Skip to content
2000
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1872-2113
  • E-ISSN: 2212-4039

Abstract

It is evident from reviewing scientific literature that the quality of argumentation in some areas of medical research has deteriorated during the last decades. Publication of a series of questionable reliability has continued without making references to the published criticism; examples are discussed in this review. Another tendency is that drugs without proven efficiency are advertised, corresponding products patented and marketed as evidence-based medications. Professional publications are required to register drugs and dietary supplements to obtain permissions for the practical use; and such papers appeared, sometimes being of questionable reliability. Several examples are discussed in this review when substances without proven effects were patented and introduced into practice being supported by publications of questionable reliability. Some of the topics are not entirely clear; and the arguments provided here can induce a constructive discussion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/ddf/10.2174/1872211313666190307162041
2019-03-01
2025-10-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/ddf/10.2174/1872211313666190307162041
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Review Article
Keyword(s): antioxidants; atherosclerosis; cardiovascular; dietary supplements; hormesis; Placebo
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test