Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
file format pdf download PDF
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background

Pelvic floor dysfunction is characterized by incomplete fecal defecation, negatively affecting the quality of life. Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) is a useful examination that is ionizing radiation-free and easily reproducible, and provides anatomical and functional details that are obtainable through multiplanar and dynamic examinations. The study aims to detect pathology using MRD in patients with suspected pelvic floor dysfunction and determine its cause.

Methods

MRD was performed on 79 individuals. Dynamic images were obtained at rest, straining, and during defecation. Pelvic hiatus mediolateral diameters were compared between groups.

Results

The defecation phase provided more accurate results than the straining phase for determining the existence and severity of pathology significantly.

Conclusion

The defecation phase is the most accurate phase for identifying the existence and severity of pathology, as the pelvic hiatus mediolateral diameter is thought to be an important factor in triggering pelvic dysfunction.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405618666220527104213
2024-01-01
2025-09-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405618666220527104213
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E270522205331.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405618666220527104213&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. LukaczE.S. LawrenceJ.M. ContrerasR. NagerC.W. LuberK.M. Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders.Obstet. Gynecol.200610761253126010.1097/01.AOG.0000218096.54169.34
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BraekkenI.H. MajidaM. Ellström EnghM. HolmeI.M. BøK. Pelvic floor function is independently associated with pelvic organ prolapse.BJOG2009116131706171410.1111/j.1471‑0528.2009.02379.x
     [Google Scholar]
  3. DioknoA.C. BrockB.M. HerzogA.R. BrombergJ. Medical correlates of urinary incontinence in the elderly.Urology199036212913810.1016/0090‑4295(90)80211‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BologN. WeishauptD. Dynamic MR imaging of outlet obstruction.Rom. J. Gastroenterol.2005143293302
     [Google Scholar]
  5. FaltinD.L. BoulvainM. FlorisL.A. IrionO. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent fecal incontinence: A randomized controlled trial.Obstet. Gynecol.2005106161310.1097/01.AOG.0000165273.68486.95
     [Google Scholar]
  6. DobbenA.C. TerraM.P. SlorsJ.F. External anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: Comparison of endoanal MR imaging and endoanal US.Radiology2007242246347110.1148/radiol.2422051575
     [Google Scholar]
  7. WalldenL. Defecation block in cases of deep rectogenital pouch; a surgical roentgenological and embryological study with special reference to morphological conditions.Acta Chir. Scand. Suppl.19521651122
     [Google Scholar]
  8. LalwaniN. MoshiriM. LeeJ.H. BhargavaP. DigheM.K. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction.Radiol. Clin. North Am.20135161127113910.1016/j.rcl.2013.07.004
     [Google Scholar]
  9. SolopovaAE HetzerFH MarincekB WeishauptD 2008
  10. BertschingerK.M. HetzerF.H. RoosJ.E. TreiberK. MarincekB. HilfikerP.R. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit.Radiology2002223250150810.1148/radiol.2232010665
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Martí-RaguéJ. Pelvic floor disease.Cir. Esp.2005775254257
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BermanL. AversaJ. AbirF. LongoW.E. Management of disorders of the posterior pelvic floor.Yale J. Biol. Med.2005784211221
     [Google Scholar]
  13. RentschM. PaetzelC. LenhartM. FeuerbachS. JauchK.W. FürstA. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: A diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology.Dis. Colon Rectum2001447999100710.1007/BF02235489
     [Google Scholar]
  14. BoyadzhyanL. RamanS.S. RazS. Role of static and dynamic MR imaging in surgical pelvic floor dysfunction.Radiographics200828494996710.1148/rg.284075139
     [Google Scholar]
  15. YangA. MostwinJ.L. RosensheinN.B. ZerhouniE.A. Pelvic floor descent in women: Dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display.Radiology19911791253310.1148/radiology.179.1.2006286
     [Google Scholar]
  16. FieldingJ.R. Practical MR imaging of female pelvic floor weakness.Radiographics200222229530410.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr25295
     [Google Scholar]
  17. MaglinteD.D.T. KelvinF.M. FitzgeraldK. HaleD.S. BensonJ.T. Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.1999172243944410.2214/ajr.172.2.9930799
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Yan MeeLaw JuliaR. Fielding MRI of Pelvic Floor DysfunctionReview AJR2008191
     [Google Scholar]
  19. TunnR. DeLanceyJ.O. QuintE.E. Visibility of pelvic organ support system structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.200118461156116310.1067/mob.2001.112972
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bhan SashaN. Mnatzakanian GevorkN. Nisenbaum Rosane, Lee Allan B, Colak Errol. MRI for pelvic floor dysfunction: Can the strain phase be eliminated?Abdom. Radiol. (N.Y.)20164121522010.1007/s00261‑015‑0577‑7
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Milana FlusbergV. Sahni Anik, Erturk Sukru M, Mortele Koenraad J. Dynamic MR defecography: Assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2011196439439910.2214/AJR.10.4445
     [Google Scholar]
  22. VanbeckevoortD. Van HoeL. OyenR. PonetteE. De RidderD. DeprestJ. Pelvic floor descent in females: Comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging19999337337710.1002/(SICI)1522‑2586(199903)9:3<373:AID‑JMRI2>3.0.CO;2‑H
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405618666220527104213
Loading
A New Dıagnostic Tool for the Assessment of Pelvic Dysfunction in MR Defecography
Curr. Med. Imaging 20, e270522205331 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405618666220527104213
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405618666220527104213
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405618666220527104213
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Descensus; MR defecography; MRI; Pelvic dysfunction; Pelvic floor

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test