The Impact of Policy on Principals’ Leadership and Management Skills and Student Achievement in Rural Secondary Schools: A South African Case Study

References

1. ThanomtonC. NiyamabhaA. WichitputchrapornW. KoedsuwanS. A casual model of transformational leadership and school environments through basic psychological needs affecting teachers’ engagement in professional learning in schools under the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration.PSAKUIJIR2018727381
   [Google Scholar]
2. Department of Basic Education. A National Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS).Pretoria, South AfricaGovernment Printers2011
   [Google Scholar]
3. TaylorN. What is wrong with South African schools? JET education services,2008Available from: http://www.jet.org.za/events/conferences [Accesses on: 18 May 2011]
   [Google Scholar]
4. TobinJ. Management and leadership issues for school building leaders. national council of professors of educational administration.J. Edu. Leadersh. Prepa.201491114
   [Google Scholar]
5. OgunsholaF.R. Principals’ gender and their managerial effectiveness in federal capital territory senior secondary schools, ABUJANigeria. South Africa International Conference on Education 17-19 September2018120134
   [Google Scholar]
6. Statistics South Africa. Focus on schooling in Eastern Cape REPORTNo. 92-01-02.2013
   [Google Scholar]
7. TshiredoL.L. The impact of the curriculum change in the teaching and learning of science: A Case Study in Under-resourced Schools in Vhembe. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Africa: Pretoria, June2013
   [Google Scholar]
8. CameronL. Higher grade-Dinaledi schools initiative helps boost maths, science pass rates.Eng. News200929311104
   [Google Scholar]
9. ReddyV. BhoratH. PowellM. VisserM. ArendsF. Skills supply and demand in South Africa. Labour Market Intelligence Partnership (LMIP)2016Available from: https://lmip.org.za/document/skills-supply-and-demand-south-africa
   [Google Scholar]
10. LiuS. HallingerP. FengD. Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: does trust matter?J. Educ. Adm.201654666168210.1108/JEA‑02‑2016‑0015
    [Google Scholar]
11. LosenD. HodsonC. KeithM.A. MorrisonK. BelwayS. Are we closing the school gap?Los AngelesThe Center for Civil Rights Project, University of California2015Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2t36g571
    [Google Scholar]
12. N Pandor: South African Principals Association Provincial Annual Conference,2006Available from: https://www.gov.za/n-pandor-south-african-principals-association-provincial-annual-conference
13. Ministerial Review Committee on School Governance. School governance in South African public schools.Pretoria, South AfricaDepartment of Education2004
    [Google Scholar]
14. ZhengX. YinH. LiZ. Exploring the relationships among instructional leadership, professional learning communities and teacher-efficacy in China.Educ. Manage. Adm. Leadersh.201847684385910.1177/1741143218764176
    [Google Scholar]
15. LixiaC. The relationship between leadership styles and teaching quality in lower secondary schools in Liang Zhou District of Wuwei, Gansu, China.Asian Polit. Sci. Rev.201711717810.12778/235108617X15452339029545
    [Google Scholar]
16. KuanprasertK. PhetsombatP. The relationship between servant leadership of school administrator and job motivation of teachers under Saint Maria Academy.Asian Polit. Sci. Rev.2019328995
    [Google Scholar]
17. BothaR.J. Excellence in leadership: demands in the professional school principal.S. Afr. J. Educ.2004243239243
    [Google Scholar]
18. Australian Institute for Teaching and Leadership. Australian professional standards for teachers. Education Services Australia: Calton South, Australia,2018Available from: https://www.aitsl.edu.au/standards.
19. BrooksR. WongB. Why scientists should have leadership skills? Sci. Am.2017Available from: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/why-scientists-should-have-leadership-skills/
    [Google Scholar]
20. JohnM. Physical sciences teaching and learning in Eastern Cape rural schools: Reflections of pre-service teachers.S. Afr. J. Educ.2019391S1S1210.15700/saje.v39ns1a1660
    [Google Scholar]
21. A framework for K-12 science education standards, Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.2012Available from: www.nap.edu
22. AhmedS. HussainR.M. Instructional leadership practices of the excellent school principals in Aceh, Indonesia: Managing the instructional program.IJIS2012488195
    [Google Scholar]
23. MaccobyM. Understanding the difference between management and leadership.Res. Technol. Manag.2000431575910.1080/08956308.2000.11671333
    [Google Scholar]
24. MathibeI. The professional development of school principals.S. Afr. J. Educ.200727523540
    [Google Scholar]
25. Metz, K. E. Young children’s inquiry in Biology: Building the knowledge bases to empower independent inquiry. 2000. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry in science learning and teaching (pp. 371-404). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
26. LevinS. LeungM. EdgetonA.K. ScottC. Elementary school principals’ professional learning: Current status and future needs.Palo Alto, CALearning Policy Institute2020Available from: https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/elementary-school-principals-professional-learning-report
    [Google Scholar]
27. BushT. KiggunduE. MoorosiP. Preparing new principals in South Africa: The ACE: School Leadership Programme.S. Afr. J. Educ.2011311314310.15700/saje.v31n1a356
    [Google Scholar]
28. National teacher and principal survey. (2017-2018). In: Methods and Procedures; National Centre for Education Statistics., 2017
    [Google Scholar]
29. HartinahS. SuharsoP. UmamR. SyazaliM. LestariB.D. RoslinaR. JermsittiparsertK. Teacher’s performance management: The role of principal’s leadership, work environment and motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia.Manag. Sci. Lett.202010123524610.5267/j.msl.2019.7.038
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rural Education Draft PolicyGovernment Gazette20176304132115
    [Google Scholar]
31. NguyenD.T. NgF.S.D. Applying the Rasch model to investigate Singapore principals’ instructional leadership practices.Leading and Managing201420126
    [Google Scholar]
32. WongC.P. NgD. The roles of school leaders in developing future-ready learners: The case of Singapore.Int. J. Educ. Manag.202135124926910.1108/IJEM‑06‑2020‑0283
    [Google Scholar]
33. MestryR. A critical analysis of legislation on the financial management of public schools: A South African perspective.De Jure 201346162177
    [Google Scholar]
34. XabaM. NgubaneD. Financial accountability at schools: Challenges and implications.J. Educ.201050139160
    [Google Scholar]
35. BayeniS.D. Principals influencing education policy practice: A case study of two schools. Education leadership, management and governance in South Africa; Chikoko, V. JorgensenK.M. New York, NYNova Science Publishers2012179194
    [Google Scholar]
36. BlakemoreK. Social policy: An introduction.BuckinghamOpen University Press2003
    [Google Scholar]
37. HonigM.I. Ed. New directions in educational policy implementation: Confronting complexity.New York, VASunny Press2006
    [Google Scholar]
38. SpillaneJ.P. GomezL.M. MeslerL. Notes on reframing the role of organizations in policy implementation: Resources for practice, in practice.Handbook of education policy research.New York, NY Routledge2009
    [Google Scholar]
39. ThoriusK.A.K. MaxcyB.D. Critical practice analysis of special education policy: An RTI example.Remedial Spec. Educ.201536211612410.1177/0741932514550812
    [Google Scholar]
40. GronnP. Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis.Leadersh. Q.200213442345110.1016/S1048‑9843(02)00120‑0
    [Google Scholar]
41. KotterJ.P. What leaders really do?Harv. Bus. Rev.200179118596 10104518
    [Google Scholar]
42. MottetT.P. MartinM.M. MyersS.A. Relationships among perceived instructor verbal approach and avoidance relational strategies and students’ motives for communicating with their instructors.Commun. Educ.200453111612210.1080/0363452032000135814
    [Google Scholar]
43. PutehM. The classroom physical environment and its relationship to teaching and learning comfort level.Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit.201553237240
    [Google Scholar]
44. BarrettA.M. GardnerV. JoubertM. TiklyL. Approaches to strengthening secondary STEM & ICT education in Sub-Saharan Africa.UKUniversity of Bristol201910.15868/socialsector.35787
    [Google Scholar]
45. JohnsonS. HodgesM. MonkM. Teacher development and change in South Africa: A critique of the appropriateness of transfer of northern/western practice.Compare200030217919210.1080/713657456
    [Google Scholar]
46. LegotloM.W. MaagaM.P. SebegoM.G. Perceptions of stakeholders on causes of poor performance in grade 12 in a province in South Africa.S. Afr. J. Educ.2002222113118
    [Google Scholar]
47. KramerD. OBE teaching tool box: OBE strategies, tools and techniques for implementing curriculum 2005.Cape TownVivlia. Publishers2002
    [Google Scholar]
48. South Africa. South African Schools Act 84 of 1996. Code of conduct. Government Gazette, 377. Cape Town.South AfricaGovernment Printers1996
    [Google Scholar]
49. MeadorD. The role of the principal in schools.Will & Deni: Mclntyre.,2019
    [Google Scholar]
50. SulemanQ. AslamH.D. HussainD.I. Effects of classroom physical environment on the academic achievement scores of secondary school students in Kohat Division.Parkistan. Int. J. Learn. Dev.201441718210.5296/ijld.v4i1.5174
    [Google Scholar]
51. PlessisP. Learner discipline in crisis: Can South African schools overcome the problem?Int. J. Educ. Sci.20159338339410.1080/09751122.2015.11890328
    [Google Scholar]
52. McHenryI. Conflict in schools.Phi Delta Kappan200082322322710.1177/003172170008200308
    [Google Scholar]
53. JoubertR. & SerakwaneJ. Establishing discipline in the contemporary classroom.J. Edu. Stud.200981
    [Google Scholar]
54. Queen-MaryT.N. MtapuriO. Teachers’ perceptions of the Integrated quality management system: Lessons from Mpumalanga, South Africa.S. Afr. J. Educ.201434111410.15700/201412120945
    [Google Scholar]
55. GlennersterR. KremerM. MbitiI. TakavarashaK. Access and quality in Kenya education system: A review of progress, challenges and potential solutions.2011Available from: https://kerd.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1571
    [Google Scholar]
56. SmithM.K. The learning organisation.Informal education.2001Available from: http://www.infed.org/biblio/learningorganisations.htm
    [Google Scholar]
57. MogashoaT.I. Teaching and learning policies in South African schools in the new democratic dispensation: A critical discourse analysis.Doctor of Education, University of South Africa: Pretoria, June 2013
    [Google Scholar]
58. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Reviews of national policies for education: South Africa. ParisOECD publishing2008
    [Google Scholar]
59. BrooksM.G. BrooksJ.G. The courage to be constructivist.Educ. Leadersh.19995731824
    [Google Scholar]
60. FootK.A. Cultural-historical activity theory as practice theory: Illuminating the development of conflict-monitoring network.Commun. Theory2001111568310.1111/j.1468‑2885.2001.tb00233.x
    [Google Scholar]
61. EngeströmY. MiettinenR. PunamäkiR. Perspectives on activity theory.CambridgeCambridge University Press199910.1017/CBO9780511812774
    [Google Scholar]
62. SpillaneJ.P. Distributed leadership.San FranciscoJossey-Bass2006
    [Google Scholar]
63. MillsA. MurgatroidS. Organisational rules: A framework for understanding organisational action.Philadelphia, EnglandOpen University Press1991
    [Google Scholar]
64. EngleR. The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and development. Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings. DaiD. New YorkTaylor & Francis, Educational Psychology Press2011
    [Google Scholar]
65. CongerJ.A. Charismatic and transformational leadership skills for scientists.Cold Spring Harbor, NYCold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press1999Vol. 2
    [Google Scholar]
66. HalversonR. Accessing, documenting and community practical wisdom: Thephonesis of school leadership practice.Am. J. Educ.200411119012110.1086/424721
    [Google Scholar]
67. GrimesP. McDonaldS. van KampenP. “We’re getting somewhere”: Development and implementation of a framework for the analysis of productive science discourse.Sci. Educ.2019103153610.1002/sce.21485
    [Google Scholar]