Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background:

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery is an effective treatment for lymphedema. Accurate evaluation and localization of the superficial lymphatic vessels before the operation is crucial for the success of the operation. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a new ultrasound technology, and its clinical application value in LVA surgery has not been established.

Objective:

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of CEUS in LVA surgery and provide a novel approach for the clinical assessment and localization of superficial lymphatic vessels.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of imaging and surgical data was performed on 20 LVA patients. Among them, 10 cases underwent evaluation and localization using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphatic imaging (Group A), while 10 cases were evaluated and localized using CEUS (Group B). The differences in surgical data between the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results:

All 20 patients were female (mean age, 57.7 years ± 6.3 [SD]). CEUS demonstrated superior visualization and localization of superficial lymphatic vessels. The average diameter of lymphatic vessels identified in the CEUS group was significantly greater than that in the ICG group (0.78±0.06 vs. 0.52±0.05mm; P<0.001). The duration of operation in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A (4.47±0.37 vs. 6.70±0.45mm; P<0.001). The number of anastomosed lymphatic vessels in group B was less than that in group A [5.0(4.0, 6.0) vs. 9.5 (9.0, 11.3); P<0.001].

Conclusion:

CEUS can serve as a viable alternative to ICG lymphatic imaging, facilitating improved lymphatic venous anastomosis surgery.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273626231120112216
2023-11-29
2025-09-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/e15734056273626.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273626231120112216&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. GradaA.A. PhillipsT.J. Lymphedema: Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations.J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.20177761009102010.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.022
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CampisiC. DaviniD. BelliniC. Lymphatic microsurgery for the treatment of lymphedema.Microsurgery2006261656910.1002/micr.20214
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WarrenA.G. BrorsonH. BorudL.J. Lymphedema: a comprehensive review.Ann. Plast. Surg.200759446447210.1097/01.sap.0000257149.42922.7e
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KoshimaI. InagawaK. UrushibaraK. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities.J. Reconstr. Microsurg.200016643744210.1055/s‑2006‑947150
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SchaverienM.V. CoroneosC.J. Surgical Treatment of Lymphedema.Plast. Reconstr. Surg.2019144373875810.1097/PRS.0000000000005993
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChangE.I. SkorackiR.J. ChangD.W. Lymphovenous Anastomosis Bypass Surgery.Semin. Plast. Surg.2018321222710.1055/s‑0038‑1636510
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YamamotoT. KoshimaI. A prospective analysis of 100 consecutive lymphovenous bypass cases for treatment of extremity lymphedema.Plast. Reconstr. Surg.20141336887e888e10.1097/prs.0000000000000189
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HamadaE. OnodaS. SatakeT. Efficacy of Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema: Treatment Strategies with Effects of Compression Therapy Discontinuation and Site-Specific Evaluation of the Upper Extremity.Lymphat. Res. Biol.202310.1089/lrb.2022.0096
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PolomskaA.K. ProulxS.T. Imaging technology of the lymphatic system.Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.202117029431110.1016/j.addr.2020.08.013
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ViscontiG. HayashiA. TartaglioneG. Preoperative planning of lymphaticovenular anastomosis in patients with iodine allergy: A multicentric experience.J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg.202073478380810.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.020
    [Google Scholar]
  11. YamamotoT. KoshimaI. YoshimatsuH. Simultaneous multi-site lymphaticovenular anastomoses for primary lower extremity and genital lymphoedema complicated with severe lymphorrhea.J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg.201164681281510.1016/j.bjps.2010.10.011
    [Google Scholar]
  12. RoganS. TaeymansJ. LuginbuehlH. Therapy modalities to reduce lymphoedema in female breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.2016159111410.1007/s10549‑016‑3919‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  13. WanR. HussainA. KuruogluD. Prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for preventing lymphedema after sarcoma resection in the lower limb: A report of three cases and literature review.Microsurgery202343327328010.1002/micr.30975
    [Google Scholar]
  14. NarushimaM. YamamotoT. OgataF. Indocyanine Green Lymphography Findings in Limb Lymphedema.J. Reconstr. Microsurg.2016321727910.1055/s‑0035‑1564608
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HayashiA. YamamotoT. YoshimatsuH. Ultrasound visualization of the lymphatic vessels in the lower leg.Microsurgery201636539740110.1002/micr.22414
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MachadoP. StanczakM. LiuJ. B. Subdermal Ultrasound Contrast Agent Injection for Sentinel Lymph Node Identification: An Analysis of Safety and Contrast Agent Dose in Healthy Volunteers.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.201837716111620
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LiJ. LuM. ChengX. How Pre-operative Sentinel Lymph Node Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Helps Intra-operative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Initial Experience.Ultrasound Med. Biol.20194581865187310.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.04.006
    [Google Scholar]
  18. XieF. ZhangD. ChengL. Intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a feasible approach for sentinel lymph node identification in early-stage breast cancer.World J. Surg. Oncol.20151331910.1186/s12957‑015‑0736‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Czedik-EysenbergM. SteinbacherJ. ObermayerB. Exclusive use of ultrasound for locating optimal LVA sites-A descriptive data analysis.J. Surg. Oncol.20201211515610.1002/jso.25728
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TownsendK.L. MilovancevM. BrachaS. Feasibility of near-infrared fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node evaluation of the oral cavity in healthy dogs.Am. J. Vet. Res.2018799995100010.2460/ajvr.79.9.995
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JangS. LeeC.U. HesleyG.K. Lymphatic Mapping Using US Microbubbles before Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis Surgery for Lymphedema.Radiology2022304121822410.1148/radiol.212351
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HayashiA. HayashiN. YoshimatsuH. Effective and efficient lymphaticovenular anastomosis using preoperative ultrasound detection technique of lymphatic vessels in lower extremity lymphedema.J. Surg. Oncol.2018117229029810.1002/jso.24812
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HaraH. MiharaM. Ultrasound-guided lymphaticovenous anastomosis without indocyanine green lymphography mapping: A preliminary report.Microsurgery202343323824410.1002/micr.30959
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SunnetciK.M. AlkanA. Biphasic majority voting-based comparative COVID-19 diagnosis using chest X-ray images.Expert Syst. Appl.202321611943010.1016/j.eswa.2022.119430
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273626231120112216
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273626231120112216
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test