Skip to content
2000
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2666-4844
  • E-ISSN: 2666-4852

Abstract

Introduction

Forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) has garnered significant interest in solving cold criminal casework and has proven to be the solution to numerous unidentified human remains (UHR). Forensic samples can be subjected to a private genomic database where whole-genome sequencing (WGS) technique to retrieve genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data is performed. After conducting bioinformatics analysis, the data can be compared with the data of other users on the genomic database to identify distant relatives.

Objective

The article aims to explore FIGG in investigating criminal casework and identifying human remains. Moreover, it aims to create awareness among Southern Africans and advocate for a comprehensive approach involving all key stakeholders and practitioners to ensure the ethical and privacy-conscious establishment of FIGG, with a particular focus on Southern Africa.

Methods

The study employed a qualitative technique, including a literature scan on FIGG. Interviews were done with various stakeholders, including SAPS detectives, forensic examiners, and overseas specialists.

Results

FIGG is gaining popularity in many countries as a supplement to existing investigative tools. It is labour-intensive and requires increased participation of Southern Africans in private genetic genealogy databases. Specific resources and dedication are required before FIGG can be successfully implemented in the region as a routine investigative tool to solve cold cases and identify unidentified human remains.

Conclusion

Implementing FIGG in the Southern African region is not imminent but may be considered.

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
2024-11-06
2025-09-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BowmanN. How they did it: Ground-breaking technology reveals ID in 37-year-old cold case, Dayton Daily News.2018Available from: https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/crime–law/how-they-did-groundbreaking-technology-reveals-year-old-cold-case/wdliYt0agtdpFF4w6U1MiP/
  2. BudowleB. ArnetteA. SajantilaA. A cost–benefit analysis for use of large SNP panels and high throughput typing for forensic investigative genetic genealogy.Int. J. Legal Med.202313751595161410.1007/s00414‑023‑03029‑737341834
     [Google Scholar]
  3. NogelM. Some areas where digital forensics can support the addressing of legal challenges linked to forensic genetic genealogy.Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig.20244930169610.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301696
     [Google Scholar]
  4. SmithJ.H. Forensic DNA investigation. Handbook of DNA Profiling. DashH.R. ShrivastavaP. LorenteJ.A. SingaporeSpringer202210.1007/978‑981‑16‑4318‑7_57
     [Google Scholar]
  5. SmithJ.H. HorneJ.S. The value of forensic DNA investigative leads in South Africa.J For Sci & Crim Inves202317455596910.19080/JFSCI.2023.17.555969
     [Google Scholar]
  6. SmithL.A. The missing, the martyred and the disappeared: Global networks, technical intensification and the end of human rights genetics.Soc. Stud. Sci.201747339841610.1177/030631271667848928032532
     [Google Scholar]
  7. TerryS.F. CaffetM. Free at last? Discussing the future of forensic genealogy.Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers202024417117210.1089/gtmb.2020.29051.sjt32216641
     [Google Scholar]
  8. MeharP.A. Forensic Genetic Genealogy: An Investigative Aid.International Medico-Legal Reporter Journal2021
     [Google Scholar]
  9. ThomsonJ. ClaytonT. ClearyJ. GleesonM. KennettD. LeonardM. RutherfordD. An empirical investigation into the effectiveness of genetic genealogy to identify individuals in the UK.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.20204610226310.1016/j.fsigen.2020.10226332114291
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HuY. WeinL.M. Analysis of the privacy‐performance tradeoff of reference testing in Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy.J. Forensic Sci.20241556-4029.1557910.1111/1556‑4029.1557938978157
     [Google Scholar]
  11. WangM. ChenH. LuoL. HuangY. DuanS. YuanH. TangR. LiuC. HeG. Forensic investigative genetic genealogy: expanding pedigree tracing and genetic inquiry in the genomic era.J. Genet. Genomics2024S1673-8527(24)00158-910.1016/j.jgg.2024.06.01638969261
     [Google Scholar]
  12. SmithJ.H. An exploration of the identification and processing of forensic investigative leads in investigating crime in the South African Police Service.Thesis, University of South Africa: Pretoria2023
     [Google Scholar]
  13. WickenheiserR.A. Expanding DNA database effectiveness.Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg.2022410022610.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.10022635402888
     [Google Scholar]
  14. WickenheiserR.A. NaugleJ. HoeyB. NowlinR. KumarS.A. KubinskiM.A. GlynnC. ValerioR. AllenL. StoiloffS. KochanskiJ. GuerriniC. SchubertA.M. National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC): Guidelines for establishing Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) programs.Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg.2023710044610.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.10044638075455
     [Google Scholar]
  15. WickenheiserR.A. Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case.Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg.2019111412510.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.07.00332411963
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SmithJ.H. SinghM. DNA forensic and forensic investigative leads.J. Forensic Med.20249347https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/dna-forensic-and-forensic-investigative-leads-105209.html
     [Google Scholar]
  17. GlynnC.L. Bridging disciplines to form a new one: the emergence of forensic genetic genealogy.Genes (Basel)2022138138110.3390/genes1308138136011291
     [Google Scholar]
  18. GreytakE.M. KayeD.H. BudowleB. MooreC. ArmentroutS.L. Privacy and genetic genealogy data.Science2018361640585710.1126/science.aav033030166479
     [Google Scholar]
  19. GreytakE.M. MooreC. ArmentroutS.L. Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations.Forensic Sci. Int.201929910311310.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.03930991209
     [Google Scholar]
  20. SamuelG. KennettD. The impact of investigative genetic genealogy: perceptions of UK professional and public stakeholders.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.20204810236610.1016/j.fsigen.2020.10236632781429
     [Google Scholar]
  21. GreytakE. WyattS. CadyJ. MooreC. ArmentroutS. Investigative genetic genealogy for human remains identification.J. Forensic Sci.20241556-4029.1546910.1111/1556‑4029.1546938317620
     [Google Scholar]
  22. TuazonO.M. WickenheiserR.A. AnsellR. GuerriniC.J. ZwenneG.J. CustersB. Law enforcement use of genetic genealogy databases in criminal investigations: Nomenclature, definition and scope.Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg.2024810046010.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.10046038380276
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Vittali-SmithC. To catch a killer cousin: investigative genetic genealogy as a critical extension of familial searching in serious crime convictions in Australia.Univ. N. S. W. Law J.202346246410.53637/CGGN8586
     [Google Scholar]
  24. WardJ. Best practice recommendations for the establishment of a national DNA identification program for missing persons: A global perspective.Forensic Sci. International. Genet. Suppl. Ser.20176e43e4510.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.009
     [Google Scholar]
  25. WardJ. A multifaceted, multijurisdictional, multiagency, and multidisciplinary approach to investigating unidentified and missing persons cases in Australia.Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series20228535510.1016/j.fsigss.2022.09.020
     [Google Scholar]
  26. WardJ. CoakleyL. GrisedaleK. SeddonS. SpidenM. WatsonJ.L. McNevinD. Operationalization of the National DNA Program for Unidentified and Missing Persons’ Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Capability for Human Remains Identification in Australia.Forensic Genom.202441324010.1089/forensic.2023.0019
     [Google Scholar]
  27. WatsonJ. McNevinD. GrisedaleK. SpidenM. SeddonS. WardJ. Operationalisation of the ForenSeq® Kintelligence Kit for Australian unidentified and missing persons casework.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.20246810297210.1016/j.fsigen.2023.10297237918284
     [Google Scholar]
  28. HennesseyM. Best practices in the development and effective use of a forensic DNA database for identification of missing persons and unidentified human remains.Forensic Genetic Approaches for Identification of Human Skeletal Remains. DashH.R. ShrivastavaP. LorenteJ.A. CambridgeAcademic Press202310.1016/B978‑0‑12‑815766‑4.00018‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Rogalla-ŁadniakU. The overview of forensic genetic genealogy.Archives of Forensic Medicine and Criminology202372421122210.4467/16891716AMSIK.22.023.1762337405841
     [Google Scholar]
  30. WatsonJ.L. McNevinD. WardJ. Genetic Kinship Testing Techniques for Human Remains Identification and Missing Persons Investigations.Forensic Genom.20244142310.1089/forensic.2023.0018
     [Google Scholar]
  31. ErlichY. ShorT. Pe’erI. CarmiS. Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches.Science2018362641569069410.1126/science.aau483230309907
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KennettD. Using genetic genealogy databases in missing person’s. [Department of Justice (U.S.), National Best Practices for Implementing and Sustaining a Cold Case Investigation Unit, National Institute of Justice.2019Available from: https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/national-best-practices-implementing-and-sustaining-cold-case-investigation
  33. de HeerB. SnapshotA. Serial Rape.J. Interpers. Violence201631459861910.1177/088626051455611025466982
     [Google Scholar]
  34. WrightK.A. PrattT.C. DeLisiM. Examining offending specialization in a sample of male multiple homicide offenders.Homicide Stud.200812438139810.1177/1088767908323930
     [Google Scholar]
  35. PrzybylskiR. Adult Sex Offender Recidivism. In: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART), editors. Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.2017Available from: https://smart.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh231/files/media/document/recidivismofadultsexualoffenders.pdf
  36. ScudderN. DanielR. RaymondJ. SearsA. Operationalising forensic genetic genealogy in an Australian context.Forensic Sci. Int.202031611054310.1016/j.forsciint.2020.11054333152660
     [Google Scholar]
  37. DavawalaA. StockA. SpidenM. DanielR. McBainJ. HartmanD. Forensic genetic genealogy using microarrays for the identification of human remains: The need for good quality samples – A pilot study.Forensic Sci. Int.202233411124210.1016/j.forsciint.2022.11124235272198
     [Google Scholar]
  38. EdgeM.D. CoopG. Attacks on genetic privacy via uploads to genealogical databases.eLife20209e5181010.7554/eLife.5181031908268
     [Google Scholar]
  39. KlingD. PhillipsC. KennettD. TillmarA. Investigative genetic genealogy: Current methods, knowledge and practice.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.20215210247410.1016/j.fsigen.2021.10247433592389
     [Google Scholar]
  40. MachadoH. SilvaS. Investigative genetic genealogy: an ethical and privacy assessment framework tool is needed. For.Sci. Rev. (Singap.)2022341719link.gale.com/apps/doc/A694031230/AONE?u=anon~df9fddef&sid=googleScholar&xid=20985e55
     [Google Scholar]
  41. TillmarA. SjölundP. LundqvistB. Klippmark, Älgenäs C, Green H. Whole-genome sequencing of human remains to enable genealogy DNA database searches - a case report.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.20204610223310.1016/j.fsigen.2020.10223331981902
     [Google Scholar]
  42. WardJ. The operationalization of a multifaceted, multijurisdictional, multiagency and multidisciplinary capability for unidentified and missing persons investigations in Australia. Aust. J. Forensic Sci.202456S1657010.1080/00450618.2024.2324737
     [Google Scholar]
  43. YadavP.K. SharmaS. Challenges in using genetic genealogy in forensics.Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology in DNA Analysis.Academic Press202451153010.1016/B978‑0‑323‑99144‑5.00007‑X
     [Google Scholar]
  44. CastilloA. AleneT. SernaJ. BermudezE. For Victims of Golden State Killer, the Horror Never Ended.Available from: https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-goldenstate-victims-20180430-story.html
  45. PhillipsC. The Golden State Killer investigation and the nascent field of forensic genealogy.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.201836118618810.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.01030041097
     [Google Scholar]
  46. SelA. The Ingenious and ‘Dystopian’ DNA Technique Police Used to Hunt the ‘Golden State Killer’.Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/true-crime/wp/2018/04/27/golden-state-killer-dna-websitegedmatch-was-used-to-identify-joseph-deangelo-as-suspect-police-say/
  47. AldhousP. The Golden State Killer Case has spawned a New Forensic Science Industry.Available from: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/peteral
  48. ZhangS. The Messy Consequences of the Golden State Killer Case.Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/10/genetic-genealogy-dnadatabase-criminal-investigations/599005/
  49. KatsanisS.H. Pedigrees and perpetrators: uses of DNA and genealogy in forensic investigations.Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.202021153556410.1146/annurev‑genom‑111819‑08421332289230
     [Google Scholar]
  50. WilliamsR. WienrothM. Social and ethical aspects of forensic genetics: A critical review.Forensic Sci. Rev.201729214516928691916
     [Google Scholar]
  51. HennB.M. HonL. MacphersonJ.M. ErikssonN. SaxonovS. Pe’erI. MountainJ.L. Cryptic distant relatives are common in both isolated and cosmopolitan genetic samples.PLoS One201274e3426710.1371/journal.pone.003426722509285
     [Google Scholar]
  52. DowdeswellT.L. Forensic genetic genealogy: A profile of cases solved.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.20225810267910.1016/j.fsigen.2022.10267935176668
     [Google Scholar]
  53. TurnerA. Would You Like Your Data Raw or Cooked?Advanced Genetic Genealogy: Techniques and Case Studies. WayneD.P. Cushing, TXWayne Research2019189214
     [Google Scholar]
  54. AngristM. Genetic privacy needs a more nuanced approach.Nature20134947435710.1038/494007a23389508
     [Google Scholar]
  55. BerkmanB.E. MillerW.K. GradyC. Is it ethical to use genealogy data to solve crimes?Ann. Intern. Med.2018169533333410.7326/M18‑134829809242
     [Google Scholar]
  56. BrownT. Why we fear genetic informants: Using genetic genealogy to catch serial killers.Columbia Sci Technol Law Rev.2019211114181
     [Google Scholar]
  57. ChauhanN. KumarR. Forensic Genetics Genealogy-The Genetic Blueprint: Dissecting the Interplay of Relationship Inference, Database Accessibility, and Ethical Concerns in Forensic Genealogy.MIT Art, Design and Technology School of Computing International Conference (MITADTSoCiCon)202410.1109/MITADTSoCiCon60330.2024.10575817
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Debus-SherrillS. FieldM.B. Familial DNA searching- an emerging forensic investigative tool.Sci. Justice2019591202810.1016/j.scijus.2018.07.00630654965
     [Google Scholar]
  59. de GrootN.F. van BeersB.C. MeynenG. Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective.J. Med. Ethics2021471278879510.1136/medethics‑2021‑10756834509983
     [Google Scholar]
  60. FormiciG. From "familial searching" to "forensic genetic genealogy": New frontiers and challenges of DNA analysis in criminal investigations.BioLaw Journal-Rivista di BioDiritto20211305328
     [Google Scholar]
  61. FullertonS.M. RohlfsR. Should police detectives have unrestricted access to public genetic databases?Available from: https://leapsmag.com/should-police-detectives-have-total-access-to-public-genetic-databases
  62. GranjaR. MachadoH. Ethical controversies of familial searching: the views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom and in Poland.Sci. Technol. Human Values20194461068109210.1177/0162243919828219
     [Google Scholar]
  63. GuerriniC.J. RobinsonJ.O. PetersenD. McGuireA.L. Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique.PLoS Biol.20181610e200690610.1371/journal.pbio.200690630278047
     [Google Scholar]
  64. GuerriniC.J. WickenheiserR.A. BettingerB. McGuireA.L. FullertonS.M. Four misconceptions about investigative genetic genealogy.J. Law Biosci.202181lsab00110.1093/jlb/lsab00133880184
     [Google Scholar]
  65. MachadoH. GranjaR. Emerging DNA technologies and stigmatization.Forensic Genetics Governance and Crime. MachadoH. GranjaR. SingaporePalgrave Pivot202010.1007/978‑981‑15‑2429‑5_7
     [Google Scholar]
  66. McEwenJ. PinoN. RaphaelA. RennaK. BoyerJ. BrodyL.C. Investigative genetic genealogy: ethical, legal, and social issues and directions for future research.Forensic Genom.202113919810.1089/forensic.2021.0008
     [Google Scholar]
  67. MoranK.S. Damned by DNA — Balancing personal privacy with public safety.Forensic Sci. Int.2018292e3e410.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.01130287163
     [Google Scholar]
  68. MurphyE. Law and policy oversight of familial searches in recreational genealogy databases.Forensic Sci. Int.2018292e5e910.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.02730287164
     [Google Scholar]
  69. RamN. GuerriniC.J. McGuireA.L. Genealogy databases and the future of criminal investigation.Science201836063931078107910.1126/science.aau108329880677
     [Google Scholar]
  70. RamjeeD. RingroseK.N. The challenges of forensic genealogy: dirty data, electronic evidence, and privacy concerns.Denver Law Rev20209819
     [Google Scholar]
  71. SamuelG. KennettD. Problematizing consent: searching genetic genealogy databases for law enforcement purposes.New Genet. Soc.202140328430410.1080/14636778.2020.1843149
     [Google Scholar]
  72. TillmarA. Sturk-AndreaggiK. Daniels-HigginbothamJ. ThomasJ.T. MarshallC. The FORCE panel: an all-in-one SNP marker set for confirming investigative genetic genealogy leads and for general forensic applications.Genes (Basel)20211212196810.3390/genes1212196834946917
     [Google Scholar]
  73. ScudderN. RobertsonJ. KeltyS.F. WalshS.J. McNevinD. Crowdsourced and crowdfunded: the future of forensic DNA?Aust. J. Forensic Sci.202052223524110.1080/00450618.2018.1486456
     [Google Scholar]
  74. ScudderN. McNevinD. KeltyS.F. FunkC. WalshS.J. RobertsonJ. Policy and regulatory implications of the new frontier of forensic genomics: direct-to-consumer genetic data and genealogy records.Curr. Issues Crim. Justice201931219421610.1080/10345329.2018.1560588
     [Google Scholar]
  75. SkevaS. LarmuseauM.H.D. ShabaniM. Review of policies of companies and databases regarding access to customers’ genealogy data for law enforcement purposes.Per. Med.202017214115310.2217/pme‑2019‑010032125932
     [Google Scholar]
  76. WallaceH.M. JacksonA.R. GruberJ. ThibedeauA.D. Forensic DNA databases–Ethical and legal standards: A global review.Egypt. J. Forensic Sci.201443576310.1016/j.ejfs.2014.04.002
     [Google Scholar]
  77. ZabelJ. The killer inside us: law, ethics, and the forensic use of family genetics.Berkeley J Crim Law20192447100
     [Google Scholar]
  78. WrightL.E. Vander VenT. FesmireC. American serial rape, 1940-2010.Crim. Justice Rev.201641444646810.1177/0734016816670458
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act, Act 37 of 2013.PretoriaGovernment Printers2015
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Meintjes-van der WaltL. OlaboredeA. DNA phenotyping: A possible aid in criminal investigation.South African J Crim Justice202336112310.47348/SACJ/v36/i1a1
     [Google Scholar]
  81. SmithJ.H. HorneJ.S. Letter to the Editor: DNA phenotyping: Exploring its potential in criminal investigations.South African J Crim Justice2023362361362
     [Google Scholar]
  82. GuanglinH. Lan-HaiW. MenggeW. Editorial: Forensic investigative genetic genealogy and fine-scale structure of human populations.Front. Genet.202313106786510.3389/fgene.2022.106786536685813
     [Google Scholar]
  83. FatumoS. ChikoworeT. ChoudhuryA. AyubM. MartinA.R. KuchenbäckerK. Diversity in genomic studies: a roadmap to address the imbalance.Nat. Med.202228224310.1038/s41591‑021‑01672‑435145307
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Department of Justice (U.S.). Interim Policy: Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Searching. United States Department of Justice.2019https://www.justice.gov/olp/forensic-science
  85. BornP. Genetic Testing in Underwriting: Implications for Life Insurance Markets.Journal of Insurance Regulation201938511810.52227/26103.2019
     [Google Scholar]
  86. ButlerJ.M. Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019–2022.Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg.2023610031110.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.10031136618991
     [Google Scholar]
  87. ChapmanM.B. The establishment of an efficient pipeline, incorporating file type conversion and tree-building software for forensic genetic genealogy in Australia.Master's Thesis, Murdoch University2024
     [Google Scholar]
  88. CharpentierA. GallicE. Using collaborative genealogy data to study migration: a research note.Hist. Fam.202025112110.1080/1081602X.2019.1641130
     [Google Scholar]
  89. ContrerasJ.L. SchultzK. TeerlinkC.C. ManessT. MeyerL.J. Cannon-AlbrightL.A. Legal terms of use and public genealogy websites.J. Law Biosci.202071lsaa06310.1093/jlb/lsaa06334221427
     [Google Scholar]
  90. ErtürkM.S. FitzpatrickC. PressM. WeinL.M. Analysis of the genealogy process in forensic genetic genealogy.J. Forensic Sci.20226762218222910.1111/1556‑4029.1512736059116
     [Google Scholar]
  91. GarcíaÓ. Forensic genealogy. Social, ethical, legal and scientific implications.Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine202147311211910.1016/j.remle.2020.06.002
     [Google Scholar]
  92. GurneyD. PressM. MooreC. RolnickC.I. HochreiterA. BossertB.L. The need for standards and certification for investigative genetic genealogy, and a notice of action.Forensic Sci. Int.202234111149510.1016/j.forsciint.2022.11149536257095
     [Google Scholar]
  93. MajumderM.A. GuerriniC.J. McGuireA.L. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk.Annu. Rev. Med.202172115116610.1146/annurev‑med‑070119‑11472732735764
     [Google Scholar]
  94. O’LearyD.E. DNA Mining and genealogical information systems: Not just for finding family ethnicity.Int. J. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manage.201825419019610.1002/isaf.1439
     [Google Scholar]
  95. OefeleinR.H. Seven years of SNPs: An assessment of methods utilized for generating profiles for forensic genetic genealogy.Forensic Sci. International. Genet. Suppl. Ser.2022834734810.1016/j.fsigss.2022.11.002
     [Google Scholar]
  96. MateenR.M. SabarM.F. HussainS. ParveenR. HussainM. Familial DNA analysis and criminal investigation: Usage, downsides and privacy concerns.Forensic Sci. Int.202131811057610.1016/j.forsciint.2020.11057633234348
     [Google Scholar]
  97. NovroskiN. The Pioneer of Investigative Genetic Genealogy in CanadaAn Interview with Steve Smith, Head of Cold Case Unit, Toronto Police Service.Forensic Genom.2024411310.1089/forensic.2024.29027.int
     [Google Scholar]
  98. TillmarA. FagerholmS.A. StaafJ. SjölundP. AnsellR. Getting the conclusive lead with investigative genetic genealogy – A successful case study of a 16 year old double murder in Sweden.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.20215310252510.1016/j.fsigen.2021.10252533991867
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
Loading
Readiness for Southern Africa to Employ Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy
Curr Foren Sci 2, e26664844316210 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
/content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
/content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA); direct-to-consumer database; forensic DNA database; forensic investigative genetic genealogy; genetic genealogy; single-nucleotide polymorphism

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test