Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 9
  • ISSN: 1872-2121
  • E-ISSN: 2212-4047
file format pdf download PDF
file format text download EPUB
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Introduction

Free Space Optics (FSO) is a wireless data transmission method for infrastructure that uses laser beam energy to transmit information waves through the atmosphere. Furthermore, due to its high bandwidth potential and simple deployment, FSO has garnered considerable interest. However, atmospheric turbulence and misalignment present obstacles to establishing dependable and effective FSO links.

Objective

For systems varying from space invariant to totally space variant, the optimal design of free-space optical connectivity systems using diffractive optics is found from an engineering perspective. Parameters such as the light's wavelength, the system's total number of optical sources and detectors, their sizes, and their spacing are used to determine the system's volume. Another important parameter is the diffractive lens's f-number. Diffraction Optical Elements (DOEs) have emerged as a promising means of addressing these difficulties. Also, the patent related to automated honey beehive box gives the insight of its monitoring system.

Methods

This paper provides an overview of the implementation and advancements of FSO systems utilizing DOEs, including the fundamental principles, design considerations, and performance improvements. The study discusses the basics of diffraction and the role of DOEs in FSO systems. It explores the diffraction grating equation and the Huygens-Fresnel principle to understand wave propagation and interference phenomena. Design considerations for FSO systems equipped with DOEs are discussed, including the selection of appropriate DOEs and evaluation of performance benefits. The study also investigates the application of AI methods, such as machine learning and deep learning, in optimizing FSO systems with DOEs.

Results and Discussion

A thorough overview of Free Space Optics (FSO) systems utilizing Diffraction Optical Elements (DOEs) is given in this review study. It examines diffraction theory and DOE use in FSO, emphasizing their potential for beam forming, beam steering, and adaptive optics. The study examines FSO with DOE design concerns, performance improvements, applications, and future approaches. FSO systems may overcome problems with air turbulence, misalignment, and fading by using the characteristics of DOEs, opening the door for dependable and effective wireless communication.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the effect of DOEs on BER efficiency is also modified by the obscuration ratio. Transmission power is increased when more DOEs are used by an amount defined by their obscuration ratios. Additionally, because of the increased power complement in these systems, the effect of DOEs is more pronounced. The integration of AI further enhances FSO capabilities by providing adaptive optimization, fault detection, predictive maintenance, and improved security. Future research directions may include exploring advanced AI techniques and conducting practical implementations of FSO systems with DOEs for various applications, particularly in Internet of Things (IoT) scenarios.

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publishers.
This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121323463240712060019
2024-07-23
2025-11-29

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121323463240712060019
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eng/19/9/ENG-19-9-05.html?itemId=/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121323463240712060019&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. KeiserG. Optical Fiber Communications.McGraw-Hill1991
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AhmedA. Outage capacity optimization for free-space optical links with pointing errors.J. Lightwave technol.200725717021710
     [Google Scholar]
  3. ZabidiI. Analysis of rain effects on terrestrial free space optics based on data measured in tropical climate.IIUM Engin. J.2012125
     [Google Scholar]
  4. TatarkoM. Ovseník and J. Turan, “Availability and Reliability of FSO Links Estimated from VisibilityCarpathian J. Electron. Comput. Eng.20125121126
     [Google Scholar]
  5. MohammedN.A. El-WakeelA.S. AlyM.H. Pointing Error in FSO Link under Different Weather Conditions.International Journal of Video & Image Processing and Network Security, IJVIPNS-IJENS2012120169
     [Google Scholar]
  6. MazinA. Atmospheric Turbulence Effect on Free Space Optical Communications.Int. J. Emerging Technol. Comp. Appl. Sci.20132013345351
     [Google Scholar]
  7. SinghS. SoniG. Pointing error evaluation in Free Space optical link.IET2013365370
     [Google Scholar]
  8. TruongN.B. SuhY.J. YuC. Latency analysis in GNU radio/USRP-based software radio platforms.MILCOM 2013 -IEEE Milit. Commun. Conf.2013201330531010.1109/MILCOM.2013.60
     [Google Scholar]
  9. RuffatoG. MassariM. RomanatoF. Diffractive optics for OAM-mode division multiplexing of optical vortices Design, fabrication and optical characterization2016 IEEE 7th International Conference on Advanced Optoelectronics and Lasers (CAOL) 12-15 September 2016, Odessa, Ukraine, pp. 148-150.10.1109/CAOL.2016.7851408
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HouW. LiR. NingZ. ChenZ. A Hierarchical Routing Algorithm for Satellite Networks Considering FSO Communication2017 14th International Symposium on Pervasive Systems, Algorithms and Networks and 2017 11th International Conference on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology and 2017 Third International Symposium of Creative Computing (ISPAN-FCST-ISCC) 21-23 June 2017, Exeter, UK, pp. 278-284.10.1109/ISPAN‑FCST‑ISCC.2017.106
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KaymakY. Fathi-Kazerooni, Rojas-Cessa, Feng, Ansari, N. Zhou et al,” Beam with adaptive divergence angle in free-space optical communications for high-speed trains2018
  12. AleksicS. A Survey on Optical Technologies for IoT, Smart Industry, and Smart Infrastructures.J. Sens. Actuator Net.2019834710.3390/jsan8030047
     [Google Scholar]
  13. NathS. ShrivastavaS.K. SengarS. SinghS.P. Deployment of Cognitive RF for Performance Enhancement of FSO systems: A FSO/Cognitive RF Hybrid Approach2019 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC) 07-09 March 2019, NOIDA, India, pp. 51-58.10.1109/ICSC45622.2019.8938248
     [Google Scholar]
  14. SalamAbdul Subsurface MIMO: A beam-forming design in internet of underground things for digital agriculture applicationsJ. Sensor. Actuator Net.20193414410.3390/jsan8030041
     [Google Scholar]
  15. AbdorahimiDanial SadeghioonAli M. Comparison of radio frequency path loss models in soil for wireless underground sensor networks.J. Sens. Actuator Net.201921444145710.3390/jsan8020035
     [Google Scholar]
  16. MartinekRadek DanysLukas JarosRene Visible light communication system based on software defined radio: performance study of intelligent transportation and indoor applications.Electronics2019443343910.3390/electronics8040433
     [Google Scholar]
  17. KashifH. KhanM.N. Future of Free Space Communication Systems (FSCS): An Overview.2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing. 02-03 October 2020, Orem, UT, USA, pp. 1-5.10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249101
     [Google Scholar]
  18. LemaG.G. Free space optics communication system design using iterative optimization.J. Opt. Commun.202044S1S1205S1216
     [Google Scholar]
  19. ChowdhuryM.Z. ShahjalalM. HasanM.K. JangY.M. The Role of Optical Wireless Communication Technologies in 5G/6G and IoT Solutions: Prospects, directions, and challenges.Appl. Sci.20199204367437210.3390/app9204367
     [Google Scholar]
  20. DhasarathanV. SinghM. MalhotraJ. Development of high-speed FSO transmission link for the implementation of 5G and Internet of Things.Wireless Netw.2020262403241210.1007/s11276‑019‑02166‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  21. StottsL.B. AndrewsL.C. Adaptive optics model characterizing turbulence mitigation for free space optical communications link budgets.Opt. Express20212913203072032110.1364/OE.43055434266123
     [Google Scholar]
  22. SoniG. Performance Evaluation and Analysis of an WoC Based Inter Satellite Link over the Low Earth Orbit2021 13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) 22-23 September 2021, Lima, Peru, pp. 116-122.10.1109/CICN51697.2021.9574683
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ChauhanS. MiglaniR. KansalL. GabaG.S. MasudM. Performance Analysis and Enhancement of Free Space Optical Links for Developing State-of-the-Art Smart City Framework.Photonics20207413210.3390/photonics7040132
     [Google Scholar]
  24. SinghH. MittalN. MiglaniR. SinghH. GabaG.S. HedabouM. Design and Analysis of High-Speed Free Space Optical (FSO) Communication System for Supporting Fifth Generation (5G) Data Services in Diverse Geographical Locations of India.IEEE Photonics J.202113511210.1109/JPHOT.2021.3113650
     [Google Scholar]
  25. HtayZ. GhassemlooyZ. AbadiM.M. BurtonA. MohanN. ZvanovecS. Performance Analysis and Software-Defined Implementation of Real-Time MIMO FSO With Adaptive Switching in GNU Radio Platform.IEEE Access20219921689217710.1109/ACCESS.2021.3092968
     [Google Scholar]
  26. WuH. Heterogeneous Integrated Sparse Optical Phased Array for Free-Space Optical Communication2021 IEEE Research and Applications of Photonics in Defense Conference (RAPID) 2021 02-04 August 2021, Miramar Beach, FL, USA, pp. 1-2.10.1109/RAPID51799.2021.9521393
     [Google Scholar]
  27. RaoS. DiggeJ. RindheB.U. Free Space Optics for 5G and Beyond2021 6th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT). 02-04 April 2021, Maharashtra, India, pp. 1-5.10.1109/I2CT51068.2021.9418147
     [Google Scholar]
  28. MilanizadehM. Establishing free-space optical communication channels through a reconfigurable silicon mesh.2021 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topicals Meeting Series (SUM) 19-21 July 2021, Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, pp.1-2.10.1109/SUM48717.2021.9505891
     [Google Scholar]
  29. WilfertO. BarcikP. KolkaZ. Security Threats for Free Space Optics due to Fog Scattering Phenomena.2021 20th International Conference on Microwave Techniques (COMITE) 19-21 April 2021, Brno, Czech Republic, pp.1-4.10.1109/COMITE52242.2021.9419872
     [Google Scholar]
  30. LiM. Free-Space Optical Communication with Finite Acceptance Aperture Using Concentric Perfect Optical Vortex2021 2nd Information Communication Technologies Conference (ICTC) 07-09 May 2021, Nanjing, China, pp. 212-215.10.1109/ICTC51749.2021.9441604
     [Google Scholar]
  31. CorralF.V. CuencaC. SotoI. Design of an Optical Wireless Network using Free Space Optics Technology (FSO), in 5G/6G Networks Environment2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA) 22-26 March 2021, Valparaíso, Chile, pp. 1-5.10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465287
     [Google Scholar]
  32. HuangY. Turbulence-Resistant Free-Space Optical Communication Using Mode Diversity Preamplification and Reception.2021 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) 09-14 May 2021,San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 1-2.10.1364/CLEO_SI.2021.SM4A.4
     [Google Scholar]
  33. TuranH. SubaşiÖ. Development of Fine Tracking Unit for Hybrid ATP Mechanism in Free-space Optical Communication2021 29th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) 09-11 June 2021, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 1-4.10.1109/SIU53274.2021.9478036
     [Google Scholar]
  34. TrotterC. Gigabit Indoor Free-Space Optical Communication Enhanced by Dynamic Beam Control.2021 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) 09-14 May 2021, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 1-2.10.1364/CLEO_SI.2021.SM4A.2
     [Google Scholar]
  35. ArjariyaA. JoseL.P. Laser Based Free Space Optical Communication System for Future Space Application2021 International Conference on Communication, Control and Information Sciences (ICCISc) 16-18 June 2021,Idukki, India, pp. 1-7.10.1109/ICCISc52257.2021.9484908
     [Google Scholar]
  36. NovakM. BarcikP. SkryjaP. KolkaZ. Service Data Transmission System for Free Space Optics2021 20th International Conference on Microwave Techniques (COMITE) 19-21 April 2021, Brno, Czech Republic, pp.1-4.10.1109/COMITE52242.2021.9419871
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ab AzizS.H. NorN.A.M. ZabidiS.A. Performance Analysis of Free Space Optics Link Under the Effect of Rain Attenuation2021 8th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE) 22-23 June 2021, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 391-396.10.1109/ICCCE50029.2021.9467207
     [Google Scholar]
  38. WatanabeK. JonoS. IzumiK. TsujimuraT. Trace Control of Laser Beam for Free Space Optics Communication 2021 60th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE) 08-10 September 2021, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1163-1168.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. YuanR. WangZ. PengM. Free-Space Optical Communication System Using Non-mode-Selective Photonic Lantern Based Receiver With Different Number of Single-Mode Fiber Cores.2021 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) 28-30 July 2021,Xiamen, China, pp. 139-143.10.1109/ICCC52777.2021.9580395
     [Google Scholar]
  40. SpitzO. DidierP. DuruptL. Diaz-ThomasD.A. BaranovA.N. CeruttiL. GrillotF. Free-Space Communication With Directly Modulated Mid-Infrared Quantum Cascade Devices.IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.2022281: Semiconductor Lasers1910.1109/JSTQE.2021.3096316
     [Google Scholar]
  41. ZhangB. YuanR. SunJ. ChengJ. AlouiniM.S. Free-Space Optical Communication Using Non-Mode-Selective Photonic Lantern-Based Coherent Receiver.IEEE Trans. Commun.20216985367538010.1109/TCOMM.2021.3081740
     [Google Scholar]
  42. HuangY. Elliptical-Aperture Multimode Diversity Reception for Free-Space Optics Communications Under Anisotropic Turbulence.2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC) 06-10 June 2021, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 1-3.10.1364/OFC.2021.W7E.4
     [Google Scholar]
  43. AmhoudE.M. ChafiiM. NimrA. FettweisG. OFDM with Index Modulation in Orbital Angular Momentum Multiplexed Free Space Optical Links.2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring) 25-28 April 2021, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1-5.10.1109/VTC2021‑Spring51267.2021.9448928
     [Google Scholar]
  44. RS. SharmaS. VishwakarmaN. MadhukumarA.S. S. R HAPS-Based Relaying for Integrated Space–Air–Ground Networks With Hybrid FSO/RF Communication: A Performance Analysis.IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.20215731581159910.1109/TAES.2021.3050663
     [Google Scholar]
  45. AvetaF. AlgedirA. RefaiH. Quality of Transmission Estimation for Multi-User Free Space Optical Communication Using Supervised Machine Learning.2021 IEEE Cognitive Communications for Aerospace Applications Workshop (CCAAW) 21-23 June 2021, Cleveland, OH, USA, pp. 1-5.10.1109/CCAAW50069.2021.9527304
     [Google Scholar]
  46. AljohaniA.J. MirzaJ. GhafoorS. A Novel Regeneration Technique for Free Space Optical Communication Systems.IEEE Commun. Lett.202125119619910.1109/LCOMM.2020.3029591
     [Google Scholar]
  47. NarasimhaV. GurugopinathS. Detection of On-Off Keying Signals in Free Space Optics: A Supervised Learning Approach2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) 21-23 May 2021, Belagavi, India, pp. 1-6.10.1109/INCET51464.2021.9456147
     [Google Scholar]
  48. RödigerB. FuchsC. NonayJ.R. JungW. SchmidtC. Miniaturized Optical Intersatellite Communication Terminal – CubeISL.2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops) 14-23 June 2021, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp.1-5.10.1109/ICCWorkshops50388.2021.9473747
     [Google Scholar]
  49. GengC. ZouF. LiF. HuangG. ZuoJ. LiuJ. FanZ. LiX. Experimental Demonstration of Adaptive Optics Correction of the External Aberrations for Distributed Fiber Laser Array.IEEE Access20219514645147210.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069794
     [Google Scholar]
  50. KimD.C. HermerschmidtA. DyachenkoP. ScharfT. Inverse design and demonstration of high-performance wide-angle diffractive optical elements.Opt. Express20202815223212233310.1364/OE.39444232752497
     [Google Scholar]
  51. KumarG. KumarR. A survey on planar ultra-wideband antennas with band notch characteristics: Principle, design, and applications.AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun.2019109769810.1016/j.aeue.2019.07.004
     [Google Scholar]
  52. KumarA. SharmaS. GoyalN. SinghA. ChengX. SinghP. Secure and energy-efficient smart building architecture with emerging technology IoT.Comput. Commun.202117620721710.1016/j.comcom.2021.06.003
     [Google Scholar]
  53. HuJ. MenguD. TzarouchisD.C. EdwardsB. EnghetaN. OzcanA. Diffractive optical computing in free space.Nat. Commun., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1525, 2024. 10.1038/s41467‑024‑45982‑w38378715
     [Google Scholar]
  54. SoniG. GuptaS. VaishA. Performance investigation of diffractive optical elements effect and rain attenuation on BER of an optical free space communication based system.J. Opt.202150460661010.1007/s12596‑021‑00720‑z
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ErrachidAdardourH. KamecheS. SinghM. A MIMO-Enabled Free Space Optical Link under Log-Normal Fading/Gamma-Gamma Channel: Exploring an Optimal Modulation Scheme.Int. J. Optics202320235010.1155/2023/8020925
     [Google Scholar]
  56. GoyalG. KumarA. SharmaD. 12 Recent Applications of rapid prototyping with 3D printing: A Review.3D Printing Technologies: Digital Manufacturing, Artificial Intelligence, Industry 4.0Berlin, BostonDe Gruyter202410.1515/9783111215112‑012
     [Google Scholar]
  57. GoyalG. KumarA. SharmaD. 16 Recent developments in 3D printing: a critical analysis and deep dive into innovative real-world applications3D Printing Technologies-Digital Manufacturing, Artificial Intelligence, Industry 4.0Berlin, BostonDe Gruyter202433535210.1515/9783111215112‑016
     [Google Scholar]
  58. GoyalG. Pointing error evaluation in FSO link.Fifth International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Com-munication and Computing (ARTCom 2013) 20-21 September 2013, Bangalore, pp. 365-370.10.1049/cp.2013.2215
     [Google Scholar]
  59. J. Hu, D. Mengu, D.C. Tzarouchis, B. Eswards, N. Engheta, and A. Ozcan, “Diffractive optical computing in free space,” nature communications, vol. 15, pp. 1-21, 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. KaurH. BhardwajA. SoniG. Performance improvement of free space optical link by varying transmitter and receiver aperture diameter.2015 Global Conference on Communication Technologies (GCCT) 23-24 April 2015, Thuckalay, India, pp. 761-766.10.1109/GCCT.2015.7342766
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Soni Performance Investigation of Free Space Optics Link Using Beam Divergence.2021 13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) 22-23 September 2021, Lima, Peru, 2021, pp. 102-107.10.1109/CICN51697.2021.9574693
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Soni Experimental evaluation determination of free space optical link performance at 532 nm wavelength under rain attenuation conditions its comparison with 850 nm wavelength.2017 International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Computational Intelligence (ICBDAC). Chirala, Andhra Pradesh, India, 2017, pp. 447-450.10.1109/ICB‑DACI.2017.8070881
     [Google Scholar]
  63. SoniG. Performance analysis of Free Space Optics link at different data rates2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) 27-29 November 2014, Mysore, India, pp. 1251-1255.10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019625
     [Google Scholar]
  64. SoniG. Performance evaluation of Free Space optical link at 650nm using red laser under rain conditions using experimental set-up.2015 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT) 18-19 December 2015, Kumaracoil, India, pp.704-706.10.1109/ICCICCT.2015.7475370
     [Google Scholar]
  65. SoniG. Performance investigation of the free space optics link based communication using DOE scheme at 1550 nm.2021 13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN). 22-23 September 2021, Lima, Peru, 2021, pp. 108-111.10.1109/CICN51697.2021.9574663
     [Google Scholar]
  66. KaurN. SoniG. Performance analysis of inter-satellite optical wireless communication (IsOWC) system at 980 nm and 1550 nm wavelengths.2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I). 27-29 November 2014, Mysore, India, pp. 1245-1250.10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019624
     [Google Scholar]
  67. SoniG. Realization of OFDM based free space optics2015 International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT) 08-10 October 2015, Greater Noida, India, pp. 32-35.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. SoniG. Performance Evaluation of a Free Space Optical Link-Based Inter Satellite Link (ISL) across Low Earth Orbit (LEO.2nd International Conference on Power Electronics IoT Applications in Renewable Energy and its Control (PARC) 21-22 January 2022, Mathura, India, pp. 1-5.10.1109/PARC52418.2022.9726662
     [Google Scholar]
  69. DwivediV. SoniG. MishraS. MishraN. SinghR. GuptaR. DwivediA. Automated Honey Beehive Box with Integrated Monitoring System.Patent No. 202311046517, 2023.
  70. Al-MekhlafiZ.G. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. MohammedB.A. QtaishA. Lattice-Based Lightweight Quantum Resistant Scheme in 5G-Enabled Vehicular Networks.Mathematics202311239910.3390/math11020399
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Al-MekhlafiZ.G. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. MohammedB.A. AlreshidiA. AlazmiM. AlshudukhiJ.S. AlsaffarM. AlsewariA. Chebyshev Polynomial-Based Fog Computing Scheme Supporting Pseudonym Revocation for 5G-Enabled Vehicular Networks.Electronics (Basel)202312487210.3390/electronics12040872
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. COVID-19 Vehicle Based on an Efficient Mutual Authentication Scheme for 5G-Enabled Vehicular Fog Computing.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health202219231561810.3390/ijerph19231561836497709
     [Google Scholar]
  73. MohammedB.A. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. Al-MekhlafiZ.G. AlreshidiA. AlazmiM. AlshudukhiJ.S. AlsaffarM. FC-PA: Fog Computing-Based Pseudonym Authentication Scheme in 5G-Enabled Vehicular Networks.IEEE Access202311185711858110.1109/ACCESS.2023.3247222
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121323463240712060019
Loading
Free Space Optical Communication and its Implementation Using Diffractive Optical Elements Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Recent Pat Eng 19, E230724232156 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722121323463240712060019
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121323463240712060019
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121323463240712060019
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): differential phase shift keying; diffractive optical element; Free space optical communication; huygens-fresnel principle; orthogonal frequency division multiplexing; visible light communication

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test