Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the depth of the SF, bone thicknesses in the buccal and lingual areas of the mandibular canal (MC), vertical positions of the SF and MC relative to each other, and the tooth level at which the deepest point of the SF was observed in the cross-sectional section.

Methods

440 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were retrospectively evaluated. The depth of the SF was determined. The buccal bone thickness (BBT) and lingual bone thickness (LBT) of the MC were measured, and the tooth alignment of the deepest point of the SF and the vertical position of the SF and MC relative to each other were determined.

Results

In both jaws, SF depth Type I ratios were lower in males than in females, and SF depth Type III ratios were higher than in females. When the relationship between the vertical position of the MC and the region where the SF was deepest was examined, it was observed that the MC was in an inferior position in most patients.

Discussion

In order to reduce the complication rate in the SF region, the relevant region should be analyzed in detail with CBCT before surgical procedures. The main limitation of our study is that the number of men and women was not equal.

Conclusion

SF depth and BBT values in the right and left jaws were higher in males than in females. LBT was higher in females in the right jaw. As the depth of the SF increased, BBT and LBT values decreased.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056386043250730170653
2025-08-21
2025-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/21/1/CMIR-21-E15734056386043.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056386043250730170653&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. İçözD. AkgünlüF. Evaluation of the relationship between submandibular fossa depth and bone thickness: A cone-beam computed tomography study.Turkiye Klinik. J. Dent. Sci.202127221722310.5336/dentalsci.2020‑76856
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SumerA.P. ZenginA.Z. UzunC. KarozT.B. SumerM. DanaciM. Evaluation of submandibular fossa using computed tomography and panoramic radiography.Oral Radiol.2015311232710.1007/s11282‑014‑0175‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WhiteS.C. PharoahM.J. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation.Amsterdam, NetherlandsElsevier Health Sciences2014
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BorahanAPMO PekinerFN Assessment of submandibular fossa depth using cone beam computed tomography.Yeditepe Dent. J.2018142515610.5505/yeditepe.2018.80664
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KamburoğluK. AcarB. YükselS. PaksoyC.S. CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients.Surg. Radiol. Anat.201537101209121510.1007/s00276‑015‑1493‑925994600
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ParniaF. FardE.M. MahboubF. HafezeqoranA. GavganiF.E. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.20101091e32e3610.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.03520123366
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HarorlıA. AkgülH.M. YılmazA.B. BilgeO.M. DağistanS. ÇakurB. Oral, dental and maxillofacial radiology.IstanbulNobel Medical Bookstores2014176
    [Google Scholar]
  8. NickenigH.J. WichmannM. EitnerS. ZöllerJ.E. KreppelM. Lingual concavities in the mandible: A morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.201543225425910.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.01825547216
    [Google Scholar]
  9. de SouzaL.A. Souza Picorelli AssisN.M. RibeiroR.A. Pires CarvalhoA.C. DevitoK.L. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.Ann. Anat.2016205535910.1016/j.aanat.2016.01.00626851559
    [Google Scholar]
  10. de Oliveira-SantosC. SouzaP.H.C. de Azambuja Berti-CoutoS. StinkensL. MoyaertK. Rubira-BullenI.R.F. JacobsR. Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography.Clin. Oral Investig.201216238739310.1007/s00784‑011‑0544‑921448636
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KomalA. BediR.S. WadhwaniP. AuroraJ.K. ChauhanH. Study of normal anatomy of mandibular canal and its variations in Indian population using CBCT.J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.20201919810510.1007/s12663‑019‑01224‑x31988571
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HaghanifarS. ArbabzadeganN. MoudiE. BijaniA. NozariF. Evaluation of lingual mandibular depression of the submandibular salivary glands using cone-beam computed tomography.Res Med Dent Sci.20186563567
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RamaswamyP. SaikiranC. RajuB.M. SwathiM. TejaD.D. Evaluation of the depth of submandibular gland fossa and its correlation with mandibular canal in vertical and horizontal locations using CBCT.JIAOMR20203212226
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WooB.M. Al-BustaniS. UeeckB.A. Floor of mouth haemorrhage and life-threatening airway obstruction during immediate implant placement in the anterior mandible.Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2006351096196410.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.02016829038
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Akol GorgunE. ÇağlayanF. Evaluation of submandibular gland and submandibular fossa: A combined cone beam computed tomography and ultrasound study.Eur. Oral Res.202357312813237929223
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DevlinH. YuanJ. Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: A theoretical analysis.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.2013421299516832995168310.1259/dmfr/2995168322933529
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SanderinkG.C. VisserW.N. KramersE.W. The origin of a case of severe image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.199120316917110.1259/dmfr.20.3.18080031808003
    [Google Scholar]
  18. NilsunB. CananB. EvrenH. KaanO. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the submandibular fossa in a group of dental implant patients.Implant Dent.201928432933910.1097/ID.000000000000089231344015
    [Google Scholar]
  19. CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.New YorkDepartment of Psychology1988
    [Google Scholar]
  20. BayrakS. Demirturk-KocasaracH. YaprakE. UstaogluG. NoujeimM. Correlation between the visibility of submandibular fossa and mandibular canal cortication on panoramic radiographs and submandibular fossa depth on CBCT.Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal2018231e105e11129274160
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ChanH.L. BrooksS.L. FuJ.H. YehC.Y. RudekI. WangH.L. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography.Clin. Oral Implants Res.201122220120610.1111/j.1600‑0501.2010.02018.x21044167
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ScarfeW.C. FarmanA.G. SukovicP. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.J. Can. Dent. Assoc.2006721758016480609
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WatanabeH. Mohammad AbdulM. KurabayashiT. AokiH. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation.Surg. Radiol. Anat.201032434334910.1007/s00276‑009‑0570‑319812884
    [Google Scholar]
  24. YoonT.Y.H. PatelM. MichaudR.A. ManiboA.M. Cone beam computerized tomography analysis of the posterior and anterior mandibular lingual concavity for dental implant patients.J. Oral Implantol.2017431121810.1563/aaid‑joi‑D‑16‑0008427759505
    [Google Scholar]
  25. YildizS. BayarG.R. GuvencI. KocabiyikN. CömertA. YazarF. Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.Surg. Radiol. Anat.201537216717310.1007/s00276‑014‑1351‑125078676
    [Google Scholar]
  26. FarahaniFM GhaffariR FarhadS Evaluation of the height, depth and angle of submandibular gland fossa and correlation of depth with mandibular canal position using cone beam computed tomography.Cont. Ora. Sci.202313263210.30486/cofs.2023.1996286.1019
    [Google Scholar]
  27. PanjnoushM. EilN. KheirandishY. MofidiN. ShamshiriA.R. Evaluation of the concavity depth and inclination in jaws using CBCT.CJDR2016521723
    [Google Scholar]
  28. BayrakdarS.K. BilgirE. Evaluation of mandibular molar tooth region morphology with cone-beam computed tomography to guide dental implant planning: A retrospective radioanatomical study.Curr Res Dent Sci.2022321510
    [Google Scholar]
  29. KawashimaY. SakaiO. ShoshoD. KanedaT. GohelA. Proximity of the mandibular canal to teeth and cortical bone.J. Endod.201642222122410.1016/j.joen.2015.11.00926725176
    [Google Scholar]
  30. de Oliveira JúniorM.R. SaudA.L.S. FonsecaD.R. De-Ary-PiresB. Pires-NetoM.A. de Ary-PiresR. Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: A CT investigation.Surg. Radiol. Anat.201133434535210.1007/s00276‑010‑0708‑320677005
    [Google Scholar]
  31. KatranjiA. MischK. WangH.L. Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers.J. Periodontol.200778587487810.1902/jop.2007.06034217470021
    [Google Scholar]
  32. FeliceP. CannizzaroG. ChecchiV. MarchettiC. PellegrinoG. CensiP. EspositoM. Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 months after loading.Eur. J. Oral Implantology20092172020467615
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056386043250730170653
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056386043250730170653
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test