Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate (i) the reasons for requesting ultrasonography (USG) in a dentistry faculty and (ii) the scanning regions, the type of probe used, and the use of Doppler USG.

Methods

USG request forms of patients who applied to our radiology clinic for USG were analyzed retrospectively. According to the clinical information of the patients in the request forms, the reasons for requesting USG were divided into four groups: soft tissue swelling, soft tissue calcification, lymph node, and other examinations. Data were statistically compared between sex (female and male) and age groups (≤40−years−old and ˃40−years−old).

Results

The USG request forms of 50 patients were obtained. The mean patient age was 45.06±14.50 years. Twenty-six patients were female (52%), while twenty-four patients were male (48%). Soft tissue swelling, soft tissue calcification, lymph node, and other examinations were noted as the reasons for requesting USG in 42%, 26%, 18%, and 14% of the patients, respectively. The most scanned regions were the submandibular (56%), parotid (16%), and cheek (10%) regions. Extraoral probe was used more frequently than intraoral probe (78% vs. 22%). Doppler USG was used in most patients (98%). A statistically significant difference was found between age groups and calcification examination ().

Conclusion

The reasons for requesting USG were mostly soft tissue swelling, soft tissue calcification, and lymph node examinations. The most commonly scanned region and used type of probe were the submandibular region and extraoral probe, respectively. Doppler USG was used in most patients.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056242244230925164809
2024-01-01
2025-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E15734056242244.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056242244230925164809&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. WhiteS.C. PharoahM.J. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities.Dent. Clin. North Am.2008524689705, v10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.00618805224
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AldrichJ.E. Basic physics of ultrasound imaging.Crit. Care Med.2007355S131S13710.1097/01.CCM.0000260624.99430.2217446771
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HertzbergBS MiddletonWD Ultrasound: The Requisites.Elsevier2015
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChandakR. DegwekarS. BhowteR.R. MotwaniM. BanodeP. ChandakM. RawlaniS. An evaluation of efficacy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of head and neck swellings.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.201140421322110.1259/dmfr/6865828621493877
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GhorayebSR BertonciniCA HindersMK Ultrasonography in dentistry.IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control200855612566610.1109/TUFFC.2008.788
    [Google Scholar]
  6. OrloffL.A. Head and neck ultrasonography: Essential and extended applications.Plural Publishing20171330
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YaşarF. Ultrasonund physics and terminology.Turkiye Klinikleri J Oral Maxillofac Radiol-Special Topics2016234652
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MarottiJ. HegerS. TinschertJ. TortamanoP. ChuembouF. RadermacherK. WolfartS. Recent advances of ultrasound imaging in dentistry - A review of the literature.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.2013115681983210.1016/j.oooo.2013.03.01223706922
    [Google Scholar]
  9. AlokA. SinghS. KishoreM. ShuklaA.K. Ultrasonography-A boon in dentistry.SRMJRDS201910298
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DibL.L. CuriM.M. ChammasM.C. PintoD.S. TorloniH. Ultrasonography evaluation of bone lesions of the jaw.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.199682335135710.1016/S1079‑2104(96)80365‑98884838
    [Google Scholar]
  11. EvirgenŞ. KamburoğluK. Review on the applications of ultrasonography in dentomaxillofacial region.World J. Radiol.201681505810.4329/wjr.v8.i1.5026834943
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yozgat İlbaşF.N. ÇağlayanF. ÖzkanY. OrbakR. Lateral peridontal cyst diagnosed by intraoral ultrasonography.Turkiye Klin. J. Medical Sci.202228121822210.5336/dentalsci.2021‑82247
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GoodingG.A.W. HerzogK.A. LaingF.C. McDonaldE.J.Jr Ultrasonographic assessment of neck masses.J. Clin. Ultrasound19775424825210.1002/jcu.1870050407407254
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GritzmannN. RettenbacherT. HollerwegerA. MacheinerP. HübnerE. Sonography of the salivary glands.Eur. Radiol.200313596497510.1007/s00330‑002‑1586‑912695816
    [Google Scholar]
  15. YılmazH.H. CıcıkM. Evaluation of the carotid artery calcifications by ultrasonography.Turkiye Klinikleri J Oral Maxillofac Radiol-Special Topics2016234045
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KumarB. MahabobM. Ultrasound in dentistry-a review.J. Indian Acad. Dent. Spec. Res.201014445
    [Google Scholar]
  17. CaglayanF. Yozgat İlbaşF.N. AksakalB. The use of ultrasonography in oral radiology: An ultrasound archive study.J. oral maxillofac. radiol.2021912010.4103/jomr.jomr_6_21
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ShimizuM. UßmüllerJ. HartweinJ. DonathK. A comparative study of sonographic and histopathologic findings of tumorous lesions in the parotid gland.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.199988672373710.1016/S1079‑2104(99)70017‑X10625857
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MorimotoY. TanakaT. YamamotoN. KodamaM. SetaY. HabuM. OdaM. KitoS. Wakasugi-SatoN. Matsumoto-TakedaS. FukaiY. TokitsuT. TomikawaM. MatobaK. YamashitaY. YoshiokaI. TakahashiT. TominagaK. New trends and advances in oral and maxillofacial imaging.Curr. Med. Imaging Rev.20095422623710.2174/157340509790112790
    [Google Scholar]
  20. BassionyM. YangJ. Abdel-MonemT.M. ElmogyS. ElnagdyM. Exploration of ultrasonography in assessment of fascial space spread of odontogenic infections.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.2009107686186910.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.01619464659
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ShahN. BansalN. LoganiA. Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry.World J. Radiol.201461079480710.4329/wjr.v6.i10.79425349663
    [Google Scholar]
  22. AktanA. GüngörE. ÇiftçiM. İşmanÖ. Usage of cone beam computed tomography in dentistry.J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni20152517176
    [Google Scholar]
  23. AkarslanZ. Pekerİ. Reasons of cone-beam computed tomography examination requests in a dental faculty.Acta Odontol Turc20153211610.17214/aot.57922
    [Google Scholar]
  24. YalçınE.D. ArtaşA. Examination of cone-beam computerized tomography requests reasons.Selcuk Dent J201963309314
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SağlamH. YeşilovaE. Bayrakdarİ.Ş. The evaluation of referral of cone-beam computed tomography examination in eskisehir osmangazi university faculty of dentistry.Selcuk Dent J20218362963410.15311/selcukdentj.736885
    [Google Scholar]
  26. AbdinianM. AminianM. SeyyedkhamesiS. Comparison of accuracy between panoramic radiography, cone-beam computed tomography, and ultrasonography in detection of foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region: An in vitro study.J. Korean Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2018441182410.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.1.1829535965
    [Google Scholar]
  27. OikarinenK.S. NieminenT.M. MäkäräinenH. PyhtinenJ. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound.Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.199322211912410.1016/S0901‑5027(05)80818‑58320449
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ÖzkanG. KöseE. YeşiltepeS. Ultrasonographic evaluation of soft tissue calcifications in the head and neck region detected on panoramic radiographs.J. Ultrasound Med.20234251057106410.1002/jum.1611736301624
    [Google Scholar]
  29. RibeiroA. KeatR. KhalidS. AriyaratnamS. MakwanaM. do PrantoM. AlbuquerqueR. MonteiroL. Prevalence of calcifications in soft tissues visible on a dental pantomogram: A retrospective analysis.J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2018119536937410.1016/j.jormas.2018.04.01429730464
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056242244230925164809
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056242244230925164809
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Dentistry; Doppler; Image; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); USG; Utrasonography
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test