Skip to content
2000
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2772-316X
  • E-ISSN: 2772-3178
file format pdf download PDF
file format text download EPUB
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Introduction

The smart learning community builds a virtual mapping learning ecosystem using digital technology, stimulates the virtualization reconstruction of teaching fields, reshapes the necessity of knowledge co-construction based on the perspective of value co-creation, and creates an important platform to support higher education teaching reform.

Objective

This study constructed a knowledge co-construction model for smart learning communities.

Method

This study used the grounded theory research method.

Results and Discussion

The optimization iteration of knowledge co-construction as “value provision that matches individual interests and community goals → value definition of self-organizing exploration → value presentation of topic focus → value proliferation of knowledge innovation” is summarized.

Conclusion

The experiential dominant logic of value co-creation and self-organizing system theory are used to analyze this model’s element structure and correlation mechanism. Based on this, suggestions for promoting knowledge co-construction to achieve sustainable community development are proposed.

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publishers.
This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X328008250516025135
2025-05-19
2026-02-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X328008250516025135
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/css/3/1/CSS-3-E2772316X328008.html?itemId=/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X328008250516025135&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. WangS. ZhangJ. WangP. LawJ. CalinescuR. MihaylovaL. A deep learning-enhanced digital twin framework for improving safety and reliability in human–robot collaborative manufacturing.Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf.20248510260810.1016/j.rcim.2023.102608
     [Google Scholar]
  2. KamruzzamanM.M. IbrahimA. AlqazzazA. New opportunities, challenges, and applications of edge-AI for connected healthcare in internet of medical things for smart cities.J. Healthc. Eng.20232023982365810.1155/2022/295069935251564
     [Google Scholar]
  3. MyungE.C. Identifying online learning experience of architecture students for a smart education environment.J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng.202342219031914
     [Google Scholar]
  4. XuX. LiuF. The influence of social capital and technical support on knowledge sharing in academic virtual communities: An analysis of knowledge sharing elements based on the platform of science net.Sci Technol Prog Policy2023403122131
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BadawiS. DrăgoiceaM. Towards a value co-creation process in collaborative environments for TVET education.Sustainability2023153179210.3390/su15031792
     [Google Scholar]
  6. JiemeiZ. YuejieM. The influence of social capital on users’ loyalty to virtual communities.Sci Res Manage2021423139149
     [Google Scholar]
  7. HaugA. Critical success factors for knowledge management systems in new product development.Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract.202411310.1080/14778238.2024.2424290
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ArgoteL. LeeS. ParkJ. Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions.Manage. Sci.20216795399542910.1287/mnsc.2020.3693
     [Google Scholar]
  9. AnaC.F.D.S. WilsonA.C.D.A. GraziellaM.C. RonaldoD.O.S.J. Organizational learning and impact assessments: A study of social businesses.Rev. Bras. Gest. Neg.202426412010.7819/rbgn.v26i4.4279
     [Google Scholar]
  10. JaneD. JoseM.G. MikelleN. A bridge to marine geosciences: A learning community for college transfer students.Oceanography 20234369495
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ToikkaT. TarnanenM. A shared vision for a school: Developing a learning community.Educ. Res.202466329531110.1080/00131881.2024.2361412
     [Google Scholar]
  12. YingjieW. Research on the construction of collaborative value co-creation situation of online knowledge community users.Inf. Sci.20213943036
     [Google Scholar]
  13. HowardR. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier.Cambridge, MassachusettsMIT Press199310.7551/mitpress/7105.001.0001
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LinH.F. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions.J. Inf. Sci.200733213514910.1177/0165551506068174
     [Google Scholar]
  15. LuoS. YoshitaT. WangY. Online knowledge community: Coneptual clarification and a CAS view for its collective intelligence.Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceBerlin Heidelberg: Springer201336071
     [Google Scholar]
  16. DongliangY. WeiZ. PengP. YunL. Research on value co-creation of knowledge demands in social multimedia.Inf. Stud.200245107581
     [Google Scholar]
  17. LiaoH.Y. ChenK.Y. LiuD.R. Virtual friend recommendations in virtual worlds.Decis. Support Syst.20156912596910.1016/j.dss.2014.11.005
     [Google Scholar]
  18. HeL. JiayuL. ShiyuL. DiW. ShuaiqiJ. Optimizing Automatic Question Answering System Based on Disease Knowledge Graph.Data Anal. Knowl Discov202155115126
     [Google Scholar]
  19. YanZ. WangT. ChenY. ZhangH. Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective.Inf. Manage.201653564365310.1016/j.im.2016.02.001
     [Google Scholar]
  20. BlennowK. BosseldalI. MalmströmM. Parallel lines – Tensions in teachers’ enactment of the vision of a newly established school in Sweden.Teach. Teach.2023297-894696310.1080/13540602.2023.2219205
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Shun-LiG. XiaoS. TuoS. Zi-XuanC. Research on knowledge aggregation service of social question answering community driven by user demand.Inf. Sci.2021392106110
     [Google Scholar]
  22. WangC. ZhaoX. HongJ. A meta-analysis of the effects of interaction on value co-creation in online collaborative innovation communities based on the service ecosystem framework.Behav. Sci.20241412117710.3390/bs1412117739767318
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Jin-YuanZ. Rong-HaiSu Antecedents and consequences of brand experience in virtual sports brand communities: A value co-creation perspective.Front. Psychol.202213103343910.3389/fpsyg.2022.1033439
     [Google Scholar]
  24. LuZ. JingS. Empirical research on knowledge service modes of think tank based on client requirements.Library Inform Service202064104655
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KhurramM F A. MuhammadN.Q. ShaguftaZ. SaqibJ. NaveedA. KausarF.K. Brand love: Role of online customer experience, value co-creation, and relationship quality.Front. Psychol.20221389793310.3389/fpsyg.2022.89793337251696
     [Google Scholar]
  26. YueqiangZ. An empirical investigation between brand orientation and brand performance: Mediating and moderating role of value co-creation and innovative capabilities.Front. Psychol.20221396793110.3389/fpsyg.2022.967931
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ZhenL. Who created the experience? the three models of experience creation and their operating mechanisms.Nankai Bus Rev2019225178191
     [Google Scholar]
  28. WenhuiZ. LingziC. WeiD. YifangZ. Value co-creation process model among entrepreneurial platform, entrepreneurs and customers: A case study of Xiaomi entrepreneurial platform.Manage. Rev.2019314283294
     [Google Scholar]
  29. MansiW. NingH. XiangZ. On value co-creation mechanism of digital brand community: From the perspective of experiment-dominant logic.Nankai Bus Rev202124392103
     [Google Scholar]
  30. YiZ. RenhuaiL. HaiquanC. Research on influencing factors of platform leadership in business ecosystem.Nankai Bus Rev20202332838
     [Google Scholar]
  31. WeiY. ShiweiK. PingK. CuijuanZ. AofeiD. Research on multiple derivatives of knowledge co-creation in virtual network community.Inf. Stud.20214475864
     [Google Scholar]
  32. DingX. YouX. ZhangX. YuY. Can patients co-create value in an online healthcare platform? An examination of value co-creation.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health202219191282310.3390/ijerph19191282336232124
     [Google Scholar]
  33. HaitaoW. LuluZ. AoS. MingdaL. BingfengG. From “human-to-human” to “human-to-non-human” – Influence factors of Artificial Intelligence-enabled consumer value co-creation behavior.Front. Psychol.20221386331310.3389/fpsyg.2022.863313
     [Google Scholar]
  34. ZaborekP. MazurJ. Enabling value co-creation with consumers as a driver of business performance: A dual perspective of Polish manufacturing and service SMEs.J. Bus. Res.2019104154155110.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.067
     [Google Scholar]
  35. StrokoschK. RoyM. Health and social care integration: Fixing a fixed service ecosystem for value co-creation.Public Manage. Rev.202412310.1080/14719037.2024.2375566
     [Google Scholar]
  36. SarahB. AjmalW. ArifaT. HinaF. Hotel’s customer empowerment, environmental corporate social responsibility, and online customer value co-creation to attain sustainable development goals (SDGs).Span J Mark202410.1108/SJME‑10‑2023‑0289
     [Google Scholar]
  37. KimmerleJ. MoskaliukJ. OeberstA. CressU. Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective.Educ. Psychol.201550212013710.1080/00461520.2015.103627326246643
     [Google Scholar]
  38. ZhengkuiL. LiuF. ZhaoN. Research review on intrinsic mechanism of group collaboration in online knowledge community.Inf. Sci.2019376170177
     [Google Scholar]
  39. ZhaoX. LiJ. Knowledge proliferation in online communities: A research on reciprocal causality between user behavior and user trust.J Mod Inform202040108492
     [Google Scholar]
  40. TaoZ. WenjingY. Study of online health community users’ knowledge sharing behavior, based on social influence theory.J. Int. Manage.2020561221
     [Google Scholar]
  41. CunninghamJ. HughesJ. HayA. GreeneF.J. SeamanC. Bridging the divides: A case study of collective action across Scottish university business schools to support small business.J. Bus. Res.202418311485910.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114859
     [Google Scholar]
  42. WangC. MirzaeiT. XuT. LinH. How learner engagement impacts non-formal online learning outcomes through value co-creation: An empirical analysis.Int J Educ Technol High Educ20221913210.1186/s41239‑022‑00341‑x35821974
     [Google Scholar]
  43. YuhuaL. KaiwenF. XihengG. ZiweiX. JingyiZ. ChengjunL. Research on value co-creation mechanism of platform enterprises in digital innovation ecosystem: A case study on haier HOPE platform in China.Front. Psychol.202213105593210.3389/fpsyg.2022.1055932
     [Google Scholar]
  44. AlanG. KathyH. Exploring the impact of an online learning community to support student teachers on school placement.Eur. J. Teach. Educ.202454710561072
     [Google Scholar]
  45. FiockH. Designing a community of inquiry in online courses.Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn.202021113415210.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
     [Google Scholar]
  46. OhnishiS. OsakoM. NakamuraS. A framework for analyzing co-creation value chain mechanisms in community-based approaches: A literature review.Sustainability2024167291910.3390/su16072919
     [Google Scholar]
  47. RavazzaniS. HazéeS. Value co-creation through social media: A multistakeholder, communication perspective.J. Serv. Manag.2022334/558960010.1108/JOSM‑11‑2021‑0411
     [Google Scholar]
  48. YanH. JinyanH. FanzheK. College students’ learning perceptions and outcomes in different classroom environments: A community of inquiry perspective.Front. Psychol.202213104702710.3389/fpsyg.2022.1047027
     [Google Scholar]
  49. ChrisM. ColinR.A. “A shared human endeavor”: Farmer participation and knowledge co-production in agroecological research.Front. Sustain. Food Syst.20237116265810.3389/fsufs.2023.1162658
     [Google Scholar]
  50. OeH. YamaokaY. OchiaiH. A qualitative assessment of community learning initiatives for environmental awareness and behaviour change: Applying UNESCO education for sustainable development (ESD) framework.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2022196352810.3390/ijerph1906352835329212
     [Google Scholar]
  51. JingQ. MuhammadY. Research on the practical logic model of knowledge-based live commerce streamer.J. Organ. End User Comput.202335112210.4018/JOEUC.332862
     [Google Scholar]
  52. YunS. JieW. ZixinZ. HaozeC. How are chinese enterprises reconstructing the global value chains: Research based on the grounded theory.Nankai Bus Rev20222558597
     [Google Scholar]
  53. YuaS. HuibX. LianxicZ. QibZ. Digital and intelligent empowerment: How to form organizational resilience in crisis: An exploratory case study based on forest cabin’s turning crisis into opportunity.J Manage World202137384104
     [Google Scholar]
  54. LinW. ZhijunC. How does value co-creation affect the improvisational capabilities of innovative enterprise: A case study based on resource dependence theory.J Manage World2020361196110
     [Google Scholar]
  55. CorbinJ.M. StraussA. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.Qual. Sociol.199013132110.1007/BF00988593
     [Google Scholar]
  56. SarkkiS. RasmusS. LandauerM. LépyÉ. HeikkinenH.I. Matching societal knowledge demand, research funding and scientific knowledge supply: Trends and co-creation dynamics around reindeer management in Finland.Polar Geogr.20214429011110.1080/1088937X.2020.1755905
     [Google Scholar]
  57. HasanM.M. ChangY. LimW.M. KalamA. ShamimA. A social cognitive theory of customer value co-creation behavior: Evidence from healthcare.J. Health Organ. Manag.202438936038810.1108/JHOM‑02‑2024‑007439413122
     [Google Scholar]
  58. LuschR.F. NambisanS. Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective.Manage. Inf. Syst. Q.201539115517510.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
     [Google Scholar]
  59. WuD.J. GibsonT.M. ZiegenbeinL.M. An identity-based learning community intervention enhances the lived experience and success of first-generation college students in the biological sciences.Sci. Rep.20241411016310.1038/s41598‑024‑60650‑138702457
     [Google Scholar]
  60. TheekeM. LeeH. Multimarket contact and rivalry over knowledge‐based resources.Strateg. Manage. J.201738122508253110.1002/smj.2676
     [Google Scholar]
  61. ProdgersL. TravisE. PownallM. “It’s hard to feel a part of something when you’ve never met people”: Defining “learning community” in an online era.High. Educ.20238561219123410.1007/s10734‑022‑00886‑w
     [Google Scholar]
  62. UpsonJ.W. SanchezM.S. SmithW. Competitive dynamics of market entry: Scale and survival.Manage Econ Rev201721118132
     [Google Scholar]
  63. SiemieniakoD. MakkonenH. KwiatekP. KarjaluotoH. Empowering value co-creation: Product and technology development in power asymmetric buyer-supplier relationships from the perspective of a weaker supplier.Ind. Mark. Manage.202512412814910.1016/j.indmarman.2024.11.008
     [Google Scholar]
  64. ManriqueE.L. PérezÁ.A.G. Community of learning as a world-building environment.Syst. Pract. Action Res.20243761025104210.1007/s11213‑024‑09683‑1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X328008250516025135
Loading
Research on Knowledge Co-construction Model of Smart Learning Community Based on Value Co-creation Perspective
Curr. Social Sci. 3, E2772316X328008 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/012772316X328008250516025135
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X328008250516025135
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X328008250516025135
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): digital technology; grounded theory; higher education teaching reform; knowledge co-construction; Smart learning community; value co-creation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test