Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 8
  • ISSN: 1573-4129
  • E-ISSN: 1875-676X

Abstract

Background

Purified human albumin fractionated from plasma has a complex matrix that imposes a lot of interference in quality control testing, particularly for impurities at trace level. In this study, a simple approach has been studied and validated for the quantification of aluminium content using Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GF-AAS). As per international guidelines, the linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, limit of detection, and quantification have been assessed.

Results

The linearity of the analyte response was evaluated over the range of concentrations from 5µg/L to 45 µg/L, and the correlation coefficient obtained was greater than 0.99. The mean recovery obtained for the accuracy ranged from 102.29% to 106.81% at three concentration levels. The specificity/selectivity evaluated for possible interference from other metal ions and relative standard deviation for the high and low content was 10.24% and 6.50%, respectively, which was statistically verified and not significant. Method precision was evaluated for repeatability and intermediate precision, and the relative standard deviation obtained was 1.83% and 4.61%, respectively. The limit of detection and quantification obtained was 1.30 µg/L and 4.10 µg/L, respectively.

Conclusion

Results obtained for the method performance show the suitability of the method for aluminium estimation in human albumin samples and should be used to control the limit of aluminium in human albumin blood products.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cpa/10.2174/0115734129319256240829053342
2024-09-04
2025-09-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. RaoufiniaR. MotaA. KeyhanvarN. SafariF. ShamekhiS. AbdolalizadehJ. Overview of albumin and its purification methods.Adv. Pharm. Bull.20166449550710.15171/apb.2016.06328101456
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FanaliG. di MasiA. TrezzaV. MarinoM. FasanoM. AscenziP. Human serum albumin: From bench to bedside.Mol. Aspects Med.201233320929010.1016/j.mam.2011.12.00222230555
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HuH. QuintanaJ. WeisslederR. ParangiS. MillerM. Deciphering albumin-directed drug delivery by imaging.Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.202218511423710.1016/j.addr.2022.11423735364124
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MatejtschukP. DashC.H. GascoigneE.W. Production of human albumin solution: A continually developing colloid.Br. J. Anaesth.200085688789510.1093/bja/85.6.88711732525
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JohnstonA. AdcockW. The use of chromatography to manufacture purer and safer plasma products.Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev.2000171377010.1080/02648725.2000.1064798711255674
    [Google Scholar]
  6. InoueM. GionY. ItohH. IkariyaK. TakechiK. MorimotoK. TomiokaS. FurutaK. YabushitaS. Reduction of aluminium concentration in albumin products.Vox Sang.199466424925210.1111/j.1423‑0410.1994.tb00323.x8079447
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WHOTRS 1019 - Annex 3: Good manufacturing practices: Guidelines on validation.1994Available From: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs1019-annex3
  8. ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINEVALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Q2(R2).2022Available From: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/ICH_Q2-R2_Document_Step2_Guideline_2022_0324.pdf
  9. European medicine agencyValidation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology.2006Available From: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-guideline-q2r1-validation-analytical-procedures-text-methodology-step-5-first-version_en.pdf
  10. HuberL. Validation and Qualification in Analytical Laboratories.2nd edBoca Raton, FloridaCRC Press200710.3109/9780849382680
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MagnussonB. Eurachem Guide: The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods – A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics.2014Available From: http://www.eurachem.org
  12. AbarcaA. CanfrancE. SierraI. MarinaM.L. A validated flame AAS method for determining magnesium in a multivitamin pharmaceutical preparation.J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.2001255-694194510.1016/S0731‑7085(01)00389‑211377077
    [Google Scholar]
  13. AOACGuidelines for single laboratory validation of chemical methods for dietary supplements and botanicals.2021Available From: https://www.aoac.org/aoac_prod_imis/AOAC_Docs/StandardsDevelopment/SLV_Guidelines_Dietary_Supplements.Pdf
  14. AlegríaG. MonserratA. ÁlvarezG. Validation of an analytical method to quantify serum electrolytes by atomic absorption spectroscopy.Acta Universitaria2015253312
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HashimZ. JeevanarajP. otal Mercury (THg), Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd) and Arsenic (As) in Hair Samples: Method validation and quantification among women at reproductive age.IJSBAR2015244334347
    [Google Scholar]
  16. EDQMEuropean Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) 11th Edition.2022Available From: https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-ph.-eur.-11th-edition
  17. UllahA.K.M.A. MaksudM.A. KhanS.R. LutfaL.N. QuraishiS.B. Development and validation of a GF-AAS method and its application for the trace level determination of Pb, Cd, and Cr in fish feed samples commonly used in the hatcheries of Bangladesh.J. Anal. Sci. Technol.2017811510.1186/s40543‑017‑0124‑y
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cpa/10.2174/0115734129319256240829053342
Loading
/content/journals/cpa/10.2174/0115734129319256240829053342
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test