Skip to content
2000
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-403X
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6557

Abstract

Introduction

This study aims to investigate the impact of different double-stent methods on the structure and mechanics of coronary bifurcation lesions, providing reference indicators for clinicians in selecting an appropriate interventional procedure.

Methods

Three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) image data of a patient with coronary bifurcation disease was performed. Two types of double-stent (Cullotte and Crush) procedures were simulated, and their effects were evaluated using Finite element analysis. Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) validation and retrospective clinical analysis were performed to support computational findings.

Results

The stress distribution following the Cullotte stent was concentrated in the SB, whereas the stress after the Crush procedure was localized at the overlap with the proximal main vessel three-layer stent. Compared with the Crush procedure, the Culotte approach resulted in a lower percentage of double-stent malapposition, better dilation of vascular stenosis, and less narrowing of the SB stent, suggesting a more favorable clinical outcome. IVUS validation and retrospective clinical analysis were performed to support computational findings.

Discussion

Culotte stenting resulted in better stent-vessel conformity and more favorable stress distribution. The findings support FEA as a valuable tool in procedural planning.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the Culotte technique may offer mechanical advantages over the Crush technique, potentially improving long-term clinical outcomes. These results emphasize the role of computational modeling in optimizing interventional strategies.

© 2026 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X404659250702080410
2025-07-11
2026-01-28

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X404659250702080410
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. HeJ. YuanS. SongC. High triglyceride-glucose index predicts cardiovascular events in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions: A large-scale cohort study.Cardiovasc. Diabetol.202322128910.1186/s12933‑023‑02016‑x 37891642
     [Google Scholar]
  2. SuleimanS CoughlanJJ ToumaG SzirtR Contemporary management of isolated ostial side branch disease: An evidence-based approach to Medina 001 Bifurcations.Interv Cardiol202116160610.15420/icr.2020.3033897832
     [Google Scholar]
  3. NeumannF.J. Sousa-UvaM. AhlssonA. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.Eur. Heart J.20194028716510.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 30165437
     [Google Scholar]
  4. YangH. QianJ. HuangZ. GeJ. Szabo 2-stent technique for coronary bifurcation lesions: Procedural and short-term outcomes.BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.202020132510.1186/s12872‑020‑01605‑y 32635890
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ChenX.R. CuiD.Y. ChenY.Q. NiuT.S. Crush is superior to Culotte in two-stent strategy for treatment of left main coronary artery bifurcations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin. Invest. Med.2020432E35E4610.25011/cim.v43i2.34048 32593275
     [Google Scholar]
  6. KahramanS. CizgiciA.Y. GunerA. Clinical outcomes of double-kissing crush or double-kissing culotte in nonleft main bifurcation lesions: The ROUTE trial.Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv.2024171101461610.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014616 39445416
     [Google Scholar]
  7. TothG.G. SasiV. FrancoD. Double-kissing culotte technique for coronary bifurcation stenting.EuroIntervention2020169e724e73310.4244/EIJ‑D‑20‑00130 32338608
     [Google Scholar]
  8. WangR. DingY. YangJ. Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions.Clin. Res. Cardiol.2022111776177510.1007/s00392‑021‑01979‑9 34862569
     [Google Scholar]
  9. SamantS. WuW. ZhaoS. Computational and experimental mechanical performance of a new everolimus-eluting stent purpose-built for left main interventions.Sci. Rep.2021111872810.1038/s41598‑021‑87908‑2 33888765
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ZhaoS. WuW. SamantS. Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bifurcation stenting.Sci. Rep.20211111648610.1038/s41598‑021‑95026‑2 34389748
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ColomboA. ChiastraC. GalloD. Advancements in coronary bifurcation stenting techniques: Insights from computational and bench testing studies.Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng.20254137000010.1002/cnm.70000 40087854
     [Google Scholar]
  12. CaoH. WuH. LiJ. LiM. LinC. Influence of different postballoon expansion procedures: A finite element analysis.Med. Phys.2023501303710.1002/mp.16086 36342301
     [Google Scholar]
  13. WuH. LiM. LinC. Influence of balloon location during proximal optimization technique (POT): A finite element analysis.J. Biomech.202112711070310.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110703 34481186
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ToriiR. WoodN.B. HadjiloizouN. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a patient-specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms.Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng.2010255565580
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HolzapfelG.A. SommerG. GasserC.T. RegitnigP. Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling.Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.20052895H2048H205810.1152/ajpheart.00435.2005
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ChiastraC. WuW. DickerhoffB. Computational replication of the patient-specific stenting procedure for coronary artery bifurcations: From OCT and CT imaging to structural and hemodynamics analyses.J. Biomech.201649112102211110.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.024 26655589
     [Google Scholar]
  17. PoncinP. ProftJ. Stent tubing: Understanding the desired attributes.Medical Device Materials: Proceedings of the Materials & Processes for Medical Devices Conference.Material Park, OH: ASM International, 2004, pp. 253-9
     [Google Scholar]
  18. WuW. KhanB. SharzeheeM. Three dimensional reconstruction of coronary artery stents from optical coherence tomography: Experimental validation and clinical feasibility.Sci. Rep.20211111225210.1038/s41598‑021‑91458‑y 34112841
     [Google Scholar]
  19. McQueenA. EscuerJ. SchmidtA.F. An intricate interplay between stent drug dose and release rate dictates arterial restenosis.J. Control. Release2022349992100810.1016/j.jconrel.2022.07.037 35921913
     [Google Scholar]
  20. CaiW. ChenL. ZhangL. Comparative analysis of three different optimization procedures for coronary bifurcation provisional stenting: Insights from micro-computed tomography and optical coherence tomography imaging of bench deployments.Zhonghua Minguo Xinzangxue Hui Zazhi201935436937910.6515/ACS.201907_35(4).20181122A 31371897
     [Google Scholar]
  21. ShiW. LiH. MitchellK. A multi-dimensional non-uniform corrosion model for bioabsorbable metallic vascular stents.Acta Biomater.202113157258010.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.008 34265472
     [Google Scholar]
  22. MarioC.D. MoriciN. GodinoC. Predictors of restenosis after treatment of bifurcational lesions with paclitaxel eluting stents: A multicenter prospective registry of 150 consecutive patients.Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.200769341642410.1002/ccd.20951 17191238
     [Google Scholar]
  23. LvY.H. GuoC. LiM. ZhangM.B. WangZ.L. Modified double-stent strategy may be an optimal choice for coronary bifurcation lesions.Medicine201897481337710.1097/MD.0000000000013377 30508932
     [Google Scholar]
  24. FilippoO.D. KangJ. BrunoF. Final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with an upfront provisional stenting strategy.EuroIntervention2025216e318e32810.4244/EIJ‑D‑24‑00471 40091870
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KahramanS. ÇizgiciA.Y. ErtürkM. A novel coronary bifurcation stenting technique: Double kissing Nano-Culotte Stenting.Anatol. J. Cardiol.202327211311610.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2022.2689 36747451
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ValenzuelaT.F. BurzottaF. IlesT.L. LassenJ.F. IaizzoP.A. Assessment of single and double coronary bifurcation stenting techniques using multimodal imaging and 3D modeling in reanimated swine hearts using Visible Heart® methodologies.Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging20213792591260110.1007/s10554‑021‑02240‑0 33993420
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ParkD.Y. AnS. JollyN. Systematic review and network meta‐analysis comparing bifurcation techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention.J. Am. Heart Assoc.2022111202539410.1161/JAHA.122.025394 35723005
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X404659250702080410
Loading
Comparison of Different Double-Stent Implantation Techniques on Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Finite Element Analysis
Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 22, E1573403X404659 (2026); https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X404659250702080410
/content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X404659250702080410
/content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X404659250702080410
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): biomechanics; Coronary bifurcation disease; crush procedure; culotte; finite element analysis; IVUS validation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test