement of interfacial thermal conductance of few-layer MoS2 supported on different substrates using Raman spectroscopy.J. Appl. Phys.20201271010430110.1063/1.5128613
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cms/10.2174/0126661454342916241207195435
Loading
/content/journals/cms/10.2174/0126661454342916241207195435
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test