Skip to content
2000
Volume 23, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 2211-3525
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3533

Abstract

This study presents the compiled information from the EU and the US on antibiotic dispensation across the countries and trends between 2011 and 2020 as per the latest available data. Antibiotic misuse continues to be a significant global health challenge, exacerbated by insufficient regulatory measures and a lack of public awareness. Utilizing data on antibiotic dispensation, we analyze the correlation between national regulatory conditions and levels of antibiotic use, with a particular focus on amoxicillin, the most frequently prescribed antibiotic. Our findings reveal that while there has been an overall decrease in amoxicillin consumption in recent years, significant disparities persist among countries. For instance, from 2015 to 2020, the U.K., France, and Germany reported some of the highest rates of antibiotic consumption, significantly above the EU average. This highlights the critical role of effective regulatory measures in mitigating overuse and promoting responsible prescribing practices. Statistical analyses indicate that robust national regulations correlate with lower rates of antibiotic consumption, underscoring the necessity for continued monitoring and policy development. The study also emphasizes the importance of future surveillance efforts aimed at preventing antibiotic overuse and addressing the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance. Overall, this study contributes to understanding how regulatory actions can shape antibiotic consumption patterns and inform strategies for improving public health outcomes in both the EU and US contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/aia/10.2174/0122113525356066250204064337
2025-03-03
2025-10-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. MachowskaA. Stålsby LundborgC. Drivers of irrational use of antibiotics in Europe.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20181612710.3390/ijerph16010027 30583571
    [Google Scholar]
  2. NunanC. Ending routine farm antibiotic use in Europe. Achieving responsible farm antibiotic use through improving animal health and welfare in pig and poultry production.Available from: https://www.cnr-bea.fr/en/2023/01/15/end-routine-farm-antibiotic-use-europe/ 2022
  3. WatierL. CavaliéP. CoignardB. Brun-BuissonC. Comparing antibiotic consumption between two European countries: Are packages an adequate surrogate for prescriptions?Euro Surveill.20172246170035210.2807/1560‑7917.ES.2017.22.46.17‑00352 29162212
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SandersP. Antibiotic use in animals—policies and control measures around Europe. Antibiotic Policies: Theory and PracticeSpringer2005649652s
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FerechM. CoenenS. Malhotra-KumarS. DvorakovaK. HendrickxE. SuetensC. GoossensH. European surveillance of antimicrobial consumption (ESAC): Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.200658240140710.1093/jac/dkl188 16735414
    [Google Scholar]
  6. OrganizationW.H. WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation.Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514880 2018
  7. KarabayO. Antibiotic consumption, resistance data, and prevention strategies.Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob2018735139
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KenyonC. Manoharan-BasilS.S. Cultural drivers of antibiotic consumption in high-income countries: A global ecological analysis.Microb. Drug Resist.20202691063107010.1089/mdr.2019.0497 32182187
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KleinE.Y. Milkowska-ShibataM. TsengK.K. SharlandM. GandraS. PulciniC. LaxminarayanR. Assessment of WHO antibiotic consumption and access targets in 76 countries, 2000–15: An analysis of pharmaceutical sales data.Lancet Infect. Dis.202121110711510.1016/S1473‑3099(20)30332‑7 32717205
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Santa-Ana-TellezY. Mantel-TeeuwisseA.K. DreserA. LeufkensH.G.M. WirtzV.J. Impact of over-the-counter restrictions on antibiotic consumption in Brazil and Mexico.PLoS One2013810e7555010.1371/journal.pone.0075550 24146761
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MuellerT. ÿstergrenP-O. The correlation between regulatory conditions and antibiotic consumption within the WHO European Region.Health Policy2016120888288910.1016/j.healthpol.2016.07.004 27460523
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BittermanR. Systematic review of antibiotic consumption in acute care hospitals.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.201622656110.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.026
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RobertsS.C. ZembowerT.R. Global increases in antibiotic consumption: A concerning trend for WHO targets.Lancet Infect. Dis.2021211101110.1016/S1473‑3099(20)30456‑4 32717207
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Van BoeckelT.P. GandraS. AshokA. CaudronQ. GrenfellB.T. LevinS.A. LaxminarayanR. Global antibiotic consumption 2000 to 2010: An analysis of national pharmaceutical sales data.Lancet Infect. Dis.201414874275010.1016/S1473‑3099(14)70780‑7 25022435
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BellB.G. SchellevisF. StobberinghE. GoossensH. PringleM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance.BMC Infect. Dis.20141411310.1186/1471‑2334‑14‑13 24405683
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KleinE.Y. Van BoeckelT.P. MartinezE.M. PantS. GandraS. LevinS.A. GoossensH. LaxminarayanR. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA201811515E3463E347010.1073/pnas.1717295115 29581252
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GoossensH. Antibiotic consumption and link to resistance.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.200915Suppl. 3121510.1111/j.1469‑0691.2009.02725.x 19366364
    [Google Scholar]
  18. D’AtriF. ArthurJ. BlixH.S. HicksL.A. PlachourasD. MonnetD.L. Targets for the reduction of antibiotic use in humans in the transatlantic taskforce on antimicrobial resistance (TATFAR) partner countries.Euro Surveill.20192428180033910.2807/1560‑7917.ES.2019.24.28.1800339 31311620
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SchmeroldI. van GeijlswijkI. GehringR. European regulations on the use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine.Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.202318910647310.1016/j.ejps.2023.106473 37220817
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GrossS. RoosenJ. HennessyD.A. Determinants of farms’ antibiotic consumption – A longitudinal study of pig fattening farms in Germany.Prev. Vet. Med.202321510590710.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105907 37062142
    [Google Scholar]
  21. EmejeM.O. OloyeS. BubakariM. AdeyeyeM. Use of antibiotics in livestock in Nigeria: Curbing antimicrobial resistance and developing a national regulatory guideline towards monitoring antibiotic use in animal and animal foods.Int. Res. J. Public Environ. Health202292556610.15739/irjpeh.22.007
    [Google Scholar]
  22. NoorlanderP.A. On regulating the use of antibiotics.Vet. Res. Commun.19793121522010.1007/BF02268970
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SilleyP. StephanB. Prudent use and regulatory guidelines for veterinary antibiotics—politics or science?J. Appl. Microbiol.201712361373138010.1111/jam.13553 28779537
    [Google Scholar]
  24. AlzahraniK.O. AlshahraniS.M. AlajelS.M. Evaluating the effectiveness of the Ministry of Health restriction policy on seasonal antibiotic consumption trends in Saudi Arabia, 2016–2020.Front. Pharmacol.202314124208710.3389/fphar.2023.1242087 38099146
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PouwelsK.B. ChatterjeeA. CooperB.S. RobothamJ.V. Antibiotic resistance, stewardship, and consumption.Lancet Planet. Health201932e6610.1016/S2542‑5196(18)30283‑3 30797410
    [Google Scholar]
  26. CizmanM. Plankar SrovinT. BeovićB. VrdeljaM. BajecT. BlagusR. European antibiotic awareness day (EAAD): Any impact on antibiotic consumption and public awareness in Slovenia?J. Antimicrob. Chemother.20187392567257210.1093/jac/dky206 30137519
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SageW.M. HymanD.A. Combating antimicrobial resistance: Regulatory strategies and institutional capacity.SSRN20098478110.2139/ssrn.1436154
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SchellackN. BenjaminD. BrinkA. DuseA. FaureK. GoffD. MendelsonM. MeyerJ. MiotJ. PerovicO. PopleT. SulemanF. van VuurenM. EssackS. A situational analysis of current antimicrobial governance, regulation, and utilization in South Africa.Int. J. Infect. Dis.20176410010610.1016/j.ijid.2017.09.002 28893672
    [Google Scholar]
  29. LöhrenU. RicciA. CummingsT.S. Guidelines for antimicrobial use in poultry.Guide to antimicrobial use in animals200812614210.1002/9781444302639.ch8
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TompsonA.C. ChandlerC.I. Addressing antibiotic use: Insights from social science around the worldLSHTM Research OnlineLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine2021
    [Google Scholar]
  31. IskandarK. MolinierL. HallitS. SartelliM. CatenaF. CoccoliniF. Craig HardcastleT. RoquesC. SalamehP. Drivers of antibiotic resistance transmission in low-and middle-income countries from a “one health” perspective—a review.Antibiotics20209737210.3390/antibiotics9070372 32630353
    [Google Scholar]
  32. BruyndonckxR. CoenenS. HensN. VandaelE. CatryB. GoossensH. Antibiotic use and resistance in Belgium: The impact of two decades of multi-faceted campaigning.Acta Clin. Belg.202176428028810.1080/17843286.2020.1721135 32024450
    [Google Scholar]
  33. XiaoY. Antimicrobial stewardship in China: Systems, actions and future strategies.Clin. Infect. Dis.201867Suppl. 2S135S14110.1093/cid/ciy641 30423041
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SulisG. SayoodS. GandraS. Antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: Current status and future directions.Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther.202220214716010.1080/14787210.2021.1951705 34225545
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MossialosE. Policies and incentives for promoting innovation in antibiotic research.Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/326376 2010P.195
  36. SchuetzP. Christ-CrainM. ThomannR. FalconnierC. WolbersM. WidmerI. NeidertS. FrickerT. BlumC. SchildU. RegezK. SchoenenbergerR. HenzenC. BregenzerT. HoessC. KrauseM. BucherH.C. ZimmerliW. MuellerB. ProHOSP Study Group, Effect of procalcitonin-based guidelines vs standard guidelines on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: the ProHOSP randomized controlled trial.JAMA2009302101059106610.1001/jama.2009.1297 19738090
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SneeringerS. Economics of antibiotic use in US livestock production.Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2981692 2015P.100
  38. MalijanG.M. HowteerakulN. AliN. SiriS. KengganpanichM. NascimentoR. BootonR.D. TurnerK.M.E. CooperB.S. MeeyaiA. A scoping review of antibiotic use practices and drivers of inappropriate antibiotic use in animal farms in WHO Southeast Asia region.One Health20221510041210.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100412 36277092
    [Google Scholar]
  39. MonnierA.A. SchoutenJ. TebanoG. ZanichelliV. HuttnerB.D. PulciniC. ÅrdalC. HarbarthS. HulscherM.E. GyssensI.C. Ensuring antibiotic development, equitable availability, and responsible use of effective antibiotics: Recommendations for multisectoral action.Clin. Infect. Dis.201968111952195910.1093/cid/ciy824 30256927
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Van BoeckelT.P. GlennonE.E. ChenD. GilbertM. RobinsonT.P. GrenfellB.T. LevinS.A. BonhoefferS. LaxminarayanR. Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals.Science201735763581350135210.1126/science.aao1495 28963240
    [Google Scholar]
  41. AlmeleebiaT.M. AlhifanyA.A. AlmutairiF. AlshibaniM. AlhossanA.M. Regulating antimicrobial sales in Saudi Arabia: Achievements and challenges.Int. J. Clin. Pract.2021754e1383310.1111/ijcp.13833 33202479
    [Google Scholar]
  42. PughD.M. The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics.Toxicol. Lett.20021281-3354410.1016/S0378‑4274(01)00531‑8 11869815
    [Google Scholar]
  43. MorA. FrøslevT. ThomsenR.W. OteriA. RijnbeekP. SchinkT. GarbeE. PecchioliS. InnocentiF. BezemerI. PoluzziE. SturkenboomM.C. TrifiròG. SøgaardM. Antibiotic use varies substantially among adults: A cross-national study from five European countries in the ARITMO project.Infection201543445347210.1007/s15010‑015‑0768‑8 25828936
    [Google Scholar]
  44. WallingaD. SmitL.A.M. DavisM.F. CaseyJ.A. NachmanK.E. A review of the effectiveness of current US policies on antimicrobial use in meat and poultry production.Curr. Environ. Health Rep.20229233935410.1007/s40572‑022‑00351‑x 35477845
    [Google Scholar]
  45. SoA.D. ShahT.A. RoachS. CheeY.L. NachmanK.E. An integrated systems approach is needed to ensure the sustainability of antibiotic effectiveness for both humans and animals.J. Law Med. Ethics201543S3Suppl. 3384510.1111/jlme.12273 26243242
    [Google Scholar]
  46. TaylorD.D. FenskeG.J. PouzouJ.G. CostardS. ZagmuttF.J. Codex alimentarius guidelines for risk analysis of foodborne antimicrobial resistance are incompatible with available surveillance data.J. Food Prot.202285111496150510.4315/JFP‑22‑038 35723548
    [Google Scholar]
  47. GouldI.M. Antibiotic policies and control of resistance.Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.200215439540010.1097/00001432‑200208000‑00007 12130936
    [Google Scholar]
  48. AliN. Addressing antibiotic resistance from farm-raised fish imported to the United States.Bard Center for Environmental Policy.2017
    [Google Scholar]
  49. VersportenA. ZarbP. CaniauxI. GrosM.F. DrapierN. MillerM. JarlierV. NathwaniD. GoossensH. KoraqiA. HoxhaI. TafajS. LacejD. HojmanM. QuirosR.E. GhazaryanL. CairnsK.A. ChengA. HorneK.C. DoukasF.F. GottliebT. AlsalmanJ. MagermanK. MarielleG.Y.T. LjubovicA.D. CoelhoA.A.M. GalesA.C. KeuleyanE. SabudaD. BoswellJ.L. ConlyJ.M. RojasA. CarvajalC. LabarcaJ. SolanoA. ValverdeC.R. Villalobos-VindasJ.M. PristasI. PleckoV. PaphitouN. ShaqiriE. RummukainenM-L. PagavaK. KorinteliI. BrandtT. MesslerS. EnimilA. IosifidisE. RoilidesE. SowM.S. SenguptaS. GeorgeJ.V. PoojaryA. PatilP. SoltaniJ. JafarpourZ. AmeenH. FitzgeraldD. MaorY. ChowersM. TemkinE. EspositoS. ArnoldoL. BrusaferroS. GuY. El-HajjiF.D. KimN.J. KambaralievaB. PavareJ. ZarakauskaL. UsonisV. BurokieneS. IvaskevicieneI. MijovicG. Duborija-KovacevicN. BondesioK. IregbuK. OduyeboO. RakaD. RakaL. RachinaS. EnaniM.A. Al ShehriM. CarevicB. DragovacG. ObradovicD. StojadinovicA. RadulovicL. WuJ.E.N. Wei Teng ChungG. ChenH.H. TambyahP.A. LyeD. TanS.H. NgT.M. TayH.L. LingM.L. ChlebickiM.P. KwaA.L. LeeW. BeovićB. DramowskiA. FinlaysonH. TaljaardJ. Ojeda-BurgosG. RetamarP. LucasJ. PotW. VerduinC. KluytmansJ. ScottM. AldeyabM.A. McCullaghB. GormleyC. SharpeD. GilchristM. WhitneyL. LaundyM. LockwoodD. DrysdaleS.B. BoudreauxJ. SeptimusE.J. GreerN. GawrysG. RiosE. MayS. Antimicrobial consumption and resistance in adult hospital inpatients in 53 countries: Results of an internet-based global point prevalence survey.Lancet Glob. Health201866e619e62910.1016/S2214‑109X(18)30186‑4 29681513
    [Google Scholar]
  50. SorensenA.C. LawrenceR.S. DavisM.F. Interplay between policy and science regarding low-dose antimicrobial use in livestock.Front. Microbiol.201458610.3389/fmicb.2014.00086
    [Google Scholar]
  51. LyN.F. FlachC. LysenT.S. MarkovE. van BallegooijenH. RijnbeekP. Duarte-SallesT. ReyesC. JohnL.H. KarimiL. ReichC. SalekS. LaytonD. Impact of European Union label changes for fluoroquinolone-containing medicinal products for systemic and inhalation use: post-referral prescribing trends.Drug Saf.202346440541610.1007/s40264‑023‑01286‑4 36976448
    [Google Scholar]
  52. ZanichelliV. MonnierA.A. GyssensI.C. AdriaenssensN. VersportenA. PulciniC. Le MaréchalM. TebanoG. Vlahović-PalčevskiV. Stanić BenićM. MilaničR. HarbarthS. HulscherM.E. HuttnerB. Variation in antibiotic use among and within different settings: A systematic review.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.201873Suppl. 6vi17vi2910.1093/jac/dky115 29878219
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Fleming-DutraK.E. HershA.L. ShapiroD.J. BartocesM. EnnsE.A. FileT.M.Jr FinkelsteinJ.A. GerberJ.S. HyunD.Y. LinderJ.A. LynfieldR. MargolisD.J. MayL.S. MerensteinD. MetlayJ.P. NewlandJ.G. PiccirilloJ.F. RobertsR.M. SanchezG.V. SudaK.J. ThomasA. WooT.M. ZettsR.M. HicksL.A. Prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions among US ambulatory care visits, 2010-2011.JAMA2016315171864187310.1001/jama.2016.4151 27139059
    [Google Scholar]
  54. ForslundK. SunagawaS. KultimaJ.R. MendeD.R. ArumugamM. TypasA. BorkP. Country-specific antibiotic use practices impact the human gut resistome.Genome Res.20132371163116910.1101/gr.155465.113 23568836
    [Google Scholar]
  55. WrightA. Regulating the safety of probiotics--the European approach.Curr. Pharm. Des.2005111172310.2174/1381612053382322 15638749
    [Google Scholar]
  56. LégerA. AlbanL. VeldhuisA. van SchaikG. StärkK.D.C. Comparison of international legislation and standards on veterinary drug residues in food of animal origin.J. Public Health Policy201940330834110.1057/s41271‑019‑00169‑2 30976059
    [Google Scholar]
  57. ChingC. ZamanM.H. WirtzV.J. Evaluation of surveillance strategies of antimicrobial consumption in animals.Antibiotics202413650510.3390/antibiotics13060505 38927172
    [Google Scholar]
  58. ToppE. LarssonD.G.J. MillerD.N. Van den EedeC. VirtaM.P.J. Antimicrobial resistance and the environment: Assessment of advances, gaps and recommendations for agriculture, aquaculture and pharmaceutical manufacturing.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.2018943fix18510.1093/femsec/fix185 29309580
    [Google Scholar]
  59. GoffD.A. KullarR. GoldsteinE.J.C. GilchristM. NathwaniD. ChengA.C. CairnsK.A. Escandón-VargasK. VillegasM.V. BrinkA. van den BerghD. MendelsonM. A global call from five countries to collaborate in antibiotic stewardship: United we succeed, divided we might fail.Lancet Infect. Dis.2017172e56e6310.1016/S1473‑3099(16)30386‑3 27866945
    [Google Scholar]
  60. SinghK.S. AnandS. DholpuriaS. SharmaJ.K. BlankenfeldtW. ShoucheY. Antimicrobial resistance dynamics and the one-health strategy: A review.Environ. Chem. Lett.20211942995300710.1007/s10311‑021‑01238‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  61. RaschiE. PoluzziE. ZulianiC. MullerA. GoossensH. De PontiF. Exposure to antibacterial agents with QT liability in 14 European countries: Trends over an 8‐year period.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.2009671889810.1111/j.1365‑2125.2008.03319.x 19076158
    [Google Scholar]
  62. NguyenK.V. Thi DoN.T. ChandnaA. NguyenT.V. PhamC.V. DoanP.M. NguyenA.Q. Thi NguyenC.K. LarssonM. EscalanteS. OlowokureB. LaxminarayanR. GelbandH. HorbyP. Thi NgoH.B. HoangM.T. FarrarJ. HienT.T. WertheimH.F.L. Antibiotic use and resistance in emerging economies: A situation analysis for Viet Nam.BMC Public Health2013131115810.1186/1471‑2458‑13‑1158 24325208
    [Google Scholar]
  63. NijsinghN. MuntheC. LarssonD.J. Managing pollution from antibiotics manufacturing: Charting actors, incentives and disincentives.Environ. Health201918117
    [Google Scholar]
  64. RocaI. AkovaM. BaqueroF. CarletJ. CavaleriM. CoenenS. CohenJ. FindlayD. GyssensI. HeureO.E. KahlmeterG. KruseH. LaxminarayanR. LiébanaE. López-CereroL. MacGowanA. MartinsM. Rodríguez-BañoJ. RolainJ.M. SegoviaC. SigauqueB. TacconelliE. WellingtonE. VilaJ. The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: Science for intervention.New Microbes New Infect.20156222910.1016/j.nmni.2015.02.007 26029375
    [Google Scholar]
  65. WilsonJ.S. OtsukiT. MajumdsarB. Balancing food safety and risk: Do drug residue limits affect international trade in beef?J. Int. Trade Econ. Dev.200312437740210.1080/0963819032000154810
    [Google Scholar]
  66. BegemannS. WatkinsF. Van HoyweghenI. VivancosR. ChristleyR. PerkinsE. The governance of UK dairy antibiotic use: Industry-led policy in action.Front. Vet. Sci.2020755710.3389/fvets.2020.00557 33088824
    [Google Scholar]
  67. ParanychianakisN.V. SalgotM. SnyderS.A. AngelakisA.N. Water reuse in EU states: Necessity for uniform criteria to mitigate human and environmental risks.Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.201545131409146810.1080/10643389.2014.955629
    [Google Scholar]
  68. EkiriA. Impact of guidelines and recommendations on the level and patterns of antimicrobial use in livestock and companion animals.PIRU Publication2019
    [Google Scholar]
  69. CarvalhoI.T. SantosL. Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of the European scenario.Environ. Int.20169473675710.1016/j.envint.2016.06.025 27425630
    [Google Scholar]
  70. HenrikssonP.J.G. RicoA. TroellM. KlingerD.H. BuschmannA.H. SaksidaS. ChadagM.V. ZhangW. Unpacking factors influencing antimicrobial use in global aquaculture and their implication for management: A review from a systems perspective.Sustain. Sci.20181341105112010.1007/s11625‑017‑0511‑8 30147798
    [Google Scholar]
  71. WellsV. Implementing who, EU and UK AMR strategies and action plans: Has the world lived up to the challenge?Available from: https://bsac.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Implementation-of-AMR-Documents-Report-011117.pdf 2017
  72. ChammemN. IssaouiM. De AlmeidaA.I.D. DelgadoA.M. Food crises and food safety incidents in European Union, United States, and Maghreb Area: Current risk communication strategies and new approaches.J. AOAC Int.2018101492393810.5740/jaoacint.17‑0446 29566775
    [Google Scholar]
  73. FrieriM. KumarK. BoutinA. Antibiotic resistance.J. Infect. Public Health201710436937810.1016/j.jiph.2016.08.007 27616769
    [Google Scholar]
  74. AndersonM. SchulzeK. CassiniA. PlachourasD. MossialosE. A governance framework for development and assessment of national action plans on antimicrobial resistance.Lancet Infect. Dis.20191911e371e38410.1016/S1473‑3099(19)30415‑3 31588040
    [Google Scholar]
  75. RigosG. KogiannouD. Antimicrobial drugs in aquaculture: Use and abuse. Present Knowledge in Food Safety.Elsevier202314216110.1016/B978‑0‑12‑819470‑6.00027‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  76. ArmbrusterW.J. RobertsT. The political economy of US antibiotic use in animal feed.Food Saf. Econ.201829332210.1007/978‑3‑319‑92138‑9_15
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/aia/10.2174/0122113525356066250204064337
Loading
/content/journals/aia/10.2174/0122113525356066250204064337
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test