Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

The lack of knowledge of the relation of the maxillary sinus with the apexes of maxillary posterior teeth can lead to important complications during common dental procedures. This can be avoided using different imaging techniques, such as orthopantomography (OPG) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The present study aims to compare the performance of OPG with CBCT in measuring the vertical distance of the apexes of posterior-superior teeth to the maxillary sinus.

Methods

This study corresponded to a cross-sectional study. OPGs and CBCT scans were obtained from the same individuals, and the qualitative and quantitative vertical distance of the apexes in relation to the maxillary sinus was categorized and measured in mm.

Results

A total of 28 pairs of OPGs and CBCT scans from the same patients were obtained. About 381 roots were analysed, which included 89 upper first premolars, 51 upper second premolars, 115 upper first molars, and 126 upper second molars. Projection/protrusion was observed with more frequency in molars, specially 1º molars in both OPG (n= 75, 65.2%) and CBCT (n= 31, 27%); however, 106 more cases (27.9%) were classified as projected in the OPG compared to CBCT (p < 0.05). When comparing the performance of the OPG and CBTC for analysing all roots qualitatively, there was a 57.8% agreement between both techniques. This difference was statistically significant (p <0.0001). Statistically significant differences were also observed when comparing the millimetric differences.

Conclusion

This study showed that OPG is not an accurate technique to observe the relationship between the maxillary sinus and the apexes of the upper posterior teeth. In those cases where precision is required when performing dental procedures in this area, CBCT should be used. When not available, the clinicians should be aware of the limitations of the OPG and add other complementary techniques.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230705120909
2024-01-01
2025-08-19
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. SharanA. MadjarD. Correlation between maxillary sinus floor topography and related root position of posterior teeth using panoramic and cross-sectional computed tomography imaging.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.2006102337538110.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.03116920546
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kirkham-AliK. LaM. SherJ. SholapurkarA. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic imaging in assessing the relationship between posterior maxillary tooth roots and the maxillary sinus: A systematic review.J. Investig. Clin. Dent.2019103e1240210.1111/jicd.1240230693662
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AmineK. SlaouiS. KaniceF.Z. KissaJ. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and lesions: A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography.J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2020121548448910.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.02131931183
    [Google Scholar]
  4. WhyteA. BoeddinghausR. The maxillary sinus: Physiology, development and imaging anatomy.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.20194882019020510.1259/dmfr.2019020531386556
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhangT. HeZ. TianH. Association between periodontal status and degree of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening: A retrospective CBCT study.BMC Oral Health202121139210.1186/s12903‑021‑01737‑334380478
    [Google Scholar]
  6. EberhardtJ.A. TorabinejadM. ChristiansenE.L. A computed tomographic study of the distances between the maxillary sinus floor and the apices of the maxillary posterior teeth.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol.199273334534710.1016/0030‑4220(92)90133‑B1545967
    [Google Scholar]
  7. RegnstrandT. TorresA. PetitjeanE. LambrechtsP. BenchimolD. JacobsR. CBCT based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth.Clin. Exp. Dent. Res.2021761197120410.1002/cre2.45134021741
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WeissR.II Read-FullerA. Cone Beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: An evidence-based review.Dent J20197252
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KuligowskiP. JarońA. PreussO. Gabrysz-TrybekE. BladowskaJ. TrybekG. Association between odontogenic and maxillary sinus conditions: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomographic study.J. Clin. Med.20211013284910.3390/jcm1013284934199113
    [Google Scholar]
  10. TadinadaA. FungK. ThackerS. MahdianM. JadhavA. SchincagliaG.P. Radiographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus prior to dental implant therapy: A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographic imaging.Imaging Sci. Dent.201545316917410.5624/isd.2015.45.3.16926389059
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Toraman AlkurtM. PekerI. DeğerliŞ. CebeciA.R.İ. SadıkE. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiographs in detecting maxillary sinus septa.J. Istanb. Univ. Fac. Dent.201650381410.17096/jiufd.8447628955570
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WolffC. MückeT. WagenpfeilS. KanatasA. BissingerO. DeppeH. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.201644101700170510.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.02527567358
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MacDonaldD. Cone-beam computed tomography and the dentist.J. Investig. Clin. Dent.201781e1217810.1111/jicd.1217826175061
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DreiseidlerT. MischkowskiR.A. NeugebauerJ. RitterL. ZöllerJ.E. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry.Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants200924221622519492636
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SunW. XiaK. TangL. LiuC. ZouL. LiuJ. Accuracy of panoramic radiography in diagnosing maxillary sinus-root relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Angle Orthod.201888681982910.2319/022018‑135.130179053
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ChowS.C. Sample size calculations for clinical trials.Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat.20113541442710.1002/wics.155
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LascalaC.A. PanellaJ. MarquesM.M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.200433529129410.1259/dmfr/2550085015585804
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ata-AliJ. Diago-VilaltaJ.V. MeloM. BagánL. SoldiniM.C. Di-NardoC. Ata-AliF. Mañes-FerrerJ.F. What is the frequency of anatomical variations and pathological findings in maxillary sinuses among patients subjected to maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography? A systematic review.Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal2017224e400e40910.4317/medoral.2145628578369
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AliS. M. HawramyF. A. HddF. MahmoodK. A. The relation of maxillary posterior teeth roots to the maxillary sinus floor using panoramic and computed tomography imaging in a sample of Kurdish People.Tikrit J DentSci201318188
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LopesL.J. GambaT.O. BertinatoJ.V.J. FreitasD.Q. Comparison of panoramic radiography and CBCT to identify maxillary posterior roots invading the maxillary sinus.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.20164562016004310.1259/dmfr.2016004327268417
    [Google Scholar]
  21. CottonT. GeislerT. HoldenD. SchwartzS. SchindlerW. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography.J. Endod.20073391121113210.1016/j.joen.2007.06.01117931947
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RodriguezM.R. RizaR. ValenzuelaJ.J. NiklanderS. Relationship between the maxillary sinus and apices of posterior-superior teeth using cone beam computed tomography.Int. J. Morphol.20232618624
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ÖzalpÖ. TezerişenerH.A. KocabalkanB. BüyükkaplanU.Ş. ÖzarslanM.M. Şimşek KayaG. AltayM.A. SindelA. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study.Imaging Sci. Dent.201848426927510.5624/isd.2018.48.4.26930607351
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230705120909
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230705120909
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test