Skip to content
2000
Volume 25, Issue 14
  • ISSN: 1389-5575
  • E-ISSN: 1875-5607

Abstract

Medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety are key domains being transformed by the ongoing revolution in optical biosensors. These light sensors are highly sensitive and specific for detecting specific biological interactions, allowing for real-time, label-free detection. Biorecognition elements (such as enzymes, antibodies, or nucleic acids), following interaction with the target analyte, generate optical signals based on the same key principles as optical biosensors. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR), fluorescence-based sensors, and fiber optic sensors offer a wide range of biosensors capable of detecting a broad spectrum of biological and chemical agents at trace concentrations. Diagnostic capability has become efficient and rapid with advances in nanotechnology and microelectronics, particularly in nanopores. Monitoring of cardiovascular health using wearable optical biosensors, such as photoplethysmography (PPG), is a non-invasive method. It has also been recently improved to better track heart rate and blood pressure, as well as evaluate mental and vascular health. Wearable optical biosensors support technologies, such as continuous monitoring and early detection of anomalies, which help in personalized healthcare. Optical biosensors are particularly suitable for detecting pathogens, biomarkers, and pollutants in clinical settings, as well as for environmental monitoring and food safety assessments. These applications range from biopharmaceuticals to biotechnology and personalized care, which are used to monitor diseases, discover drugs, and detect pathogens. Despite progress, matrix interference with the sample matrix, sensor stability, and miniaturization remain challenges to be overcome. However, with future progress in materials science, nanotechnology, and increased integration with the Internet of Things (IoT), the potential for optical biosensors will continue to rise as portable, cost-effective, real-time data-analyzing diagnostic tools that expand accessibility to those in underserved regions. Developed using optical and electrochemical approaches, the biosensors reviewed in this article are discussed in terms of their principles, types, applications, and prospects, including their roles in healthcare and environmental sectors.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575403525250822093011
2025-09-11
2026-02-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575403525250822093011
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ClarkL.C.J. LionsC. Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1968102294510.1111/j.1749‑6632.1962.tb13623.x
     [Google Scholar]
  2. de SilvaA.P. GunaratneH.Q. GunnlaugssonT. HuxleyA.J. McCoyC.P. RademacherJ.T. RiceT.E. Signaling recognition events with fluorescent sensors and switches.Chem. Rev.1997971515156610.1021/cr960386p
     [Google Scholar]
  3. JohnsonI. Fluorescent probes for living cells.Histochem. J.19983012314010.1023/a:1003287101868
     [Google Scholar]
  4. TeraiT. NaganoT. Fluorescent probes for bioimaging applications.Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.20081251552110.1016/j.cbpa.2008.08.007
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DeyD. GoswamiT. Optical biosensors: A revolution towards quantum nanoscale electronics device fabrication.J. Biomed. Biotechnol.2011201134821810.1155/2011/348218
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ZanchettaG. LanfrancoR. GiavazziF. BelliniT. BuscagliaM. Emerging applications of label-free optical biosensors.Nanophotonics201764627645
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dhar MalhotraB. AliM.A. Nanomaterials in biosensors: Fundamentals and applications.Nanomaterials Biosens.2018174
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Velasco-GarciaM.N. Optical biosensors for probing at the cellular level: A review of recent progress and future prospects.Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.200920273310.1016/j.semcdb.2009.01.013
     [Google Scholar]
  9. XiongY. HuangQ. CanadyT.D. BaryaP. LiuS. ArogundadeO.H. RaceC.M. CheC. WangX. ZhouL. Photonic crystal enhanced fluorescence emission and blinking suppression for single quantum dot digital resolution biosensing.Nat. Commun.202213464710.1038/s41467‑022‑32387‑w
     [Google Scholar]
  10. SansoneL. MacchiaE. TaddeiC. TorsiL. GiordanoM. Label-free optical biosensing at femtomolar detection limit.Sens. Actuators B Chem.20182551097110410.1016/j.snb.2017.08.059
     [Google Scholar]
  11. SarkarA. SarkarK.D. AmruthaV. DuttaK. An overview of enzyme-based biosensors for environmental monitoring.Tools, techniques and protocols for monitoring environmental contaminants.1st edAmsterdam, The NetherlandsElsevier2019307329
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ZhuY.C. MeiL.P. RuanY.F. ZhangN. ZhaoW.W. XuJ.J. ChenH.Y. Enzyme-based biosensors and their applications.1st edAmsterdam, The NetherlandsElsevier2019
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ZhangZ. ZengK. LiuJ. Immunochemical detection of emerging organic contaminants in environmental waters. TrAC.Trends Analyt. Chem.201787495710.1016/j.trac.2016.12.002
     [Google Scholar]
  14. SinghK.V. KaurJ. VarshneyG.C. RajeM. SuriC.R. Synthesis and characterization of hapten-protein conjugates for antibody production against small molecules.Bioconjug. Chem.20041516817310.1021/bc034158v
     [Google Scholar]
  15. PohankaM. Overview of piezoelectric biosensors, immunosensors and DNA sensors and their applications.Materials20181144810.3390/ma11030448
     [Google Scholar]
  16. GautamA.P. Review on recent advances in biosensors for detection of water.Int. J. Environ. Sci.201221565157410.6088/ijes.002020300041
     [Google Scholar]
  17. PaltushevaZ.U. AshikbayevaZ. TosiD. GritsenkoL.V. Highly sensitive zinc oxide fiber-optic biosensor for the detection of CD44 protein.Biosensors20221211101510.3390/bios12111015
     [Google Scholar]
  18. PiliarikM. VaisocherováH. HomolaJ. Surface plasmon resonance biosensing.Methods Mol. Biol.2009503658810.1007/978‑1‑60327‑567‑5_5
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Nejati-KoshkiK. FathiF. ArabzadehA. MohammadzadehA. Biomarkers and optical based biosensors in cardiac disease detection: Early and accurate diagnosis.Analyt. Meth Adv. Meth Appl.202315415441545810.1039/d3ay01414b
     [Google Scholar]
  20. KumarV. BhattD. Saruchi; Pandey, S. Luminescence nanomaterials for biosensing applications.J. Biol. Chem.20233871011102510.1002/bio.4373
     [Google Scholar]
  21. AdiguzelY. Biosensor with UV spectrophotometric detection.Proceedings20182311310.3390/ecsa‑4‑04928
     [Google Scholar]
  22. HirschM. MajchrowiczD. WierzbaP. WeberM. BechelanyM. Jędrzejewska-SzczerskaM. Low-coherence interferometric fiber-optic sensors with potential applications as biosensors.Sensors2017172261
     [Google Scholar]
  23. FathiF. RashidiM.R. PakchinP.S. Ahmadi-KandjaniS. NikniaziA. Photonic crystal based biosensors: Emerging inverse opals for biomarker detection.Talanta202122112161510.1016/j.talanta.2020.121615
     [Google Scholar]
  24. UdhaniR. KothariC. KumarS. Biosensors and lateral flow immunoassays: Current state and future prospects.Clin. Chim. Acta202557412027210.1016/j.cca.2025.120272
     [Google Scholar]
  25. RhoD. BreauxC. KimS. Label-free optical resonator-based biosensors.Sensors20202020590110.3390/s20205901
     [Google Scholar]
  26. RodaA. MirasoliM. MicheliniE. Di FuscoM. ZangheriM. CeveniniL. RodaB. SimoniP. Progress in chemical luminescence-based biosensors: A critical review.Biosens. Bioelectron.20167616417910.1016/j.bios.2015.06.017
     [Google Scholar]
  27. RiedelT. Diagnosis of EpsteineBarr virus infection in clinical serum samples by an SPR biosensor assay.Biosens. Bioelectron.20145527828410.1016/j.bios.2013.12.011
     [Google Scholar]
  28. EndoT. Multiple label-free detection of antigen-antibody reaction using localized surface plasmon resonance-based core-shell structured nanoparticle layer nanochip.Anal. Chem.2006786465647510.1021/ac0608321
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Oliveira BrettA.M. Chapter 4 DNA-based biosensors. Compr. Anal. Chem.200544179208
     [Google Scholar]
  30. PimkováK. Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for the detection of VEGFR-1-a protein marker of myelodysplastic syndromes.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.201240238138710.1007/s00216‑011‑5395‑3
     [Google Scholar]
  31. PiliarikM. High-resolution biosensor based on localized surface plasmons.Opt. Express201220672680
     [Google Scholar]
  32. YuanJ. Detection of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 in patients with ovarian cancer using a label-free biosensor based on localized surface plasmon resonance.Int. J. Nanomedicine201272921292810.2147/IJN.S32641
     [Google Scholar]
  33. LeeJ.H. Highly sensitive localized surface plasmon resonance immunosensor for label-free detection of HIV-1.Nanomedicine201391018102610.1016/j.nano.2013.03.005
     [Google Scholar]
  34. HammondJ. Localized surface plasmon resonance as a biosensing platform for developing countries.Biosensors2014417210.3390/bios4020172
     [Google Scholar]
  35. TomassettiM. ContaG. CampanellaL. FaveroG. SanzoG. MazzeiF. AntiochiaR. A flow SPR immunosensor based on a sandwich direct method.Biosensors201662210.3390/bios6020022
     [Google Scholar]
  36. GongJ. PengW. HanY. LiuW. HanS. GuoT. HeY. A surface plasmon resonance sensor for antibiotics detection based on photo-initiated polymerization molecularly imprinted array.Talanta201616179780310.1016/j.talanta.2016.09.049
     [Google Scholar]
  37. LamarcaR.S. FrancoD.F. NalinM. de Lima GomesP.C.F. MessaddeqY. Label-free ultrasensitive and environment-friendly immunosensor based on a silica optical fiber for the determination of ciprofloxacin in wastewater samples.Anal. Chem.202092144151442210.1021/acs.analchem.0c02355
     [Google Scholar]
  38. CennamoN. ZeniL. RiccaE. IsticatoR. MarzulloV.M. CapoA. StaianoM. D’AuriaS. VarrialeA. Detection of naphthalene in sea-water by a label-free plasmonic optical fiber biosensor.Talanta201919428929710.1016/j.talanta.2018.10.051
     [Google Scholar]
  39. ZhangH. YangL. ZhouB. LiuW. GeJ. WuJ. WangY. WangP. Ultrasensitive and selective gold film-based detection of mercury (II) in tap water using a laser scanning confocal imaging-surface plasmon resonance system in real time.Biosens. Bioelectron.20134739139510.1016/j.bios.2013.03.067
     [Google Scholar]
  40. ChangC.C. LinS. WeiS.C. ChenC.Y. LinC.W. An amplified surface plasmon resonance “turn-on” sensor for mercury ion using gold nanoparticles.Biosens. Bioelectron.20113023524010.1016/j.bios.2011.09.018
     [Google Scholar]
  41. HegnerováK. HomolaJ. Surface plasmon resonance sensor for detection of bisphenol A in drinking water.Sens. Actuators B Chem.201015117717910.1016/j.snb.2010.09.025
     [Google Scholar]
  42. JiaK. A lower limit of detection for atrazine was obtained using bioluminescent reporter bacteria via a lower incubation temperature.Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.201284221226
     [Google Scholar]
  43. BiranI. Optical imaging fiber-based live bacterial cell array biosensor.Anal. Biochem.200331510611310.1016/S0003‑2697(02)00700‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  44. GoldenJ.P. Fluorometer and tapered fiber optic probes for sensing in the evanescent wave.Opt. Eng.19923114581462
     [Google Scholar]
  45. ZhouC. A compact fiber-optic immunosensor based on evanescent wave excitation using a semiconductor laser.Sens. Actuators B Chem.199742169175
     [Google Scholar]
  46. ShaharH. TanL.L. TaG.C. HengL.Y. Optical enzymatic biosensor membrane for rapid in situ detection of organohalide in water samples.Microchem. J.20191464148
     [Google Scholar]
  47. HanS. ZhouX. TangY. HeM. ZhangX. ShiH. XiangY. Practical, highly sensitive, and regenerable evanescent- wave biosensor for detection of Hg2+ and Pb2+ in water.Biosens. Bioelectron.20168026527210.1016/j.bios.2016.01.070
     [Google Scholar]
  48. YildirimN. LongF. HeM. GaoC. ShiH.C. GuA.Z. A portable DNAzyme-based optical biosensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of lead (II) in water sample.Talanta201412961762210.1016/j.talanta.2014.03.062
     [Google Scholar]
  49. ArjmandM. SaghafifarH. AlijanianzadehM. SoltanolkotabiM. A sensitive tapered-fiber optic biosensor for the label-free detection of organophosphate pesticides.Sens. Actuators B Chem.201724952353210.1016/j.snb.2017.04.121
     [Google Scholar]
  50. TaittC.R. Evanescent wave fluorescence biosensors: Advances of the last decade.Biosens. Bioelectron.201576103111
     [Google Scholar]
  51. LochheadM.J. Rapid multiplexed immunoassay for simultaneous serodiagnosis of HIV-1 and coinfections.J. Clin. Microbiol.2011493584359010.1016/j.bios.2015.07.040
     [Google Scholar]
  52. YildirimN. Aptamer-based optical biosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of 17beta-estradiol in water samples.Environ. Sci. Technol.2012463288329410.1021/es203624w
     [Google Scholar]
  53. LiuL. ZhouX. LuM. ZhangM. YangC. MaR. MemonA.G. ShiH. QianY. An array fluorescent biosensor based on planar waveguide for multianalyte determination in water samples.Sens. Actuators B Chem.201724010711310.1016/j.snb.2016.08.118
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Xiao-HongZ. Bao-DongS. Han-ChangS. Lan-HuaL. Hong-LiG. MiaoH. An evanescent wave multichannel immunosensor system for the highly sensitive detection of small analytes in water samples. Sensor. Actuator.Biol. Chem.201419815015610.1016/j.snb.2014.02.106
     [Google Scholar]
  55. LiuR. GuanG. WangS. ZhangZ. Core-Shell nano- structured molecular imprinting fluorescent chemosensor for selective detection of atrazine herbicide.Analyst2011136184190
     [Google Scholar]
  56. LiuL. ZhouX. LuY. ShiH. MaM. YuT. Triple functional small-molecule-protein conjugate mediated optical biosensor for quantification of estrogenic activities in water samples.Environ. Int.201913210509110.1016/j.envint.2019.105091
     [Google Scholar]
  57. HerranzS. MarazuelaM.D. Moreno-BondiM.C. Automated portable array biosensor for multisample microcystin analysis in freshwater samples.Biosens. Bioelectron.201233505510.1016/j.bios.2011.12.016
     [Google Scholar]
  58. GuptaS. SarkarS. KatranidisA. BhattacharyaJ. Development of a cell-free optical biosensor for detection of a broad range of mercury contaminants in water: A plasmid DNA-based approach.ACS Omega201949480948710.1021/acsomega.9b00205
     [Google Scholar]
  59. NocerinoV. MirandaB. TramontanoC. ChianeseG. DardanoP. ReaI. De StefanoL. Plasmonic nanosensors: Design, fabrication, and applications in biomedicine.Chemosensors202210515010.3390/chemosensors10050150
     [Google Scholar]
  60. SeitzW.R. Transducer mechanisms for optical biosensors. Part 1: The chemistry of transduction.Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.198930191910.1016/0169‑2607(89)90118‑1
     [Google Scholar]
  61. KumarS. IadiciccoA. KimS. TosiD. MarquesC. Introduction to the feature issue: Advances in optical biosensors for biomedical applications.Biomed. Opt. Express20241553183319010.1364/BOE.527613
     [Google Scholar]
  62. LiuJ. JalaliM. MahshidS. Wachsmann-HogiuS. Are plasmonic optical biosensors ready for use in point-of-need applications?The Analyst2020145236438410.1039/c9an02149c
     [Google Scholar]
  63. ChenC. Wang, J. Optical biosensors: An exhaustive and comprehensive review.Analyst2020145516051628
     [Google Scholar]
  64. KalakondaS.N. BammidiR. EdubilliH. MedapatiS. BoyinaS.L.D. PrasadV.V.S. Biosensors – An insight into the electrochemical and optical biosensors.Int. J. Pharm. Investig.202313340241210.5530/ijpi.13.3.051
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Herrera-DomínguezM. Morales-LunaG. MahlknechtJ. ChengQ. Aguilar-HernándezI. Ornelas-SotoN. Optical biosensors and their applications for the detection of water pollutants.Biosensors202313337010.3390/bios13030370
     [Google Scholar]
  66. NareshV. LeeN. A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors.Sensors2021214110910.3390/s21041109
     [Google Scholar]
  67. MostufaH. OhS.H. MaierS.A. HomolaJ. Advances and applications of nanophotonic biosensors.Nat. Nanotechnol.202217151610.1038/s41565‑021‑01045‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  68. DinishU.S. Highly sensitive SERS detection of cancer proteins in low sample volume using hollow core photonic crystal fiber.Biosens. Bioelectron.20123329329810.1016/j.bios.2011.12.056
     [Google Scholar]
  69. SrivastavaS.K. SERS biosensor using metallic nanosculptured thin films for the detection of endocrine disrupting compound biomarker vitellogenin.Small2014103579358710.1002/smll.201303218
     [Google Scholar]
  70. FengC. Optical aptasensors for quantitative detection of small biomolecules: A review.Biosens. Bioelectron.201459647410.1016/j.bios.2014.03.014
     [Google Scholar]
  71. PolletJ. Fiber optic SPR biosensing of DNA hybridization and DNA-protein interactions.Biosens. Bioelectron.20092586486910.1016/j.bios.2009.08.045
     [Google Scholar]
  72. WangW. Aptamer-based PDMS-gold nanoparticle composite as a platform for visual detection of biomolecules with silver enhancement.Biosens. Bioelectron.2011263110311410.1016/j.bios.2010.10.034
     [Google Scholar]
  73. MostufaS. RezaeiB. CiannellaS. YariP. Gómez-PastoraJ. HeR. WuK. Advancements and perspectives in optical biosensors.ACS Omega2024923241812420210.1021/acsomega.4c01872
     [Google Scholar]
  74. DamborskýP. ŠvitelJ. Katrlík, J. Optical biosensors.Essays Biochem.20166019110010.1042/EBC20150010
     [Google Scholar]
  75. GangwarR.K. PathakA.K. KumarS. Recent progress in photonic crystal devices and their applications: A review.Photonics20231011119910.3390/photonics10111199
     [Google Scholar]
  76. KnightS. LipothJ. NamvariM. GuC. HedayatiM. Syed-AbdulS. SpiteriR.J. The accuracy of wearable photoplethysmography sensors for telehealth monitoring: A scoping review.Telemed. J. E Health202329681382810.1089/tmj.2022.0182
     [Google Scholar]
  77. KimK.B. BaekH.J. Photoplethysmography in wearable devices: A comprehensive review of technological advances, current challenges, and future directions.Electronics20231213292310.3390/electronics12132923
     [Google Scholar]
  78. CharltonP.H. AllenJ. BailónR. BakerS. BeharJ.A. ChenF. CliffordG.D. CliftonD.A. DaviesH.J. DingC. DingX. DunnJ. ElgendiM. FerdoushiM. FranklinD. GilE. HassanM.F. HernesniemiJ. HuX. JiN. ZhuT. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiol. Meas.2023441111100110.1088/1361‑6579/acead2
     [Google Scholar]
  79. CharltonP.H. KyriacoP.A. MantJ. MarozasV. ChowienczykP. AlastrueyJ. Wearable photoplethysmography for cardiovascular monitoring.Instit. Elect. Elect. Eng.2022110335538110.1109/JPROC.2022.3149785
     [Google Scholar]
  80. AllenJ. KyriacouP.A. Editorial: Advances in basic and applied research in photoplethysmography.Front. Physiol.202415141504910.3389/fphys.2024.1415049
     [Google Scholar]
  81. KhoninaS.N. KazanskiyN.L. ButtM.A. Optical fibre-based sensors—an assessment of current innovations.Biosensors202313983510.3390/bios13090835
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575403525250822093011
Loading
Optical Biosensors: A Comprehensive Review of Their Applications in Photoplethysmography, Environmental Monitoring, and Medical Diagnostics
Mini Rev Med Chem 25, 1051 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0113895575403525250822093011
/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575403525250822093011
/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575403525250822093011
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): biochemical sensors; biomedical applications; environmental monitoring; fluorescence-based sensors; food safety testing; medical diagnostics; molecular diagnostics; nanotechnology; Optical biosensors; surface plasmon resonance

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test