Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC), an exceedingly malignant neoplasm, often eludes early detection, culminating in a dire prognosis. Accurate cancer staging systems and pathological differentiation are designed to guide adjuvant interventions and predict postoperative prognoses.

Objective

This study sought to investigate the predictive capacity of DW-MRI in discerning T stages, lymph node metastasis, and pathological differentiation grades in patients with EHCC.

Methods

Eighty-five patients were pathologically diagnosed with EHCC and underwent abdominal MRI within two weeks before surgery at our hospital from Aug 2011 to Aug 2021. Tumor axial maximum area (AMA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for diverse T stages, N stages, and differentiation grades were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The Mann-Whitney test displayed significantly higher lesion AMA values ( =0.006) and lower tumor ADC values ( = 0.001) in the node-positive group (median ADC and AMA value: 1.220×10-3 mm2/s, 82.231 mm2) than in the node-negative group (median ADC and AMA value: 1.316×10-3 mm2/s, 51.174 mm2). A tumor ADC value<1.249×10-3 mm2/s from the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC=0.725, =0.001) exhibited the capability to predict node-positive EHCC with a sensitivity of 64.29%, and specificity of 73.68%. Furthermore, a progressive decrease in the degree of EHCC differentiation was associated with a reduction in the tumor ADC value (=0.000).

Conclusion

The N stage and differentiation of EHCC can be evaluated non-invasively using diffusion-weighted MRI.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056253270231117113002
2024-01-01
2025-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E15734056253270.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056253270231117113002&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. OliveiraI.S. KilcoyneA. EverettJ.M. Mino-KenudsonM. HarisinghaniM.G. GanesanK. Cholangiocarcinoma: Classification, diagnosis, staging, imaging features, and management.Abdom. Radiol.20174261637164910.1007/s00261‑017‑1094‑728271275
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GadM.M. SaadA.M. FaisaluddinM. GamanM.A. RuhbanI.A. JaziehK.A. Al-HusseiniM.J. Simons-LinaresC.R. SonbolM.B. EstfanB.N. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma; united states incidence and mortality trends.Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol.202044688589310.1016/j.clinre.2020.03.02432359831
    [Google Scholar]
  3. TchelebiL.T. JethwaK.R. LevyA.T. AnkerC.J. KennedyT. GrodsteinE. HallemeierC.L. JabbourS.K. KimE. KumarR. LeeP. SmallW.Jr WilliamsV.M. SharmaN. RussoS. American radium society (ARS) appropriate use criteria (AUC) for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Am. J. Clin. Oncol.2023462738410.1097/COC.000000000000096936534388
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChaiteerakijR. HarmsenW.S. MarreroC.R. AboelsoudM.M. NdzengueA. KaiyaJ. TherneauT.M. SanchezW. GoresG.J. RobertsL.R. A new clinically based staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Am. J. Gastroenterol.2014109121881189010.1038/ajg.2014.32725384902
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ParenteA. KamarajahS.K. BaiaM. TirottaF. ManziaT.M. HilalM.A. PawlikT.M. WhiteS.A. DahdalehF.S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma: A national population-based comparative cohort study.J. Gastrointest. Surg.202327474174910.1007/s11605‑023‑05606‑y36749556
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ImJ.H. ChoiG.H. LeeW.J. HanD.H. ParkS.W. BangS. ChoiH.J. SeongJ. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy offer a recurrence and survival benefit in patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.202114782435244510.1007/s00432‑021‑03524‑733471185
    [Google Scholar]
  7. JuntermannsB. KaiserG.M. ReisH. GriesS. KasperS. PaulA. CanbayA. FingasC.D. Long-term Survival after resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of UICC staging and surgical procedure.Turk. J. Gastroenterol.201930545446010.5152/tjg.2019.1827531061000
    [Google Scholar]
  8. AkashiK. EbataT. MizunoT. YokoyamaY. IgamiT. YamaguchiJ. OnoeS. NaginoM. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from a viewpoint of age: Is it beneficial to octogenarians in an aging society?Surgery201816451023102910.1016/j.surg.2018.05.05130082134
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZhouY. LiuS. WuL. WanT. Survival after surgical resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors.Asian J. Surg.201740212913810.1016/j.asjsur.2015.07.00226337377
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ZhangX.F. BealE.W. ChakedisJ. ChenQ. LvY. EthunC.G. SalemA. WeberS.M. TranT. PoultsidesG. SonA.Y. HatzarasI. JinL. FieldsR.C. BuettnerS. ScogginsC. MartinR.C.G. IsomC.A. IdreesK. MogalH.D. ShenP. MaithelS.K. SchmidtC.R. PawlikT.M. Defining early recurrence of hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent surgery: A multi-institutional study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium.World J. Surg.20184292919292910.1007/s00268‑018‑4530‑029404753
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MaoZ. GuoX. SuD. WangL. ZhangT. BaiL. Prognostic factors of cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection: A retrospective study of 293 patients.Med. Sci. Monit.2015212375238110.12659/MSM.89358626269932
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ShuJ. Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics features for preoperative prediction of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma stage.Eur J Cancer.2021155227235
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GluskinJ.S. ChegaiF. MontiS. SquillaciE. MannelliL. Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Detection and Evaluation of Treatment Response.J. Cancer20167111565157010.7150/jca.1458227471573
    [Google Scholar]
  14. CadourF. TradiF. BartoliA. DuffaudF. GaubertJ.Y. Diffusion weighted imaging changes in extra-abdominal desmoid tumor after cryotherapy.Ann. Med.202355152152510.1080/07853890.2023.217458936724758
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FujiwaraM. YoshidaS. TakaharaT. SomaT. NakamuraY. IshikawaY. FukudaS. WasedaY. TanakaH. YokoyamaM. FujiiY. Prostate and metastasis diffusion volume based on apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic factor in Hormone-naïve prostate Cancer.Clin. Exp. Metastasis202340218719510.1007/s10585‑023‑10200‑236914924
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZhangM. HorvatJ.V. Bernard-DavilaB. MarinoM.A. LeithnerD. Ochoa-AlbizteguiR.E. HelbichT.H. MorrisE.A. ThakurS. PinkerK. Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging201949386487410.1002/jmri.2628530375702
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZhouM. GongT. ChenM. WangY. High-resolution integrated dynamic shimming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the assessment of rectal cancer.Eur. Radiol.20233385769577810.1007/s00330‑023‑09494‑336826497
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LiuL. WangS. YuT. BaiH. LiuJ. WangD. LuoY. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative evaluation and prediction of postoperative supplementary therapy for patients with cervical cancer.Ann. Transl. Med.202210212010.21037/atm‑21‑531935282103
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZaborieneI. ZvinieneK. LukoseviciusS. IgnataviciusP. BarauskasG. Dynamic perfusion computed tomography and apparent diffusion coefficient as potential markers for poorly differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Dig. Surg.202138212813510.1159/00051197333503636
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WangQ. ZhangJ. XuX. ChenX. XuB. Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient parameters for glioma grading.J. Neurooncol.20181391616810.1007/s11060‑018‑2841‑529574566
    [Google Scholar]
  21. XuY.S. LiuH.F. XiD.L. LiJ.K. LiuZ. YanR.F. LeiJ.Q. Whole-lesion histogram analysis metrics of the apparent diffusion coefficient: A correlation study with histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdom. Radiol.20194493089309810.1007/s00261‑019‑02109‑w31256226
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MarijaC. KresimirD. OgnjenB. IvaP. NenadK. MatijaB. Estimation of colon cancer grade and metastatic lymph node involvement using DWI/ADC sequences.Acta Radiol.2022284185122113000810.1177/0284185122113000836197524
    [Google Scholar]
  23. De CataldoC. BrunoF. PalumboP. Di SibioA. ArrigoniF. ClementeA. BafileA. GravinaG.L. CappabiancaS. BarileA. SplendianiA. MasciocchiC. Di CesareE. Apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging (ADC-MRI) in the axillary breast cancer lymph node metastasis detection: A narrative review.Gland Surg.2020962225223410.21037/gs‑20‑54633447575
    [Google Scholar]
  24. BaruaS.K. KamanP.K. BaruahS.J. T PR. BagchiP.K. SarmaD. SinghY. Role of Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) in assessment of primary penile tumor characteristics and its correlations with inguinal lymph node metastasis: A prospective study.World J. Oncol.201895-614515010.14740/wjon1138w30524639
    [Google Scholar]
  25. CuiX.Y. ChenH.W. CaiS. BaoJ. TangQ.F. WuL.Y. FangX.M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Eur. J. Radiol.201281112961296510.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.04022285604
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ChenH.W. Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.World J Gastroenterol.201016253196201
    [Google Scholar]
  27. AminM.B. EdgeS.B. GreeneF.L. The American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual.8th edNew YorkSpringer201710.1007/978‑3‑319‑40618‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  28. GriessenauerC.J. MillerJ.H. AgeeB.S. FisherW.S.III CuréJ.K. ChapmanP.R. ForemanP.M. FisherW.A.M. WitcherA.C. WaltersB.C. Observer reliability of arteriovenous malformations grading scales using current imaging modalities.J. Neurosurg.201412051179118710.3171/2014.2.JNS13126224628617
    [Google Scholar]
  29. HuangX.Q. ShuJ. LuoL. JinM.L. LuX.F. YangS.G. Differentiation grade for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma: Assessed by diffusion-weighted imaging at 3.0-T MR.Eur. J. Radiol.201685111980198610.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.00427776649
    [Google Scholar]
  30. JhaveriK.S. Hosseini-NikH. MRI of cholangiocarcinoma.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging20154251165117910.1002/jmri.2481025447417
    [Google Scholar]
  31. AgnelloF. RonotM. VallaD.C. SinkusR. Van BeersB.E. VilgrainV. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: Quantitative and qualitative analysis.Radiology2012262251151910.1148/radiol.1111092222143926
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056253270231117113002
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056253270231117113002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test