Skip to content
2000
Volume 23, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1570-162X
  • E-ISSN: 1873-4251

Abstract

Introduction

People with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience barriers to healthcare access and optimal outcomes. Language interpretation services can facilitate clear communication-which is key to effective HIV care and treatment.

Methods

We analyzed weighted data from the 2019 cycle of the Medical Monitoring Project (MMP), a cross-sectional, complex sample survey of U.S. adults with diagnosed HIV, and data from the 2021 MMP Facility Survey, a survey of facilities providing care to 2019 MMP respondents. We estimated the percentage of people with HIV (PWH) with LEP who received care at facilities offering language interpretation services and facilities providing language interpretation services, overall and by selected characteristics.

Results

Overall, 89.9% of PWH with LEP received care at a facility with language interpretation services, and 83.6% of facilities provided language interpretation services. PWH with LEP who were unemployed were less likely than those who were employed to receive care at a facility with language interpretation services. Facilities that were Federally Qualified Health Centers, were not private practices, received Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program funding, and accepted public health care coverage were more likely to provide language interpretation services than facilities without these characteristics.

Discussion

Most PWH with LEP obtained HIV care at health care facilities providing language interpretation services, a positive finding as language is a common barrier to accessing care for people with LEP. Most facilities also provided language interpretation services, an important step towards ensuring meaningful access for people with LEP, as required by law.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that most HIV care facilities are providing access to language services to PWH with LEP in the United States.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/chr/10.2174/011570162X362664250527051957
2025-06-04
2026-01-29

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/chr/10.2174/011570162X362664250527051957
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DietrichS. HernandezE. Nearly 68 million people spoke a language other than English at home in 2019.2022 https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/12/languages-we-speak-in-united-states.html
  2. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Limited English Proficiency (LEP). https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/special-topics/limited-english-proficiency/index.html
  3. U.S. Census Bureau. Language use in the United States:2019 https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2022/acs/acs-50.pdf
  4. PadillaM. FaganJ. TieY. WeiserJ. DemekeH.B. Luke SR. Limited English proficiency among adults with HIV in the United States – Medical Monitoring Project, 2015–2018.AIDS Care202133121603160710.1080/09540121.2020.183842833107766
     [Google Scholar]
  5. CastroM.R.H. SchwartzH. HernandezS. CalthorpeL. FernándezA. SteinD. MackersieR.C. MenzaR. BongiovanniT. The association of limited English proficiency with morbidity and mortality after trauma.J. Surg. Res.202228032633210.1016/j.jss.2022.07.04436030609
     [Google Scholar]
  6. RamirezN. ShiK. YabroffK.R. HanX. FedewaS.A. NogueiraL.M. Access to care among adults with limited English Proficiency.J. Gen. Intern. Med.202338359259910.1007/s11606‑022‑07690‑335882706
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Foiles SifuentesA.M. Robledo CornejoM. LiN.C. Castaneda-AvilaM.A. TjiaJ. LapaneK.L. The role of limited English proficiency and access to health insurance and health care in the Affordable Care Act Era.Health Equity20204150951710.1089/heq.2020.005733376934
     [Google Scholar]
  8. WilsonE. Hm ChenA. GrumbachK. WangF. FernandezA. Effects of limited English proficiency and physician language on health care comprehension.J. Gen. Intern. Med.200520980080610.1111/j.1525‑1497.2005.0174.x16117746
     [Google Scholar]
  9. YeheskelA. RawalS. Exploring the “patient experience” of individuals with limited English proficiency: A scoping review.J. Immigr. Minor. Health201921485387810.1007/s10903‑018‑0816‑430203377
     [Google Scholar]
  10. NguyenN.V. Guillen LozoyaA.H. CarusoM.A. Capetillo PorrazM.G.D. Pacheco-SpannL.M. AllyseM.A. BarwiseA.K. Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: A qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience.Int. J. Equity Health202423116410.1186/s12939‑024‑02246‑939164755
     [Google Scholar]
  11. O’TooleJ.K. Alvarado-LittleW. LedfordC.J.W. Communication with diverse patients: Addressing culture and language.Pediatr. Clin. North Am.201966479180410.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.00631230623
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BoylenS. CherianS. GillF.J. LeslieG.D. WilsonS. Impact of professional interpreters on outcomes for hospitalized children from migrant and refugee families with limited English proficiency: A systematic review.JBI Evid. Synth.20201871360138810.11124/JBISRIR‑D‑19‑0030032813387
     [Google Scholar]
  13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Key EHE strategies.2023 https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/ending-the-hiv-epidemic/key-strategies/
  14. BeerL. JohnsonC.H. FaganJ.L. FrazierE.L. NyakuM. CrawJ.A. SandersC.C. Luna-GierkeR.E. ShouseR.L. A national behavioral and clinical surveillance system of adults with diagnosed HIV (The Medical Monitoring Project): Protocol for an annual cross-sectional interview and medical record abstraction survey.JMIR Res. Protoc.2019811e1545310.2196/1545331738178
     [Google Scholar]
  15. VickstromE.R. ShinH.B. CollazoS.G. BaumanK.J. How well—still good? Assessing the validity of the American community survey english-ability question.2015 https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2015/demo/SEHSD-WP2015-18.pdf
  16. BeerL. WilliamsD. TieY. McManusT. YuanA.X. CrimS.M. DemekeH.B. CreelD. BlackwellA.D. CrawJ.A. WeiserJ. The capacity of HIV care facilities to implement strategies recommended by the ending the HIV epidemic initiative: The medical monitoring project facility survey.J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.202394429030010.1097/QAI.000000000000329037643411
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Workforce. What is a shortage designation?2023 https://bhw.hrsa.gov/workforce-shortage-areas/shortage-designation#mups
  18. Health resources and services administration. Program parts and initiatives.2024 https://ryanwhite.hrsa.gov/about/parts-and-initiatives
  19. UgasM. MackinnonR. AmadasunS. EscamillaZ. GillB. GuilianiM. FazelzadR. MartinH. SamoilD. PapadakosJ. Associations of health literacy and health outcomes among populations with limited language proficiency: A scoping review.J. Health Care Poor Underserved202334273175710.1353/hpu.2023.003937464529
     [Google Scholar]
  20. KarlinerL.S. JacobsE.A. ChenA.H. MuthaS. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature.Health Serv. Res.200742272775410.1111/j.1475‑6773.2006.00629.x17362215
     [Google Scholar]
  21. SudoreR.L. LandefeldC.S. Pérez-StableE.J. Bibbins-DomingoK. WilliamsB.A. SchillingerD. Unraveling the relationship between literacy, language proficiency, and patient–physician communication.Patient Educ. Couns.200975339840210.1016/j.pec.2009.02.01919442478
     [Google Scholar]
  22. PillaiD. ArtigaS. Employment among immigrants and implications for health and health care.2023 https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/employment-among-immigrants-and-implications-for-health-and-health-care/
  23. 8 U.S.C. 1611 - Aliens who are not qualified aliens ineligible for Federal public benefits.2018 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2022-title8/USCODE-2022-title8-chap14-subchapI-sec1611/summary
  24. The White House. 2021. National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States 2022–2025. Washington, DC.2021 https://files.hiv.gov/s3fs-public/NHAS-2022-2025.pdf
  25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin (including LEP).2015 https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/race/index.html
  26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.2023 https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/section-1557/index.html#:~:text=The%20Office%20for%20Civil%20Rights,in%20covered%20health%20programs%20or
  27. DasguptaS. TieY. BeerL. WeiserJ. Unmet needs for ancillary care services are associated with HIV clinical outcomes among adults with diagnosed HIV.AIDS Care202234560661410.1080/09540121.2021.194600134180733
     [Google Scholar]
  28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CLAS standards. https://thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov/clas/standards
/content/journals/chr/10.2174/011570162X362664250527051957
Loading
Access to Language Interpretation Services at Health Care Facilities Providing Care to Adults Diagnosed with HIV in the United States, 2019
Cur. HIV Res. 23, 203 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/011570162X362664250527051957
/content/journals/chr/10.2174/011570162X362664250527051957
/content/journals/chr/10.2174/011570162X362664250527051957
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): clear communication; communication interpretation services; HIV; limited English proficiency; medical monitoring project; public health care

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test