Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

VETC-positive has emerged as a novel predictor of HCC for poor prognosis. Enhanced CT is one of the most common diagnostic methods, which can indicate VETC positivity, providing important evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of VETC-positive HCC.

Objective

The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical and preoperative enhanced CT imaging characteristics and diagnostic value of VETC-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical, pathological, and imaging data of 53 HCC patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University between June 2019 and September 2022. According to pathological results, patients were categorized into 11 VETC-positive and 42 VETC-negative cases. Observational parameters included: (1) Clinical indicators: gender, age, history of hepatitis B virus infection, preoperative AFP, TNM staging, and preoperative biochemical and coagulation laboratory tests, including Alb, AST, ALT, TBil, DB, PT, TT, and INR. Additionally, pathological results such as histological grading, microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite nodules, neural invasion, and postoperative recurrence were analyzed. (2) Preoperative enhanced CT observational indicators: maximum tumor diameter, intrahepatic growth, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing/clear capsule, intratumoral arteries, intratumoral necrosis, along with measurement of unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, calculating enhancement ratios (enhancement ratio = enhanced CT value - unenhanced CT value / unenhanced CT value).

Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x̅±s), with intergroup comparisons conducted using the test; categorical variables were compared using the test or exact test. Multivariate analysis employed stepwise regression for logistic regression, incorporating clinical and imaging characteristics into the logistic regression equation. Based on logistic regression results, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analysis on survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests, aiming survival curves.

Results

(1) Clinical characteristics of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Preoperative AFP levels showed statistical significance (P=0.037), while no significant differences were observed in gender, age, Alb, TB, DB, AST, ALT, PT, TT, and INR between VETC-positive and VETC-negative patients (P>0.05). (2) Enhanced CT imaging features of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Intratumoral necrosis showed statistical significance (P<0.05), with intratumoral arteries being 63.6% (7/11) in the positive group compared to 42.9% (18/42) in the negative group. No significant differences were found in maximum tumor diameter, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing capsule, intratumoral arteries, as well as unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, arterial phase enhancement ratio, portal phase enhancement ratio, and delayed phase enhancement ratio (P>0.05). (3) Multivariate analysis influencing VETC positivity: Arterial phase CT values (HU) (OR=0.937, P=0.029), intratumoral arteries (OR=9.452, P=0.021), and intratumoral necrosis (OR=0.013, P=0.003) were identified as independent risk factors for VETC positivity (Odds Ratio=0.937, 9.452, 0.013, 95% CI=0.883-0.993, 1.4-63.823, 0.001-0.223, P<0.05). The AUC of VETC was 0.863 (95% CI: 0.728-0.997), with a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 88.1%. (4) Postoperative early tumor recurrence in VETC-positive and VETC-negative patients: All 53 patients were followed up, with an average tumor recurrence time of 11 (4-20) months, showing significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion

As one of the routine and preferred methods for HCC examination, enhanced CT plays a pivotal role in diagnosis, staging, and post-treatment evaluation. Combining preoperative enhanced arterial phase CT values, intratumoral arteries, and intratumoral necrosis can highly indicate VETC positivity.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056361565250530050624
2025-06-10
2025-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/21/1/CMIR-21-E15734056361565.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056361565250530050624&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. China NHCotPsRoStandardization for diagnosis and treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma(2022 edition).Chin Arch Gen Surg2022162819610.3877/cma.j.issn.1674‑0793.2022.02.001
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ZhengR.S. ChenR. HanB.F. WangS.M. LiL. SunK.X. ZengH.M. WeiW.W. HeJ. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022.Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi202446322123110.3760/cma.j.cn112152‑20240119‑0003538468501
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FangJ.H. ZhouH.C. ZhangC. ShangL.R. ZhangL. XuJ. ZhengL. YuanY. GuoR.P. JiaW.H. YunJ.P. ChenM.S. ZhangY. ZhuangS.M. A novel vascular pattern promotes metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-independent manner.Hepatology201562245246510.1002/hep.2776025711742
    [Google Scholar]
  4. RenneS.L. WooH.Y. AllegraS. RudiniN. YanoH. DonadonM. ViganòL. AkibaJ. LeeH.S. RheeH. ParkY.N. RoncalliM. Di TommasoL. Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) is a powerful predictor of aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology202071118319510.1002/hep.3081431206715
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FanY. YuY. HuM. WangX. DuM. GuoL. HuC. Imaging features based on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for predicting vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Br. J. Radiol.20219411192020095010.1259/bjr.2020095033417489
    [Google Scholar]
  6. QuQ. LiuZ. LuM. XuL. ZhangJ. LiuM. JiangJ. GuC. MaQ. HuangA. Preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI features for evaluation of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters and microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: Creating nomograms for risk assessment.J Magn Reson Imaging20246031094111010.1002/jmri.2918738116997
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YuY. FanY. WangX. ZhuM. HuM. ShiC. HuC. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI radiomics to predict vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) and patient prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Eur. Radiol.202232295997010.1007/s00330‑021‑08250‑934480625
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FengZ. LiH. ZhaoH. JiangY. LiuQ. ChenQ. WangW. RongP. Preoperative CT for characterization of aggressive macrotrabecular-massive subtype and vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma.Radiology2021300121922910.1148/radiol.202120361433973839
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ChenZ.Y. GuoZ.X. LuL.H. MeiJ. LinW.P. LiS.H. WeiW. GuoR.P. The predictive value of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters in treatment optimization for recurrent early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer Med.202110165466547410.1002/cam4.410234212527
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FangJ.H. XuL. ShangL.R. PanC.Z. DingJ. TangY.Q. LiuH. LiuC.X. ZhengJ.L. ZhangY.J. ZhouZ.G. XuJ. ZhengL. ChenM.S. ZhuangS.M. Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC) pattern is a predictor of sorafenib benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology201970382483910.1002/hep.3036630506570
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LuL. WeiW. HuangC. LiS. ZhongC. WangJ. YuW. ZhangY. ChenM. LingY. GuoR. A new horizon in risk stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma by integrating vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters and microvascular invasion.Hepatol. Int.202115365166210.1007/s12072‑021‑10183‑w33835379
    [Google Scholar]
  12. YamashitaY. BabaH. Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters in hepatocellular carcinoma: A unique and valuable pathological imaging.Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr.20209448448710.21037/hbsn.2019.11.1632832498
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FangmingC. XiuminQ. LinjieB. DanpingW. YongY. HaoW. JitaoW. YongpingZ. Risk factor analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma with vessels encapsulating tumor clusters and the application value of its risk scoring model.Zhonghua Xiaohua Waike Zazhi202322115015910.3760/cma.j.cn115610‑20221222‑00757
    [Google Scholar]
  14. YangJ. DongX. WangF. JinS. ZhangB. ZhangH. PanW. GanM. DuanS. ZhangL. HuH. JiW. A deep learning model based on MRI for prediction of vessels encapsulating tumour clusters and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdom. Radiol.20244941074108310.1007/s00261‑023‑04141‑338175256
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HuangC.W. LinS.E. HuangS.F. YuM.C. TangJ.H. TsaiC.N. HsuH.Y. The vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC) pattern is a poor prognosis factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of microvessel density.Cancers20221421542810.3390/cancers1421542836358846
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MorseM.A. SunW. KimR. HeA.R. AbadaP.B. MynderseM. FinnR.S. The role of angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Clin. Cancer Res.201925391292010.1158/1078‑0432.CCR‑18‑125430274981
    [Google Scholar]
  17. YangJ. DongX. WangG. ChenJ. ZhangB. PanW. ZhangH. JinS. JiW. Preoperative MRI features for characterization of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters and microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdom. Radiol.202248255456610.1007/s00261‑022‑03740‑w36385192
    [Google Scholar]
  18. YaoW. YangS. GeY. FanW. XiangL. WanY. GuK. ZhaoY. ZhaR. BuJ. Computed tomography radiomics-based prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.Front. Med.2022981967010.3389/fmed.2022.81967035402463
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056361565250530050624
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056361565250530050624
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test