Skip to content
2000
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0250-6882
  • E-ISSN: 0250-6882

Abstract

Introduction

Entry-level physiotherapists function as autonomous healthcare practitioners within a complex healthcare system, requiring professional competence in the clinical domain. Physiotherapy (PT) educational programs typically emphasize onsite teaching and use summative assessments to evaluate students' achievement of program objectives and learning outcomes. However, possessing knowledge and skills does not guarantee efficacy or confidence in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the impact of online teaching approaches (TAs) during the COVID-19 era on the physiotherapy self-efficacy (PSE) of senior FCHS physiotherapy students across three clinical areas: musculoskeletal (MSK), neurological (N), and cardiorespiratory (CR), and to explore the influence of academic factors on PSE scores.

Methods

Researchers collected data for this cross-sectional study using a four-section questionnaire. One section specifically addressed the PSE. The study focused on three cohorts of pre-graduation senior PT students at Fatima College of Health Sciences (FCHS) who encountered a combination of onsite, online, and blended TAs due to COVID-19. Nonparametric statistical analysis was employed to analyze the data.

Results

Of the seventeen participating students (68% participation rate, median age 22), the results indicate a statistically significant decrease in self-efficacy from MSK to N and CR clinical areas. The impact of online TAs on PSE varied by course specialty; TAs related to CR specialty courses significantly correlated with PSE scores, showing a preference for onsite TA to enhance self-efficacy over blended and online TAs. Furthermore, greater exposure to clinical cases and verbal encouragement from clinical educators were associated with higher self-efficacy. Physiological reactions, such as body pain, were also found to be influenced by the specific clinical area.

Conclusion

The impact of online TAs, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, on the self-efficacy of senior PT students is dependent on the specialty of the courses. This impact was most significant in CR specialty courses. Moreover, other factors, such as the sufficiency of exposure to clinical cases and clinical educators’ verbal encouragement, significantly contributed to students' self-efficacy.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882367727250212105002
2024-01-01
2025-08-17
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. American Physical Therapy Association APTA Vision statement for the physical therapy profession2020 https://www.apta.org/apta-and-you/leadership-and-governance/vision-mission-and-strategic-plan#:~:text=Vision%20Statement%20for%20the%20Physical,to%20improve%20the%20human%20experience
  2. Emirate Physiotherapy Society Standards of practice. https://www.uaephysio.org/standardsof practice.php
  3. HaywardL.M. BlackL.L. MostromE. JensenG.M. RitzlineP.D. PerkinsJ. The first two years of practice: A longitudinal perspective on the learning and professional development of promising novice physical therapists.Phys. Ther.201393336938310.2522/ptj.2012021423064736
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE) Evaluative criteria for accreditation of education programs for the preparation of physical therapists. https://www.capteonline.org/ faculty-and-program-resources/resource_documents/accreditation-handbook
  5. van LankveldW. JonesA. BrunnekreefJ.J. SeegerJ.P.H. Bart StaalJ. Assessing physical therapist students’ self-efficacy: Measurement properties of the Physiotherapist Self-Efficacy (PSE) questionnaire.BMC Med. Educ.201717125010.1186/s12909‑017‑1094‑x29233154
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RosenfeldtA.B. GreenwoodK. LubbeckK. BrownJ. IversenM.D. The Acute care confidence survey: Examination of the psychometric properties and predictors of performance among students in a large inpatient hospital system.J. Phys. Ther. Educ.202034216617110.1097/JTE.0000000000000138
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BanduraA. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive-development and functioning.Educ. Psychol.199328211714810.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BlackB. LucarelliJ. IngmanM. BriskeyC. Changes in physical therapist Students’ self-efficacy for physical activity counselling following a motivational interviewing learning module.J. Phys. Ther. Educ.2016303283210.1097/00001416‑201630030‑00006
    [Google Scholar]
  9. JonesA. SheppardL. Use of a human patient simulator to improve physiotherapy cardiorespiratory clinical skills in undergraduate physiotherapy students: A randomised controlled trial.Internet J. Allied Health Sci. Pract.2011911110.46743/1540‑580X/2011.1338
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SmithM. LiehrP. Middle Range Theory for Nursing.3rd edSpringer Publishing Company201319720710.1891/9780826195524
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ZimmermanB. Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes.International encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.OxfordElsevier201554154610.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.26060‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KharraziA. KareshkiH. Self-regulated learning: The role of environmental perceptions and motivational beliefs.Psychol. Rep.2010107130331710.2466/01.11.14.20.PR0.107.4.303‑31720923075
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RichardsonM. AbrahamC. BondR. Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychol. Bull.2012138235338710.1037/a002683822352812
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JonesA. SheppardL. Developing a measurement tool for assessing physiotherapy students’ self-efficacy: A pilot study.Assess. Eval. High. Educ.201237336937710.1080/02602938.2010.534765
    [Google Scholar]
  15. JonesA. SheppardL. Student self-efficacy questionnaire.AustraliaJames Cook University2013
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MącznikA.K. RibeiroD.C. BaxterG.D. Online technology use in physiotherapy teaching and learning: A systematic review of effectiveness and users’ perceptions.BMC Med. Educ.201515116010.1186/s12909‑015‑0429‑826415677
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HaighJ. Information technology in health professional education: Why IT matters.Nurse Educ. Today200424754755210.1016/j.nedt.2004.07.00815465170
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZayatE.L. An assessment of e-learning in Egypt through the perceptions of Egyptian university students: A field work survey. 5th International Conference on e-learning applications (Jan 14-15, 2007) "Explore, Share and Stimulate Research in e-Learning Applications. Cairo, Egypt. Jan 14-15, 2007, pp. 3-8
    [Google Scholar]
  19. El-SayadG. Md SaadN.H. ThurasamyR. How higher education students in Egypt perceived online learning engagement and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic.Comput. Sci. Educ.20218452755010.1007/s40692‑021‑00191‑y
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HenrieC.R. HalversonL.R. GrahamC.R. Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review.Comput. Educ.201590365310.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JwayyedS. StifflerK.A. WilberS.T. SouthernA. WeigandJ. BareR. GersonL.W. Technology-assisted education in graduate medical education: a review of the literature.Int. J. Emerg. Med.2011415110.1186/1865‑1380‑4‑5121824405
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kukulu K. KorukcuA. Ozdemir Y. Self-confidence, gender and academic achievement of undergraduate nursing students. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs.201120433010.1111/j.1365‑2850.2012.01924.x.22583626
    [Google Scholar]
  23. El-SobkeyS.B. Experience of the Egyptian physical therapy educators on the online teaching during COVID-19 outbreak 2021. Med. Educ. Online.2022271207386110.1080/10872981.2022.2073861
    [Google Scholar]
  24. BanduraA. The evolution of social cognitive theory.Great Minds in Management. SmithK.D. HittM.K. Oxford, UKOxford University Press200593510.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0002
    [Google Scholar]
  25. BanduraA. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory.J. Soc. Clin. Psychol.19864335937310.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
    [Google Scholar]
  26. BanduraA. Self-efficacyEncyclopedia of human behaviorAcademic PressNew York19947181
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WonS. LeeS. Y. BongM. Social persuasions by teachers as a source of student self-efficacy: The moderating role of perceived teacher credibility.Psychol. Schs.201754553254710.1002/pits.22009
    [Google Scholar]
  28. El-SobkeyS.B. BanuS.B. HammoudE. SalihS. SachdevaM. KamilN. AldawsariA.N. CottamS. Test anxiety among health profession students: A cross-sectional survey at Fatima College of Health Sciences in Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.Fortune J. Health Sci.20247769410.26502/fjhs.167
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882367727250212105002
Loading
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882367727250212105002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test