Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer, one of the most prevalent malignant tumors in females, usually occurs in the breast epithelial tissues.

Objective

The study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses in BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) 4.

Methods

Examination outcomes and clinical information of 83 patients with BI-RADS 4 breast masses were analyzed retrospectively. These included patients who received CEUS, SWE, and pathological examinations. The difference of CEUS in determining the classification of BI-RADS 4 breast masses was evaluated using histopathological outcomes of breast masses as a reference standard. The diagnostic value of CEUS, SWE, and CEUS combined with SWE in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses in BI-RADS 4 was also explored.

Results

Pathological biopsy results revealed 63 malignant masses and 20 benign masses among 83 BI-RADS 4 breast masses, with a 75.9% incidence of malignant masses. After the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast masses with CEUS, SWE, and CEUS+SWE, the incidence of malignancy was 56.6%, 78.3%, and 73.5%, respectively. CEUS+SWE showed higher sensitivity (93.7% . 81% and 68.3%), specificity (90% . 30% and 80%), positive predictive value (96.7% . 78.5% and 91.5%), negative predictive value (81.8% . 33.3% and 44.4%), and diagnostic coincidence rate (92.8% . 68.7% and 71.1%) than SWE and CEUS alone in diagnosing pathological type of breast masses. Moreover, CEUS combined with SWE exhibited a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.918) than SWE (0.741, = 0.028) and CEUS (0.555, 0.001) alone in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast masses.

Conclusion

Overall, the diagnostic value of CEUS+SWE for the pathological type of BI-RADS is preferred over CEUS and SWE alone. CEUS+SWE showed higher values than CEUS and SWE alone in diagnosing BI-RADS 4 breast masses. Specifically, CEUS+SWE can correctly identify benign and malignant masses, reduce unnecessary trauma, and avoid misdiagnosis. In summary, CEUS combined with SWE can serve as an effective diagnostic method and avoid delaying the best treatment opportunity for some malignant lesions.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056257195231025072821
2024-01-01
2025-09-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E15734056257195.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056257195231025072821&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. GuoX.J. SunY.Y. JiaF. Comparison of therapeutic effects of three-dimensional and two-dimensional conformal radiation therapy on early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery China Clinical.Pract. Med.20191013
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DeSantisC.E. MillerK.D. Goding SauerA. JemalA. SiegelR.L. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019.CA Cancer J. Clin.201969321123310.3322/caac.2155530762872
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KimK. SongM.K. KimE.K. YoonJ.H. Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: A study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist.Ultrasonography20173613910.14366/usg.1601227184656
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LeeS.W. ChoiH.Y. BaekS.Y. LimS.M. Role of color and power doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses.J. Clin. Ultrasound200230845946410.1002/jcu.1010012242733
    [Google Scholar]
  5. WuM. WangX.M. ZhouR.H. The role of BI-RADS classification in ultrasonic diagnosis of breast cancer.Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging.2013247465468
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ForteA.J. HuayllaniM.T. BoczarD. CinottoG. CiudadP. ManriqueO.J. LuX. McLaughlinS.A. The basics of ultrasound elastography for diagnosis, assessment, and staging breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review of the literature.Gland Surg.20209258959510.21037/gs.2020.02.0832420294
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GuoR. LuG. QinB. FeiB. Ultrasound imaging technologies for breast cancer detection and management: A review.Ultrasound Med. Biol.2018441377010.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.01229107353
    [Google Scholar]
  8. YoukJ.H. GweonH.M. SonE.J. Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: The state of the art.Ultrasonography201736430030910.14366/usg.1702428513127
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LeeS.H. ChangJ.M. ChoN. KooH.R. YiA. KimS.J. YoukJ.H. SonE.J. ChoiS.H. KookS.H. ChungJ. ChaE.S. ParkJ.S. JungH.K. KoK.H. ChoiH.Y. RyuE.B. MoonW.K. Korean Breast Elastography Study Group Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography.Ultrasonography201433131010.14366/usg.1301224936489
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BarrR.G. Sonographic breast elastography: A primer.J. Ultrasound Med.201231577378310.7863/jum.2012.31.5.77322535725
    [Google Scholar]
  11. EvansA. SimY.T. PourreyronC. ThompsonA. JordanL. FlemingD. PurdieC. MacaskillJ. VinnicombeS. PharoahP. Pre-operative stromal stiffness measured by shear wave elastography is independently associated with breast cancer-specific survival.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.2018171238338910.1007/s10549‑018‑4836‑529858751
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HuangJ.X. LinS.Y. OuY. ShiC.G. ZhongY. WeiM.J. PeiX.Q. Combining conventional ultrasound and sonoelastography to predict axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.Eur. Radiol.20223295986599610.1007/s00330‑022‑08751‑135364714
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LiH.X. Study on the application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with elastic imaging score in breast BI-RADS 4 types of lesions.Imaging Res. Med.20193183
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WangW.N. BaiB.Y. XueH.H. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of four types of breast BI-RADS nodules.J. Mod. Oncol.2018
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ZhouS.C. LeJ. ZhouJ. HuangY.X. QianL. ChangC. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis and pathologic response prediction in breast cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Clin. Breast Cancer2020204e490e50910.1016/j.clbc.2020.03.00232371140
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ChengY.Y. ZhangZ.F. BiW.L. Strain ratio method and area ratio method used in the differential diagnosis value of breast nodules.J. Med. Imaging2017273475478
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KoppenhaverS. KnissJ. LilleyD. OatesM. Fernández-de-las-PeñasC. MaherR. CroyT. ShinoharaM. Reliability of ultrasound shear-wave elastography in assessing low back musculature elasticity in asymptomatic individuals.J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.201839495710.1016/j.jelekin.2018.01.01029413453
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhangY.Y. KongF.Y. ChenC.H. Value of color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.Cancer Progression.2019171011701173
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ShangM.Y. GuoS. ZhangQ. Current status of breast cancer screening in China.Pract. J. Cancer.202022411175178
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LiC.R. XiaB.L. YangJ. Clinical application value of elastic imaging in breast imaging report and data system of 4 types of masses.J. Prac. Med. Imaging20166534536
    [Google Scholar]
  21. YuP.L. ZhangJ. WenB.J. Analysis of ultrasonic elastic strain rate ratio in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast mass of BI-RADS4 grade.J. Oncol.201664
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HeM.S. WeiM.M. ChenY. LouK.X. WangD.W. XuH.N. Application of area ratio method of ultrasonic elastic imaging in diagnosis of Grade 4 breast mass with BI-RADS.Zhonghua Linchuang Yishi Zazhi20164457678
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WangWN BaiBY XueHH Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing breast nodules in BI-RADS 4.J. Mod. Oncol2018
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LuX.F. HuX.H. Features and differential diagnosis of ultrasound elastography and shear wave elastography in non-mass breast diseases.Yingxiang Kexue Yu Guanghuaxue2021
    [Google Scholar]
  25. HuangC.R. YangS.W. XieL.L. The value of area ratio on ultrasonographic elastography with different planes in differentiating diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast malignant tumor.Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging.20152634
    [Google Scholar]
  26. XiaoX. DongL. JiangQ. GuanX. WuH. LuoB. Incorporating contrast-enhanced ultrasound into the BI-RADS scoring system improves accuracy in breast tumor diagnosis: A preliminary study in China.Ultrasound Med. Biol.201642112630263810.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.07.00527544439
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZhaoY.X. LiuS. HuY.B. GeY.Y. LvD.M. Diagnostic and prognostic values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer: A retrospective study.OncoTargets Ther.2017101123112910.2147/OTT.S12413428260926
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ShiX.C. TangS.S. YuH.W. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A Meta-analysis.Chinese J. Medical Imaging Technol..2015313355358
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ShenP. GongZ.P. WangM. Application of SWE combined with SMI in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumor and its effect on diagnostic efficiency.Shengwu Yixue Gongcheng Yu Linchuang2018224418422
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ZhangX. SuiX.F. Research progress in the application of shear wave velocity measurement technique in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.Anhui Medical Journal.2017387948951
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056257195231025072821
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056257195231025072821
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test