Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 9
  • ISSN: 1872-2121
  • E-ISSN: 2212-4047

Abstract

Introduction

Choosing an e-learning website is crucial for researchers and developers in today's fiercely competitive world. The concept of an e-learning website is expanding quickly these days. When a substantial number of selection criteria are considered across a wide range of options, the process of selecting and ranking e-learning websites becomes a complex and challenging task.

Objective

The present research aims on the evaluation and selection of E-learning websites by modelling it as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem due the dependency of multiple conflicting attributes. This study targets on the upcoming problem of evaluating, ranking, and selecting E-learning websites, having a significant impact on the educational industry.

Methods

The present research work proposes the W-CODAS strategy for optimizing e-learning websites, which combines the Shannon Entropy approach which is used to calculate the weights of the selection criteria with the CODAS technique. The results obtained will be protected using patents.

Results and Discussion

According to the method and framework that is proposed, the E-learning website exhibiting the lowest preference index value is assigned the top rank or position, whereas the website which has the highest value is ranked or placed at last.

Conclusion

This study was conducted to rank the various E-learning websites. In particular, an integrated MCDM method has been developed by combining entropy approach and distance based approach. It is established that once a complete set of selection criteria and their respective priority weights have been identified, this CoDAS method can be applied to rank them. The interdependencies/priority weights of the selection criteria have been given due consideration in the CoDAS method. The proposed methodology W-CoDAS in the present research is based on the simple mathematical matrix operations that reduce the complexity of the evaluation distance-based process as well as implementation time. The results are verified by comparing the W-CODAS ranking findings to established MCDM systems like TOPSIS and VIKOR, and employing Spearman's rank correlation test, enhances the robustness and credibility of the research.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121344808250307072239
2025-03-26
2025-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eng/19/9/ENG-19-9-07.html?itemId=/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121344808250307072239&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. DragulanescuN.G. Website quality evaluations: Criteria and tools.Int. Inf. Libr. Rev.200234324725410.1080/10572317.2002.10762580
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PalmerJ.W. Web site usability, design, and performance metrics.Inf. Syst. Res.200213215116710.1287/isre.13.2.151.88
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KimballA. San Francisco, CA: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.U.S. 200602049422006
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BüyüközkanG. RuanD. FeyzioğluO. Evaluating e-learning web site quality in a fuzzy environment.Int. J. Intell. Syst.200722556758610.1002/int.20214
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KerkiriT. ManitsarisA. MavridouA. Reputation metadata for recommending personalized e-learning resources.Second International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP 2007)Uxbridge, UK, 17-18 December 2007, pp. 110-115.10.1109/SMAP.2007.32
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LimC.J. LeeS. Pedagogical usability checklist for ESL/EFL e-learning websites.J. Converg. Inf. Technol.2007236776
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YangY.T.C. ChanC.Y. Comprehensive evaluation criteria for English learning websites using expert validity surveys.Comput. Educ.200851140342210.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.011
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LiuG.Z. LiuZ.H. HwangG.J. Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors.Comput. Educ.2011561657910.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.019
    [Google Scholar]
  9. AbdellatiefM. SultanA.B.M. JabarM.A. AbdullahR. A technique for quality evaluation of e-learning from developers perspective.Am. J. Econ. Bus. Adm.20113115716410.3844/ajebasp.2011.157.164
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BakliziM. AlghyalineS. E-learning websites selection and ranking using multi-criteria decision-making methodology.J. Propul. Tech.20114441946195810.52783/tjjpt.v44.i4.1155
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NilashiM. JanahmadiN. Assessing and prioritizing affecting factors in e-learning websites using AHP method and fuzzy approach.Inform. Knowl. Manage201221
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TanP.J.B. Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of English e-learning websites in Taiwan.SAGE Open201334215824401350383710.1177/2158244013503837
    [Google Scholar]
  13. EcerF. A hybrid banking websites quality evaluation model using AHP and COPRAS G: A Turkey case.Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ.201420475778210.3846/20294913.2014.915596
    [Google Scholar]
  14. UrhM. VukovicG. JerebE. PintarR. The model for the introduction of gamification into e learning in higher education.Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.201519738839710.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.154
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NagpalR. MehrotraD. BhatiaP.K. BhatiaA. FAHP approach to rank educational websites on usability.Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst.201544
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JainD. GargR. BansalA. A parameterized selection and evaluation of E-learning websites using TOPSIS method.Int. J. Res. Dev. Technol. Manage. Sci.2015221226
    [Google Scholar]
  17. JainD. GargR. BansalA. SainiK.K. Selection and ranking of E-learning websites using weighted distance-based approximation.J. Comput. Educa.20163219320710.1007/s40692‑016‑0061‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  18. AinQ. AslamM. MuhammadS. AwanS. PervezM.T. NaveedN. QadriS. A technique to increase the usability of e-learning websites.Pak. J. Sci.2016682
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KabakM. özceylanE. DağdevirenM. GencT. Evaluation of distance education websites: A hybrid multi-criteria approach.Turk. J. Electr. Enginee. Comput. Sci.20172542809281910.3906/elk‑1512‑271
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GargR. JainD. Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making evaluation of e-learning websites using FAHP, COPRAS, VIKOR, WDBA.Decis. Sci. Lett.20176435136410.5267/j.dsl.2017.2.003
    [Google Scholar]
  21. YasminM. TatogluE. KilicH.S. ZaimS. DelenD. Big data analytics capabilities and firm performance: An integrated MCDM approach.J. Bus. Res.202011411510.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.028
    [Google Scholar]
  22. NaveedQ.N. Mohamed QureshiM.R.N. ShaikhA. AlsayedA.O. SanoberS. MohiuddinK. Evaluating and ranking cloud-based e-learning critical success factors(CSFs) using combinatorial approach.IEEE Access2019715714515715710.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949044
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Abdel-BassetM. DingW. MohamedR. MetawaN. An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries.Risk Manage.202022319221810.1057/s41283‑020‑00061‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  24. NaveedQ.N. QureshiM.R.N. TairanN. MohammadA. ShaikhA. AlsayedA.O. ShahA. AlotaibiF.M. Evaluating critical success factors in implementing E-learning system using multi-criteria decision-making.PLoS One2020155e023146510.1371/journal.pone.023146532365123
    [Google Scholar]
  25. GongJ.W. LiuH.C. YouX.Y. YinL. An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection.Appl. Soft Comput.202110210711810.1016/j.asoc.2021.10711836570416
    [Google Scholar]
  26. DivyaP.S. Review Analysis of E-Learning Websites Selection and Ranking Methodologies.2022 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC)Noida, India, 01-03 December 2022, pp. 485-490.10.1109/ICSC56524.2022.10009392
    [Google Scholar]
  27. GuptaA. BansalM. Evaluation and ranking of e-government websites using weighted-combinative distance-based assessment approach.Int. J. Soft. Innov.202210111510.4018/IJSI.309729
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121344808250307072239
Loading
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121344808250307072239
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test