Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

The diagnosis of sacral neoplasms is often delayed because they tend to remain clinically silent for a long time. Imaging is useful at all stages of the management of sacral bone tumors, i.e., from the detection of the neoplasm to the long-term follow-up. Radiographs are recommended as the modality of choice to begin the imaging workup of a patient with known or suspected sacral pathology. More sensitive examinations, such as Computerized Tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MRI), or scintigraphy, are often necessary. The morphological features of the lesions on CT and MRI help orientate the diagnosis. Although some imaging characteristics are helpful to limit the differential diagnosis, an imaging-guided biopsy is often ultimately required to establish a specific diagnosis. Imaging is of paramount importance even in the long-term follow-up, in order to assess any residual tumor when surgical resection remains incomplete, to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and to detect recurrence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405617666210512011923
2022-02-01
2025-09-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405617666210512011923
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Review Article
Keyword(s): benign; bone tumor; malignant; osteolysis; Sacrum; tumor
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test