Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
file format pdf download PDF
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background:

The degree of cervical foraminal stenosis on MRI scans may be measured and categorised using the Kim or modified Kim methods. These grading scales have not previously been validated in a cohort of patients awaiting surgery.

Objectives:

To establish the normal foraminal and root diameters as well as the consistency of inter and intra-rater grading using the Kim and modified Kim grading systems in pre-operative surgical patients.

Methods:

Asymptomatic cervical nerve roots and foramina demonstrated on the pre-operative MRI scans of adult surgical patients with cervical radiculopathy were measured and categorised by six raters using the Kim and modified Kim grading methods. Repeat “second pass” measurements were made by the same assessors on the same images a minimum of one month later.

Results:

Foraminal diameters (mm) in asymptomatic foramina were C2/C3 (mean ± SD): 4.18 ± 1.44, C3/C4 2.96 ± 1.23, C4/C5 3.02 ± 1.19, C5/C6 3.15 ± 1.33, C6/C7 3.53 ± 1.36, C7/T1 3.93 ± 1.34. Nerve root diameters were C3 3.11 ± 0.87, C4 2.95 ± 0.77, C5 2.56 ± 0.73, C6 2.26 ± 0.76, C7 2.56 ± 0.82, C8 3.83 ± 0.86.

Inter-rater consistency was kappa [95% CI]: Kim 0.01 [0.00, 0.03], modified Kim 0.08 [0.05, 0.10]. Intra-rater consistency was kappa [95% CI]: Kim 0.81 [0.77, 0.86], modified Kim 0.69 [0.62, 0.76].

Conclusion:

There was poor inter-rater consistency but good intra-rater consistency when assessing the severity of foraminal stenosis on axial T2 MRI scans. Foraminal diameter was narrowest at C3/C4 and C4/C5, whereas the smallest root diameter was C5/C6. Volumetric or oblique MR may improve consistency.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266400231106054026
2024-11-08
2025-10-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266400231106054026
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/e15734056266400.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266400231106054026&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. KimK.T. KimY.B. Cervical radiculopathy due to cervical degenerative diseases : Anatomy, diagnosis and treatment.J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc.201048647347910.3340/jkns.2010.48.6.47321430971
     [Google Scholar]
  2. CaridiJ.M. PumbergerM. HughesA.P. Cervical radiculopathy: A review.HSS J.20117326527210.1007/s11420‑011‑9218‑z23024624
     [Google Scholar]
  3. LeeJ.E. ParkH.J. LeeS.Y. LeeY.T. KimY.B. LeeK.H. ShinH. KwonY.J. Interreader reliability and clinical validity of a magnetic resonance imaging grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.201741692693010.1097/RCT.000000000000062828481805
     [Google Scholar]
  4. MeacockJ. SchrammM. SelvanathanS. CurrieS. StockenD. JayneD. ThomsonS. Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.Neuroradiology202163330531610.1007/s00234‑020‑02596‑533392737
     [Google Scholar]
  5. KimS. LeeJ.W. ChaiJ.W. YooH.J. KangY. SeoJ. AhnJ.M. KangH.S. A new MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on axial T2-weighted images.Korean J. Radiol.20151661294130210.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.129426576119
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ParkH.J. KimJ.H. LeeJ.W. LeeS.Y. ChungE.C. RhoM.H. MoonJ.W. Clinical correlation of a new and practical magnetic resonance grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis assessment.Acta Radiol.201556672773210.1177/028418511453792925009277
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ParkH-J. KimS.S. LeeS-Y. ParkN-H. ChungE-C. RhoM-H. KwonH-J. KookS-H. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.Br. J. Radiol.20138610252012051510.1259/bjr.2012051523410800
     [Google Scholar]
  8. KundelH.L. PolanskyM. Measurement of observer agreement.Radiology2003228230330810.1148/radiol.228201186012819342
     [Google Scholar]
  9. ParkH-J. KimS.S. LeeY-J. LeeS-Y. ParkN-H. ChoiY-J. ChungE-C. RhoM-H. Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis.Br. J. Radiol.20138610252012018010.1259/bjr.2012018023426848
     [Google Scholar]
  10. SohnH.M. YouJ.W. LeeJ.Y. The relationship between disc degeneration and morphologic changes in the intervertebral foramen of the cervical spine: A cadaveric MRI and CT study.J. Korean Med. Sci.200419110110610.3346/jkms.2004.19.1.10114966350
     [Google Scholar]
  11. LentellG. KruseM. ChockB. WilsonK. IwamotoM. MartinR. Dimensions of the cervical neural foramina in resting and retracted positions using magnetic resonance imaging.J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.200232838039010.2519/jospt.2002.32.8.38012168956
     [Google Scholar]
  12. MatsumotoM. FujimuraY. SuzukiN. NishiY. NakamuraM. YabeY. ShigaH. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects.J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.199880-B1192410.1302/0301‑620X.80B1.08000199460946
     [Google Scholar]
  13. KidoM. HinodeY. SuwazonoS. AkamineH. SenooH. TatsutaN. FujiwaraY. NakachiR. Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults.Data Brief20192710477610.1016/j.dib.2019.10477631763419
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LiuY. ZhouX. MaJ. GeY. CaoX. The diameters and number of nerve fibers in spinal nerve roots.J. Spinal Cord Med.201538453253710.1179/1079026814Z.00000000027324605949
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HolmesA. WangC. HanZ.H. DangG.T. The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine.Spine19941922Suppl.2505251010.1097/00007632‑199411001‑000037855673
     [Google Scholar]
  16. HansrajK.K. Assessment of stresses in the cervical spine caused by posture and position of the head.Surg. Technol. Int.20142527727925393825
     [Google Scholar]
  17. LeeS.H. ParkS.Y. WangJ.C. KangK.C. HwangS.P. JangS. A comprehensive MRI classification system for cervical foraminal stenosis.Spine J.20151510S20310.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.278
     [Google Scholar]
  18. HumphreysS.C. AnH.S. EckJ.C. CoppesM. LimT.H. EstkowskiL. Oblique MRI as a useful adjunct in evaluation of cervical foraminal impingement.J. Spinal Disord.199811429529910.1097/00002517‑199808000‑000059726297
     [Google Scholar]
  19. WolanskyL.J. ParikhD.D. ShahK.J. YalamanchiliR. FarkasJ. Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for cervical disc disease: What is your neighbor up to?J. Neuroimaging200515218318710.1111/j.1552‑6569.2005.tb00304.x15746231
     [Google Scholar]
  20. BarnaureI. GalleyJ. FritzB. SutterR. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical foraminal stenosis: Comparison of 3D T2 SPACE with sagittal oblique 2D T2 TSE.Skeletal Radiol.20225171453146210.1007/s00256‑022‑03988‑935006279
     [Google Scholar]
  21. DemondionX. LefebvreG. FischO. VandenbusscheL. CepparoJ. BalbiV. Radiographic anatomy of the intervertebral cervical and lumbar foramina (vessels and variants).Diagn. Interv. Imaging201293969069710.1016/j.diii.2012.07.00822883939
     [Google Scholar]
  22. KintzeléL. RehnitzC. KauczorH.U. WeberM.A. Oblique sagittal images prevent underestimation of the neuroforaminal stenosis grade caused by disc herniation in cervical spine MRI.Röfo Fortschr. Geb. Röntgenstr. Neuen Bildgeb. Verfahr.20181901094695410.1055/a‑0612‑820529874691
     [Google Scholar]
  23. YooJ.U. ZouD. EdwardsW.T. BayleyJ. YuanH.A. Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine.Spine199217101131113610.1097/00007632‑199210000‑000011440000
     [Google Scholar]
  24. GoodmanB.S. GeffenJ.F. MallempatiS. NobleB.R. MRI images at a 45-degree angle through the cervical neural foramina: A technique for improved visualization.Pain Physician20069432733217066117
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266400231106054026
Loading
Consistency of Radiological Grading of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
Curr. Med. Imaging 20, e15734056266400 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056266400231106054026
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266400231106054026
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266400231106054026
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): (MAX 6-8); Brachialgia; Cervical radiculopathy; Cervical Spine; Cervical spondylosis; MRI

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test