Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to investigate the value of gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) combined with an 80 mm wide-body detector in head-neck CTA.

Methods

Ninety patients with head-neck CTA were prospectively selected and randomly divided into a control group and a test group, with 45 patients in each group. The control group was scanned conventionally. With a tube voltage of 100 kVp and detector width of 40 mm, a 70 ml contrast agent was injected at a flow rate of 5.0 ml/s. The test group used GSI. With a tube current fixed of 445 mAs and a detector width of 80 mm, the contrast agent was injected at a flow rate of 3.5 ml/s and 0.6 ml/kg body weight, and the 55 keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were automatically reconstructed. Finally, the target vessel CT values, background noise (BN), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), subjective scores, contrast agent dose, CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) were recorded. The DLP was converted to the effective dose (ED).

Results

The target vessel CT values, BN, SNR, CNR, and subjective scores of the two groups were not statistically significant (all > 0.05), and the image quality of both groups was the same and met the diagnostic requirements. The contrast agent dose and effective dose (ED) in the test group were approximately 44% and 26% lower than that of the control group, respectively (all < 0.05).

Conclusion

In head-neck CTA examination, the Revolution CT GSI combined with an 80 mm wide-body detector can reduce the contrast agent dose and radiation dose while ensuring image quality.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056186139231101063906
2024-01-01
2025-09-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E15734056186139.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056186139231101063906&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. KimH.J. YoonD.Y. KimE.S. YunE.J. JeonH.J. LeeJ.Y. ChoB.M. 256-row multislice CT angiography in the postoperative evaluation of cerebral aneurysms treated with titanium clips: Using three-dimensional rotational angiography as the standard of reference.Eur. Radiol.20203042152216010.1007/s00330‑019‑06560‑731844961
    [Google Scholar]
  2. VagalA. MeganathanK. KleindorferD.O. AdeoyeO. HornungR. KhatriP. Increasing use of computed tomographic perfusion and computed tomographic angiograms in acute ischemic stroke from 2006 to 2010.Stroke20144541029103410.1161/STROKEAHA.113.00433224569815
    [Google Scholar]
  3. van der MolenA.J. ReimerP. DekkersI.A. BongartzG. BellinM.F. BertolottoM. ClementO. Heinz-PeerG. StaculF. WebbJ.A.W. ThomsenH.S. Post-contrast acute kidney injury – Part 1: Definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors.Eur. Radiol.20182872845285510.1007/s00330‑017‑5246‑529426991
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ZhaoY. XuY. BaoY. GengX. ZhangT. LiD. Comparative analysis of radiation dose and image quality between organ dose modulation and 3D smart mA modulation during head-neck CT angiography.J. XRay Sci. Technol.20192719711010.3233/XST‑18044330507604
    [Google Scholar]
  5. PeartJ.M. SimR.G. HofmanP.L. Therapeutic effects of hysterosalpingography contrast media in infertile women: what do we know about the H2O in the H2Oil trial and why does it matter?Hum. Reprod.202136352953510.1093/humrep/deaa32533326555
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ZhaoY. GengX. ZhangT. WangX. XueY. DongK. Assessment of radiation dose and iodine load reduction in head-neck CT angiography using two scan protocols with wide-detector.J. XRay Sci. Technol.201927598199310.3233/XST‑19054131450541
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MaG. YuY. DuanH. DouY. JiaY. ZhangX. YangC. ChenX. HanD. GuoC. HeT. Subtraction CT angiography in head and neck with low radiation and contrast dose dual-energy spectral CT using rapid kV-switching technique.Br. J. Radiol.20189110862017063110.1259/bjr.2017063129412008
    [Google Scholar]
  8. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.Ann. ICRP2007372-4133218082557
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BeckettK.R. MoriarityA.K. LangerJ.M. Safe use of contrast media: What the radiologist needs to know.Radiographics20153561738175010.1148/rg.201515003326466182
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ThomsenH.S. Contrast media safety—An update.Eur. J. Radiol.2011801778210.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.10421856102
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BaeK.T. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: Considerations and approaches.Radiology20102561326110.1148/radiol.1009090820574084
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ZhangT. GengX. LiD. XuY. ZhaoY. Comparison of the image quality and radiation dose of different scanning modes in head-neck CT angiography.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.20215052020042810.1259/dmfr.2020042833353399
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KangE.J. Clinical applications of wide-detector ct scanners for cardiothoracic imaging: An update.Korean J. Radiol.201920121583159610.3348/kjr.2019.032731854147
    [Google Scholar]
  14. YabuuchiH. KamitaniT. SagiyamaK. YamasakiY. MatsuuraY. HinoT. TsutsuiS. KondoM. ShirasakaT. HondaH. Clinical application of radiation dose reduction for head and neck CT.Eur. J. Radiol.201810720921510.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.02130177405
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GuptaP. SinhaA. KhandelwalN. Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!Indian J. Radiol. Imaging201424212512810.4103/0971‑3026.13438725024519
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FlohrT.G. RaupachR. BruderH. Cardiac CT: How much can temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and volume coverage be improved?J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.20093314315210.1016/j.jcct.2009.04.00419527890
    [Google Scholar]
  17. EngelK.J. HerrmannC. ZeitlerG. X‐ray scattering in single‐ and dual‐source CT.Med. Phys.200835131833210.1118/1.282090118293587
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhangT. ZhaoS. LiuY. LiuZ. MaZ. ZuoZ. ZhaoY. Comparison of two different GSI scanning protocols in head and neck CT angiography: Image quality and radiation dose.J. XRay Sci. Technol.202230468969610.3233/XST‑22118135527624
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZhuY. PiZ. ZhouH. LiZ. LeiF. HuiJ. ZhangX. XieJ. LiangY. Imaging pediatric acute head trauma using 100-kVp low dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in single rotation on a 16 cm wide-detector CT.J. XRay Sci. Technol.202129351752710.3233/XST‑21085633814483
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HingwalaD.R. ThomasB. KesavadasC. KapilamoorthyT.R. Suboptimal contrast opacification of dynamic head and neck MR angiography due to venous stasis and reflux: Technical considerations for optimization.AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.201132231031410.3174/ajnr.A230121127145
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056186139231101063906
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056186139231101063906
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): CNR; Contrast agent; Head-neck CTA; Revolution CT; SNR; Wide-body detector
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test