Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate liver volumetry is crucial for hepatectomy. In this study, we developed and validated a deep learning system for automated liver volumetry in patients undergoing hepatectomy, both preoperatively and at 7 days and 3 months postoperatively.

Methods

A 3D U-Net model was trained on CT images from three time points using a five-fold cross-validation approach. Model performance was assessed with standard metrics and comparatively evaluated across the time points.

Results

The model achieved a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 94.31% (preoperative: 94.91%; 7-day post-operative: 93.45%; 3-month post-operative: 94.57%) and a mean recall of 96.04%. The volumetric difference between predicted and actual volumes was 1.01 ± 0.06% preoperatively, compared to 1.04 ± 0.03% at other time points (p < 0.05).

Discussion

This study demonstrates a novel capability to automatically track post-hepatectomy regeneration using AI, offering significant potential to enhance surgical planning and patient monitoring. A key limitation, however, was that the direct correlation with clinical outcomes was not assessed due to constraints of the current dataset. Therefore, future studies using larger, multi-center datasets are essential to validate the model's clinical and prognostic utility.

Conclusion

The developed artificial intelligence model successfully and accurately measured liver volumes across three critical post-hepatectomy time points. These findings support the use of this automated technology as a precise and reliable tool to assist in surgical decision-making and postoperative assessment, providing a strong foundation for enhancing patient care.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056394257250818060804
2025-08-29
2025-12-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/21/1/CMIR-21-E15734056394257.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056394257250818060804&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. JarnaginW.R. GonenM. FongY. DeMatteoR.P. Ben-PoratL. LittleS. CorveraC. WeberS. BlumgartL.H. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: Analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade.Ann. Surg.2002236439740710.1097/00000658‑200210000‑0000112368667
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ClavienP.A. PetrowskyH. DeOliveiraM.L. GrafR. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation.N. Engl. J. Med.2007356151545155910.1056/NEJMra06515617429086
    [Google Scholar]
  3. SchindlM.J. RedheadD.N. FearonK.C. GardenO.J. WigmoreS.J. The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection.Gut200554228929610.1136/gut.2004.04652415647196
    [Google Scholar]
  4. RiberoD. AbdallaE.K. MadoffD.C. DonadonM. LoyerE.M. VautheyJ-N. Portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy and its effects on regeneration, resectability and outcome.Br. J. Surg.200794111386139410.1002/bjs.583617583900
    [Google Scholar]
  5. NakayamaY. LiQ. KatsuragawaS. IkedaR. HiaiY. AwaiK. KusunokiS. YamashitaY. OkajimaH. InomataY. DoiK. Automated hepatic volumetry for living related liver transplantation at multisection CT.Radiology2006240374374810.1148/radiol.240305085016857979
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GotraA. SivakumaranL. ChartrandG. Liver segmentation: Indications, techniques and future directions.Insights Imaging20178437739210.1007/s13244‑017‑0558‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SuzukiK. EpsteinM.L. KohlbrennerR. GargS. HoriM. OtoA. BaronR.L. Quantitative radiology: Automaticomated CT liver volumetry compared with interactive volumetry and manual volumetry.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.20111974W706W71210.2214/AJR.10.595821940543
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LiuZ. HanK. WangZ. Automatic liver segmentation from abdominal CT volumes using improved convolution neural networks.ACM202127111112410.1007/s00530‑020‑00709‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  9. AhnY. YoonJ.S. LeeS.S. SukH.I. SonJ.H. SungY.S. LeeY. KangB.K. KimH.S. Deep learning algorithm for automated segmentation and volume measurement of the liver and spleen using portal venous phase computed tomography images.Korean J. Radiol.202021898799710.3348/kjr.2020.023732677383
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FarzanehN. SteinE.B. SoroushmehrR. GryakJ. NajarianK. A deep learning framework for automated detection and quantitative assessment of liver trauma.BMC Med. Imaging20222213910.1186/s12880‑022‑00759‑935260105
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PerezA.A. Noe-KimV. LubnerM.G. GraffyP.M. GarrettJ.W. EltonD.C. SummersR.M. PickhardtP.J. Deep learning CT-based quantitative visualization tool for liver volume estimation: Defining normal and hepatomegaly.Radiology2022302233634210.1148/radiol.202121053134698566
    [Google Scholar]
  12. AraújoJDL da CruzLuana Batista João OtávioBandeira Diniz Liver segmentation from computed tomography images using cascade deep learning.Comput Biol Med.202214010.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105095
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HuynhHT Le-TrongN BaoPT OtoA SuzukiK Fully automated MR liver volumetry using watershed segmentation coupled with active contouring.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg.201712223524310.1007/s11548‑016‑1498‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChristP.F. ElshaerM.E.A. EttlingerF.I. Automatic liver and lesion segmentation in CT using cascaded fully convolutional neural networks and 3D conditional random fields.Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAIAthens, Greece, October 17-21, 201610.1007/978‑3‑319‑46723‑8_48
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChlebusG. SchenkA. MoltzJ.H. van GinnekenB. HahnH.K. MeineH. Automatic liver tumor segmentation in CT with fully convolutional neural networks and object-based postprocessing.Sci. Rep.2018811549710.1038/s41598‑018‑33860‑730341319
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JeongJ.G. ChoiS. KimY.J. LeeW.S. KimK.G. Deep 3D attention CLSTM U-Net based automated liver segmentation and volumetry for the liver transplantation in abdominal CT volumes.Sci. Rep.2022121637010.1038/s41598‑022‑09978‑035430594
    [Google Scholar]
  17. WardhanaG NaghibiH SirmacekB AbayazidM Toward reliable automatic liver and tumor segmentation using convolutional neural network based on 2.5D models.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg202116110.1007/s11548‑020‑02292‑y
    [Google Scholar]
  18. TakamotoT. BanD. NaraS. MizuiT. NagashimaD. EsakiM. ShimadaK. Automated three-dimensional liver reconstruction with artificial intelligence for virtual hepatectomy.J. Gastrointest. Surg.202226102119212710.1007/s11605‑022‑05415‑935941495
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RonnebergerO FischerP BroxT. Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation.arxiv2015
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KingmaDP BaJ Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization.Arxiv2014
    [Google Scholar]
  21. CampanaL. EsserH. HuchM. ForbesS. Liver regeneration and inflammation: From fundamental science to clinical applications.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.202122960862410.1038/s41580‑021‑00373‑734079104
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056394257250818060804
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056394257250818060804
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test