Skip to content
2000
Volume 12, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1871-5273
  • E-ISSN: 1996-3181

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is strictly connected with aging and frailty. Although dementia contributes to frailty, it is not well established whether AD patients could be per se defined “frail”. At the same time, it is not known whether among AD patients, which are a heterogeneous group of patients, it is possible to identify a subgroup of frail individuals. In this work we sought indices useful to identify “the frail AD”. To do this we evaluated disease progression rate and response to pharmacological treatment (Mini Mental State Examination evaluation), cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (amyloid-β42, total-tau and phospho-tau) levels, inflammatory indices (serum c-reactive protein, fibrinogen, D-Dimers) in a group of patients with a diagnosis of probable AD. Our results describe the clinical profile of patients which could be considered as non-responders and rapidly progressive AD. In the absence of other indices we conclude that patients with these features could well be considered “frail” among AD.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/1871527311312040010
2013-06-01
2025-10-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/1871527311312040010
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test