Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-3971
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6360

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the serum level of human leukocyte antigen G [HLA-G] in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to healthy controls; moreover, it attempted to assess its relationship with SLE and RA disease activity indices. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted on 31 SLE patients (17 cases with a recent diagnosis and 14 cases with a previous diagnosis), 21 RA patients (7 cases with a recent diagnosis and 14 cases with a previous diagnosis), and 18 healthy controls who visited Ghaem Hospital affiliated to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mahhad, Iran. SLE and RA activity indices were measured and recorded. Furthemore, soluble isoforms, including shed HLA-G1 and HLA-G5, were measured in serum samples via the ELISA method. Results: A comparison of the five groups showed no significant differences in the serum level of sHLA-G. However, sHLA-G serum level was significantly higher in SLE and RA patients compared to healthy controls (P<0.05). sHLA-G level showed no correlation with disease duration and activity in SLE and RA patients (P>0.05). However, a strong positive correlation was observed between the serum level of sHLA-G and 24-h urine protein in the previously diagnosed SLE group (r=0.83, P=0.01). Conclusion: It seems that the serum level of sHLA-G is higher in RA and SLE patients compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, a strong correlation was found between sHLA-G serum levels and 24-h urine protein in cases with a previous diagnosis of SLE.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/crr/10.2174/1573397118666220617100226
2023-02-01
2025-09-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/crr/10.2174/1573397118666220617100226
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test