Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2213-1116
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1132

Abstract

Background

Introducing pilot protection in active distribution networks containing PV can improve the reliability and selectivity of protection. However, the basic communication facilities of the existing distribution network make it difficult to meet the requirements of data synchronization, and the PV T-connection to the network leads to sudden changes in the impedance angle.

Methods

Therefore, pilot protection of a negative sequence and additional network considering PV is proposed. The scheme is based on the feature that the PV model only outputs positive sequence components after a fault. For asymmetrical faults, the negative sequence impedance detected at both ends of the protection is utilized to construct a comparative negative sequence impedance protection criterion. For symmetrical faults, the voltage characteristics of the faulty additional network are utilized to construct a protection criterion.

Discussion

The protection method requires less data information, low dependence on communication, and can quickly identify asymmetric faults occurring in the area. The operation results have high reliability and simple calculation; additional criteria can effectively avoid the impact of load current changes on the protection, can effectively withstand different transition resistance access conditions, and different penetration rates of photovoltaic power access. This study has two limitations: (1) The model considers only PV; (2) The proposed protection scheme applies only to local circuits.

Results

Finally, an actual distribution network model with PV is constructed in PSCAD to verify the effectiveness and reliability of the protection method.

Conclusion

The protection method is selective and reliable and is not affected by high penetration rate and PV fault characteristics.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/eeng/10.2174/0123520965308316240716173922
2026-01-01
2025-11-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eeng/19/1/EENG-19-E300724232459.html?itemId=/content/journals/eeng/10.2174/0123520965308316240716173922&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. ČolakJ. NikolovskiS. KljajićR. GlavašH. Protection coordination of photovoltaic power plant in the time domain.Advanced Engineering Letters202431212910.46793/adeletters.2024.3.1.3
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GhanaatianM. LotfifardS. Sparsity-based short-circuit analysis of power distribution systems with inverter interfaced distributed generators.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20193464857486810.1109/TPWRS.2019.2920382
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ShuaiZ. ShenC. YinX. LiuX. ShenZ.J. Fault analysis of inverter-interfaced distributed generators with different control schemes.IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.20183331223123510.1109/TPWRD.2017.2717388
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LiuH. XuK. ZhangZ. LiuW. AoJ. Research on theoretical calculation methods of photovoltaic power short-circuit current and influencing factors of its fault characteristics.Energies201912231610.3390/en12020316
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LiJ. GaoH. ZhuW. Inverse-time current differential protection in active distribution network considering characteristics of inverter-interfaced distributed generations.J. Electr. Eng. Technol.201631177483
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Soleymani AghdamT. Kazemi KaregarH. ZeineldinH.H. Optimal coordination of double-inverse overcurrent relays for stable operation of DGs.IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform.201915118319210.1109/TII.2018.2808264
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DaiZ. ZhangY. YuL. Improved current protection for new distribution networks.J. North China Elect. Power Univ.2024510119
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WuY. FanK. XuB. A distributed adaptive current protection approach to account for topology changes.EPAE20244425066
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LiH. Overcurrent protection method of double setting direction in distribution network connected to distributed generators.Dianzi Qijian20234601223231
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MaJ. LiuJ. DengZ. WuS. ThorpJ.S. An adaptive directional current protection scheme for distribution network with DG integration based on fault steady-state component.Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.20181020122323410.1016/j.ijepes.2018.04.024
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WangN. HanG. GaoH. Research on current differential protection criterion of active distribution network.PSPC202351071423
    [Google Scholar]
  12. YangY. LiS. ChenX. Longitudinal protection scheme for distribution networks containing distributed power sources based on amplitude-phase characteristics of fault sequence currents.JTUT2024550193101
    [Google Scholar]
  13. WeiD. YuS. FangJ. A pilot protection scheme for distribution networks with photovoltaic power supply based on integrated sequence current.Taiyang Neng Xuebao20214207185192
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HanB. WangG. LiH. Novel pilot protection scheme for distribution networks with inverter-interfaced distributed generators.High Voltage Engineering.2017431034533462
    [Google Scholar]
  15. YuC. GaoZ. LiuZ. TaoZ. Current differential protection for active distribution networks based on adaptive phase angle compensation coefficient.Appl. Sci. 2023138472310.3390/app13084723
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WangG. FengJ. LiJ. Adaptive Current Differential Protection for Distribution Networks with Inverted Distributed Power and Branch Loads.Power System Technology2023116
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HanB. LiH. WangG. ZengD. LiangY. A virtual multi-terminal current differential protection scheme for distribution networks with inverter-interfaced distributed generators.IEEE Trans. Smart Grid2018955418543110.1109/TSG.2017.2749450
    [Google Scholar]
  18. NazariA.A. HosseiniS.A. TaheriB. Improving the performance of differential relays in distinguishing between high second harmonic faults and inrush current.Electr. Power Syst. Res.202322310967510.1016/j.epsr.2023.109675
    [Google Scholar]
  19. YuD.C. ZhouN.C. LiaoJ.Q. WangQ.G. WeiN.Q. Non-unit ultra-high-speed DC line protection method for HVDC grids using dynamic fitting algorithm with data reconstruction.Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.202315410946910.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109469
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WenZ. JiaK. YuL. High speed protection based on time-frequency characteristic similarity for a Teed transmission line connected to renewable energy power plants.PSPC20235104111
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ChenG. LiuY. YangQ. Impedance differential protection for active distribution network.IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.2020351253610.1109/TPWRD.2019.2919142
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HeJ. ChenK. LiM. TangY. NieM. Active injection protection scheme for flexible HVDC grids based on amplitude of input impedance.Global Energy Interconnection20214653254210.1016/j.gloei.2022.01.002
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhuY. LuY. Sufficient optimized comprehensive current amplitude differential protection for distribution network with distributed generation.Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao201838S16874
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LinX. MaX. WangZ. SuiQ. LiZ. YeY. WuY. CaoS. WangG. A novel current amplitude differential protection for active distribution network considering the source-effect of IM-type unmeasurable load branches.Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.202112910678010.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106780
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LiX. LuY. Improved amplitude differential protection scheme based on the frequency spectrum index for distribution networks with DFIG based wind DGs.IEEE Access20208642256423710.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984031
    [Google Scholar]
  26. XuS. LuY. The current phase variation pilot protection method.TCES20163116198206
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MohantyR. ChenP. TuanL.A. Protection of converter dominated MV microgrid using changes in current’s phase angle.IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.202216465666810.1049/gtd2.12317
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ChandraA. SinghG.K. PantV. A novel protection strategy for microgrid based on estimated differential energy of fault currents.Electr. Power Syst. Res.202321410882410.1016/j.epsr.2022.108824
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TongX. LianW. TengY. The wide-area backup protection based on differential active power against transition resistance using limited PMUs.PCSEE201838823352347
    [Google Scholar]
  30. XuB. GaoH. YuanT. Pilot protection for VSC-HVDC transmission line of grid-connected offshore wind farm based on quasi-power theorem.PSA202347224454
    [Google Scholar]
  31. XuX. LiB. TanH. Multi-terminal current differential protection based on synchronized phase.Electr. Eng.202122118892
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ChenJ. SangL. WuZ. Multi-terminal differential protection scheme for active distribution network based on amplitude-phase relationship.EMI202158097177
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/eeng/10.2174/0123520965308316240716173922
Loading
/content/journals/eeng/10.2174/0123520965308316240716173922
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test