Skip to content
2000
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2589-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2589-9783

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of scientific publications. The h-index offers a consistent estimation method about a researcher’s overall scientific achievements since it combines the total number of publications (i.e., productivity) and the number of citations (i.e., quality of those publications). In other words, the h-index is intended to measure simultaneously the quality and quantity of scientific output in a cumulative approach and does not provide data regarding the recent productivity. This editorial presents advantages and limitations of h-index that all researchers in health sciences need to be aware of, especially if this metric is used for professional progression, and discusses the simple modification indexed to “academic/scientific age”. It is obvious that no single metric is perfect, and the use of two or more metrics is more prone to success.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdrr/10.2174/258997751102191111141801
2019-12-01
2025-09-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cdrr/10.2174/258997751102191111141801
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Editorial
Keyword(s): advantages; author profiles; citation impact; h-index; limitations; m-index
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test