Current Drug Safety - Volume 11, Issue 1, 2016

This review focuses on the emerging concepts concerning the efficacy profile of biological drugs in psoriasis ranging from moderate to severe, and attempts to provide the most recent individual positioning of biologics in treating psoriasis. Biologic agents targeting towards specific immune mediators have emerged as treatment options for patients with moderate to-severe plaque psoriasis unresponsive or intolerant to traditional systemic agents. Data on the safety of biologics are available for up to 5 years in psoriasis and are on the whole reassuring. National registries are still evolving and will provide data on safety, to help the long-term monitoring of patients with psoriasis ongoing biological treatment. Although several biologics have demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability in short-term trials, treatment guidelines recommend them as third line therapies due to relative lack of long-term safety data, especially for those who have been commercialized recently. Here, we have reviewed the long-term safety data obtained from National Registries, randomized controlled trials, openlabel extension studies and meta-analyses on etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Biologic treatments have modified the therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of many dermatological and non- dermatological diseases and data on literature have widely focused on the efficacy and safety of TNF-alpha inhibitors in psoriasis. Although the etiopathogenesis has not completely elucidated, inflammation appears the lait motif unifying the immune-pathogenesis of diverse skin disease, as atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata and hidradenitis suppurativa. Actually, data on the off-label use of biologics in cutaneous immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are scarce and restricted to anecdotal cases and case series. The present review aims to evidence the major off- label use of TNF-alpha inhibitors in dermatology.

The increasing insights into the pathogenetic mechanisms of inflammatory autoimmune arthritis and the development of innovative systems of industrial production have led to discover molecules that are able to target/block other molecules that play a critical role in the immune system functioning, and that have been introduced in clinical practice alone and/or in addiction with other “old” disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. For this reason, such drugs are currently known as “biological drugs” and include molecules that induce the immunosuppression acting on several immune pathways. However, though the biological drugs have been employed from more than a decade, there still exist some drawbacks of their use, in particular about the high costs of this therapy and their overall safety, including the route of administration for the intravenous use. In this review we provide an update on the correct use and current therapeutic indications of such drugs, including some of the new biologic therapies that will be soon available for the clinical use, focusing on these biological drugs: • Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab); • The T cell co-stimulation inhibitor, abatacept; • The anti-CD20 receptor monoclonal B cell agent, rituximab; • The interlukin-6 (IL-6) receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody, tocilizumab; • The interlukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitor, anakinra; • The interlukin-IL17 (IL-17) pathway inhibitors (ustekinumab, secukinumab, brodalumab).

During the last decades, the advent of biological therapies has revolutionized the management of several immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, as inflammatory bowel diseases, autoimmune arthritis and psoriasis, which significantly impact both quality of life and health care economics. Biological therapies currently available can be divided into two main categories: the tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, certolizumab pegol) and interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibodies (ustekinumab). Biologics, reducing TNFα bioavailability or inhibiting proximal regulators of inflammatory cascade, represent an established therapeutic strategy of inflammatory autoimmune diseases, with remarkable efficacy and a safety profile that is extensively examined and monitored. The biology and the immunological effects of TNFα, IL-12, IL-23 and related signalling pathways are accurately summarized. The dosing regimens, methods of administration, pharmacodynamics profiles, and side effects of the currently licensed TNFα antagonists and IL12/IL23 inhibitor are discussed in detail.

The discovery of some key molecular mechanisms underlying the dysregulation of the immune system responsible for inflammatory systemic diseases as severe as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), and Systemic Vasculitides, led to the development and subsequent introduction into clinical practice of biological drugs which are significantly improving the management of such complex disorders. This novel molecular targeted therapeutics represents in fact a valid alternative or complementary treatment to conventional immunosuppressive strategies, characterized by broad, unspecific actions and severe adverse effects. Main advantages of the use of biologic drugs reside in their steroid-sparing effect and in the ability of inducing remission of refractory disease states or curing specific organ involvements. Aim of this article is to review and briefly discuss the scientific evidence supporting the use of biologics in these diseases, with a particular emphasis on their efficacy and safety profile compared to the canonical drugs.

Non-infectious uveitis can be a potentially sight threatening disease. Very recently, therapeutic strategies have turned towards a new methodology, which includes biologic agents. The introduction of biologic drugs has started a Copernican revolution in ophthalmology: biologic therapies represent a revolutionary option for those patients who present non-responder, sight threatening uveitis. The availability of these therapies has improved the uveitis outcome. The present review shows the most relevant medical literature on biologic agents in ophthalmology, such as tumor necrosis factor blockers, anti-interleukins and other related biologics. Several papers reported the efficacy of biologic agents in a large number of refractory uveitides, which suggest a promising role of biologic drugs for selected cases. On the other hand, the medical literature does not have consistent numbers yet, which hopefully will validate the promising preliminary results. Biologic agents are not only promising drugs for the treatment of nonresponder uveitis, but also they show an apparently favourable safety profile, although several topics remain unsolved: it is still not clear when commencing the treatment, which agent to choose, and the length of biologic therapy. Moreover, the high costs and the still not clear safety profile have very often limited their use only for severe, non-responder uveitis in highly specialized uveitis centres.

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn’s Disease (CD) are chronic, progressive and disabling disorders characterized by a heterogeneous clinical course. Some years ago the main goal of the therapy was to achieve and maintain clinical remission, whereas at present the main goal of therapy is represented by the deep remission, characterized by sustained clinical remission, complete mucosal healing and normalization of serological markers of inflammation. In the last years new therapeutic approaches have been introduced which have led to a reduction in the mortality rate and have modified the natural history of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD). In addition, several prognostic factors have been identified which have allowed to better stratify the disease and to choose the most appropriate therapy for the single patient. Moreover, early treatment with immunosuppressive drugs and/or biologics has changed, at least in the short term, the course of the disease by reducing hospitalization rate and the need for surgery. Therefore, the development of biologic therapies has represented an important step in the treatment of IBD, since these drugs induce remission and response rates that are not achieved by other therapies. Since their use can result in significant adverse events that increase morbidity, patients must be aware of the risks associated with treatment and must be strictly monitored. Although treatment with biologic drugs is not successful in all patients and many of them lose clinical response, new therapies are currently under evaluation.

The better understanding of immunology and antitumor immune responses have prompted the development of novel immunotherapy agents like PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1 and anti- PDL-1 antibodies) that improve the capacity of the immune system to acknowledge and delete tumors, including lung cancer. Currently, two anti-PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and one anti- PD-L1 (MPDL-3280A) agents are in advanced stages of development in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among these, nivolumab demonstrated a survival benefit versus docetaxel in refractory squamous NSCLC, reporting 41% reduction in risk of death (median overall survival: 9.2 versus 6.0 months; objective response rate: 20% versus 9%), and better safety profile than standard-of-care chemotherapy (grade 3-4 adverse events: 7% versus 55%). However, the enhancement of immune response to cancer targeting specific immune regulatory checkpoints is associated with a toxicity profile different from that related to traditional chemotherapeutic agents and molecularly targeted therapies. The success of immunotherapy is related to ongoing evaluation/identification and treatment of these immunerelated side effects. Herein, first clinical results of PD-1 agents in lung cancer are reviewed, focusing on toxicity profile and its management.

Compliance Aids have gained widespread use to assist patients in managing their medicines, with a view to addressing the issue of adherence. However, although patient outcomes may have been improved through better use of compliance aids, it has been highlighted that there are limited data on the stability of medicines, when removed from the original container and repackaged in a compliance aid. Exposure of medicines to heat, light, moisture and air (oxygen) may impact on both their chemical and physical stability, resulting in the potential for quality of the medicine and thus the safety for the patient being compromised. It is also uncertain whether the compliance aid can provide the same protection from these environmental conditions as the manufacturer’s packaging, even though the time frame for repackaging is only 28 days. This paper presents a comprehensive review and detailed discussion of the available literature on the stability implications of repackaging medicines into compliance aids. The importance of repackaging is thus highlighted by its ability to impact on therapeutic outcomes for patients.

Purpose: Varenicline, the newest agent marketed for smoking cessation is regarded as effective in providing prolonged smoking abstinence. However, its adverse effect profile may cause discontinuation, potentially reducing smoking abstinence rates, thus requiring an examination of the frequency and impact of adverse effects on discontinuation. Methods: We sought only Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of varenicline on humans, with a follow-up period of at least three months and an average Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) score at least 5 (moderate dependence) for both the active and placebo groups. PubMed, Medscape, JCU One Search, ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S.), and the Cochrane Collaboration from January 2006 to January 2015 were searched. Fixed and random effects models were run to determine relationships between adverse effects and premature discontinuation from varenicline. Results: 12 RCTs were included, involving 5 459 patients, with those receiving varenicline found to be nearly twice as likely (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.82 [1.47; 2.26]) to experience adverse effects compared to those patients on a placebo. The active group experienced nearly a 1.5 times higher (OR = 1.47 [1.19; 1.81]) rate of discontinuation. Nausea, insomnia, and headache are the most commonly reported adverse effects, with ORs of 4.40 [3.80; 5.11], 1.75 [1.48; 2.08], and 1.20 [1.02; 1.41] respectively. Conclusion: Adverse effects experienced during varenicline treatment appear to be associated with higher discontinuation, which are linked to lowered smoking cessation rates, suggesting a need for strategies to minimise the impacts of adverse effects, to better ensure adherence.

Objective: The actual prevalence of drug induced QTc prolongation in clinical practice is unknown. Our objective was to determine the occurrence and characteristics of drug-induced QT prolongation in several common clinical practices. Additionally, a subgroup of patients treated with dextropropoxyphene of particular interest for the regulatory authority was analysed. Research Design and Methods: Medical history and comorbidities predisposing to QT interval prolongation were registered for 1270 patient requiring medical assistance that involved drug administration. Three ionograms and ECGs were performed: baseline, intra- and after treatment; QT interval was corrected with Bazzet formula. Results: Among patients, 9.9% presented QTc >450/470 ms, 3% QTc > 500 ms, 12.7% ΔQTc >30 ms and 5.2% ΔQTc >60 ms. QTc prolongation associated with congestive heart failure, ischemic cardiopathy, diabetes, renal failure, arrhythmias, hypothyroidism, and bradycardia. At univariate analysis, clarithromycin, haloperidol, tramadol, amiodarone, glyceryl trinitrate, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, amoxicillin + sulbactam, ampicillin + sulbactam, fentanyl, piperacillin + tazobactam, and diazepam prolonged QTc. Prolongation remained significantly associated with furosemide, clarithromycin, glyceryl trinitrate and betalactamase inhibitors after multivariate analysis. Conclusion: QT interval prolongation in everyday practice is frequent, in association to clinical factors and drugs that can be easily identified for monitoring and prevention strategies.

Objective: To report and discuss a serious cutaneous adverse reaction in a child who was treated with acetaminophen (paracetamol). Case Summary: A five years old male child presented a pruriginous maculopapular rash and a “druginduced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis” was suspected. Applying Spanish Pharmacovigilance System probability algorithm (modified Karch-Lasagna algorithm) for the suspected drugs (acetaminophen, ibuprofen and azithromycin), the causality of this adverse reaction was possible for acetaminophen and unlikely for the other two drugs. In this case it was recommended suspending and avoiding treatment with acetaminophen. This adverse reaction was reported to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System (notification number: 10-600428). Discussion: Skin adverse reactions induced by drugs are uncommon but often serious and potentially fatal. There are few cases reports of “Stevens-Johnson syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis” associated with acetaminophen in the literature. We present a documented case in a child. According to modified Karch-Lasagna algorithm, this case represents a possible adverse reaction. Conclusion: Hypersensitivity reactions with skin involvement are rarely associated with acetaminophen ingestion, but in a population such as the paediatric population, in which its use is widespread, the involvement of this drug should always be suspected if no other possible cause at sight.

Aripiprazole, a dopamine stabilizing atypical antipsychotic is used in treatment of tardive dyskinesia caused by other neuroleptics. Tardive dyskinesia is rarely caused by Aripiprazole and has only been documented in high risk patients i.e., female gender, advanced age, affective illness, coexisting neurological disorders. Here the author describes two atypical cases of tardive dyskinesia associated with Aripiprazole. First case of tardive dyskinesia was observed in a neuroleptic naïve young adult male with paranoid illness after six months of treatment with Aripiprazole upon addition of Fluoxetine and the second case was a middle aged female with affective illness where dyskinetic movements appeared after stopping Aripiprazole. The role of Fluoxetine in causing tardive dyskinesia with Aripiprazole and covert dyskinesia due to Aripiprazole with appropriate management is discussed.

Generic formulations represent a way to reduce the costs of brand compounds when their patent is expired. While, the bio-equivalence in generic drugs is guaranteed, some excipients as well as dyes could be different and this could reduce the drug safety. Herein, we report the development of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in two patients after the switch from brand to generic formulations. We have tested cytochrome P450 enzymes expression as well as drug serum levels. None of these markers were altered. Checking deeply into both patient’s medical history, they harbored poly-sensitivity or allergy to pollen and graminacea and used different active ingredients for different health problems coming from the same generic company Almus®. This company used different dyes and excipients compared to the branded drugs made by distinguished companies. In conclusion, we strongly suggest to both pharmacists and physicians to be careful in giving the advice to change the drug, thinking to reduce health sanitary costs without considering the personal clinical history of each one. Paradoxically this behavior is causing other health issues, bringing to an increase of the overall costs for patients as well as for National Health System.