Current Drug Safety - Volume 8, Issue 2, 2013

Carcinogenic properties of ulipristal acetate (UPA), a selective progesterone receptor modulator developed for the treatment of benign gynecological conditions such as uterine fibroids, were assessed in a 26-week carcinogenicity study in transgenic TgRasH2 mice and a 104-week study in Sprague Dawley rats. Dose levels used in the mouse study were 15, 45, or 130 mg/kg/day and for the ratstudy the doses used were 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg/day. Vehicle and water controls were part of both studies and a positive control, N-Nitroso-N-methylurea intraperitoneally, was included in the transgenic mouse assay. Survival at all dose levels was similar to vehicle controls in both sexes of both species and there was no evidence of any UPA-induced carcinogenicity in either species. Rats receiving UPA had decreased incidences of fibroadenomas and adenocarcinomas in the mammary gland in all treated groups. UPA exposure [AUC(0–24h)] at the highest dose in rats was 67 times human therapeutic exposure at 10 mg/day. In mice, no tumor of any type increased at UPA exposures up to 313 times of therapeutic exposure. UPA-related findings in mice were limited to organ weight changes in the liver, pituitary, thyroid/parathyroid glands, and epididymis as well as minimal panlobular hepatocellular hypertrophy in male and female mice receiving 130 mg/kg/day. Rats had UPA-related non-neoplastic findings in the reproductive system (mammary gland, ovary, uterus, vagina, seminal vesicle, prostate), endocrine system (adrenal, pituitary), thymus, muscle, liver, pancreas and lungs most of which are considered to be due to exaggerated pharmacological action of the compound.

Background: Prescribing pharmacological treatment for hospitalized older patients represents a challenge for physicians. In particular, hospitalized older adults present with acute and chronic diseases, which may require multiple treatments and increase their susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Patterns of drugs use have rarely been investigated in these patients. Objective: to describe patterns of drugs use among hospitalized older adults participating in the CRiteria to assess Appropriate Medication use among Elderly complex patients (CRIME) project. Methods: we performed a cross-sectional multicentre study based on data from the CRIME project, a study performed in geriatric and internal medicine acute care wards of 7 Italian hospitals. The only two exclusion criteria were: age < 65 years old and unwillingness to participate in the study. Participants were assessed at hospital admission and followed until discharge. Results: mean (Standard Deviation) age of 1123 participants was 81.5 (7.4) years, with 629 (56%) being women and 572 participants (51%) were admitted from Emergency Room. Mean length of stay was 11.2 (6.7) days. Mean number of drugs used greatly varied before (6.2, SD 3.2), during (10.6, SD 5.6) and after (7.1, SD 3.1) hospitalization. No difference in the number of drugs used during hospital stay was observed across age groups. During hospital stay, drugs for acid related disorders (77.9%) and antithrombotic agents (76.8%) were the most commonly used drugs, followed by drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system (58.0%) and diuretics (57.1%). Very common was the use of psycholeptics (34.3%) and psychoanaleptics (22.4%). Conclusion: Use of multiple drug treatments is common in hospitalized older adults and hospitalization is associated with a substantial increment in the number of drugs used, with no differences across age groups.

Background: While it is well known that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are usually designed with sufficient sample size and power to detect the efficacy but not safety of a medicine, the extent to which RCTs quantify safety has not been well ascertained. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the safety data available for five commonly prescribed medicines at the time of marketing. Methods: Published RCTs for five medicines risperidone, sertraline, donepezil, strontium ranelate and tramadol extended release were identified. All adverse events (AEs) in the trials were independently extracted by two clinical researchers. Using the sample size in the trials, the power to detect the observed difference in AEs rates between the treatment and placebo groups was calculated. A power of 80% or more was deemed adequate to detect AEs; studies with power of < 80% were deemed insufficiently powered to detect AEs. Results: 12 RCTs were identified. Six trials were insufficiently powered to detect any of the potential AEs reported. Of the 150 evaluated AEs, the trials were insufficiently powered to detect 81% (122/150) of the AEs reported. For the adverse events that were detected with adequate powered clinical trials, only 53% (10/19) of potentially very common AEs (≥ 10%) and 17% (18/106) of potentially common AEs (1%-<10%) were identified. Conclusion: Trials are insufficiently powered to detect the majority of adverse events that are reported in clinical trials, even for common adverse events. Observations other than primary efficacy endpoints such as AEs that are not prespecified with adequate power should be treated as hypothesis generating only and not justification of evidence. Claims of safety based on trial evidence not designed for the safety endpoint are often premature.

Background: High-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for the empiric treatment of communityacquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections has been evaluated for efficacy, but characterization of adverse reactions is lacking. Methods: To describe adverse reactions associated with high-dose TMP-SMX therapy, a retrospective medical record review of outpatients receiving TMP-SMX was conducted. Each episode (case) of a patient receiving high-dose TMPSMX (at least 4 double-strength tablets per day) was matched by next closest prescription number with a patient (control) receiving standard-dose TMP-SMX. Results: 982 cases were reviewed; 491 in each arm. At least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred in 9.1% of patients. There was a significant difference in the incidence for any ADR between high-dose and standard-dose groups (13.0% vs 5.09%, respectively; p<0.0001). More patients taking high-dose TMP-SMX developed hyperkalemia (3.46% vs 0.81%, p=0.0066), acute renal injury (3.67% vs 1.63%, p=0.044), and rash (1.83% vs 0.20%, p=0.021). Patients receiving high-dose TMP-SMX had significantly higher rates of electrolyte abnormality ADR (5.09% vs 1.63%, p=0.0021), gastrointestinal ADR (5.30% vs 2.24%, p=0.011), renal ADR (3.67% vs 1.63%, p=0.044), central nervous system ADR (2.65% vs 0.81%, p=0.047), and hypersensitivity (2.24% vs 0.41%, p=0.022). Concomitant receipt of an angiotensinconverting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor was a univariate variable associated with hyperkalemia, and advanced age and receipt of high-dose TMP-SMX were independent variables. Conclusion: ADRs such as hyperkalemia are more likely to be associated with the use of high-dose TMP-SMX in the ambulatory setting. Clinicians should use caution when initiating high-dose TMP-SMX and consider laboratory monitoring in patients of advanced age or those receiving concomitant ACE inhibitor therapy.

Treatment of sex hormones deficiencies in men and women is a subject of considerable discussion due in no small measure to safety concerns. In order to appreciate the appropriate balance between potential risk and benefit, it is important to understand the issues at hand. This is particularly true in the case of the use of testosterone in women. To understand the effect of testosterone supplementation in deficient patients, it is useful to review the normal physiology of testosterone in women. An understanding of the impact of testosterone deficiency will further elucidate perspectives on the topic. This paper aims to present a rational consideration of the known and potential adverse effects of testosterone supplementation in women. Areas of concern regarding the use of androgens in women generally fall into three categories: masculinization, cardiovascular effects and cancer risks, but there are a variety of other issues to be borne in mind. Full understanding of these risks in the context of treating females experiencing testosterone deficiency is limited in some cases, and inferences have to be drawn from other areas.

Background: Major congenital malformations (MCMs) are a significant cause of infant morbidity and mortality and constitute an important societal and economic burden. Methods: We conducted a literature review to synthesize current evidence on MCMs. Specific objectives were to: 1) summarize internationally reported prevalence of MCMs based on registries and surveillance systems; 2) describe the epidemiology of different MCM types including critical periods and causative factors; 3) to identify the role played by principal known teratogens on the increase in the risk of MCMs; and 4) determine challenges associated with the epidemiologic assessment of potential risk factors for MCMs as well as potential preventive measures. Results: It is estimated that 7.9 million infants worldwide are born every year with a MCM, yet there is considerable variation in reported rates across countries. This may be attributable to varying definitions arising from heterogeneity among different classes with respect to critical periods for embryogenesis and organogenesis. There is also substantial etiologic heterogeneity among MCMs classes that potentially contribute to challenges in epidemiologic studies. Modifiable factors such as pharmacologic exposures have received considerable attention and a number of drugs have been shown to be teratogenic including folic acid antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, coumarin derivatives and retinoids including isotretinoin. Conclusion: The majority of MCMs are due to unexplained causes. Other contributing factors include genetics, environmental factors, multifactorial inheritance, maternal-related conditions, and maternal drug or chemical exposure. However, there remains a need to better understand the epidemiology of MCMs when studying drug effect during gestation.

Introduction: A liver dysfunction induced by halogenated volatile anaesthetics is considered as a significant diagnostic problem. The aim of our report was to describe the first case of lethal hepatic failure in a female patient undergoing kidney transplantation (KTx) from a living donor after repeated sevoflurane anaesthes. Case Presentation: A 47-year-old hypertensive and diabetic female patient received kidney from her 70-year-old mother. There was an immediate graft function and around 800 ml of blood loss on the abdominal drains, which gradually decreased after the erythrocyte and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) substitution. On the first postoperative (p.o.) day she gradually became anuric and overweighed at the next day undergoing dialysis. Because of prolonged hypotension and somnolence she required reintubation. The second day transaminases increased (AST&ALT>700, LDH>1200 U/L). On the third p.o. day she was urgently reoperated because of a sudden excessive bleeding. However, there was a rather slow flow of tears from the whole operative field that was even more excessive after the operation with signs of a consumptive coagulopathy. She was adequately substituted until the bleeding stopped more than 24 hrs after its onset. The new laboratory results showed further increase in transaminazes (3300 U/L-ALT, 5100-AST, 8900-LDH) and ultrasound investigation confirmed an extensive toxic hepatic lesion. On the fourth p.o. night the patient was stable, diuresis rate was at 100 ml/hour, but in the morning she became hyposaturated because of an increased bronchial secretion. The dialysis could not improve the cardio-respiratory insufficiency and she died 30min later. Conclusions: This case report suggests that sevoflurane can lead to a severe hepatotoxicity in at-risk individuals with repeated sevoflurane anaesthesia, having renal failure, in those with a preoperative known history of cardiovascular disorders, as well as in those with excessive extracellular volume. A particular precaution should be considered in cases of an elective surgery including organ transplantation.

Objective: We report a case of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) and immune hemolytic anemia (IHA) associated with cefpodoxime therapy. Case Summary: A patient with a recent history of cefpodoxime proxetil treatment presented with elevated serum creatinine, oliguria, nausea, vomiting, and dyspnea. Evidence of renal failure, abnormal urinalysis, and renal biopsy with inflammatory infiltrate in the interstitium confirmed a diagnosis of AIN. The patient subsequently developed IHA, which was confirmed by peripheral blood smear results and positive Coombs’ test. The patient recovered after dialysis therapy and 2 days of intravenous methylprednisolone (500mg/day) followed by oral prednisolone (60 mg/day), which was rapidly tapered and stopped within 3 weeks. Conclusions: To our knowledge, cefpodoxime-induced AIN and IHA are unprecedented. Physicians should be aware that drug-induced AIN and hemolysis can be associated with cefpodoxime proxetil.

There is increasing evidence that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significant blood glucose lowering effects. A 70-year old Caucasian male with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and diabetes had a stable glycemic control being treated with glibenclamide (3.5 mg twice daily). After the first daily dose of the TKI sorafenib (800 mg) the patient experienced acute nocturnal disorientation and somnolence with a corresponding blood glucose of 37 mg/dl. After administration of glucose intravenously the neurological disturbances were completely reversible. As there was no intercurrent deterioration neither of hepatic nor of renal function, the severe hypoglycemia can likely be attributed to a drug-drug interaction of sorafenib with the sulfonylurea. The complete inhibition of the CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 mediated metabolic pathway of glibenclamide through sorafenib might have resulted in a rapid accumulation of glibenclamide. Profound blood glucose lowering effects of sorafenib might have additionally contributed to the hypoglycemic episode.