Skip to content
2000
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1573-398X
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6387

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic modalities of pulmonary embolism (PE) are still emerging day after day with new tools and promising characteristic features. Objective: The aim of our work was to assess the diagnostic yield of echopulmonography in patients with PE regarding pleural, parenchymal and vascular features of acute events and consequences. Methods: This is a prospective quasi-experimental study in which transthoracic echopulmonography was adopted as a screening method for patients with clinical suspicion of PE in comparison to Multi-Detector Computed Tomography Angiography of the chest, which is the best standard. This study was conducted on 32 patients at the chest department in Mansoura University Hospital and a Specialized Internal Medicine Hospital. Results: Echopulmonography was positive for pulmonary embolism at 68.75% but was of negative value in 31.25%. On the other hand, CTPA was positive for pulmonary embolism in (71.78%) but was of negative value in 28.12%. EPG confirm PE in 87% of patients diagnosed with PE by CTPA with a false-negative result of 13%. EPG could exclude PE in 77.7% of patients who were negative for PE by CTPA with a false-positive result of 22.2%. Conclusion: Echopulmonography might show promising features to be a substitute for computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/1573398X17666210129123946
2020-12-01
2025-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/1573398X17666210129123946
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): computed tomography; CTPA; deep vein thrombosis; DVT; Echopulmonography; pulmonary embolism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test