Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Introduction

In some hospitals in remote areas, due to the lack of MRI scanners with high magnetic field intensity, only low-resolution MRI images can be obtained, hindering doctors from making correct diagnoses. In our study, high-resolution images can be obtained through low-resolution MRI images. Moreover, as our algorithm is a lightweight algorithm with a small number of parameters, it can be carried out in remote areas under the condition of the lack of computing resources. Moreover, our algorithm is of great clinical significance in providing references for doctors' diagnoses and treatment in remote areas.

Methods

We compared different super-resolution algorithms to obtain high-resolution MRI images, including SRGAN, SPSR, and LESRCNN. A global skip connection was applied to the original network of LESRCNN to use global semantic information to get better performance.

Results

Experiments reported that our network improved SSMI by 0.8% and also achieved an obvious increase in PSNR, PI, and LPIPS compared to LESRCNN in our dataset. Similar to LESRCNN, our network has a very short running time, the small number of parameters, low time complexity, and low space complexity while ensuring high performance compared to SRGAN and SPSR. Five MRI doctors were invited for a subjective evaluation of our algorithm. All agreed on significant improvements and that our algorithm could be used clinically in remote areas and has great value.

Conclusion

The experimental results demonstrated the performance of our algorithm in super-resolution MRI image reconstruction. It allows us to obtain high-resolution images in the absence of high-field intensity MRI scanners, which has great clinical significance. The short running time, a small number of parameters, low time complexity, and low space complexity ensure that our network can be used in grassroots hospitals in remote areas that lack computing resources. We can reconstruct high-resolution MRI images in a short time, thus saving time for patients. Our algorithm is biased towards clinical and practical applications, and doctors have affirmed the clinical value of our algorithm.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230522151414
2024-01-01
2025-10-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E220523217206.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230522151414&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. DuchonC.E. Lanczos filtering in one and two dimensions.J. Appl. Meteorol.19791881016102210.1175/1520‑0450(1979)018<1016:LFIOAT>2.0.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  2. YangJ. WrightJ. HuangT.S. Image super-resolution as sparse representation of raw image patches.2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2008)24-26 June 2008Anchorage, Alaska, USA. IEEE2008
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GaoX . Image super-resolution with sparse neighbor embedding.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing20122173194
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CvprA IdP . Convolutional sparse coding for image super-resolution.2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)2015
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DakuaS.P. SahambiJ.S. Automatic left ventricular contour extraction from cardiac magnetic resonance images using cantilever beam and random walk approach.Cardiovasc. Eng.2010101304310.1007/s10558‑009‑9091‑220082140
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DakuaS.P. SahambiJ.S. Modified active contour model and Random Walk approach for left ventricular cardiac MR image segmentation.Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng.20112791350136110.1002/cnm.1430
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ChaoD. ChenC.L. HeK. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution.European Conference on Computer Vision2014
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KimJ. JungK.L. KyoungM.L. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks.arXiv:1511.045872015
    [Google Scholar]
  9. JohnsonJ. AlahiA. Fei-FeiL. Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution.ChamSpringer201610.1007/978‑3‑319‑46475‑6_43
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LedigC. TheisL. HuszarF. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network.arXiv:1609.048022016
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WangX. YuK. WuS. ESRGAN: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks.arXiv:1809.002192018
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MaC. RaoY. ChengY. Structure-preserving super resolution with gradient guidance.2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)202010.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00779
    [Google Scholar]
  13. CaballeroJ. Cardiac image super-resolution with global correspondence using multi-atlas patchmatch.Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv201316Pt 3916
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GaoY. LiH. DongJ. A deep convolutional network for medical image super-resolution.2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC)2017
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LiuH XuJ YanW Learning deconvolutional deep neural network for high resolution medical image reconstruction.Inf. Sci.2018468142154
    [Google Scholar]
  16. RenS. JainD.K. GuoK. XuT. ChiT. Towards efficient medical lesion image super-resolution based on deep residual networks.Signal Process. Image Commun.20197511010.1016/j.image.2019.03.008
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BingX. ZhangW. ZhengL. ZhangY. Medical image super resolution using improved generative adversarial networks.IEEE Access20197145030145038[J].10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944862
    [Google Scholar]
  18. AgustssonE. TimofteR. NTIRE 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study.2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)2017
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZhengH. QuX. BaiZ. LiuY. GuoD. DongJ. PengX. ChenZ. Multi-contrast brain magnetic resonance image super-resolution using the local weight similarity.BMC Med. Imaging2017171610.1186/s12880‑016‑0176‑228095792
    [Google Scholar]
  20. de Leeuw den BouterM.L. IppolitoG. O’ReillyT.P.A. RemisR.F. van GijzenM.B. WebbA.G. Deep learning-based single image super-resolution for low-field MR brain images.Sci. Rep.2022121636210.1038/s41598‑022‑10298‑635430586
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ZhangR. IsolaP. EfrosA.A. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric.2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition201810.1109/CVPR.2018.00068
    [Google Scholar]
  22. TianC. ZhugeR. WuZ. Lightweight image super-resolution with enhanced CNN [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems202820510623510.1109/CVPR.2018.00068
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230522151414
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230522151414
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Doctors diagnosis; Evaluation algorithm; lightweight; MRI images; Super-resolution
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test