Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

This study aimed to compare and analyze the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for coronary artery fistula (CAF) and evaluate the effectiveness of these two imaging modalities.

We retrospectively collected and analyzed imaging data from 200 patients diagnosed with CAF through surgery or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). These patients underwent CCTA and TTE examinations in our hospital. Finally, the course, origin, number, size, and location of the CAF in all patients were assessed. The diagnostic results of CCTA were compared with those of TTE, using DSA and/or surgical diagnosis as the reference standard.

Among the 200 patients with CAF, CCTA correctly diagnosed 156 cases, but missed 44 cases, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 78.0% (156/200). In contrast, TTE accurately diagnosed 55 cases, but missed 145 cases, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 27.5% (55/200). The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA was significantly higher than that of TTE in detecting CAF ( < 0.001).

CCTA demonstrated significantly greater diagnostic value than TTE, demonstrating to be the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing CAF.

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publishers. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056333289250311184106
2025-04-17
2025-10-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/21/1/CMIR-21-E15734056333289.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056333289250311184106&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CaiR. MaX. ZhaoX. XuJ. ZhuL. KuL. CTA analysis of 482 cases of coronary artery fistula: A large‐scale imaging study.J. Card. Surg.20223772172218110.1111/jocs.1650035508600
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PodolecJ. WiewiórkaŁ. SiudakZ. MalinowskiK. BartuśK. DudekD. ŻmudkaK. LegutkoJ. Presence and characteristics of coronary artery fistulas among patients undergoing coronary angiography.Kardiol. Pol.201977111034103910.33963/KP.1496331486416
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BalestriniC.S. SaaibiJ.F. OrtizS.N. Aorto‐right atrial fistula secondary to rupture of an occluded old saphenous venous graft to right coronary artery.Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.201484351351810.1002/ccd.2485923404794
    [Google Scholar]
  4. VaidyaY.P. GreenG.R. Coronary artery fistula.J. Card. Surg.201934121608161610.1111/jocs.1426731557360
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AcharyaD. LitovskyS. PapapietroS.E. PamboukianS.V. TallajJ.A. Coronary artery fistula after cardiac transplantation.Circulation2012126172144214510.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.11551923091087
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BagaiA. LuJ. Al-AmroB. Rezende-NetoJ. PrabhudesaiV. AckeryA.D. YanagawaB. Management of right coronary artery fistula caused by nail gun trauma.J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.20161526e139e14110.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.08627720262
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AnastacioM.M. LeeA.M. LawtonJ.S. Congenital fistula from the left main coronary artery to the left atrium presenting with an acute myocardial infarction.J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.20121446e147e14810.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.01523040318
    [Google Scholar]
  8. QinZ. GongB. LuoL. GeL. One-stop procedure of “atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation + left atrial appendage closure + coronary artery fistula embolization”: A case report.Perfusion20233871526152910.1177/0267659122111364635787024
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McLarryJ. FerencikM. ShapiroM.D. Coronary Artery Anomalies: A Pictorial Review.Curr. Cardiovasc. Imaging Rep.2015872310.1007/s12410‑015‑9339‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LimJJ JungJI LeeBY Prevalence and types of coronary artery fistulas detected with coronary CT angiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol.20142033W237W243
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ZhangY. ZhangX. JiangY. YangP. HuX. PengB. YueX. LiY. MaP. YuanY. YuY. LiuB. LiX. 3D whole-heart noncontrast coronary MR angiography based on compressed SENSE technology: A comparative study of conventional SENSE sequence and coronary computed tomography angiography.Insights Imaging20231413510.1186/s13244‑023‑01378‑w36790611
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ChenY. GuoH. DongP. LiY. ZhangZ. MaoN. ChuT. SunZ. WangF. FengZ. WangH. MaH. Feasibility of 3.0 T balanced fast field echo non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography.Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther.2023131516010.21037/cdt‑22‑48736864952
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ScottA.D. KeeganJ. FirminD.N. Motion in cardiovascular MR imaging.Radiology2009250233135110.1148/radiol.250207199819188310
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LeeS.E. SungJ.M. RizviA. LinF.Y. KumarA. HadamitzkyM. KimY.J. ConteE. AndreiniD. PontoneG. BudoffM.J. GottliebI. LeeB.K. ChunE.J. CademartiriF. MaffeiE. MarquesH. LeipsicJ.A. ShinS. Hyun ChoiJ. ChinnaiyanK. RaffG. VirmaniR. SamadyH. StoneP.H. BermanD.S. NarulaJ. ShawL.J. BaxJ.J. MinJ.K. ChangH.J. Quantification of Coronary Atherosclerosis in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease.Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging2018117e00756210.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.00756230012825
    [Google Scholar]
  15. OuchiK. SakumaT. OjiriH. Coronary artery fistula in adults: Incidence and appearance on cardiac computed tomography and comparison of detectability and hemodynamic effects with those on transthoracic echocardiography.J. Cardiol.202076659360010.1016/j.jjcc.2020.06.00532636129
    [Google Scholar]
  16. XieM. LiL. ChengT.O. SunZ. WangX. LvQ. PengH. YuanL. WangJ. ZhangL. Coronary artery fistula: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy by echocardiography versus coronary arteriography and surgery in 63 patients studied between 2002 and 2012 in a single medical center in China.Int. J. Cardiol.2014176247047710.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.19825115264
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shrestha AratiS. JinJ.Y. Coronary Artery Fistula and Its Imaging Modalities—A Review Article.Open J. Radiol.20177212112910.4236/ojrad.2017.72014
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GowdaR.M. VasavadaB.C. KhanI.A. Coronary artery fistulas: Clinical and therapeutic considerations.Int. J. Cardiol.2006107171010.1016/j.ijcard.2005.01.06716125261
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AtikS.U. SaltikI.L. Incidentally detected small fistula flows in pulmonary artery by colour Doppler: Echocardiographic findings and follow-up results.Cardiol. Young201929121435143910.1017/S104795111900205131662133
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SharmaA. PandeyN.N. KumarS. Imaging of coronary artery fistulas by multidetector CT angiography using third generation dual source CT scanner.Clin. Imaging201953899610.1016/j.clinimag.2018.09.01930317136
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ByunS.S. ParkJ.H. KimJ.H. SungY.M. KimY.K. KimE.Y. ParkE.A. Coronary CT findings of coronary to bronchial arterial communication in chronic pulmonary disease.Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging201531S1Suppl. 1697510.1007/s10554‑015‑0647‑525802014
    [Google Scholar]
  22. D’AngeloT. LengaL. ArendtC.T. BucherA.M. PeterkeJ.L. CarusoD. MazziottiS. AscentiG. BlandinoA. OthmanA.E. MartinS.S. AlbrechtM.H. BodelleB. VoglT.J. WichmannJ.L. Carotid and cerebrovascular dual-energy computed tomography angiography: Optimization of window settings for virtual monoenergetic imaging reconstruction.Eur. J. Radiol.202013010916610.1016/j.ejrad.2020.10916632693314
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Czekajska-ChehabE. SkoczyńskiM. PrzybylskiP. StaśkiewiczG. TomaszewskiA. SiekE. KurzepaJ. SkoczyńskiM. DropA. Coronary artery fistulas morphology in coronary computed tomography angiography.Folia Morphol. (Warsz)202079477778510.5603/FM.a2019.013231802472
    [Google Scholar]
  24. D’AngeloT. CiceroG. MazziottiS. AscentiG. AlbrechtM.H. MartinS.S. OthmanA.E. VoglT.J. WichmannJ.L. Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: Technique and clinical applications.Br. J. Radiol.20199210982018054610.1259/bjr.2018054630919651
    [Google Scholar]
  25. JamaA. BarsoumM. BjarnasonH. HolmesD.R.Jr RihalC.S. Percutaneous closure of congenital coronary artery fistulae: Results and angiographic follow-up.JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.20114781482110.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.01421777892
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056333289250311184106
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056333289250311184106
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test