Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
file format pdf download PDF
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Backgroud

Stroke is reportedly the biggest cause of death and disability in the world, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). The severity of a stroke can be lowered by recognising the many stroke warning indicators early on. Using CNN, the primary goal of this study is to predict the likelihood that a brain stroke would develop at an early stage.

Objective

The novelty of the proposed work is to acquire models that can accurately differentiate between stroke and no-stroke (normal) cases using MR Imaging sequences like DWI, SWI, GRE and T2 FLAIR aiding in timely diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Methods

A dataset comprising real time MRI scans of patients with stroke and no-stroke conditions was collected and preprocessed for model training. The preprocessing involves standardizing the resolution of the images, normalizing pixel values, and augmenting the dataset to enhance model generalization. The ResNet, DenseNet, EfficientNet, and VGG16 architectures were implemented and trained on the preprocessed dataset. The training process involved optimizing model parameters using stochastic gradient descent and minimizing the loss function.

Results

The results demonstrate promising performance across all models by obtaining an accuracy of 98% for ResNet, DenseNet and EfficientNet, while 97% for VGG16 in differentiating the stroke using real time MRI data.

Conclusion

The proposed work explored the effectiveness of CNN models, including ResNet, DenseNet, EfficientNet, and VGG16, for the differentiation of stroke and no-stroke cases. The models were trained and evaluated using a real-time dataset of brain MR Images. The obtained accuracies highlight the potential of CNN models in accurately differentiating between stroke and non-stroke cases.

© 2024 Kaliannan and Rengaraj
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273238231203105157
2024-01-01
2025-09-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273238231203105157
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E15734056273238.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273238231203105157&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Rajendra AcharyaU. MeiburgerK.M. FaustO. En Wei KohJ. Lih OhS. CiaccioE.J. SubudhiA. JahmunahV. SabutS. Automatic detection of ischemic stroke using higher order spectra features in brain MRI images.Cogn. Syst. Res.20195813414210.1016/j.cogsys.2019.05.005
     [Google Scholar]
  2. ColiV.L. TournierP.H. DoleanV. KanfoudI.E. PichotC. MigliaccioC. Blanc-FéraudL. Detection of simulated brain strokes using microwave tomography.IEEE J. Electromagn. RF Microw. Med. Biol.20193425426010.1109/JERM.2019.2921076
     [Google Scholar]
  3. KarthikR. MenakaR. A multi-scale approach for detection of ischemic stroke from brain MR images using discrete curvelet transformation.Measurement201710022323210.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.001
     [Google Scholar]
  4. KodamaT. KamataK. FujiwaraK. KanoM. YamakawaT. YukiI. MurayamaY. Ischemic stroke detection by analyzing heart rate variability in rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model.IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.20182661152116010.1109/TNSRE.2018.283455429877839
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhangT. ZhangW. LiuX. DaiM. XuanQ. DongX. LiuR. XuC. Multifrequency magnetic induction tomography for hemorrhagic stroke detection using an adaptive threshold split bregman algorithm.IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.20227111310.1109/TIM.2022.3180406
     [Google Scholar]
  6. MakJ. KocanaogullariD. HuangX. KerseyJ. ShihM. GrattanE.S. SkidmoreE.R. WittenbergG.F. OstadabbasS. AkcakayaM. Detection of Stroke-Induced Visual Neglect and Target Response Prediction Using Augmented Reality and Electroencephalography.IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.2022301840185010.1109/TNSRE.2022.318818435786558
     [Google Scholar]
  7. QiuW. KuangH. TelegE. OspelJ.M. SohnS.I. AlmekhlafiM. GoyalM. HillM.D. DemchukA.M. MenonB.K. Machine learning for detecting early infarction in acute stroke with non–contrast-enhanced CT.Radiology2020294363864410.1148/radiol.202019119331990267
     [Google Scholar]
  8. AlanaziE.M. AbdouA. LuoJ. Predicting risk of stroke from lab tests using machine learning algorithms: Development and evaluation of prediction models.JMIR Form. Res.2021512e2344010.2196/2344034860663
     [Google Scholar]
  9. SubbannaN.K. RajashekarD. ChengB. ThomallaG. FiehlerJ. ArbelT. ForkertN.D. Stroke lesion segmentation in FLAIR MRI datasets using customized Markov random fields.Front. Neurol.20191054110.3389/fneur.2019.0054131178820
     [Google Scholar]
  10. BandiV. BhattacharyyaD. MidhunchakkravarthyD. Prediction of Brain Stroke Severity Using Machine Learning.Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle202034675376110.18280/ria.340609
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GuoL. Khosravi-FarsaniM. StancombeA. BialkowskiK. AbboshA. Adaptive clustering distorted born iterative method for microwave brain tomography with stroke detection and classification.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.20226941512152310.1109/TBME.2021.312211334694991
     [Google Scholar]
  12. SubudhiA. JenaS.S. SabutS. Automated detection of brain stroke in MRI with hybrid fuzzy C-means clustering and random forest classifier.Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl.2019183195001810.1142/S1469026819500184
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ZhangY. WuJ. LiuY. ChenY. WuE.X. TangX. MI-UNet: multi-inputs UNet incorporating brain parcellation for stroke lesion segmentation from T1-weighted magnetic resonance images.IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.202125252653510.1109/JBHI.2020.299678332750908
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LiL. WeiM. LiuB. AtchaneeyasakulK. ZhouF. PanZ. KumarS.A. ZhangJ.Y. PuY. LiebeskindD.S. ScalzoF. Deep learning for hemorrhagic lesion detection and segmentation on brain CT images.IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.20212551646165910.1109/JBHI.2020.302824333001810
     [Google Scholar]
  15. YuJ. ParkS. KwonS.H. ChoK.H. LeeH. AI-based stroke disease prediction system using ECG and PPG bio-signals.IEEE Access202210436234363810.1109/ACCESS.2022.3169284
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dourado JrC.M. da SilvaS.P. da NobregaR.V. BarrosA.C. Reboucas FilhoP.P. de AlbuquerqueV.H. Deep learning IoT system for online stroke detection in skull computed tomography images.Comput. Netw.2019152253910.1016/j.comnet.2019.01.019
     [Google Scholar]
  17. TursynovaA OmarovB TukenovaN SalgozhaI KhaavalO RamazanovR OspanovB. Deep learning-enabled brain stroke classification on computed tomography images.Computers, Materials & Continua2023751
     [Google Scholar]
  18. SubudhiA. AcharyaU.R. DashM. JenaS. SabutS. Automated approach for detection of ischemic stroke using Delaunay Triangulation in brain MRI images.Comput. Biol. Med.201810311612910.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.01630359807
     [Google Scholar]
  19. HuN. ZhangT. WuY. TangB. LiM. SongB. GongQ. WuM. GuS. LuiS. Detecting brain lesions in suspected acute ischemic stroke with CT-based synthetic MRI using generative adversarial networks.Ann. Transl. Med.20221023510.21037/atm‑21‑405635282087
     [Google Scholar]
  20. KuangH. MenonB.K. QiuW. Segmenting hemorrhagic and ischemic infarct simultaneously from follow-up non-contrast CT images in patients with acute ischemic stroke.IEEE Access20197398423985110.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906605
     [Google Scholar]
  21. YuY. GuoD. LouM. LiebeskindD. ScalzoF. Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation severity in acute stroke from source perfusion MRI.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.20186592058206510.1109/TBME.2017.278324129989941
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodriguez-DuarteD.O. OrigliaC. VasquezJ.A.T. ScapaticciR. CroccoL. VipianaF. Experimental assessment of real-time brain stroke monitoring via a microwave imaging scanner.IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag.2022382483510.1109/OJAP.2022.3192884
     [Google Scholar]
  23. SubudhiA. DashM. SabutS. Automated segmentation and classification of brain stroke using expectation-maximization and random forest classifier.Biocybern. Biomed. Eng.202040127728910.1016/j.bbe.2019.04.004
     [Google Scholar]
  24. KayaB. ÖnalM. A CNN transfer learning‐based approach for segmentation and classification of brain stroke from noncontrast CT images.Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol.20233341335135210.1002/ima.22864
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KaliannanS. RengarajA. DanielA.P. A Novel Fusion Approach to Detect Brain Tumor Using Machine Learning for MRI Images.TS Traitement Signal20223941363137010.18280/ts.390430
     [Google Scholar]
  26. AbdalkaderM. SieglerJ.E. LeeJ.S. YaghiS. QiuZ. HuoX. MiaoZ. CampbellB.C.V. NguyenT.N. Neuroimaging of acute ischemic stroke: multimodal imaging approach for acute endovascular therapy.J. Stroke2023251557110.5853/jos.2022.0328636746380
     [Google Scholar]
  27. AlquhayzH. TufailH.Z. RazaB. The multi-level classification network (MCN) with modified residual U-Net for ischemic stroke lesions segmentation from ATLAS.Comput. Biol. Med.2022151Pt A10633210.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.10633236413815
     [Google Scholar]
  28. ChenS. DuanJ. WangH. WangR. LiJ. QiM. DuanY. QiS. Automatic detection of stroke lesion from diffusion-weighted imaging via the improved YOLOv5.Comput. Biol. Med.202215010612010.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.10612036179511
     [Google Scholar]
  29. AlajanbiM. MalerbaD. LiuH. Distributed Reduced Convolution Neural Networks.Mesopotamian Journal of Big Data20212021262910.58496/MJBD/2021/005
     [Google Scholar]
  30. HussainZ.F. IbraheemH.R. Novel Convolutional Neural Networks based Jaya algorithm Approach for Accurate Deepfake Video Detection.Mesopotamian Journal of Cyber Security20232023353910.58496/MJCS/2023/007
     [Google Scholar]
  31. WuJ. YangQ. ZhouS. Latent shape image learning via disentangled representation for cross-sequence image registration and segmentation.Int. J. CARS202218462162810.1007/s11548‑022‑02788‑936346499
     [Google Scholar]
  32. WuJ. TangX. Brain segmentation based on multi-atlas and diffeomorphism guided 3D fully convolutional network ensembles.Pattern Recognit.202111510790410.1016/j.patcog.2021.107904
     [Google Scholar]
  33. RahmanS. HasanM. SarkarA.K. Prediction of brain stroke using machine learning algorithms and deep neural network techniques.European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science202371233010.24018/ejece.2023.7.1.483
     [Google Scholar]
  34. MushtaqS. SainiK.S. A Review on Predicting Brain Stroke using Machine Learning.In 2023 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom)2023667673
     [Google Scholar]
  35. AkterB. RajbongshiA. SazzadS. ShakilR. BiswasJ. SaraU. A machine learning approach to detect the brain stroke disease.2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT)202210.1109/ICSSIT53264.2022.9716345
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273238231203105157
Loading
Differentiating the Presence of Brain Stroke Types in MR Images using CNN Architecture
Curr. Med. Imaging 20, e15734056273238 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056273238231203105157
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273238231203105157
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056273238231203105157
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Accuracy; Deep learning; DenseNet; EfficientNet; MRI; ResNet; Stroke differentiation; VGG16

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test