Skip to content
2000
Volume 6, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2666-7967
  • E-ISSN: 2666-7975

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 is a disease of SARS-CoV-2 beta coronavirus infection. One way to control the progression of COVID-19 symptoms is a rapid and accurate diagnosis. The current gold standard of COVID-19 diagnostic method uses RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and sputum specimens.

Objective

To assess the efficacy of saliva and rectal swabs as non-invasive alternatives to the conventional nasopharyngeal swab for RT-PCR testing in COVID-19 diagnosis, with a focus on the potential benefits for healthcare providers and patient comfort.

Methods

This observational study was conducted with 80 confirmed cases at a tertiary hospital in Indonesia, the study compared RT-PCR positivity rates among different collection methods.

Results

A high positivity rate of 92% for nasopharyngeal swabs, with saliva and rectal swabs yielding 36% and 34%, respectively. Notably, the positivity rates for saliva and rectal samples increased to 60% and 50% when testing occurred between five to seven days post-symptom onset. Crucially, in older patients, both saliva and rectal swabs demonstrated higher positivity rates than in younger patients within the initial four days of symptom onset, with rates of 43% and 17%, respectively. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between rectal swab positivity on day one and mortality in the older cohort, where lower Ct values on day seven were significantly associated with the deceased group.

Conclusion

These findings support the potential of saliva and rectal swabs in predicting disease severity and patient outcomes, suggesting a safer and more convenient testing strategy for COVID-19.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975302062240328050110
2024-04-02
2025-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CucinottaD. VanelliM. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic.Acta Biomed.2020911157160 32191675
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SusiloA. RumendeC.M. PitoyoC.W. Coronavirus disease 2019: A review of the latest literature.Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia2020714510.7454/jpdi.v7i1.415
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BNPB.Available From: https://covid19.go.id/id/peta-sebaran (Accessed on 01 January 2021).2021
  4. PerhimpunanD.P.I. Management of COVID-19 patients.PDPI2020191921
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LauerS.A. GrantzK.H. BiQ. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: Estimation and application.Ann. Intern. Med.2020172957758210.7326/M20‑0504 32150748
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AbulY. LeederC. GravensteinS. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of COVID-19 in older adults.Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am.202337112610.1016/j.idc.2022.11.001 36805007
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ToK.K.W. TsangO.T.Y. LeungW.S. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: An observational cohort study.Lancet Infect. Dis.202020556557410.1016/S1473‑3099(20)30196‑1 32213337
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PierriB. TafuroM. CuomoM.C. Assessment of Saliva Specimens reliability for COVID-19 surveillance.Front. Public Health20221084099610.3389/fpubh.2022.840996 35444987
    [Google Scholar]
  9. WyllieA.L. FournierJ. Casanovas-MassanaA. Saliva is more sensitive for SARS-CoV-2 detection in COVID-19 patients than nasopharyngeal swabs.MedRxiv202010.1101/2020.04.16.20067835
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ToK.K.W. TsangO.T.Y. YipC.C.Y. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva.Clin. Infect. Dis.2020711584184310.1093/cid/ciaa149 32047895
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ChenY. ChenL. DengQ. The presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in the feces of COVID‐19 patients.J. Med. Virol.202092783384010.1002/jmv.25825 32243607
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WangW. XuY. GaoR. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens.JAMA2020323181843184410.1001/jama.2020.3786 32159775
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Satgas Penanganan.Available From: https://covid19.go.id/petasebaran (Accessed on 31 Desember 2020).2020
  14. SilvaJ. LucasC. SundaramM. Mortality While several clinical and immunological parameters correlate with disease severity and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection, work remains in identifying unifying correlates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that can be used to guide clinic.MedRxiv2021
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LiH. RenL. ZhangL. High anal swab viral load predisposes adverse clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients.Emerg. Microbes Infect.2020912706271310.1080/22221751.2020.1858700 33259268
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SurendraH. ElyazarI.R.F. DjaafaraB.A. Clinical characteristics and mortality associated with COVID-19 in Jakarta, Indonesia: A hospital-based retrospective cohort study.MedRxiv202010010810.1101/2020.11.25.20235366
    [Google Scholar]
  17. World Health OrganizationWHO R&D Blueprint novel coronavirus COVID-19 therapeutic trial synopsis.World Health Organization. 2020:1–9. 2020. Available From: http://www.moh.gov.sa/en/CoronaNew/PressReleases/Pages/default.aspx
  18. FatmaYU ÖzlemE Evaluation of prolonged RT-PCR positivity and viral load in COVID-19 patients.Med Records202352: 217-2.2022;10.37990/medr.1166091
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SriA MirnaM AndiAZ The compatibility of chest CT scan with RT-PCR in suspected COVID-19 patients.Open Access Macedonian Open Access Maced J Medical Sci202311B314910.3889/oamjms.2023.11346
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TanzilurR. IftadulI. NishatU.N. HRCT evaluation of post vaccinated RT-PCR positive COVID-19 patients at a dedicated COVID-19 hospital.Eur J Clin Med202233141710.24018/clinicmed.2022.3.3.192
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975302062240328050110
Loading
/content/journals/covid/10.2174/0126667975302062240328050110
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): COVID-19; fecal swab; nasopharyngeal swab; RT-PCR; saliva; sputum specimens
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test