oa Salt-and-pepper Noise Reduction for Medical Images based on Image Fusion

References

1. ReddyT.J. Medical image denoise method based on curvelet transform: An approach for edge preservation.Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol.201654768771
   [Google Scholar]
2. EssafF. LiY. SakhoS. Review on deep learning methods used for computer-aided lung cancer detection and diagnosis.ACAI 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial IntelligenceNewYork, NY, USA2019104111
   [Google Scholar]
3. ZhangK. ZuoW. ChenY. MengD. ZhangL. Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising.IEEE Trans. Image Process.20172673142315510.1109/TIP.2017.266220628166495
   [Google Scholar]
4. ZhangK. ZuoW. ZhangL. Ffdnet: Toward a fast and flexible solution for cnn based image denoising.IEEE Trans. Image Process.20182794608462210.1109/TIP.2018.283989129993717
   [Google Scholar]
5. LiuD. WenB. LiuX. When image denoising meets high-level vision tasks: A deep learning approacharXiv:1706.04284v32017
   [Google Scholar]
6. LehtinenJ. MunkbergJ. HasselgrenJ. Noise2noise: Learning image restoration without clean data.International Conference on Machine Learning201829652974
   [Google Scholar]
7. DuttaS ManideepB RaiS A comparative study of deep learning models for medical image classification.Iop Conference2017042097
   [Google Scholar]
8. El Kader IsselmouA. XuG. ZhangS. Deep learning algorithm for brain tumor detection and analysis using mr brain images.ICIMH 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Medicine and HealthNew York, NY, USA2019283210.1145/3348416.3348421
   [Google Scholar]
9. NugrohoA. HidayatR. NugrohoH.A. DebayleJ. Combinatorial active contour bilateral filter for ultrasound image segmentation.J. Med. Imaging20207505700310.1117/1.JMI.7.5.05700333344671
   [Google Scholar]
10. AslamM.A. MunirM.A. CuiD. CUI D. Noise removal from medical images using hybrid filters of technique.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.20201518101206110.1088/1742‑6596/1518/1/012061
    [Google Scholar]
11. LimJ.S. Two-dimensional signal and image processing.USAPrentice-Hall, Inc.1990
    [Google Scholar]
12. HwangH HaddadR A Adaptive median filters: New algorithms and results.Image Processing IEEE Transactions on199544499502
    [Google Scholar]
13. ChenT. WuH.R. Adaptive impulse detection using center-weighted median filters.IEEE Signal Process. Lett.20018113[J].10.1109/97.889633
    [Google Scholar]
14. KoS J LeeY H Center weighted median filters and their applications to image enhancement.Circuits Systems IEEE Transactions on1991389984993
    [Google Scholar]
15. SrinivasanK.S. EbenezerD. A new fast and efficient decision-based algorithm for removal of high-density impulse noises.IEEE Signal Process. Lett.2007143189192[J].10.1109/LSP.2006.884018
    [Google Scholar]
16. XuG. TanJ. A universal impulse noise filter with an impulse detector and nonlocal means.Circuits, systems, and signal processing.2014332421435
    [Google Scholar]
17. ChanC FultonR FengD D Median non-local means filter for low snr image denoising: Application to pet with anatomical knowledge.IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim Medical Imaging Conference201036133618
    [Google Scholar]
18. LiZ. YuL. TrzaskoJ.D. LakeD.S. BlezekD.J. FletcherJ.G. McColloughC.H. ManducaA. Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising.Med. Phys.201341101190810.1118/1.485163524387516
    [Google Scholar]
19. LeiH. TanJ. GanK. Non-local means image denoising algorithm based on edge detection.2014 5th International Conference on Digital Home (ICDH)2014117121
    [Google Scholar]
20. ZhangH. ZhuY. ZhengH. Namf: A nonlocal adaptive mean filter for removal of salt-and-pepper noise.Math. Probl. Eng.2021202111010.1155/2021/4127679
    [Google Scholar]
21. ThanhD.N.H. ThanhL.T. HienN.N. PrasathS. Adaptive total variation L1 regularization for salt and pepper image denoising.Optik202020816367710.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163677
    [Google Scholar]
22. PangS. DingT. QiaoS. MengF. WangS. LiP. WangX. A novel YOLOv3-arch model for identifying cholelithiasis and classifying gallstones on CT images.PLoS One2019146e021764710.1371/journal.pone.021764731211791
    [Google Scholar]
23. TuranB. Ann based removal for salt and pepper noise.Global Conference on Engineering Research2021558566
    [Google Scholar]
24. SoriW J JiangF. AreroW.G. Dfd-net: Lung cancer detection from denoised ct scan image using deep learning.Front. Comput. Sci.202115213
    [Google Scholar]
25. JiangX. ZhuY. ZhengB. YangD. Images denoising for COVID-19 chest X-ray based on multi-resolution parallel residual CNN.Mach. Vis. Appl.202132410010.1007/s00138‑021‑01224‑334219975
    [Google Scholar]
26. ThanhD.N.H. HienN.N. KalavathiP. PrasathV.B.S. Adaptive switching weight mean filter for salt and pepper image denoising.Procedia Comput. Sci.202017129230110.1016/j.procs.2020.04.031
    [Google Scholar]
27. HambardeP. TalbarS. MahajanA. ChavanS. ThakurM. SableN. Prostate lesion segmentation in MR images using radiomics based deeply supervised U-Net.Biocybern. Biomed. Eng.20204041421143510.1016/j.bbe.2020.07.011
    [Google Scholar]
28. LiuW. AnguelovD. ErhanD. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector[C]//Computer Vision–ECCV 201614th European ConferenceAmsterdam, The NetherlandsOctober 11–14, 201620162137
    [Google Scholar]
29. LiZ. ZhouF. FSSD: Feature fusion single shot multibox detector.arXiv:1712.009602017
    [Google Scholar]
30. FengC. ZhongY. GaoY. ScottM.R. HuangW. TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detection.2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)Montreal, QC, Canada20213490349910.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00349
    [Google Scholar]