Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry - Volume 3, Issue 3, 2003
Volume 3, Issue 3, 2003
-
-
Fluoroquinolones: Action and Resistance
More LessFluoroquinolones trap gyrase and topoisomerase IV on DNA as ternary complexes that block the movement of replication forks and transcription complexes. Studies with resistant mutants indicate that during complex formation quinolones bind to a surface α-helix of the GyrA and ParC proteins. Lethal action is a distinct event that is proposed to arise from release of DNA breaks from the ternary complexes. Many bacterial pathogens are exhibiting resistance due to alterations in drug permeability, drug efflux, gyrase-protecting proteins, and target topoisomerases. When selection of resistant mutants is described in terms of fluoroquinolone concentration, a threshold (mutant prevention concentration, MPC) can be defined for restricting the development of resistance. MPC varies among fluoroquinolones and pathogens, when combined with pharmacokinetics, MPC can be used to identify compounds least likely to enrich mutant subpopulations. Use of suboptimal doses and compounds erodes the efficacy of the class as a whole because resistance to one quinolone reduces susceptibility to others and / or increases the frequency at which resistance develops. When using fluoroquinolones in combination therapy, the development of resistance may be minimized by optimizing regimens for pharmacokinetic overlap.
-
-
-
The ATP-Binding Site of Type II Topoisomerases as a Target for Antibacterial Drugs
Authors: A. Maxwell and D.M. LawsonDNA topoisomerases are essential enzymes in all cell types and have been found to be valuable drug targets both for antibacterial and anti-cancer chemotherapy. Type II topoisomerases possess a binding site for ATP, which can be exploited as a target for chemo-therapeutic agents. High-resolution structures of protein fragments containing this site complexed with antibiotics or an ATP analogue have provided vital information for the understanding of the action of existing drugs and for the potential development of novel anti-bacterial agents. In this article we have reviewed the structure and function of the ATPase domain of DNA gyrase (bacterial topoisomerase II), particularly highlighting novel information that has been revealed by structural studies. We discuss the efficacy and mode of action of existing drugs and consider the prospects for the development of novel agents.
-
-
-
Non-Camptothecin DNA Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy
Authors: M. Ling-hua, L. Zhi-yong and Y. PommierHuman DNA topoisomerase I is the target of camptothecins, which have been recently introduced in the clinic for cancer chemotherapy. The discovery of novel noncamptothecin inhibitors is facilitated by the availability of biochemical and cellular assays for testing topoisomerase I activity. Among the non-camptothecin inhibitors, the indolocarbazoles (NB-506 and J-107088) are the most advanced in their development, and are in clinical trials. A number of indenoisoquinolines and minor groove binders (benzimidazoles) have been reported recently. Their antitumor activity is promising for further development. The potential binding site(s) of topoisomerase I inhibitors in the enzyme I-DNA complex is discussed.
-
-
-
Stabilization of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase II-DNA Cleavage Complexes
Authors: A.M. Wilstermann and N. OsheroffTopoisomerase II is an essential enzyme that plays critical roles in many DNA processes, including chromosome segregation. In order to carry out its important physiological functions, topoisomerase II creates and rejoins double-stranded breaks in the genetic material. Thus, while the enzyme is necessary for cell survival, it also has the capacity to fragment the genome. Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA breaks are sequestered within a covalent enzyme-DNA complex. Normally, these “cleavage complexes” are present at low levels and are tolerated by the cell. However, conditions that significantly increase the physiological concentration or life-time of topoisomerase II-DNA cleavage complexes lead to chromosomal translocations and other mutagenic events, and can induce cell death pathways. The potentially lethal aspect of enzyme mechanism has been exploited by a number of highly successful anticancer agents. Since drugs that increase levels of topoisomerase II-DNA cleavage complexes transform the enzyme into a potent cellular toxin, they are referred to as topoisomerase II “poisons” to distinguish them from compounds that inhibit the catalytic activity of the enzyme. Recent evidence indicates that many DNA lesions also act as topoisomerase II poisons. This finding has provided tremendous insight into enzyme and drug action and raises important questions regarding the physiological interactions of topoisomerase II with DNA damage. Since the DNA cleavage and ligation reactions of topoisomerase II are fundamental to its physiological and pharmacological functions, this review will focus on how the enzyme cuts and rejoins the double helix and how these reactions are altered by topoisomerase II poisons.
-
-
-
Dual Topoisomerase I / II Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy
Authors: W.A. Denny and B.C. BaguleyWhile the majority of topoisomerase (topo) inhibitors show selectivity against either topo I or topo II, a small class of compounds can act against both enzymes. These can be divided into three classes. The first and largest class comprise drugs that bind to DNA by intercalation and include the clinically-evaluated acridine DACA, the benzopyridoindole intoplicine, the indenoquinolinone TAS-103, the benzophenazine XR11576, and the pyrazoloacridine NSC 366140. The second category comprises hybrid molecules, prepared by physically linking separate inhibitors of topo I and topo II, or by linking pure topo inhibitors to other DNA-interactive carriers. While several derivatives (e.g., camptothecin-epipodophyllotoxin and ellipticine-distamycin hybrids) have been prepared, there have been no detailed studies. The third category are less well defined as a structural class, but apparently recognize structural motifs that are present in both topo I and II enzymes. These include a series of benzoisoquinolinium quaternary salts such as NK 109, and more interestingly modified versions of classical topo I or topo II inhibitors, e.g., the modified camptothecin BN 80927 and the modified epipodophyllotoxin tafluposide (F-11782). There is as yet no detailed understanding of the factors that result in selective or dual inhibition, but structure-activity studies in several classes show that structural changes can influence topo I / II selectivity. DNA intercalation mode also appears to play a part. The basis for the high antitumor activity of some topo inhibitors is not yet understood but may depend on the complex pattern of activities that include both inhibition and poisoning of the two enzymes.
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 25 (2025)
-
Volume (2025)
-
Volume 24 (2024)
-
Volume 23 (2023)
-
Volume 22 (2022)
-
Volume 21 (2021)
-
Volume 20 (2020)
-
Volume 19 (2019)
-
Volume 18 (2018)
-
Volume 17 (2017)
-
Volume 16 (2016)
-
Volume 15 (2015)
-
Volume 14 (2014)
-
Volume 13 (2013)
-
Volume 12 (2012)
-
Volume 11 (2011)
-
Volume 10 (2010)
-
Volume 9 (2009)
-
Volume 8 (2008)
-
Volume 7 (2007)
-
Volume 6 (2006)
-
Volume 5 (2005)
-
Volume 4 (2004)
-
Volume 3 (2003)
-
Volume 2 (2002)
-
Volume 1 (2001)
Most Read This Month
